NOAA calls for R.I. officials to fill open seats on CRMC
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) gives top marks to the expert staff of Rhode Island's coastal regulatory agency in a new evaluation. But federal regulators remain concerned over three open seats on the politically appointed Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC), calling on Gov. Dan McKee and the legislature to fill the vacancies 'as soon as possible.'
'It is essential that a quorum is maintained and the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Program conducts a regular and full schedule of Council and subcommittee meetings in order to implement Rhode Island's approved coastal management program,' NOAA's Office of Coastal Management wrote in its April 10 report.
The 148-page document examined federal data collection, in-person meetings with staff and council members, and verbal and written public comments on the agency's performance spanning the five-year period from September 2019 to October 2024. Federal monitoring of the state coastal program is required as part of a 1972 federal law setting up coastal regulations and funding for state-level programs.
More than one-third of CRMC's $6.2 million budget in fiscal 2025 came from federal funds, including roughly $1.7 million from NOAA.
NOAA's latest evaluation concludes that the state is 'successfully implementing and enforcing' its federal coastal management program based on examination of its program administration, offshore wind projects, public access and protections against shoreline erosion.
However, NOAA highlighted several weaknesses in Rhode Island's adherence to federal regulations, including the vacancies on the 10-member council. Seven spots are filled, with the newest gubernatorial appointee, Dr. Michael Reuter of Barrington, confirmed by the Rhode Island Senate last month. The three open seats risk canceled meetings and delayed decisions if the council can't get at least six of its sitting members to show up — a problem that has plagued the appointed body for years.
Olivia DaRocha, a spokesperson for McKee's office, said in an email Wednesday that the governor was seeking qualified candidates for the open seats. She confirmed candidates are now under consideration, but did not respond to follow-up questions such as how many contenders are being vetted.
Council vacancies are one of many problems cited by critics, whose frustrations with the panel's controversial, and at times, unlawful, decisions have reached a boiling point. Coastal advocates have teamed up with Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha and state lawmakers to overhaul the agency, proposing to eliminate the council and reshape the CRMC as an administrative body akin to the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. Several versions of this proposal have been introduced in the Rhode Island General Assembly this year, but not advanced beyond committee prior to the legislature's April break.
NOAA took no position on the pending state legislation but noted states have flexibility to determine the structure of their coastal management programs. Of the 29 states with federal coastal management programs, only three — Rhode Island, California and North Carolina — give significant decision-making power to an appointed panel, according to a February report from the Rhode Island Department of Administration.
Jed Thorp, advocacy director for Save the Bay, saw NOAA's indifference to how Rhode Island executes its coastal management program in a positive light. Save the Bay is a leading advocate for the proposed overhaul of the CRMC.
'Sometimes, opponents [of the reform bill] will point to NOAA as this sort of bogeyman,' Thorp said in an interview Wednesday. 'NOAA is basically saying, 'we don't care how you set it up. You have a menu of options available to you.''
Save the Bay ultimately wants to get rid of the council, but Thorp still wants the open seats filled in the interim.
'We need the council to be fully seated so they can function and conduct their business,' Thorp said.
The CRMC issued a statement on April 10 celebrating its 'good grade' from NOAA. Jeffrey Willis, CRMC executive director, acknowledged requests for an interview but did not respond to subsequent calls and emails.
The report offered high praise for the agency's 32-person staff who 'excel at defining their role as regulator and policymaker, forging strong partnerships with others who have complementary skill sets and missions.'
However, the increasing scope of their work and responsibilities, from the slew of proposed offshore wind projects to disputes over public access to the shoreline and complex permitting applications, are more than the current employee roster can handle. Employees worked 60 to 80-hour weeks during reviews of proposed offshore wind projects, according to the report.
'Moving forward, a continued insufficient staffing level and strain felt by staff places the state of Rhode Island at a disadvantage in being asked to manage and analyze a significant amount of information and material required to complete additional federal consistency reviews,' the report stated.
Lack of staffing has also contributed to a backlog of permitting applications, insufficient enforcement against violators such as Quidnessett Country Club, and delayed and incomplete reporting required for federal grants, the report stated.
McKee has rejected calls to fund new hires for the strapped coastal agency. His proposed fiscal 2026 budget rejects the CRMC's request for money for five more employees.
In lieu of more full-time workers, NOAA suggested partnerships with university law programs and use of third-party contractors. And it reiterated a requirement first made in a 2020 report to transition to an online permitting database. The original 2024 deadline has now been extended to Sept. 30, 2026.
The CRMC did not respond to questions Wednesday regarding the delays in creating the online database.
The evaluation comes as the Trump administration has imposed major layoffs and budget cuts at NOAA. How attempts to gut the federal regulatory agency will trickle down to Rhode Island's state coastal program remains murky, though Willis told council members during an April 8 meeting that the CRMC could lose up to 10% of its $1.7 million in NOAA funding. When incorporating additional administrative costs for the state to seek and carry out federal funding, the cuts could rise to 17%, Willis said.
'At this time of year, we usually have our federal allocation in hand,' Willis said. 'Right now, we don't know how we're going to put it in our budget and we don't know what kind of funding we're going to get. We're just in a wait-and-see period.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Foulkes and Shekarchi lead the pack in summer campaign fundraising
Here's a look at where things stand. Governor Dan McKee (D) Cash on hand: $879,207 Slices of cake that buys: 79,710 The governor brought in $206,000 during the second quarter, but spent $75,000 as he began to staff up for his reelection campaign. His team knows it will need to ramp up fundraising for the rest of the year. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up Lieutenant Governor Sabina Matos (D) Advertisement Cash on hand: $14,611 Slices of cake that buys: 1,324 Matos had a quiet second quarter as Democratic primary opponents began to line up against her. She also repaid herself $5,000 from previous campaign loans. Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) Cash on hand: $142,496 Slices of cake that buys: 12,919 The secretary of state raised about $42,000 in the second quarter of the year, and he doesn't appear likely to have a serious opponent next year. Attorney General Peter Neronha (D) Cash on hand: $119,203 Slices of cake that buys: 10,807 Advertisement The attorney general still isn't ruling out a run for governor, but he has not been actively raising money in 2025. Treasurer James Diossa (D) Cash on hand: $215,377 Slices of cake that buys: 19,526 It's unlikely that Diossa will have a Democratic primary challenger next year, so he and Secretary of State Amore are already basically raising money for whatever they want to do in 2030. House Speaker Joe Shekarchi (D) Cash on hand: $3,858,818 Slices of cake that buys: 349,847 The speaker's campaign fund is so large that he generates more bank interest than Lieutenant Governor Matos has in her entire account. Senate President Val Lawson (D) Cash on hand: $205,439 Slices of cake that buys: 18,625 It pays to be No. 1. The new Senate president nearly raised as much in one quarter as she raised for all of 2022, 2023, and 2024 combined. House Majority Leader Chris Blazejewski (D) Cash on hand: $360,445 Slices of cake that buys: 32,678 The speaker-in-waiting is in a holding pattern while Shekarchi considers a run for governor. He didn't have much activity in the second quarter, although he did pay himself back for a $4,800 loan he made to his campaign back in 2010. Senate Majority Leader Frank Ciccone (D) Cash on hand: $115,286 Slices of cake that buys: 10,452 Ciccone may have avoided a Democratic primary next year by allowing some version of an assault weapons ban to move forward, and he should see his campaign fund swell in the coming months. Providence Mayor Brett Smiley (D) Cash on hand: $1,003,616 Slices of cake that buys: 90,989 The mayor doesn't yet have an opponent in next year's Democratic primary, but he's going to have a massive financial advantage in the race. State Representative David Morales is considering challenging him from the left. Advertisement Helena Foulkes (D) Cash on hand: $2,105,532 Slices of cake that buys: 190,891 Foulkes hasn't formally announced her campaign for governor, but she has hired the firm run by Eric Hyers as a consultant in the race. Hyers ran David Cicilline's first two campaigns for Congress, and Gina Raimondo's 2014 race for governor. He also ran Andy Beshear's campaign for governor in Kentucky, and Steve Bullock's reelection campaign for Montana governor. This story first appeared in Rhode Map, our free newsletter about Rhode Island that also contains information about local events, links to interesting stories, and more. If you'd like to receive it via email Monday through Friday, . Dan McGowan can be reached at


E&E News
2 days ago
- E&E News
NOAA, transportation nominees clear Senate panel
The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee approved President Donald Trump's nominee for NOAA administrator Wednesday with bipartisan backing. The panel advanced Neil Jacobs by voice vote, but Democratic Sens. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Andy Kim of New Jersey, Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania and Brian Schatz of Hawaii, all of whom represent states facing acute risk from sea-level rise and intensifying coastal storms, asked to be recorded as opposing the pick. Ranking member Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), however, expressed support for Jacobs despite continued reservations about the nominee, who also served as NOAA administrator in the first Trump administration. Advertisement 'The NOAA position could never be more important, and while we may have some differences with Dr. Jacobs … I believe that he is in agreement on what NOAA's priorities should be,' Cantwell said.


Atlantic
3 days ago
- Atlantic
Let's Ban More Nonexistent Things
Oh, good! Congressional Republicans have introduced the Clear Skies Act, a bill 'to prohibit weather modification within the United States, and for other purposes.' I cannot stress enough that this is not what is causing any of the extreme weather we are seeing. Maybe that's the point. As Representative Tim Burchett of Tennessee (who sponsored the bill alongside Marjorie Taylor Greene) put it, 'If it doesn't exist, then you don't have anything to worry about.' As long as we are applying this 'let's ban nonexistent things' approach to legislation, I have some notes for the Clear Skies Act as it seeks to ban weather modification. This term, the bill notes, 'includes (i) geoengineering (ii) cloud seeding (iii) solar radiation modification and management (iv) a release of an aerosol into the atmosphere to influence temperature, precipitation, or the intensity of sunlight.' Why not cast a wider net? Don't stop at just (iv)! Let's also ban: (v) strip-club patrons 'making it rain' (vi) children singing 'Rain, rain, go away / come again some other day' (vii) any and all actions of the weather-modifying rodent Punxsutawney Phil, who must be brought before the House in chains to answer for his crimes (viii) Thor (ix) when your knees ache (this brings on rain) (x) witches setting to sea in eggshells (it is from these small crafts that they cast spells and raise storms to bedevil ships at sea) (xi) pathetic fallacy (banned until further notice) (xii) butterflies flapping their wings even a single time (this is how you make hurricanes) (xiii) the demigod Maui insofar as he is doing things with the breeze (xiv) caterpillars growing suspiciously thick winter coats (this is how we get blizzards) (xv) any and all frozen treats with names like Blizzard, McFlurry, Frosty, ICEE (could their intention be any clearer?) (xvi) fairies, fae, Fair Folk, sprites of all kinds (xvii) Prospero from The Tempest, specifically (known to use weather for revenge) (xviii) Storm from X-Men (ditto) (xix) Magneto (I don't understand how electromagnetism affects weather so we had better ban him just in case) (xx) Gandalf the Grey (Gandalf the White is okay, according to Stephen Miller) (xxi) leprechauns (xxii) Santa Claus (NORAD is already tracking him; simply order them to shoot to kill) (xxiii) The Midgard Serpent (if it ever releases its tail from its mouth, Ragnarok will ensue, and that is the last thing we need right now) (xxiv) gray aliens (Pleiadians are okay, according to Stephen Miller) (xxv) Hillary Clinton (some say she does weather things) (xxvi) NOAA (does this still exist?) (xxvii) releasing greenhouse gases willy-nilly without regard for the climate (well, it was worth a shot).