Young Democrats: Senate Bill 1 reduces Ohio universities to propaganda machines
The bill's lack of specificity isn't a mistake. It's a deliberate effort to control what can be taught at Ohio's universities. By branding broad topics as "controversial," the law forces professors to censor their lessons to avoid legal consequences. This creates an environment where open inquiry and debate are stifled, and students are deprived of a full, nuanced education.
More: Senate Bill 1 bans students from learning views other than state-approved ones | Opinion
This is not just an abstract concern. History shows us how censorship and control of education can lead to dangerous consequences. The famous poem "First They Came" by Martin Niemöller reminds us how small, incremental attacks on free expression can spiral into widespread repression. Once one topic is deemed off-limits, others follow, and soon, universities are reduced to mere propaganda machines instead of places of critical thought.
With SB 1 about to take effect, Ohio's universities risk losing their role as institutions of open dialogue and critical thinking. Students will be deprived of opportunities to engage with diverse ideas, and professors will be forced to teach to a narrow, politically driven agenda. SB 1 is a betrayal of Ohio's students, faculty, and future. This state deserves better. We deserve truth, not censorship and propaganda.
Storm Boyd is president of the Hamilton County Young Democrats. He is also the chairman of Equality Cincinnati.
Gov. Mike DeWine's signature on Senate Bill 1 didn't just gut higher education, it put lives on the line. This bill forces Ohio's medical schools to censor critical information, leaving future doctors unprepared to save lives. While lawmakers included a loophole allowing medical schools to seek exemptions to keep accreditation, they'll only receive the bare minimum, and even that will be warped by political interference.
Young medical students will graduate with dangerous gaps in knowledge. Topics such as vaccine effectiveness, reproductive health, and systemic inequalities will be deemed too "controversial" to teach. Imagine trusting a doctor who wasn't allowed to fully learn about vaccines or a physician who never learned the horrifying history behind how women were excluded from clinical trials from 1977 to 1993, leaving dangerous gaps in how medications affect half the population. We're only now starting to close that gap, but SB 1 will reopen it.
As a trained biomedical engineer, I've seen firsthand how when science becomes politicized, it is our most vulnerable who get the most hurt. Science cannot and should not be political.
More: I wanted to stay in Ohio for law school, but Senate Bill 1 drove me away | Letters
This law doesn't just hurt students − it will cost lives. Future doctors will be forced to practice with incomplete knowledge, and young patients, especially women and those from marginalized communities, will pay the price. Ohio is creating a generation of doctors who will be shackled by politics instead of being led by science.
Young people deserve better. We deserve doctors and scientists who are taught to save lives, not trained to walk on eggshells. Senate Bill 1 is a disaster, and Ohio cannot afford the consequences.
Laalitya Acharya lives in Mason and is the president of Warren County Young Democrats.
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Senate Bill 1 is a betrayal of Ohio's students and faculty | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Gov. DeWine celebrates 170th Ohio State Fair
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine joins Janice Dean and tries some of Schmidt's caramel apple cream puffs at the historic state fair in Columbus.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Economic concerns loom as Haitian temporary legal status expires soon
There are concerns in Clark County about negative impacts on the economy when thousands of Haitian immigrants in that community lose their temporary legal status in about a month. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine visited Springfield on Friday and spoke with community leaders about their concerns. From businesses that employ immigrants, such as Topre America, to leaders like Springfield's mayor, to people in healthcare and faith-based groups that serve the needy, such as St. Vincent DePaul. DeWine held a series of meetings to provide the community with updates. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] News Center 7's John Bedell was with Gov. DeWine in Springfield and will explain how the state is continuing to help Clark County and the surrounding area on News Center 7 at 5:30 p.m. TRENDING STORIES: Man accused of dog attack arrested by U.S. Marshals in Dayton 2 men, 2 juveniles arrested in connection with recent road sign thefts Man in custody after SWAT called to Vandalia neighborhood DeWine held a series of meetings to provide the community with updates. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter] Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
What does the Ohio House property tax override mean?
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — The Ohio House pushed for property tax relief this week, but legislators disagree on whether removing some property tax authority will help Ohioans' pocketbooks. Gov. Mike DeWine signed Ohio's 2026-2027 budget into law on June 30, but vetoed 67 provisions within the several thousand page document. On Monday, the Ohio House held a rare out-of-season session to override one of the budget vetoes in an attempt to provide property tax relief. During the vote, politicians on both sides of the aisle said Ohio's tax system is too complex to be productive, so NBC4 is breaking this issue down. Olentangy coach resigns amid investigation into inappropriate text messages What happened? On Monday, 89 of the House's 99 members met and voted to override DeWine's veto on school district property tax levy restrictions. The move needed 60 votes, and it successfully passed 61-28. The House originally planned to vote on three overrides, but leaders said they did not think they had the votes due to absences. See previous coverage in the video player above. It is now up to the Senate to decide if they will also vote on the override, but they have not yet announced plans to vote. The override is not official unless 20 of Ohio's 33 Senators concur. What could change? If the Senate concurs the veto override, Ohio would change what type of property tax levies schools and other services could place on the ballot. The changes stop schools and political subdivisions, like fire departments or libraries, from introducing replacement and emergency levies. This change also stops school districts from asking for operating levies if it has too much money left over in their general funds. Replacement levies occur when a levy is expiring, and can either keep the same levy in place or, more commonly, replace it with a higher tax rate. Emergency levies are used when funding is crucial to keep operating, and they expire after a set number of years. These are all operating levies, meaning they are used to pay for daily necessities like supplies, utilities and salaries. These funds typically cannot be used for permanent improvement projects, like building a new high school or fire department. House members in favor of the changes said words like 'emergency' and 'replacement' can influence people to vote for property tax increases they may not want. They hope removing these levy options will promote transparency in levy requests. Bobcats, bald eagles and bears, oh my! Species seeing population growth in Ohio What does this mean for schools? This would limit how public school districts are allowed to ask for public money by removing several levy options. Schools would still be allowed to request other property tax levies. The Ohio Education Association (OAE) said these levies are crucial for school districts' long-term financial stability. Replacement levies are frequently used to help districts keep up with inflation, so having to always seek new levies brings a more complicated request to taxpayers. According to the OAE, this change could force Ohio schools to increase class sizes and cut programming. Schools will also no longer be allowed to ask for certain levies if they carry over more than 100% of their expenditures in their general funds from school year to school year. School districts say this is an important protection for long-term financial planning, as they cannot ask for more money even if they say they need more. House Republicans who voted in favor of the override said it will encourage districts to be more fiscally responsible. Proponents of the change say this is not taking money from schools, as voters will still have the opportunity to approve levies. Opponents, like Rep. Ismail Mohamed (D-Columbus), said the veto would limit the choices Ohioans have at the ballot. What does this mean for local services? Although the change affects school districts immensely, it also affects political subdivisions like local governments, fire departments, libraries and parks. All of these services rely on property taxes, and many of them use replacement levies to stay afloat. For instance, Franklin Township had two replacement levies fail in the past year, leading them to have to close one of their two fire stations. Legislators and advocates who disagree with the possible property tax change say examples like this prove Ohioans already have control over whether or not to pass a levy. Like local schools, this could make it more difficult to pass levies, or just complicate how these services are asking for funding. House Democrats say these services will have to choose between more frequent levy requests or making budget cuts. House Republicans largely say this will protect taxpayers from overreach and encourage local services to be better stewards of tax dollars. Three months later, still no updates in OSU investigation of hidden cameras in dorm bathroom What does this mean for my taxes? Even if the Senate concurs this veto override, this change does not guarantee a different property tax rate for Ohioans. The change reduces how many types of levies subdivisions can ask for, but fewer levies may not correlate with fewer levy requests. Proponents say this will help provide transparency at the ballot and prevent tax hikes that voters may not expect. The change would go into effect Jan. 1, 2026, so it would not change tax laws until after the November election. Proponents say this is a proactive change to help future overreach. Opponents say it is unlikely this will provide meaningful property tax relief because it does not address immediate pressures. They said it could even add financial pressure for taxpayers as local governments and schools try to find other revenue sources. Ohio leaders say property tax reform is coming, regardless of whether the override stands. Gov. Mike DeWine has tasked a property tax reform work group with analyzing concerns and generating solutions by Sept. 30. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
