Sitharaman holds talks with Russian, Brazilian and Chinese counterparts at BRICS meet in Rio
In her meeting with Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, Sitharaman reaffirmed the 'long-standing' partnership between India and Russia. She also thanked Russian President Vladimir Putin for his unwavering support after the recent terror attack in Pahalgam.
Sitharaman said that both countries enjoy 'exemplary levels of mutual trust and understanding,' and underlined the strength of the 'Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership'. The two ministers discussed bilateral financial cooperation, developments at the New Development Bank (NDB), and new initiatives under the BRICS framework.
She also congratulated Russia for successfully chairing BRICS in 2024 and said that India remains committed to boosting South-South cooperation through the platform.
'The two sides also discussed issues of bilateral cooperation, including cooperation in the financial sector, along with matters related to NDB,' the Ministry of Finance said in a post on X.
Sitharaman also met Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad. During the meeting, both sides shared views on raising the voice of the Global South, climate finance before COP30 and working together at global platforms such as the UN, G20, WTO, BRICS and IBSA.
'The two leaders discussed issues of mutual interest, including South-South cooperation, amplifying the voice of the Global South, COP30 and climate finance issues, and engagement in regional and global forums such as the United Nations, G20, BRICS, WTO and IBSA,' the Finance Ministry in its post said.
She praised Brazil's leadership of BRICS, especially its efforts to build a 'multipolar world order' and expand the grouping. She said India would support Brazil's priorities and would focus on practical cooperation when it takes over the BRICS Chairship in January 2026. Sitharaman also spoke about the strategic importance of India-Brazil ties and their growing collaboration in different sectors.
'India and Brazil, as strategic partners, share warm and cordial ties spanning across multiple sectors, and are cooperating closely in multiple sectors to further strengthen the strategic partnership,' the Finance Ministry quoting Sitharaman said.
Earlier, Sitharaman met China's Finance Minister Lan Fo'an. She recalled meeting him earlier in Samarkand during the AIIB Annual Meetings in September 2024.
Sitharaman said that India and China are among the 'world's largest and fastest-growing economies' and can play a major role in pushing 'inclusive' global growth and innovation. She referred to their civilisational ties and growing economic power and said both countries must work more closely to represent the Global South and help shape global debates.
'Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman highlighted that India and China can strengthen collaboration across a wide range of areas due to the common rich human capital, deep civilizational ties, and expanding economic influence,' the Finance Ministry said in its X post, adding,' The Union Finance Minister suggested that deeper engagement between the two countries can help to amplify the voice of developing economies, and shape global narratives that reflect the priorities and aspirations of the Global South.'(ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
‘Line Being Drawn': Trump To Impose BRICS Tariffs Only If Policies Are ‘Anti-US', Says Report
Last Updated: Trump had threatened to impose 10% additional tariffs on countries aligning with "anti-American policies" of BRICS nations. The Donald Trump administration will not immediately impose an additional 10% tariff on the BRICS nations, as against what he threatened to do, but will only proceed if the countries take 'anti-American" policy actions, news agency Reuters reported, citing a source on Tuesday. President Trump on Sunday said that the US will slap an extra 10% tariff on any country aligning itself with 'anti-American policies" of the BRICS group of developing nations. This triggered sharp denials from its member nations that they are acting against the United States. China said that BRICS does not seek confrontation. 'A line is being drawn. If policy decisions are made that are anti-American, then the tariff will be charged," Reuters quoted a source as saying, who requested anonymity. The White House has not yet released any executive order in this regard against the BRICS nations, which include India, China, and Russia. Trump's threat to the BRICS nations came after their leaders issued a 31-page statement during the Summit in Brazil, criticising the US tariffs on several nations, warning that the unilateral tariffs threatened global trade. They also condemned attacks on Gaza and Iran by Israel, a close US ally. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter," Trump posted on Truth Social on Monday. His announcement came as several countries in the BRICS group, including India, Indonesia, and other nations, were already in negotiations for trade deals with the US ahead of the deadline on Wednesday. The earlier three-month pause on Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day" tariffs would have gone live on July 9; however, the effective date has been postponed until August 1. It was not immediately clear if Trump's new threat would derail trade negotiations that are underway with India, Indonesia, and other BRICS nations. However, Trump sent out tariff letters to leaders of 14 countries on Monday, which included Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, South Africa, Bangladesh, among others. However, no letter has been sent to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. South Africa insisted that it was not 'anti-American" and said that its talks with the US government remained constructive. (With Reuters inputs) First Published: July 08, 2025, 05:42 IST
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Months ahead of COP30, Bonn climate talks fumble pressure test
As the world braces for another climate summit in November this year, the Subsidiary Bodies meeting in Bonn, Germany, brought together negotiators, scientists, policymakers, and civil society actors to tackle the complex, behind-the-scenes work that shapes the outcome of the Conference of the Parties (COP) summit. Held annually in Bonn, this mid-year gathering sets the technical and political groundwork for the ensuing COPs, with the 30th Session of the COP (COP30) scheduled for later this year in Belém, Brazil. Beyond setting the agenda, Bonn could be considered a litmus test to gauge how seriously countries are committed to implementing past pledges and how prepared they are to scale up ambition in the face of a rapidly closing climate window. Sadly, this year's Bonn conference was marked by delays, deep disagreements, and mounting frustration, especially over procedural priorities and climate finance. As global temperatures continue to break records, the urgency to act was palpable — as was the resistance to revisiting entrenched political differences. Delayed start, deep divisions The conference got off to a slow start as agenda adoption, a procedural step, was stalled by disputes over finance and trade measures. The Like-Minded Developing Countries (LMDCs, including India) demanded the inclusion of Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, which obligates developed countries to provide climate finance and unilateral trade measures, such as carbon border taxes, on the agenda. India, along with the LMDCs, continues to see carbon border taxes as unfair, undermining principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities. Both these propositions were opposed by developed nations, particularly the European Union, which argued that finance issues were being addressed under other agenda items. Eventually, a compromise was reached to address these issues: not as standalone agenda items but through informal consultations. Disappointed with developed countries' reluctance to discuss the legal obligations to provide financial support to developing countries, the LMDCs stated their intention to revisit this contentious issue at COP30. This prolonged deadlock delayed the start of formal negotiations by nearly two days and underscored the persistent divide. While developing nations pushed for historical responsibilities to be acknowledged and operationalised, developed countries advocated forward-looking frameworks and voluntary support mechanisms. An elusive agreement One of the most intensely negotiated themes at Bonn was the Global Goal on Adaptation, which aims to reduce vulnerability to climate change, enhance adaptive capacity, and strengthen resilience. There were also discussions on integrating the National Adaptation Plan progress into the Goal, which the G77+China rooted for. One of the key drawbacks of the Goal thus far has been the lack of metrics. At Bonn, about 490 indicators from a list of nearly 9,000 were shortlisted, with the aim of consolidating them further to about 100. These indicators will be used to track adaptation actions under health, water, agriculture, and infrastructure, among others. India emphasised that adaptation must not be assessed through a uniform lens and backed indicators that are flexible, context-sensitive, and don't overburden national reporting. However, differences and tensions arose over whether and how to include indicators on the means of implementation, including finance, capacity, and technology transfer. Many developing countries and regional blocs, such as the African Group and Independent Alliance of Latin America and the Caribbean (AILAC), stressed that without finance-related indicators, adaptation efforts will remain an unfunded mandate. However, countries like Japan and Australia pushed back against including finance-related indicators. Additionally, the African Group and AILAC were opposed to including indicators to track domestic finance allocation and development assistance, while Australia supported their inclusion, emphasising the importance of tracking national adaptation processes. The process to refine indicators was thus contentious. Countries including Australia warned against micromanaging expert groups tasked with technical work while others demanded clear guidance and tight timelines. Towards the end of the conference, Parties agreed on a globally applicable headline indicator set, which would be complemented by regionally or nationally tailored context-specific sub-indicators. Guidance on indicators to reflect the means of implementation wasn't agreed on, however. 'Safe space' debate The Mitigation Work Programme (MWP) — created to scale up action to meet the 1.5° C target — also came under scrutiny. While many Parties acknowledged the usefulness of dialogues under the MWP, several questioned its ability to deliver actual emissions reductions. The debate between Parties was on how a constructive and inclusive environment, a.k.a. safe space, could be provided for the MWP discussions: some advocated a push to ramp up ambitions while others wanted to limit their scope. Developing countries emphasised that many of them have already set ambitious Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) targets but lack the financial and technical support to implement them. The LMDCs, including India, and the African and Arab Groups, warned against the MWP being used to impose new commitments and urged that it remain a facilitative, non-punitive process. The Philippines called for the MWP to facilitate, promote, and enhance international cooperation. Further, a proposal was made to develop a digital platform to share mitigation tools and experiences. While Brazil, supported by Egypt, argued that this could help connect fragmented initiatives, the Alliance of Small Island States and the EU cautioned about the duplication of existing platforms, which could take attention away from scaling up ambitions. L&D, just transition, gender The review of the Warsaw International Mechanism on Loss and Damage (L&D) made some headway, with proposals emerging on integrating L&D into NDCs and streamlining technical assistance. However, funding gaps and questions about how the Santiago Network — a UN initiative linking vulnerable developing nations with technical support to tackle climate impacts, focusing on loss and damage reduction — would operate continued to cloud consensus. In this session, interventions by observers emphasised the need to consider non-economic L&D, scale up finance, and align L&D efforts with human rights obligations. India and other developing countries called for streamlining access to technical support and adequate and scaled-up funding for responding to climate-induced losses. In discussions under the Just Transition Work Programme, Parties emphasised that just transition must be anchored in equity, development rights, and national contexts. Social dialogue, labour rights, and meaningful stakeholder engagement, especially that of Indigenous Peoples, were highlighted as foundational to just transition. Parties also flagged the economic impacts of unilateral measures, such as carbon border taxes (tariffs imposed on imported goods based on their carbon footprint) and trade barriers, and the role of critical minerals in energy transition. Parties agreed to address these issues through linked agenda items, and this would remain a bone of contention at COP30. A new dispute emerged at Bonn in connection with the development of a new Gender Action Plan. There were differences of opinion on terminology (gender diversity and intersectionality). Key areas of focus proposed for the Plan included unpaid care work, sexual and reproductive health, and addressing gender-based violence, signalling the need for a framework that responds to evolving realities. In this context, the roles of gender-disaggregated data, traditional knowledge systems, and gender-responsive budgeting were also discussed. Climate finance gridlock Climate finance loomed large across almost every negotiation track. The issues of how much funding is available, where it is going, where it will go, and how predictable it is remained a recurring theme across discussions on adaptation, mitigation, and L&D. The presidency-led consultation on the 'Baku to Belem' roadmap aims to operationalise a target to mobilise $1.3 trillion annually in climate finance. But deep disagreements emerged over the structure of finance — grants v. loans, public v. private, and mitigation v. adaptation — and who should be held responsible for raising the money. Developing countries pushed for transparent and clear burden-sharing frameworks among developed countries, with the G77 and China calling for tackling systemic barriers to finance. Small Island Developing States, represented by AOSIS, demanded earmarked and fast-disbursing funds tailored to their unique vulnerabilities. The Least Developed Countries sought a tripling of adaptation finance by 2030 compared to 2022 levels and a greater reliance on grants. Several groups, including AILAC, the Environmental Integrity Group, and the Arab Group, also stressed the importance of tracking progress; scaling non-debt instruments; and innovating revenue streams, such as taxes on financial transactions. The EU noted the need for the roadmap to be a transparent platform engaging external stakeholders and building on existing initiatives. Taken together, these inputs reflect a clear call for an inclusive and accountable roadmap that's responsive to diverse regional needs. Meanwhile, concerns emerged over the credibility of ex-ante finance reporting by developed countries on their planned financial contributions, per Article 9.5 of the Paris Agreement. Several developing countries highlighted discrepancies between planned or promised contributions and actual disbursements and called for reforms to improve transparency and accountability. On the service arrangements of the Adaptation Fund: Parties led by AOSIS requested that the World Bank, currently an Interim Trustee of the Fund, be named the Permanent Trustee of the Adaptation Fund. With COP30 in Belém just months away, the Bonn Climate Conference was both a teaser and a pressure test. On the positive side, parties made incremental progress on technical workstreams like adaptation indicators, transparency frameworks, and Article 6 (on cooperative mechanisms). But the underlying political tensions around equity and finance remain unresolved. Bonn 2025 reaffirmed that while the science is unequivocal, politics will determine the pace of action. Indu K. Murthy leads the Climate, Environment and Sustainability sector at the Centre for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP), a research-based think tank.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
PM Modi Arrives In Brasilia For State Visit After Attending BRICS Summit
Brasilia: Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Brasilia on Monday evening (local time) for his State Visit to Brazil. Brazil's Minister of Defence, Jose Mucio Monteiro Filho, received him at the airport. PM Modi appreciated the artists, who performed a traditional Brazilian Samba Reggae performance to welcome him. He arrived in Brasilia after attending the BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro from July 6-7. PM Modi travelled to Brazil at the invitation of Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. In a post on X, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated, "Taking new strides in India- Brazil steadfast partnership. PM @narendramodi has landed in the capital city of Brasilia on a State Visit to Brazil. On arrival, he was warmly received by Mr. Jose Mucio Monteiro Filho, Minister of Defence of Brazil, at the airport. The welcome was made delightfully musical by the traditional Brazilian Samba Reggae performance." Taking new strides in 🇮🇳-🇧🇷 steadfast partnership. PM @narendramodi has landed in the capital city of Brasilia on a State Visit to Brazil. On arrival, he was warmly received by Mr. José Múcio Monteiro Filho, Minister of Defence of 🇧🇷, at the airport. The welcome was made… — Randhir Jaiswal (@MEAIndia) July 7, 2025 During his visit, PM Modi will hold bilateral discussions with Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on broadening the Strategic Partnership between the two nations in areas of mutual interest, including trade, defence, energy, space, technology, agriculture, health, and people-to-people linkages, according to Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) statement. PM Modi described the Rio de Janeiro leg of his visit to Brazil as "productive." He stated that he and other leaders held extensive deliberations at the BRICS Summit. PM Modi stated that his bilateral meetings with world leaders will boost India's friendship with various nations. PM Modi shared a video on the social media platform X, which showed him participating in the BRICS Summit and holding bilateral meetings with world leaders. The video also showed how PM Modi received a warm welcome from the Indian diaspora upon arrival in Rio de Janeiro. While sharing the video on X, PM Modi stated, "The Rio leg of my Brazil visit was very productive. We had extensive deliberations at the BRICS Summit. I compliment President Lula and the Brazilian Government for the work they've done through their BRICS Presidency in making this platform even more effective. My bilateral meetings with world leaders will also boost India's friendship with various nations." "Now on the way to Brasilia for the State Visit. Will hold detailed talks with President Lula on different aspects of India-Brazil ties," PM Modi posted on X. Earlier on Monday, PM Modi met Uruguay President Yamandu Orsi on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit and discussed the expansion of the India-MERCOSUR Preferential Trade Agreement. "They reviewed cooperation in the areas of digital collaboration, ICT, Digital Public Infrastructure and UPI, defence, railways, health and pharmaceuticals, agriculture, energy, culture and people-to-people linkages," the MEA said in a statement. "A key area of discussion was strengthening bilateral trade and investment. Both sides expressed interest in the expansion of the India-MERCOSUR Preferential Trade Agreement, aiming to unlock greater economic potential and trade complementarities," it added. Earlier, PM Modi, along with other BRICS leaders, partners and outreach invitees, gathered for the traditional family photo at the 17th BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro. While addressing a session on 'Environment, COP-30 and Global Health' at the BRICS Summit in Brazil on Monday, PM Modi said India would redefine the BRICS grouping under its upcoming chairmanship by focusing on "Building Resilience and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability." "Under India's BRICS Chairmanship, we will define BRICS in a new form. BRICS would mean 'Building Resilience and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability'." He affirmed that India would carry forward the spirit of people-centric progress during its leadership of the BRICS in the coming year. PM Modi arrived in Brazil on Saturday (local time) after concluding his visit to Argentina, where he held a bilateral meeting with Argentine President Javier Milei. After Brazil, PM Modi will head to Namibia on July 9 and also address its parliament. He began his five-nation visit on Wednesday in Ghana. From Ghana, PM Modi went to Trinidad and Tobago and then to Argentina.
