Explosion rocks Damascus, triggered by detonation of war remnants
ALBAWABA- A powerful explosion struck the Mezzeh district of Damascus on Monday, sparking alarm across the Syrian capital. According to Al-Hadath correspondent, the blast occurred at a military site and was caused by the detonation of unexploded war remnants.
The explosion comes amid heightened security concerns and follows recent warnings by Syrian authorities about attempts by militant groups to exploit any security gaps.
Syrian Interior Ministry spokesperson Nour al-Din al-Baba stated that the Islamic State (ISIS) seeks to take advantage of any instability to "take revenge on society and embarrass the Syrian government."
He also confirmed that security forces had recently thwarted an attempt to detonate a booby-trapped motorcycle among civilian gatherings in Damascus, underlining the group's ongoing attempts to incite chaos. Also Read Iran denies report of violating ceasefire
The Mezzeh blast comes just days after a deadly suicide attack targeted Mar Elias Church in Damascus. The Interior Ministry revealed that the attack was carried out by two ISIS-affiliated suicide bombers who had infiltrated the capital from the eastern Syrian desert.
The cell also reportedly planned to strike Sayyida Zainab, a prominent religious site. According to the ministry, the attackers were part of a broader terrorist network whose members had ties to the Al-Hol camp, known for sheltering ISIS sympathizers.
The ministry added that the cell leader, now in custody, provided valuable intelligence on four other suspected terrorist locations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Bawaba
2 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Syria refutes reports of foiling assassination plot on Ahmad al-Sharaa
Published June 29th, 2025 - 08:02 GMT ALBAWABA - Syrian authorities on Sunday denied media reports that they had foiled an assassination attempt plotted against Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa. Also Read 'All ways lead to Rome': Street posters cause controversy in Syria During the past days, media reports allegedly claimed that the Syrian security forces had foiled an assassination attempt on al-Sharaa during his last visit to Daraa city in southwestern Syria. SANA news agency quoted a source in the Syrian Ministry of Information as saying, "There is no truth to what was circulated by several media outlets about the Syrian Arab Army and Turkish intelligence thwarting an assassination attempt on President Ahmad al-Sharaa during his visit to Daraa." TRT World reported earlier that a senior IS figure with alleged ties to the Lebanese group (Hezbollah) reportedly attempted to assassinate Ahmed al-Sharaa during a recent visit to Daraa city. However, the Syrian government denied the reports that talked about the assassination attempt against Ahmed al-Sharaa on Sunday in an official statement. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (
Al Bawaba
6 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Iran's Strategic Path Forward After the 2025 Conflict With Israel and the United States
Dr. Gil Feiler In June 2025, Iran faced one of its most serious geopolitical crises in decades following a sustained Israeli and U.S. military campaign. The conflict, sparked by Iranian support for regional proxies and its continued nuclear defiance, led to direct strikes on Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure, leaving the regime bruised but not broken. As a fragile ceasefire begins to take hold, Iran stands at a crossroads. This article assesses the Islamic Republic's current status and future strategic options across four key domains: military, nuclear, economic, and societal. Military Capabilities and Options Iran entered the recent conflict with a vast but unevenly distributed military force, centered around the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), its missile arsenal, and its regional proxy network. However, the coordinated strikes by Israel and the United States—especially those targeting IRGC command facilities and missile bases—have significantly degraded Iran's capacity to conduct conventional operations. The air and missile strikes inflicted high-profile losses on Iran. Israeli precision attacks killed key IRGC commanders and destroyed facilities tied to drone and missile development. American involvement intensified after attacks on Gulf shipping lanes, leading to U.S. bunker-busting strikes on hardened nuclear sites at Fordow and Natanz. While Iran maintains reserves of drones and missiles, analysts note a substantial depletion of its long-range precision-guided missiles. In the short term, Iran can still inflict localized damage through: Small-scale missile and drone attacks targeting Israel and U.S. bases. Disruptive operations in the Strait of Hormuz, including the use of naval mines or fast-attack boat. Reactivating proxy cells in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen—though many of these groups have suffered their own losses or are currently disorganized. Iran faces severe military constraints: Its air defenses are outmatched by Israeli and U.S. technology. Proxy groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis are under pressure and less responsive. The threat of overwhelming retaliation limits the Islamic Republic's room for maneuver. Thus, while Iran retains asymmetric capabilities, it is unlikely to prevail in any direct or sustained military confrontation with either Israel or the United States. Nuclear Strategy and Posture Iran's nuclear program remains at the heart of regional and global concern. Prior to the June strikes, the country had amassed over 400 kg of highly enriched uranium—sufficient for several nuclear warheads. While Iran insists its program is peaceful, the technical threshold for weaponization had been effectively crossed by early 2025. The Israeli and U.S. attacks inflicted measurable setbacks to Iran's enrichment capacity. Reports indicate that key centrifuge cascades were destroyed, and secondary infrastructure was damaged. However, the strikes are assessed to have delayed—rather than dismantled—the program. Iran could likely resume full enrichment within months if left unchecked. A major internal debate now grips Tehran. Hardliners advocate for rapid weaponization to establish a deterrent against future attacks. Pragmatists warn that this would provoke an even harsher Western response and further isolate Iran. Military elites are reportedly split, with some urging a covert path to a nuclear capability while others caution against provoking regime collapse. While informal discussions with European envoys resumed briefly in Geneva on June 20, they quickly broke down after the second wave of strikes. U.S. demands—complete dismantlement of advanced centrifuges, intrusive inspections, and ending IRGC regional operations—are currently seen by Tehran as political non-starters. Economic Pressure and Regional Influence Iran's economy is reeling from years of sanctions, internal mismanagement, and now war-related shocks. The recent conflict has further worsened key economic indicators, while also threatening the regional energy market. The Iranian rial has fallen sharply in black markets since mid-June. Oil exports: While exports to China have continued under opaque arrangements, the threat of Israeli or U.S. interdiction has discouraged further buyers. Food and fuel prices are spiking, leading to sporadic protests in major cities including Shiraz, Mashhad, and Tehran. The threat of closing the Strait of Hormuz remains Iran's most potent economic weapon, but one it is reluctant to use. Such a move would trigger an international naval response and further damage Iran's own energy-dependent economy. Regional Strategy and Influence Iran's influence in the region has been weakened by: The degradation of Hezbollah's arsenal and command structure. Growing disillusionment among Iraqi Shi'a militias who suffered significant losses in Israeli retaliatory strikes. Arab Gulf states distancing themselves from Tehran amid fears of economic contagion and spillover warfare. Although Iran retains ideological sway among some non-state actors, its regional network is facing its most serious crisis since the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. Societal Pressures and Diplomatic Challenges The Iranian public has become increasingly vocal in its opposition to the regime's war footing. The latest conflict has intensified the divide between the ruling clerical elite and the urban middle class, women, and youth. Public sentiment, as observed in recent social media trends and diaspora communications, reflects: Widespread anger over economic hardship and corruption. Sympathy for Iranian military casualties but deep skepticism about the war's purpose. Renewed calls for democratic reform and regime change. This discontent remains mostly leaderless, but the regime's legitimacy has visibly eroded. Young Iranians, in particular, have shown little appetite for war, instead advocating for peace and economic opportunity. Iran's leadership faces four strategic choices: Hardline consolidation: Double down on repression, propaganda, and nuclear escalation. Pragmatic diplomacy: Negotiate with the U.S. and Europe to restore economic stability. Managed transition: Initiate internal political reforms to preserve the Islamic Republic in a modified form. Collapse: Continue on a confrontational path, risking total isolation and internal breakdown. Each of these paths carries serious trade-offs. As of late June 2025, the regime appears divided, with no clear strategy emerging. The international community remains cautious: The U.S. is reviewing its options, with President Trump hinting at regime change rhetoric while stopping short of formal policy shifts. The European Union continues to offer diplomatic channels but with limited credibility in Tehran. Russia and China have issued condemnations of Western strikes but have offered Iran little more than symbolic support. Conclusion Iran's future strategy will be defined by how it balances its nuclear ambitions, military vulnerabilities, economic pressures, and societal unrest. The June 2025 conflict has altered the strategic calculus in Tehran, exposing both the regime's resilience and its fragility. With options narrowing, Iran's leaders face a stark choice: to escalate further in defiance of international pressure or to pivot toward negotiation and reform. The coming months will determine not only the fate of the Islamic Republic, but the stability of the broader Middle East.
Al Bawaba
a day ago
- Al Bawaba
'All ways lead to Rome': Street posters cause controversy in Syria
ALBAWABA - A mysterious advertisement, apparently for a restaurant opening in the Syrian city of Aleppo, has sparked fear and controversy in a country that has been experiencing security incidents, bombings, and kidnappings for months, some of them sectarian, religious, or even religious. The story began when posters were seen on public walls in the city bearing the phrase "All roads lead to Rome," without any further details revealing whether they were advertising posters. The placement of some of these posters in a neighborhood of Aleppo, mainly inhabited by Christians, sparked conflicting interpretations and concerns after two young men were spotted placing the posters on a wall in the Aziziyah neighborhood late at night. Syrian bloggers believed the posters were directed at the Christian population, posing a threat to them and urging them to leave Syria for Rome. Another group said the poster may represent an armed faction, while others called on the authorities to open an investigation into the posters. Many rumors emerged on social media following the ad shared by Syrians, before it became clear that they were advertisements for a restaurant opening in the city called "Roma."
