logo
What is the "Golden Dome for America"? Here's what to know about Trump's missile defense plan.

What is the "Golden Dome for America"? Here's what to know about Trump's missile defense plan.

CBS News21-05-2025
President Trump's missile defense project, called the "Golden Dome for America," aims to protect the U.S. from foreign threats. But it has been criticized by China as threatening to increase the risks of militarizing space and a global arms race.
The president on Tuesday said his administration had "selected an architecture" for the "state-of-the-art system," which could cost hundreds of billions of dollars and put U.S. weapons in space for the first time in history.
What is the Golden Dome and how will it work?
The Golden Dome is a multilayered defense system that the president, speaking in the Oval Office alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, said will deploy "next-generation technologies across the land, sea and space, including space-based sensors and interceptors."
"The Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world and even if they are launched from space," the president said, adding that he wants it to be operational before his term ends.
The concept includes both ground- and space-based capabilities that would defend against missiles by: detecting and destroying them ahead of launch, intercepting them early in flight, halting them midcourse and stopping them in the last few moments of approaching a target.
The initiative would have multiple layers that expand on what the U.S. already has and build new programs to counter the full range of aerial threats, according to Gen. Gregory Guillot, the head of U.S. Northern Command, who testified in front of Congress in April.
He described a domain awareness layer to track threats and then two other layers, "the first being an ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) defeat layer, which largely exists today with the GBIs (ground-based interceptors) that can defeat a North Korean threat and then an air layer that would defeat cruise missiles and air threats."
"This is not going to be off the cuff," Tom Karako, the director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told CBS News in an interview.
"This is going to be well-rooted in the systems engineering and the understanding of the threat and in the overall architecture plans that have been in the works for a long time," Karako said.
The new initiative, which will encompass many programs, will be built in states including Florida, Georgia, Indiana and Alaska, according to Mr. Trump, and involve multiple American defense and technology companies that have not yet been selected.
The Congressional Budget Office has estimated a cost of $542 billion for the space-based components alone.
Aerospace and defense company Lockheed Martin, which said on X it is ready to support the dome mission, describes it as a "revolutionary concept."
"This is a Manhattan Project-scale mission, one that is both urgent and crucial to America's security," the company says.
Lockheed Martin COO Frank St. John said it would protect against nuclear missiles, as well as intermediate-range ballistic and cruise missiles, and other threats.
Mr. Trump said U.S. Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein would be responsible for overseeing the dome's progress.
However, there is no funding yet to match the plan, which is "still in the conceptual stage," Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told senators on Tuesday at a hearing. The Pentagon is also still developing the requirements that the dome will have to meet, The Associated Press reported.
Israel's Iron Dome
The Golden Dome idea first came to public light during Mr. Trump's joint address to Congress in March, when he asked for funding for it. He said, "Israel has it, other places have it, and the United States should have it, too."
The president was referring to Israel's Iron Dome, which at least partially inspired the Golden Dome concept. Israel's system, installed in 2011 to defend against incoming projectiles, largely addresses shorter-range threats like rockets, while two other air defense systems work to defend against missiles.
The Iron Dome, developed with U.S. backing, has intercepted thousands of rockets and has a success rate topping 90%, according to Israel.
China responds
Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said her country urges the U.S. "to abandon the development and deployment of a global missile defense system as soon as possible."
"The United States, in pursuing a 'U.S.-first' policy, is obsessed with seeking absolute security for itself," she said at a Wednesday briefing in Beijing, according to news agencies. "This violates the principle that the security of all countries should not be compromised and undermines global strategic balance and stability. China is seriously concerned about this."
She also said the Golden Dome plan "heightens the risk of space becoming a battlefield" and "fuels an arms race."
When asked about China's response in an interview on "Fox & Friends First," Lockheed Martin's St. John said, "What we've seen historically is that the thing that leads to conflict is the lack of deterrence, and so our belief, along with the administration, is that having strong deterrence is the best way to deter conflict."
A U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency assessment shows that the U.S. military expects, over the coming decade, to contend with missile threats that are greater in "scale and sophistication." It also said that "China and Russia are developing an array of novel delivery systems to exploit gaps in the current U.S. ballistic missile defenses."
China has been rapidly developing missile and other military capabilities, while deepening ties with Russia. The two nations said in a statement earlier this month that the dome project was "deeply destabilizing in nature" and would turn space into "an arena for armed confrontation."
Karako said that the Golden Dome initiative is "a belated realignment of U.S. missile defense policy" to counter both China and Russia, countries that the last two administrations in their national defense strategies have pointed to as strategic competitors.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Soaring Stocks I'd Buy Now With No Hesitation
3 Soaring Stocks I'd Buy Now With No Hesitation

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Soaring Stocks I'd Buy Now With No Hesitation

Netflix, IBM, and Brinker International have all posted impressive one-year gains. Premium valuations haven't stopped these stocks from delivering strong results. These successful companies with soaring stocks show that buying at a high can still pay off if the business is thriving. 10 stocks we like better than Netflix › Some stocks don't catch my eye unless they're really affordable. Starting a new position at a low price helps me in several ways: I'm more likely to take a calculated chance on a risky idea. The stock will be poised for greater long-term returns if the investment thesis plays out in my favor. This is also a classic way to follow in the footsteps of investing legends like Warren Buffett. "It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price," Buffett said. But there are a handful of stocks that would be fantastic buys even at a soaring valuation. These are the growth stories I understand and trust so well that I don't mind a premium price tag. You never know where any stock will go in the short term, and maybe you'll see a dip or correction along the way -- but these stocks are primed for long-term success and might never be this affordable again. Everything is relative on Wall Street. That's why I'd gladly buy Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX), IBM (NYSE: IBM), and Brinker International (NYSE: EAT) shares right now, even though the stocks are skyrocketing. Let me explain so you can determine whether these elevated stocks are right for your portfolio, too. Media-streaming veteran Netflix had a dry spell in recent years, but it's a different story in 2025. New ideas such as ad-based subscription plans and a crackdown on account-sharing shenanigans are making a difference, and the long-term growth opportunity is as large as ever. Netflix shares have gained 92% over the last year as I'm writing this on July 3. The stock trades at 61 times earnings and 74 times free cash flows -- lofty territory even for a proven high-growth performer. At the same time, Netflix keeps proving the bears wrong, time and time again. Let's say you invested $1,000 in Netflix stock at the start of 2016. It traded at 408 times earnings back then, and free cash flows were negative. That must have been a bad idea, right? Well, that hypothetical bet on Netflix's long-term strategy would be worth $11,350 today. I can't promise that Netflix will outperform expectations by that much again. Past performance doesn't necessarily reflect future results, you know. But I have been able to tell similar stories many times over the last two decades, and Netflix isn't done growing yet. Big Blue started focusing on cloud computing, consulting services, and artificial intelligence (AI) when Ginni Rometty took the helm, way back in 2012. (Arvind Krishna is now CEO.) It took years of frustration, but IBM's AI and cloud focus is finally paying off. Leaving consumer-grade AI services to other providers, IBM offers business-class tools with robust data security and audit-ready information flows. As a result, IBM's generative AI orders soared from $1 billion a year ago to $6 billion in April's Q1 report. And the stock isn't even expensive, changing hands at a modest 21 times free cash flow. That's not too shabby after posting market-busting returns over the last year. Finally, restaurant chain Brinker is executing a successful turnaround plan. The company behind Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy struggled to rebuild its customer traffic after the COVID-19 pandemic, falling behind top performers such as Chipotle Mexican Grill and Darden Restaurants in terms of revenue growth. That downtrend took a sharp turn for the better under new CEO Kevin Hochman, who took the reins in 2022. Under Hochman, Chili's simplified its sprawling menu and refocused its marketing efforts. Other restaurants and the industry press now see Brinker as a shining example of how to fix a broken brand. So Brinker's stock is soaring too, but from a much lower starting point. Hence, the shares are trading at an affordable valuation of 21 times free cash flow and 25 times earnings, even after more than doubling in one year. I don't own this stock yet, but that might change soon. It's so refreshing to see a common-sense business plan striking exactly the right chord with consumers. Before you buy stock in Netflix, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Netflix wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Anders Bylund has positions in International Business Machines and Netflix. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chipotle Mexican Grill, International Business Machines, and Netflix. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short June 2025 $55 calls on Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Soaring Stocks I'd Buy Now With No Hesitation was originally published by The Motley Fool

Major political scandal led to ethics reform in Tennessee: Notorious Nashville
Major political scandal led to ethics reform in Tennessee: Notorious Nashville

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Major political scandal led to ethics reform in Tennessee: Notorious Nashville

An invoice scam by a low-level government employee in Memphis led to a police investigation that culminated 20 years ago in a federal probe that brought down some of the state's biggest political figures. A dozen local and state officials were arrested in 2005 on bribery charges and convicted in a case led by the FBI dubbed "Tennessee Waltz," aptly named after the famed song about a stinging betrayal. It remains one of the biggest political scandals in state history. The case is part of the state's infamous past, but its impact stretched across decades with ethics reforms that still serve as guardrails for politicians today. The highest-ranking public servants arrested after betraying their oaths of office include two former state senators from Memphis − John Ford and the late Roscoe Dixon. Ford, the most powerful politician caught in the FBI investigation, was convicted of accepting $55,000 in cash payoffs from an undercover agent posing as a corrupt businessman. Ford's chicanery included shepherding a bill tailored to benefit the fake company − even using the wording proposed by the undercover agent. Dixon was convicted on bribery and extortion charges for accepting $9,500 in bribes to help pass legislation. Police in Memphis initially investigated a tip about an invoice scam in which a contractor for the Shelby County Juvenile Court Clerk's Office accepted money for work never performed. When investigators realized the corruption extended all the way to the state capitol in Nashville, they sought help from the FBI, which has no jurisdictional boundaries. FBI agents created a fake electronics recycling company, E-Cycle, and used informants to infiltrate state government. They also used undercover agents to pay bribes and record conversations with politicians. An FBI agent used the name "Joe Carson" and posed as the head of E-Cycle, meeting with lawmakers, passing out fake business cards, making campaign contributions and hosting a reception with live music for politicians at the Sheraton Nashville Hotel. Federal agents were surprised at how easy it was to bribe lawmakers − and to write a new state bill the politicians were ready to pass that would have favored the fake company. The case lasted more than three years and ensnared politicians in Memphis, Chattanooga and at the state capitol in Nashville. Those convicted and sentenced to prison included: Chris Newton, a former Republican representative from Cleveland; William Cotton, a Democratic Hamilton County commissioner; Charles Love, who had been a member of the Hamilton County school board; and Darrell Catron, a former Shelby County Juvenile Court aide. The FBI sting led to the arrest of a father-son duo from a Memphis political dynasty. Michael Hooks Sr., a powerhouse Democrat and son of a Civil Rights pioneer − pleaded guilty to accepting $24,200 in bribes while chairing the Shelby County Commission. His son, Michael Hooks Jr., pleaded guilty to theft from a federally funded program when he was a Memphis city school board member. The scandal resulted in the creation of new state ethics laws and an independent ethics commission. The Tennessean is publishing a Notorious Nashville story for each year from 2000-2024. Catch up on the series here. Beth Warren can be reached at bwarren@ This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Nashville, Memphis political corruption led to ethics reform

Are whole-body MRIs worth the hype?
Are whole-body MRIs worth the hype?

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are whole-body MRIs worth the hype?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. In recent years, celebrities like Kim Kardashian have taken to social media to tout the supposed benefits of whole-body MRI scans. Companies that offer the service promise that the scans can spot a range of conditions, including cancer, aneurysms, liver disease and multiple sclerosis, in as little as an hour. And if the initial scan looks clear, the companies encourage clients to return periodically to check up on their health status. But are full-body MRIs really a silver bullet, or just another expensive health fad? According to Dr. Matthew Davenport, a professor of radiology at the University of Michigan, for most people, whole-body MRI scans aren't only unnecessary but can actually lead to their own set of problems. Structural MRI scans visualize the inside of the body using magnetic fields and radio waves. Because they render detailed 3D images of internal anatomy, they're useful for detecting various conditions, including blood clots, musculoskeletal injuries, tumors, and neurological or cardiovascular problems. But doctors normally order these scans only when they already suspect that something is wrong based on an individual's symptoms, medical history and other test results. In some circumstances, doctors may recommend regular whole-body MRIs for certain patients as a preventive measure, Davenport said. But this generally occurs only when patients are diagnosed with rare disorders that put them at high risk of developing cancer. Such conditions include Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a genetic disorder that increases the risk of developing cancer at a young age. The idea is that the regular scans could spot lesions in these high-risk individuals, potentially flagging them for further testing. However, for people without such conditions, there's little reason to get regular full-body MRIs, Davenport said. "There is no scientific evidence that whole-body MRI in asymptomatic, average-risk patients improves health," he told Live Science in an email. In fact, full-body MRIs may actually do more harm than good, he said. That's because tests that can be used for diagnostics, like MRI scans, are likely to discover incidental findings. Incidental findings are unexpected results that occur from a medical test ordered for a different reason. For example, a person might get an MRI of an injured rib and then have a suspicious mass pop up on the scan. Sometimes, these findings end up pointing to a previously undiagnosed condition that requires treatment. But more often, they're just benign abnormalities in the body that pose no threat. Related: The 10 deadliest cancers, and why there's no cure About 15% to 30% of diagnostic imaging tests raise at least one incidental finding, estimates suggest. That means people who get regular whole-body MRIs are likely to find abnormalities in their bodies that may not indicate any serious health issues. "The vast majority of findings identified by whole body MRI in a patient without specific risk factors will be findings that would not improve health if they had not been detected," Davenport said. Nevertheless, you may not know if an incidental finding is important without further tests, so these results can prompt additional diagnostic tests, biopsy procedures and even unnecessary surgeries — not to mention the health anxiety that can accompany those procedures. Because of this, Davenport argues that ordering too many medical imaging tests on otherwise healthy people is likely to backfire. Currently, no major medical societies recommend whole-body MRIs for people without conditions that put them at high risk of cancer. Davenport also pointed out that companies that offer full-body MRIs benefit from a highly profitable business model in that clients pay for the tests out-of-pocket. Full-body MRIs typically cost anywhere from $1,000 to over $4,000, depending on the provider and specific service they're offering. Some insurance plans may cover whole-body MRIs in high-risk individuals, but because the scans are elective for most and not backed by clinical guidelines, they're generally not covered by private or government insurance in the U.S. RELATED STORIES —Who needs more exercise: Women or men? —Can weight loss drugs help you drink less alcohol? —What is alkaline water, and does it have any benefits? While on one hand, whole-body MRIs may stoke health anxiety and lead to potential overtreatment, in some people, they may also provide a false sense of security, Davenport suggested. For many medical conditions, such as colon cancer and blood cancer, MRIs aren't used as a primary diagnostic tool because the scans don't necessarily pick up the diseases. Davenport recommended that the general public stick with established medical screening procedures recommended by physicians rather than relying on whole-body MRI. "It is possible we will see a future where imaging like whole body MRI is used for routine screening," Davenport said. "However, substantial research is needed before that." This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store