Czech billionaire Kretinsky named chairman of Royal Mail after takeover
Mr Kretinsky's EP Group said that, following the closure of the deal earlier this month, he would head up the board as chairman of both Royal Mail and its parent company International Distribution Services (IDS).
Confirmation of the appointment came after IDS formally left the London Stock Exchange on June 2 after being taken over by Mr Kretinsky.
In April, shareholders approved the £3.6 billion takeover deal, giving the more than 500-year-old company a foreign owner for the first time.
Royal Mail's new owner also said on Friday that it had issued a £1 so-called golden share to the UK Government, as agreed under the deal.
The golden share means the firm must keep Royal Mail's headquarters and tax residency in the UK.
EP added that it has changed Royal Mail's articles of association to include the rights of the Government, and to set up an advisory committee in line with pledges made to trade unions the Communication Workers Union and Unite, as well as the Competition and Markets Authority.
EP Group recently appointed former UK trade minister Greg Hands as a full-time strategic adviser.
Mr Hands, who was minister for trade policy until last summer when he lost his seat in the House of Commons, will advise the business with a 'special focus on the UK and Germany'.
Mr Kretinsky – dubbed the Czech Sphinx – agreed the deal to buy Royal Mail's owner in May last year, but it was not cleared until December after he made a raft of commitments over the future of the service and its workers.
He was already the biggest shareholder in IDS, which also owned parcel business GLS, prior to the deal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
TONY HETHERINGTON: All 12 cheques I deposited at the Post Office have disappeared
Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below. M.H. writes: I am a director of a small agricultural supply business, contacting you in desperation. My firm deposited 12 cheques for Barclays bank – totalling £6,212 – at the local Post Office. They were never credited to our account. I have spoken to the bank every week for the past month and had no support. Tony Hetherington replies: The Barclays branch in your town closed its doors three years ago. Account holders were told to use branches in two nearby towns. Alternatively, Barclays advised: 'Cheques can be deposited at the Post Office. Please allow an extra two days for cheques deposited using a pre-printed paying-in slip to reach your Barclays accounts.' I asked the bank what had gone wrong, and staff told me: 'We're really sorry that a number of cheques paid in by Mr H's company were lost in transit by Royal Mail.' It offered you £200 after acknowledging that you would have to contact the dozen people and firms whose cheques were lost and ask them for replacements. However, a bad situation became worse. You deposited a further 11 cheques at the same Post Office, with a total value of £6,593, and they also failed to reach your Barclays account. I began making inquiries again, and a day later ten of the cheques turned up, leaving just £27 missing. Barclays raised its offer to you to £300, and the bank will also meet any expenses faced by your customers who have to ask their own banks to cancel the missing cheques. I do hope procedures at that Post Office branch are tightened up as well. Vinted and Mangopay keeping my cash Ms T.J. writes: Vinted and Mangopay are refusing to release £27 – the proceeds from items I have sold using their services. I have been asked to complete a Politically Exposed Person questionnaire, which I already did months ago. I am now being asked to supply photographic evidence such as a copy of my passport or driving licence. I refuse to do this, as I don't know why they need such personal information. It seems they are thinking of any way not to release my money. Tony Hetherington replies: For those who do not know it, Vinted is an online business based in Lithuania which acts as a middleman for anyone wanting to sell or buy secondhand clothes and similar items. And Mangopay is a money transfer company based in Luxembourg. I contacted both companies but Mangopay, which is allowed by the Financial Conduct Authority to operate in the UK, failed to offer any comment or explanation at all. Vinted, though, replied quoting a 2004 Luxembourg law dealing with money laundering and terrorist financing! It referred to this as a 'Know Your Customer' procedure that Mangopay must apply. But hang on a moment – surely Mangopay's customer is Vinted, not you? Well, apparently you are really a Mangopay customer. Before putting anything up for sale on Vinted, it seems you should have studied the Lithuanian company's 20 pages of terms and conditions. These reveal that it uses four money transmission firms, all based in different countries. And when you use Vinted, you are automatically enlisted as a customer of one of these firms. This, in turn, means you have to abide by Mangopay's own 21 pages of terms and conditions, which give it every right to cling on to your £27 until you jump through a series of hoops. One of these hoops is that if Mangopay suspects you are a crook, an arms dealer, an international diplomat or a high-flying politician, it can investigate you as a potentially corrupt Politically Exposed Person, rather like a Russian oligarch whose assets might be frozen. The pages of questions issued by Mangopay include asking you whether in the past 12 months you have been a head of state, a supreme court judge, or a general in charge of an army. And even if you answer no to every question, Mangopay warns that simply by returning its questionnaire you are accepting that it can demand further information and documents from you. So, are you as corrupt as a villain from a James Bond movie? And just what did you sell on Vinted to spark Mangopay's suspicions? You told me: 'I'm retired and trying to downsize, selling a few things.' You sold a pair of men's loafers for £8, a dress for £4 and a vintage-style trench coat for £15. As for being a Mangopay customer, you protested: 'I never signed up to be one. If I had been given that option, I would never have signed up to Vinted in the first place.' The Trustpilot review site is full of protests from people in your position. And, just a few weeks ago, my Mail colleague Sarah Vine publicly ditched Vinted after struggling unsuccessfully to get money owed to her. She wrote: 'Well done, Vinted: you've wasted several hours of my few remaining years – and swindled me out of £62.50.' Surprisingly, the online barrier to your account suddenly vanished after I started questioning it. You grabbed your £27 while you could. But it was 'a really quite appalling way to operate a business', you told me. I can hardly disagree.
Glasgow Times
19 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Plans to build dozens of new flats in Newton Mearns rejected
Planners at East Renfrewshire Council had recommended Westpoint Homes' proposal for the former Mearns Primary School site was given the go ahead. But the planning committee rejected the scheme amid concerns over the access road and the suitability of the site. The decision came after over 20 objections, many from residents in nearby Scholars Court, which raised a number of issues including overlooking, over-development and the height of the buildings. The overflow car park sits behind a Marks & Spencer foodhall and beside a Royal Mail sorting office and Mearns library. M&S had concerns about the impact on delivery and servicing access to its store while Royal Mail was worried about 'potential noise complaints' from new residents. Westpoint wanted to build two blocks of flats, each with a private balcony or terrace, to be marketed to over-55s due to pressure on school places in East Renfrewshire. A council report stated the owners of the site had monitored the demand for parking and confirmed the car park is 'surplus to requirements and that sufficient car parking within the remainder of the site can accommodate demand'. Planners added the site is 'considered to be a highly sustainable location for residential development' and the scheme was 'considered to be of a design, scale, height, massing and density that is in keeping with the buildings in the locality'. READ MORE: Here's when Paisley Museum is now expected to reopen after latest delay 'The height of the buildings has been reduced to 4 storeys which is more in keeping with the surrounding area and the neighbouring development at Scholars Court,' the report stated. 'Any potential adverse overlooking has been addressed by means of privacy screens.' They also reported the proposal would not be 'considered to give rise to significant additional overlooking' and the council's road service had no objection to the plan, subject to conditions which would have been attached to the planning permission. However, Cllr Andrew Morrison, Conservative, said he was 'still quite concerned about vehicle access to this, because the existing road is single track in parts'. He said while there was a proposal to widen the road, it is 'essentially going to be a shared space with a significant number of HGVs'. A council planner said there was an 'expectation' that the road would be widened. He highlighted there was no objection from the council's roads team. However, Cllr Morrison moved the application was rejected as he believed it would result in 'significant loss of character and amenity to the surrounding area' and wasn't 'appropriate to the location'. He added it did not provide safe access. 'There are complaints from residents already with respect to HGV movements in the goods yard which is from the residents of Scholars' Court and this application will be even closer to said yard.' His motion was seconded by Cllr Paul Edlin and permission was refused. Provost Mary Montague had been in favour of approving the application.
South Wales Guardian
2 days ago
- South Wales Guardian
Czech billionaire Kretinsky named chairman of Royal Mail after takeover
Mr Kretinsky's EP Group said that, following the closure of the deal earlier this month, he would head up the board as chairman of both Royal Mail and its parent company International Distribution Services (IDS). Confirmation of the appointment came after IDS formally left the London Stock Exchange on June 2 after being taken over by Mr Kretinsky. In April, shareholders approved the £3.6 billion takeover deal, giving the more than 500-year-old company a foreign owner for the first time. Royal Mail's new owner also said on Friday that it had issued a £1 so-called golden share to the UK Government, as agreed under the deal. The golden share means the firm must keep Royal Mail's headquarters and tax residency in the UK. EP added that it has changed Royal Mail's articles of association to include the rights of the Government, and to set up an advisory committee in line with pledges made to trade unions the Communication Workers Union and Unite, as well as the Competition and Markets Authority. EP Group recently appointed former UK trade minister Greg Hands as a full-time strategic adviser. Mr Hands, who was minister for trade policy until last summer when he lost his seat in the House of Commons, will advise the business with a 'special focus on the UK and Germany'. Mr Kretinsky – dubbed the Czech Sphinx – agreed the deal to buy Royal Mail's owner in May last year, but it was not cleared until December after he made a raft of commitments over the future of the service and its workers. He was already the biggest shareholder in IDS, which also owned parcel business GLS, prior to the deal.
