Is 420 the magic credit score number for a home loan application?
If you have bad credit, you might be wondering whether a bank will ever be willing to give you a home loan.
A person's credit score reflected how well they had paid off credit in the past and how likely they were to be able to service their debts in the future.
It takes into account factors like how long you have had credit accounts - that could also include things like power and internet bills - how often you make your payments on time, how much you owe on loans and credit cards, what types of credit you have, how often you ask for credit and any defaults or insolvencies in your history.
There are three different credit bureaux in New Zealand but, for all of them, the lower your score, the poorer your credit rating.
Centrix ranged from zero to 1000.
It said anything below 496 was poor and about 10 percent of the population was in that range. Centrix noted people in this bracket were more likely to be rejected for a loan.
Missed power or phone bills could sometimes impact a person's credit score. (File photo)
Photo:
Shutterstock / Allie Schmitz
People with slightly better scores might get a loan but have extra conditions.
For example, anything below 299 is low and 300 to 499 represented "room for improvement".
David Cunningham, chief executive at mortgage advice firm Squirrel, said about 420 was the level at which banks would draw a line.
"Some people's scores are way lower than expected. The biggest thing we see is missed minimum payments on credit cards over several months.
"One-off has a negligible impact. It's when it becomes a deteriorating trend."
He said people also needed to watch out for power bills and phone bills.
Sometimes a missed payment could affect someone's credit without them realising, for example if they had moved house and not paid a final bill.
But he said banks were generally open to an explanation if people could provide information about how they got into trouble.
Another mortgage adviser, Jeremy Andrews at Key Mortgages, said it was a "blurry line" that borrowers did not want to push too far.
"A score of 400 to 500 trending upward with good recent conduct might be better than a score of 500-plus with recent bounced payments or dishonours, unarranged overdraft fees. Any recent collection steps or agencies having to step in will be much harder to mitigate."
He said other things could be easier to fix or explain.
"Historical events affecting credit scores such as not paying bills on time, or just tipping into arrears, could be a short term problem and easily fixed. But if a borrower has not been paying either financial companies or property related bills such as property rates, on time every time, that can be a much bigger problem to resolve."
Head of Link Advisory Glen McLeod said banks had internal thresholds.
"That said, it's not just about the score itself. Lenders look at the full picture: what kind of credit issues are showing up, how recent they are, and what caused them.
"Life events-like a separation, illness, or unexpected financial hardship-can reflect on your credit score, even if they were temporary. That context matters and can influence how a lender views your application.
"If the credit history is too risky for a mainstream bank, non-bank lenders may still be an option. They tend to be more flexible, though that usually comes with higher interest rates to reflect the added risk."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
KiwiSaver members to get one last chance at $521 government contribution
To qualify for the full amount, members need to have contributed at least $1042 in the 12 months to 30 June. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER The clock is ticking down on KiwiSaver members' last chance to get $521 in their accounts, from the government. It was announced in this year's Budget that the government would halve the member tax credit to a maximum of $260.72, and remove it for anyone earning more than $180,000 a year. That means the current KiwiSaver year, which expires at the end of Monday, is members' last opportunity to get the $521.43 that had previously been offer - and for the highest earners to get it at all. To qualify for the full amount, members need to have contributed at least $1042 in the 12 months to 30 June. The contribution is currently paid at a rate of 50 cents per $1 contributed up to that amount. Anyone who is working full-time and contributing 3 percent of their income to KiwiSaver will probably have contributed enough. But people who have been out of the workforce, or not making contributions to KiwiSaver, may need to check whether they have, and make a lump sum payment if not. Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson previously told RNZ the change would be most keenly felt by lower-income people. She said, for people earning less than $30,000 a year, the member tax credit was expected to add up to 15 percent or 20 percent of their total balance at 65. With the reduction, it would be between 6 and 11 percent. Pie Funds chief executive Ana-Marie Lockyer said even with the changes, the contribution could be expected to grow to $41,000 over the course of a 16-year-old's working life. The contribution is not available to people aged over 65, but from the new KiwiSaver year, will be available to 16 and 17-year-olds. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
You can DIY your KiwiSaver, but should you?
Photo: RNZ More KiwiSaver schemes allow investors to choose their own investments - but should you do it? This week, Sharesies expanded its 'self select' KiwiSaver option to include US shares and exchange-traded funds. Members can now add more than 150 New Zealand and US investments to their KiwiSaver portfolios, alongside 'base funds'. Up to half a KiwiSaver member's plan can be allocated to their own investment picks, with a maximum of 5 percent in each pick. To varying degrees, Craigs Investment Partners, NZ Funds, Nikko, InvestNow, Kernel and KiwiWRAP also allow investors to select where their money goes. Sharesies super and funds general manager Matt McPherson said investors said they wanted more connection and control over what was available. "People who want to take some of the control, but not all of it are who we're building for." He said about 40 percent of Sharesies KiwiSaver members had some of their own picks and about 10 percent of their contributions going into those. He said the most popular self-select pick was the S&P500. "What people like about that is that it's very low cost and it's very passive." Investments in big global brands were also proving popular, such as Microsoft, Apple and Amazon. Each stock was in its own pie fund for Sharesies investors to simplify tax considerations. Genesis Advice financial adviser Edward Glennie said it was sensible for KiwiSaver schemes to have limits on how much choice investors could have, "If you're allowed to put 100 percent on one particular stock, that might compromise your returns, particular if you're unadvised." He said he would work with clients through KiwiWRAP to help them set up a suitable portfolio. Self-select options could sometimes have higher costs, but he said that was probably the direction the market was headed. It also allowed people to get away from the 'one manager' model that had been dominant since the scheme launched 18 years ago. "I think the market is gradually opening up." Data director Greg Bunkall said it was difficult to anticipate most individuals outperforming fund managers with their own picks. "In Australia, studies comparing self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) portfolios with APRA-regulated funds present mixed results, with superior returns observed among SMSFs that possess substantial balances and leverage the expertise of financial advisors in their decision-making processes." McPherson said the option would not be the right thing for all investors. "Fund managers do great work of finding undervalued companies and investing in them, so that's why the product is built around this idea of, if you want to, you can do a bit of it, as opposed to having to take on all the responsibility." McPherson said Sharesies' model was more like the self-directed options seen in Australian, than full self-management. Kernel Wealth founder Dean Anderson said members could "mix and match" from Kernel's 21 funds. "We've found overall investors are very informed, with fund selection often reflecting an investor's age and life stage. Of course, Kernel isn't a default provider, so investors have typically made an educated decision to move to us and have realised the benefits of being engaged with their KiwiSaver. "Consistently outperforming the market over time is incredibly challenging, but KiwiSaver members, who customise their plans, often have a specific purpose in mind. Some may want 100 percent of their KiwiSaver invested in global shares, others might prioritise values by choosing ESG-centric funds or they could be aiming to diversify away from other assets they own, selecting funds that balance their overall wealth. "As investors approach the time to access their KiwiSaver, the self-select function becomes even more valuable. They might start to bucket their assets-moving funds for the first few years of retirement spending into a cash fund, while keeping another bucket in higher-growth assets to support their financial needs 10, 20 or even 30 years down the line. "This flexibility is incredibly useful, rather than being forced to only be in one strategy."
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Invercargill mayor Nobby Clark criticises own council of being too risk averse
Invercargill Mayor Nobby Clark says his council should take more risks. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER Invercargill mayor Nobby Clark has hit out at his own council, saying its aversion to risk has resulted in an "eye watering" consultants bill. His comments follow the organisation revealing it spent more than $7.3 million on consultants in less than three years between July 2022 and December 2024. Clark said the council's low tolerance for risk meant elected members didn't "run against" advice from management, and management used consultants to "justify" the advice they gave elected members. "For me, personally, I think the risk should be higher. We should take more risk," Clark said. "Because at the end of the day, you've got to balance it out against the cost of these consultants, which are eye watering amounts." Clark said the only way to change the situation was to tell staff not to spend large amounts on advice, and for councillors to accept the risk. "And if we get it wrong, we get it wrong." Invercargill City Council was approached for comment but did not respond in time for publication. The numbers were made public on the back of a LGOIMA request from the Taxpayers' Union, which released the data on Friday. It showed $2.58 million was spent on consultants for the 12 months to June 2023, $3.23 million was spent for the 12 months to June 2024, and $1.52 million was spent for the six months to December 2024. The document showed more than 160 companies were used during the two-and-a-half-year period. Deloitte topped the spending with more than $424,000 for work on reviewing rates, contract compliance, internal audit support, and risk and assurance support. Stantec was next with a figure of more than $396,000 for support with the Bluff wastewater consent. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
