Dollar droops as optimism over US trade deals boost Fed easing bets
ADVERTISEMENT The greenback also languished near a four-year low versus sterling and a more than decade trough to the Swiss franc after Washington and China moved closer to a tariff agreement, even as U.S. President Donald Trump injected some uncertainty into the market's bullish narrative by abruptly cutting off trade talks with Ottawa.
Investors interpreted Fed Chair Jerome Powell's testimony to U.S. Congress last week as dovish, after he said that rate cuts were likely if inflation does not spike this summer due to tariffs.
Bets for at least one quarter-point reduction by September have risen to 92.4% according to CME Group's FedWatch Tool, from about 70% a week earlier. The Fed's rate-setting committee also meets next month, but does not gather in August. "The market pricing implies a cut as a slam dunk" in September, Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone, wrote in a client note. Friday's monthly U.S. payrolls report is "the marquee risk event" this week, Weston said, and the risk to the dollar "seems asymmetric given the Fed's reaction function is biased towards the timing of the next cut." That means the dollar is more likely to suffer a rout on weak numbers than rally on a hot outcome, he said.
ADVERTISEMENT An additional weight on the dollar came from Trump's continued assault on Powell, saying on Friday that he would "love" if the Fed chief resigned before his term ends in May. Trump also said he wants to cut the benchmark rate to 1% from the current 4.25% to 4.5%, and reiterated that he plans to replace Powell with a more dovish chairperson.
ADVERTISEMENT Investors are also keeping an eye on Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill, which is currently before the Senate and could add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The dollar index - which measures the U.S. currency against six major counterparts, including the euro, sterling and franc - edged up 0.1% to 97.276, but was still not far from the more than three-year low of 96.933 late last week.
ADVERTISEMENT The euro was slightly weaker at $1.1716, just off the highest level since September 2021 reached on Friday at $1.1754. Sterling was little changed at $1.3709, hovering close to Thursday's peak of $1.37701, a level not previously seen since October 2021.
ADVERTISEMENT The dollar was steady at 0.7988 Swiss franc, after dipping to 0.7955 franc on Friday for the first time since January 2015, when the Swiss National Bank unexpectedly removed a cap on the currency's value against the euro. The U.S. currency was flat at 144.58 yen. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that Washington and Beijing had resolved issues surrounding shipments of Chinese rare earth minerals and magnets to the United States, further modifying a deal reached in May in Geneva. He also said various trade deals with other countries could be done by the U.S. Labor Day holiday on September 1, suggesting some wiggle room on Trump's July 9 deadline to reach deals or face aggressive "reciprocal" tariffs. "USD will be driven by U.S. trade developments this week in our view," Commonwealth Bank of Australia analysts wrote in their weekly FX strategy report. "We are sceptical so many trade deals can be agreed so quickly," they said. "Nonetheless, news that some trade deals have been agreed will support the USD against the major currencies - EUR, JPY and GBP - (and) the USD will likely decrease against other currencies such as AUD."
The risk-sensitive Australian dollar ticked up slightly to $0.6537, edging back towards Thursday's 7-1/2-month high of $0.6563.
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Why doesn't India have US fighter jets? IAF uses fighter planes from Russia, France, and…
Home News Why doesn't India have US fighter jets? IAF uses fighter planes from Russia, France, and… Why doesn't India have US fighter jets? IAF uses fighter planes from Russia, France, and… Even after having good bilateral relations with the United States, India has never purchased any fighter jet from the country. Here is the reason. Why doesn't India have US fighter jets? IAF uses fighter planes from Russia, France, and… In recent years, India has seen tremendous growth in the defence sector and has emerged as one of the leading weapon exporters. Simultaneously, the country has strengthened its armed forces with new and high-tech weapons. For instance, New Delhi purchased the mighty Rafale fighter jet from France and bought the S-400 air defence system from Russia. India also has good bilateral relations with the United States, but you will be surprised to know that the country does not have any 'Made in US' fighter jet. Notably, America tried to sell its fighter jets, even recently President Trump tried to sell the F-35 to India, yet New Delhi doesn't show interest in the American jets. Fighter jets from the US, such as the F-35, the F-16, are famous in the world, with several countries even using them, but India has never gone to America for fighter jets — not just today but since its independence. Let us tell you why. Which Countries' Fighter Jets Does India Have? India purchased fighter jets from many countries, and this diversity in aircraft meets the country's defence needs and strategies. Russia tops the list when it comes to purchasing fighter jets. The 'Made in Russia' fighter jets have been in service in India for a long time and have participated in many wars. Apart from Russia, India has fighter jets from France and Britain. It is to be noted that, India also has its own indigenous Tejas fighter jet. Why Does India Not Buy Fighter Jets From America? There are many reasons why India doesn't buy fighter jets from the US. Reasons vary from strategic, technical, to political. Notably, America has been a long-time defence partner of Pakistan and supplied several military weapons, including fighter jets like – F-16. In such a situation, India maintains a distance from American fighter jets so that it remains strong strategically. Russia Is Also A Factor India has been closer to Russia since its independence. While America has always stood with Pakistan in difficult times, Russia has stood with India. Russia has not only given India fighter jets but also technology. Some of them are also being produced here. Russia has supplied a large number of fighter jets, tanks, and missile systems to India. Buying defence weapons from Moscow has always been easy and economical for New Delhi, and technical support is also good. Transport Aircraft Have Been Purchased From America While India has not acquired US-made fighter jets, it has purchased military transport aircraft, including Lockheed C-130J-30 Super Hercules. But Why Made In America Helicopters? India's armed forces have acquired a significant number of US-made helicopters. These include 22 AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters for the Indian Air Force (procured in 2015), followed by a further six for the Indian Army (2020). Additionally, 15 CH-47F(I) Chinook heavy-lift helicopters were purchased for the Indian Air Force. For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest World News on
Hans India
36 minutes ago
- Hans India
Innovation Takes Centre Stage: 95% of Indian Companies Rank It Among Top 3 Priorities
Amid ongoing economic and geopolitical turbulence, a new report from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) reveals that innovation resilience is a defining trait of high-performing firms. The report, titled Most Innovative Companies 2025: In Disruptive Times, the Resilient Win, explores insights from two decades of BCG's innovation research. Based on an analysis of the firms that have appeared on BCG's annual 50 Most Innovative Companies lists since 2005, the report found a strong link between long-term innovation excellence and total shareholder return (TSR). Top innovators outperformed the broader market by 2.4 percentage points annually on average, with particularly strong gains during the Great Recession and the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet while innovation has remained a top-three priority for 64% to 83% firms every year, many companies aren't up to the task. From 2021 to 2024, the proportion of executives who said that they see their companies as innovation leaders declined by 24 percentage points. And despite continued high R&D spending, the report found no consistent link between R&D investment and TSR. 'The ability to innovate through adversity is what separates exceptional companies from the rest,' said Justin Manly, a BCG managing director and senior partner and a coauthor of the report. 'R&D spending alone isn't enough. What matters most is investing in the right initiatives and capabilities to turn uncertainty into opportunity.' Asian Innovators Gain Prominence, Europe Falters China & India leads in innovation prioritization with 95% of its respondents' reporting innovation as a top three priority in 2024—the most of any region apart from India, which also came in at 95%. In 2005, no Chinese companies appeared in BCG's top 50 ranking. By 2023, Chinese companies held 8 of the 50 slots (16% of the total list)—including 2 of the top 10. Meanwhile, since 2005, North American companies have seen their share fall from nearly three-quarters of the list to about half, although they still represent two-thirds of all serial innovators—firms that have ranked on the list 10 or more times. In contrast, European companies have had less staying power. European companies typically rank lower on the top 50 list, and Europe also accounts for the highest share of companies that have appeared on the list only once. Compared to other regions, Europe's most innovative companies tend to skew toward industrial sectors such as automotive and pharma, rather than technology. Digital Maturity Defines Today's Innovation Leaders Digital maturity has become table stakes for innovation success. BCG's analysis of corporate earnings call transcripts found that mentions of digital innovation doubled from 2005 to 2024. The 25 serial innovators that have ranked 10+ times in the top 50 referenced digital topics nearly four times as often as their peers did. Nevertheless, digital innovation excellence remains a moving target. In 2024, AI and GenAI captured more than 80% of all venture capital investment. And agentic AI is set to raise the innovation bar again. A New C-Suite Agenda for Innovation As companies face increased geopolitical uncertainty, the report outlines four questions to help business leaders prepare for a potential post-globalization world: Ambition. How do we adjust our innovation targets as profit pools shift? Portfolio. Which projects should we prioritize, redesign, or discontinue to reduce exposure or tap into new opportunities? Talent. What talent constraints or opportunities are likely to arise? Footprint. Do our innovation centers need reshaping to build resilience? 'The best innovators don't just weather the storm—they redesign the ship while sailing through it,' said Amy MacDougall, a BCG partner and a coauthor of the report. 'This is the moment for bold action to future-proof innovation systems.' About Boston Consulting Group Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we work closely with clients to embrace a transformational approach aimed at benefiting all stakeholders—empowering organizations to grow, build sustainable competitive advantage, and drive positive societal impact. Our diverse, global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives that question the status quo and spark change. BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting, technology and design, and corporate and digital ventures. We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout all levels of the client organization, fueled by the goal of helping our clients thrive and enabling them to make the world a better place.
Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Tax Bill Hits Republican Resistance in House Ahead of Vote
Donald Trump's multitrillion-dollar tax bill is running into Republican resistance in the House as moderate and ultra-conservative GOP lawmakers threaten to defy the president and sink his domestic agenda. House lawmakers are returning to Washington from a holiday week to vote Wednesday on the Senate version of the bill, which squeaked through that chamber on Vice President JD Vance's tie-breaking vote. The House passed its own version of the measure in May by a one-vote margin. But several Republicans who were strong-armed into voting for that bill are now vowing to oppose the Senate-passed measure, putting Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline at risk. House Speaker Mike Johnson can afford to lose only three Republican votes in the face of unified Democratic opposition, if all members are present and voting. Republicans Warren Davidson and Thomas Massie, who voted against the bill in May, remain firm no votes. Johnson's No. 2, Steve Scalise, projected optimism on Tuesday. 'We're going to get it done tomorrow,' he told reporters. But Representative Chip Roy, a hardline conservative who balked at the cost of the House's earlier bill but ultimately supported it, said 'a significant number' of lawmakers are concerned about the Senate version of the bill. 'I have very strong concerns and am not very inclined to support,' the Texas Republican said. The GOP holdouts are pushing for major — and sometimes competing — changes to the Senate bill, including some troubled by the scale of Medicaid cuts and others demanding deeper spending reductions. Still, House Ways and Means chairman Jason Smith said Tuesday that he's confident the bill will pass. Trump, the GOP's most forceful whip, quickly turned his attention from the Senate to the House, putting public pressure on Republicans to back the bill. 'We can have all of this right now, but only if the House GOP UNITES, ignores its occasional 'GRANDSTANDERS' ' Trump posted on Tuesday. Several ultraconservatives in the House Freedom Caucus are among the loudest naysayers, vowing to oppose the bill over the deficit increases projected by the Joint Committee on Taxation. Freedom Caucus member Andy Ogles called the current version a 'dud' that 'guts key Trump provisions' to comply with strict Senate rules. Certain parts of the House bill were scrapped in the Senate because of a fast-track procedural tactic that allowed for a simple majority vote. Ogles introduced an amendment to replace the entire bill with the House version passed in May. But any changes to the legislation would need to be reconciled with the Senate, a process that could take weeks given the tight margins. Representative Ralph Norman said he would vote no, adding that it's 'tough sledding' if the Senate-passed bill goes to the floor. Representative Victoria Spartz, who frequently waffles on her positions, went so far as to say the chamber will have a 'decision to make' if Johnson brings the Senate bill to the floor, signaling his speakership could be in jeopardy. The Senate has already negotiated a deal with the House on one of the most contentious provisions for swing-district Republicans: the state and local tax deduction cap. The Senate bill increases the SALT cap to $40,000 annually for a five-year period, when it would then snap back to the current $10,000 limit. The House bill was more generous amid pushback from Republicans from New York, California and New Jersey. Most of the so-called SALT caucus ultimately supported the Senate deal as the best they could get. But New York's Nick LaLota has said the deal isn't enough and that he would vote no on the bill. Moderates are also blasting the deeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate bill. 'I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding streams our hospitals rely on, including provider taxes and state directed payments, or any provisions that punish expansion states,' Representative David Valadao wrote in a post on X Friday. Valadao led a group of 16 House Republicans who pledged not to support the bill if the Senate chose to slash the Medicaid provider tax rate beyond a permanent freeze at 6%. States often use the provider taxes, within some already existing rules, to help defray their Medicaid matching fund requirements, allowing them to bring in more federal money to make Medicaid payments to providers and expand coverage. Republican Senators included a gradual reduction in the tax to medical providers to a final 3.5%, unleashing an internal debate about how rural hospitals would cope with the changes. The bill added a $50 billion fund for rural hospitals after objections from Senators Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins and Josh Hawley. It's unclear if it will satisfy House skeptics, some of whom represent districts in metropolitan areas. Murkowski, a holdout in the Senate who pivoted to a yes vote in the final hours, told reporters after the final vote that she hopes the House continues to make changes. 'The House is going look at this and recognize that we're not done yet,' Murkowski said after hours of negotiation for her vote with Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Majority Whip John Barrasso. 'I would like to see a better outcome for people in this country.' With assistance from Emily Birnbaum and Yash Roy. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
