Satellite photos show destroyed bombers at a Russian air base struck by Ukrainian drones
The photos provided by Planet Labs PBC showed aircraft wreckage and scorched areas at the Belaya Air Base, a major installation for Russia's long-range bomber force. In the images, at least three Tu-95 bombers and four Tu-22Ms appeared to be destroyed.
The planes were parked on an apron beside a runway surrounded by grassland. Other aircraft at the base appeared unscathed.
Ukraine said that 41 Russian warplanes, including strategic bombers and other types of combat aircraft, were destroyed or damaged in Sunday's operation, which officials said was planned over 18 months. The attack delivered a heavy blow to Russia's air force and its military prestige.
The Russian Defense Ministry said the attack set several warplanes ablaze at air bases in the Irkutsk region and the Murmansk region in the north, but the fires were extinguished. It also said Ukraine also tried to strike two air bases in western Russia, as well as another one in the Amur region of Russia's Far East, but those attacks were repelled.
Russian President Vladimir Putin hasn't commented on the issue.
The Tu-95 is a is a four-engine turboprop plane that can fly intercontinental missions and was designed in the 1950s to rival the U.S. B-52 bomber.
The Tupolev Tu-22M is a sweep-wing twin-engine supersonic bomber.
Russia has used the heavy planes in the all-out war, which began in February 2022, to launch waves of cruise missile strikes across Ukraine.
For decades, long-range bombers have been part of the Soviet and Russian nuclear triad that also includes land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and atomic-powered submarines carrying ICBMs. The strategic bombers have flown regular patrols around the globe showcasing Moscow's nuclear might.
___
Follow AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Memo: Trump adopts new aggressive stance on Russia
President Trump moved to a more aggressive footing with Russia on Monday, promising to funnel weapons through NATO allies to Ukraine and threatening to hammer Moscow's trading partners with sanctions. Even though there is a lengthy hiatus of 50 days before those sanctions would take effect, it's still a notable shift from the president. Trump had long been skeptical of the pace and scale of U.S. aid to Ukraine. It has been only a little more than four months since he and Vice President Vance had a famously fractious meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office. In the aftermath of that meeting, where Zelensky was assailed for his supposed ingratitude and the weakness of his bargaining position, it seemed like the choking off of U.S. military aid to Kyiv was near-certain. That, in turn, would make a Russian victory in the war begun by President Vladimir Putin's February 2022 invasion equally inevitable. Now, the picture looks very different. Trump — for reasons that appear personal as much as strategic — has become increasingly irritated with Putin's refusal to bring the war to an end. On Monday, meeting at the White House with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Trump complained that he enjoys 'very pleasant' phone calls with Putin only to see Russian 'missiles go off that night.' The accusation of double-dealing or disingenuousness on the part of Putin has become more of a centerpiece of Trump's rhetoric recently. On Monday, he contended that Putin 'didn't fool' him, even as he held that the Russian leader had pulled the wool over the eyes of past Presidents Biden, Obama and George W. Bush. Just last week, Trump made a similar point in even more pointed terms, saying, 'We get a lot of bulls‑‑‑ thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time but it turns out to be meaningless.' Now, of course, the question is how meaningful Trump's own shift will be. The most obviously substantive move is the provision of weapons — notably Patriot air defense systems. The deal by which those, and other weapons, will be bought by European NATO members and then transferred on to Ukraine seems to resolve one central tension in the conflict. It enables Trump to vastly reduce the cost to the U.S. Treasury Department — and thus to U.S. taxpayers — of military aid to Ukraine, while bolstering Ukraine's defenses and ameliorating the panic from U.S. allies in Europe that Trump's isolation would invite greater Russian expansionism. Referring to NATO allies, Trump said Monday, 'We are going to be sending them weapons, and they're going to be paying for them. We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for them.' The Wall Street Journal, citing two unnamed sources familiar with the upcoming weapons transfers, reported that the package could be worth about $10 billion. The Department of State says the United States has provided almost $67 billion in military assistance to Ukraine since Russia's invasion. The sanctions element of Monday's proposal was a bit more vague. Trump initially used the word 'tariffs' to describe what he had in mind as a tactic to deepen Russia's economic isolation. But it fell to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to clarify that Trump was in fact suggesting the imposition of economic sanctions on Moscow's trading partners. Those sanctions are supposedly going to take effect if a peace deal is not arrived at within Trump's 50-day time frame. There are a few obvious caveats. The most obvious is whether Trump will follow through given his propensity to move in unpredictable ways. A second is whether Putin would try to persuade the president, during that period, that it is actually Ukraine that is being the more stubborn party. A third mixed signal came even Monday, when Trump appeared lukewarm about the proposed congressional legislation that would ramp up sanctions on Russia directly. Even so, it's notable that the more hawkish members of the GOP, including Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), have been vocally enthusiastic about Trump's apparent shift. There are, too, some in Republican circles who believe Trump's instinctive isolationism has been diluted somewhat by the perceived success of the recent U.S. airstrikes against targets in Iran — strikes that resulted neither in any casualties for the U.S. nor created any serious danger of getting sucked into a longer war. The American public also seems to have an appetite for tougher economic measures against Russia. An Economist/YouGov poll last month found that 44 percent of Americans surveyed favored increasing sanctions on Russia and 19 percent wanted to maintain sanctions at their current level, while only 15 percent wanted to reduce or eliminate sanctions. Much remains uncertain, including how Putin will react to Monday's announcements. And, of course, the biggest vexing question is how many concessions either Russia or Ukraine are willing to make to end the war. But Trump, long derided by critics for his softness on Putin, is this time taking a harder line than he ever has before. The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What to know about the US-NATO weapons deal for Ukraine
President Trump said Monday he had brokered a deal to send more weapons to Ukraine without burdening the U.S., while threatening Russian President Vladimir Putin with new sanctions if there is no deal to end the war in 50 days. Trump's announcement marks a potential turning point for a president who had wanted to pull U.S. support from Ukraine and has repeatedly demonstrated favorable treatment to Putin despite Moscow's invasion of its neighbor. Under the deal, weapons would be sourced from NATO allies in Europe that just agreed to step up their defense spending at a summit Trump hailed as a success. Here's what to know about the deal. Trump announced last week that he had struck a deal for NATO to purchase weapons from the U.S. to send to Ukraine. He said Monday that these systems would include Patriot missile defense batteries critical for Ukraine to guard its skies under increasing Russian bombardment. 'It's everything. It's Patriots. It's all of them. It's a full complement with the batteries,' Trump said, adding that the batteries could arrive in Ukraine within days. 'They're paying for everything. We're not paying anymore,' Trump said. A top German military official told reporters in Kyiv last week that Berlin was in negotiations for weeks with the U.S. over the potential purchase and transfer of a Patriot missile battery. The NATO Support and Procurement Agency is the arm of the organization that handles acquisitions and logistics support and can be used to purchase and deliver the weapons for Ukraine. The agency employs about 1,550 staff and oversees more than 2,500 contractors in NATO's missions across the world, according to NATO's website. Another avenue NATO allies can use to procure weapons for Ukraine is purchasing them directly with the U.S. on a bilateral basis, with NATO helping to facilitate such transactions. 'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to NATO. NATO may choose to have certain of them sent to other countries where we can get a little additional speed, where the country will release something and be it'll be mostly in the form of a replacement,' Trump said. There's little information on what exact weapons systems Trump is greenlighting for countries to purchase or what is being prioritized. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told lawmakers at the NATO summit last month that in addition to Patriots, the country needs additional long-range weapons. 'But beyond that, I haven't heard any specifics from this administration,' she said in a call with reporters. Trump acknowledged Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had paused weapons shipments to Ukraine as part of a review of Pentagon stockpiles, despite reports the president was caught off-guard when weapons to Ukraine were halted July 1. 'What Pete was doing, and me too, I knew what Pete was doing, was evaluation, because we knew this was going to happen,' Trump said, referring to the NATO procurement deal. 'So we did a little bit of a pause.' The U.S. still has $3.86 billion worth of presidential drawdown authority for Ukraine as part of appropriations provided by Congress. This allows for the U.S. to send weapons directly from Pentagon stockpiles and use the money to purchase backfills. Former President Biden last provided a drawdown worth $500 billion on Jan. 9. Politico reported last week that Trump is considering a drawdown package for Ukraine. The moves are likely to rankle Trump's MAGA base, which oppose the U.S. sending weapons and military aid abroad. 'We do not want to give or sell weapons to Ukraine or be involved in any foreign wars or continue the never ending flow of foreign aid,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) posted Monday on the social platform X. Trump made his latest remarks in the Oval Office following a meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, a staunch supporter of Ukraine. 'Dear Donald, this is really big,' said Rutte, who has demonstrated a unique ability to both flatter and cajole Trump to the side of Europe. 'You called me on Thursday that you had taken a decision. And the decision is you want Ukraine — what it needs to have to maintain to defend itself against Russia, but you want Europeans to pay for it, which is totally logical, and this is building on the tremendous success of the NATO summit,' he said. Trump gave Putin a 50-day deadline to reach a deal over Ukraine or risk being hit with a 100 percent tariff on exports to the U.S. 'The country's economy is going very poorly, and he's got to get his economy back. He's got to save his economy,' Trump said. But Trump raised doubt over his support for a Republican-led sanctions bill on Russia that has 85 cosponsors. Trump suggested the sanctions bill might not be needed; he is meeting with Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) later Monday. Still, Trump has increasingly expressed frustration with Putin and identified him as the obstacle to peace, after months of trying to reorient the U.S. as a neutral mediator between Moscow and Kyiv. Rutte said Trump's outreach to Putin in the initial days of his administration served to 'break the deadlock' and start the conversation over whether peace was possible. 'You have to test him, and you did this, and you really gave him a chance to be serious to get to the table to start negotiations,' Rutte said. Trump said, 'We probably had, four times, a deal,' but that Putin's talk 'didn't mean anything.' 'I don't want to say he's an assassin, but he's a tough guy,' Trump said of his dealings with Putin. 'He's fooled a lot of people. … Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden. He didn't fool me,' he said, referring to former U.S. presidents. 'But what I do say is that at a certain point, ultimately, talk doesn't talk. It's got to be action. It's got to be results.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bolton on Russian sanctions threat: Trump laying the groundwork to say ‘I'm done with it'
Former national security adviser John Bolton said Monday that President Trump could soon retreat from efforts to resolve Russia's war with Ukraine. The Trump administration has been engaged with both Kyiv and Moscow in search of peace, while GOP lawmakers have pushed for secondary sanctions against Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'He didn't get what he wanted, which was a quick ceasefire from his friend Vladimir. He tried for six months, it's not going anywhere,' Bolton said of Trump during a Monday appearance on NewsNation's 'On Balance.' 'So now he's justifying taking steps against Putin, but I think it also lays the groundwork for him to say, 'I'm done with it, it's Europe's war, that's what I said in the beginning, I'm done with it,'' he added. On Monday, the president threatened to impose tariffs on the Kremlin if Russia continues to reject ceasefire proposals. 'We're very, very unhappy with [Russia], and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in about 50 days,' Trump said during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office. Bolton said the increased pressure comes after Putin has outwitted Trump for months by prolonging the peace process. 'I think he believed Putin was his friend — I think he still believes Putin was his friend. But you know, you can have arguments with your friends, they don't last forever,' Bolton told anchor Leland Vittert. 'I think what was really going on today was that he was saying, 'this is not my war, this is Biden's war', and in 50 days, he may put secondary sanctions on Russia or he may not. I think he's trying to walk away from this,' he added. Last week, NATO leaders struck a deal with the Trump administration outlining the organization's purchase of U.S. weapons to be sent to Ukraine in an effort to support the defense of their sovereign borders. Trump said Monday the systems would include Patriot missile defense batteries to increase Ukraine's air surveillance, providing more warning of incoming strikes from Russia. 'Look, a number of American commanders in Europe, former commanders in the European combatant command, have said they think Ukraine could win the war. And I think what the U.S. could do uniquely to help the Ukrainians out is give them a strategy to do that, and then give them the weapons systems that they need,' Bolton told NewsNation. 'And I understand it's three years into this thing, but the fact is Putin thinks he's on a roll now, he thinks he's doing well in Ukraine militarily. I don't understand how he believes that, but that's what he believes. And a real defeat on the battlefield would have implications not just for what Russia's done in Ukraine, but for Russia's threat to all the former parts of the Soviet Union and to China watching America stand up to this aggression.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
