Mailbag: Huntington Beach City Council instigating political agenda, not solving city problems
Vote 'no' on both if you think the City Council or a committee appointed by the council — not parents — should decide what is appropriate for children. Vote 'yes,' if you feel parents should retain the right to decide what is appropriate for their own children.
The council has brought this costly and unnecessary election upon the city by voting to establish a committee to censor or ban books from the children's section of the library before they had even considered what qualified one to be a committee member, how members of said committee would be chosen and what guidelines would be used to determine unsuitable books or material. Isn't voting to establish a committee without knowing how it will be appointed, and how it will function tantamount to deciding to build a house without blueprints?
It seems our current council does not know how to govern the city or try to solve its problems. So they choose to be busy fomenting a political agenda, to make it seem as if they are actually doing something.
By the way, one wonders what the committee would do with the Bible and its stories of violent murder, adultery, rape and incest.
Mark WimbishHuntington Beach
The opponents of Measures A and B would have you believe that their opposition is about protecting children and being fiscally responsible. Nothing could be further from the truth.
To scare voters about Measure A, they cite passages from books that are not even in our library and books that are in the adult section to try to make people believe children are being exposed to inappropriate materials. They fly in a book banning agitator from out of state.
They claim their opposition to Measure B is about fiscal responsibility. These are the same council members who gave away millions of taxpayers' dollars to the promoter of the Pacific Airshow for a cancellation that was not the city's doing. And then tried to hide the settlement from the public. They are the same council members who voted to spend an extra $1M of taxpayers' money to have this special election for these two ballot measures.
This election is not about protecting children and it's not about fiscal responsibility. It's about control. They want to control what books are in our library and they want to stifle resistance from our library staff. They want book selection in the hands of political appointees and library operations in the hands of a company where they control the terms of the contract.
Does this sound familiar? It should. We all learned about this when studying the world history of the early 20th century. We all saw it happen in real time in Turkey and Hungary in the last several decades.
They are running the authoritarian playbook and we're seeing this happen across our country at all levels of government. It's death by a thousand paper cuts.
You've probably heard the story of how to boil a frog: you don't put the frog in boiling water — it will immediately hop out. You put the frog in tepid water and slowly raise the temperature, bit by bit, so the frog doesn't notice until it's too late.
Don't be a frog.
Let's stop this right now: Vote 'yes' on Measure A and vote 'yes' on Measure B.
David RynersonHuntington Beach
I am a longtime resident of Huntington Beach and I'm also proud to say a retired public school teacher.
Please vote 'yes' on Measures A and B in the current special election.
A 'yes' vote on Measure A protects parents' rights by letting them decide what their children read instead of a politically appointed committee. It also protects against government overreach by maintaining the current system of educated and trained library staff managing and curating our book selection.
Measure B protects public operation of our libraries by requiring a vote by the electorate to make a change to our current system which has operated effectively and freely for over 100 years!
'Yes' on A and B is what is best for our H.B. community and parents' rights while also protecting our children.
Thank you to the 'yes' on A and B voters in H.B. who have helped to preserve our freedoms!
Laura SireHuntington Beach
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
10 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
East Chicago honors Hispanic political pioneers Jesse and Rosemarie Gomez
The 3800 block of Grand Boulevard in East Chicago now honors Jesse and Rosemarie Gomez, both Hispanic pioneers in politics. Jesse was the first Hispanic elected official in Indiana, Councilman Robert Garcia said. Rosemarie became the first Hispanic woman to serve on the East Chicago City Council after her husband died in 1979. Garcia represents the district that the Gomezes once did. The City Council approved the resolution last year, but getting everyone together for Friday's dedication of the new sign for Jesse & Rosemarie Gomez Way took time. 'We stand on the back of those elected officials,' Garcia said. 'I stand on the shoulders of their leadership and their legacy.' Their son, also named Jesse Gomez but with a different middle name, followed in his parents' footsteps, serving on both the city council and now on the school board. Gomez told his parents' story. 'My father's family arrived here in East Chicago from Mexico as trailblazers in 1916, and he was born here on April 14, 1920,' Gomez said. At age 12, Gomez's father and his family returned to Zacatecas, Mexico, later attending the University of Mexico, where he focused on political science. With the impending start of World War II, he returned to East Chicago to register for the draft and work at Inland Steel. After he left the mill, he worked as an insurance agent, an editorial writer for two Spanish-language newspapers, a radio announcer for WJOB's Spanish-language 'Hora Mexicana' program, and as a health inspector for the city. In 1963, he was elected 6th District councilman, the first Hispanic elected to political office in the state's history. He was re-elected to three additional consecutive terms, Gomez said, eventually becoming the 5th District councilman. 'Time with an elected official is interesting,' Gomez said. 'As a youngster, I remember that we often had a table set for eight at dinner – two for my parents, four for the children and one for the live-in family friend, Joe. The eighth seat was reserved for someone else, usually an immigrant who was first making their way here to East Chicago from Mexico, Puerto Rico or somewhere across the Atlantic.' 'My father was a good dancer, a great sketch artist, a fantastic chess player, a horrible joke teller and, in his mind, the greatest soccer player in the world,' Gomez said. Gomez rattled off a long list of achievements during his father's career, including serving as a Spanish language volunteer for the Pan-American Games and project coordinator for the East Chicago Vietnam Veterans Memorial, not to mention service twice as City Council president. 'That's a lot for one person to do in a lifetime. My father achieved that during his short time here on Earth,' Gomez said. The elder Jesse died Aug. 31, 1979, at age 59. Rosemarie was born Jan. 14, 1926, in Saltillo, Mexico. While she was young, her family moved back and forth between the United States and Mexico. She attended East Chicago public schools but left early to work at Inland Steel to help her family financially, Gomez said. She later returned to school and graduated from Washington High School. In 1939, Rosemarie portrayed the Statue of Liberty during the Mexican Independence Day Parade. The next year, she served as queen of that parade. Rosemarie, 99, has her own long list of accomplishments and involvement in the community. 'My mother was a great cook, a fantastic gardener, and she is one of the most loving, kind and considerate people that you ever will meet,' Gomez said. One day, Gomez said, his father told Rosemarie she needed to become an American citizen, which she did. 'My mother later found out that the reason he asked her to do that was so that years later she could vote for him when he first ran for the City Council, a race he won,' Gomez said. 'Together, my parents were trailblazers, in similar fashion to the way their parents were,' Gomez said. 'They were kind of the Hispanic version of John and Jackie Kennedy.'
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
City of Virginia Beach to inform voters of 10-1 system during Nov. 4 election
NOTE: This video is previous coverage from 7/1/25 VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (WAVY) – The city of Virginia Beach informed voters Thursday that a referendum question will be on the ballot regarding the 10-1 system. The question will read: '' A 'yes' vote means that you support the 10-1 system, which was used in the 2022 and 2024 city council elections. In the 10-1 system, the city is divided into 10 districts and the voters of each district elect a single council member with the mayor elected at-large (city-wide). A 'no' vote means you support the 7-3-1 system described in the current city charter as modified by a general law change that occurred in 2021. In the modified 7-3-1 system, the city is divided into 7 districts and the voters of each district elect a single council member, with three other council members and the mayor elected at-large (city-wide). On July 1, a 2023 vote taken by City Council on the 10-1 system was ruled as void by a judge, but the decision on what system to use to elect council and School Board members was put off. 'Every voting change we've ever had in our city, beginning with the merger in 1963, the citizens of Virginia Beach have determined by referendum their voting system,' former City Council member Linwood Branch said. 'We broke with precedent this time, but I'm glad seven members of council are now going to get us back to having the citizens have that opportunity. It's their vote. It's no one else's.' Resources will be listed on the referendum website to explain why the question is on the ballot, along with frequently asked questions and recordings of City Council meetings and materials from the meetings. Additional information will be provided leading up to Sept. 19, which is the start of early voting. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Churches, politics, and taxes
One need not explicitly preach that one political candidate should be chosen over another. Let the Bible readings and the Gospel be the springboards for reminding those in the pews about their Jesus-established obligations and which politicians support those obligations. Advertisement Many parishioners go to church to be nourished in their faith and seek a heavenly destination. These are good reasons. Nevertheless, while politics brought into church can make our celebrations an extension of the upsetting news we are all confronted with every day, that confrontation is necessary when the news screams of hatred, cruelty, fear, racism, hellish political decisions, and evil, inhuman behavior, such as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up David Pierce Sandwich IRS's pivot ushers in a new set of concerns The simple but irksome question 'Do we really want churches to become more political?' hastened me to express an angst-ridden response: No — never. Eugene Scott raised the question in the context of the recent decision by the IRS to relax the constraints of the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which prohibited churches and other tax-exempt organizations from endorsing political candidates. Advertisement My disposition changed when I got to Scott's reference to Governor Gavin Newsom of California, who recently voiced his opinion regarding the revised interpretation of the Johnson Amendment. Newsom said, 'I don't know if it's healthy — I don't even know if it's legal, but it's not surprising. I just find it politically convenient.' He added, 'It's called gaming the system — in every way.' His terse but judicious statement brought a smile back to my face. With keen insight, Scott notes that 'this pivot' by the IRS 'is not as sharp of a turn as some proponents of the separation of church and state may believe, because, for better or worse, pastors have used their pulpits to make political stances for decades. This is in part because politicians often make decisions that can positively impact churches — allowing them to receive federal dollars.' As a Catholic octogenarian who goes to church frequently, I have never had a priest speak from the pulpit other than on the Gospel without any reference whatsoever to any other cause. However, I believe Scott makes a valid point. Francis J. Hickey II Lexington Online debate: From 'pastors walk a fine line' to who is 'we'? Following is an edited sampling of comments posted on Eugene Scott's op-ed: Churches are splitting apart as congregants, many of whom have known each other for decades, feel their pastors aren't political enough or are too political. Pastors walk a fine line, always in the shadow of either getting fired or losing members. We get so caught up in what is seen, which is temporary, that we forget to pay attention to what is unseen, which is eternal. Yes, the Gospel does provide a moral architecture that guides us in this temporal world, but telling people how to vote on gender identity, or equating Christianity with 'patriotism,' or concluding that a person's believing Christian evangelical theology means they must be MAGA —intolerance cuts both ways — is not Gospel. (EW Piper) Advertisement First question: Who is 'we' in the headline 'Do we really want churches to become more political?' (TerwilligerBuntsOne) Churches can become political when they pay taxes like you and me. (tipinnh) There are three religious truths: 1) Jews do not recognize Jesus as the Messiah. 2) Protestants do not recognize the pope as the leader of the Christian faith. 3) Baptists do not recognize each other in the liquor store or at Hooters. — Author Unknown (pgerlings)
