Energy bills swollen by Scottish windfarm switch off costs
However, critics focused on the revelation that the Westminster administration planned to use £2.5bn allocated to the fledgling Great British Energy operation to fund work on a new generation of small modular nuclear reactors.
SNP supporters slammed the move which they claimed would leave a big hole in the £8.3bn budget that GB Energy had promised would be used to support the development of technologies such as floating offshore wind and tidal energy.
Keir Starmer decided to put the official headquarters of GB Energy in Aberdeen to mollify critics of his cabinet's decision to curb oil and gas activity.
But the SNP Government has opposed North Sea field developments that could create thousands of jobs.
It has pinned its hopes on the expansion of wind power, which acting climate change minister Alasdair Allan claimed recently could create thousands of high-quality jobs in support of a just transition from dependence on oil and gas. The number of renewables jobs created in Scotland, however, has fallen below expectations for years.
READ MORE: Just transition furore reignited as SNP Government flounders
Mr Allan put the onus on the UK Government to help accelerate windfarm development in Scotland by improving the support provided for developers under the flagship Contracts for Difference programme.
Energy secretary Ed Miliband has held out the prospect that the budget for the forthcoming CfD allocation round will be much bigger than the £1.6bn set for the last one.
The costs will be added to the bills of householders regardless of their income.
But figures from the body that regulates the national energy system show bill payers have reason to be concerned about the wisdom of accelerating a programme that imposes costs on them that many can't afford.
The National Energy System Operator revealed that the size of the bill it has to pay to deal with supply issues stemming from the fact that output from renewables such as windfarms is intermittent soared to £2.7bn in the latest year from £2.5bn in the preceding period.
The balancing payments include amounts that NESO pays to compensate windfarm operators that are asked to constrain generation when there is insufficient demand. They also include payments made to operators of gas fired power stations to increase output when there is not enough wind power to meet energy requirements.
READ MORE: Israeli-owned firm takes control of UK's biggest gas field
NESO said the increase was driven by a rise in constraint costs and made clear that this was largely due to the fact that so much windfarm capacity has been added in Scotland although demand is much higher south of the border.
'Whilst payments to generators are distributed throughout the country the cause of cost is concentrated in Scotland,' it said.
The organisation underlined the absurdity of the situation we find ourselves in after rushing to develop windfarms without ensuring the required infrastructure was in place to transport the power produced to where it is needed or to store it.
The Seagreen windfarm off the Angus coast became fully operational in 2023 (Image: SSE)
Noting that wind curtailment is currently a major driver of balancing costs, NESO said: 'This is because a large proportion of wind capacity in GB is connected in Scotland, which at present is a constrained region of the network.
'This means that when wind generation is high we must take actions to turn down wind output and turn on replacement energy in unconstrained regions to keep the system balanced.'
The NESO report emphasises that the costs resulting from this situation fall on householders.
In 2024/25 balancing charges added around £3 a month to a typical domestic electricity bill.
That may not sound much but household bills are also inflated by other charges such as those related to CfDs and the Climate Change Levy.
NESO's analysis indicates that developing more windfarms will make things worse for the time being.
It warned: 'Balancing costs are expected to rise in the short term, reaching a peak of ~£8bn in 2030.'
Part of the solution will involve a massive expansion of electricity transportation networks in the face of potential opposition from locals in areas affected and of storage facilities. However, energy giants such as SSE and Drax have made clear they will only make the hefty investment required to develop hydro storage facilities if the UK Government provides enough support for revenues to ensure they can generate strong returns.
READ MORE: Scottish hydropower hopes fade amid threats to bumper projects
This all means that power generation assets that can ensure the country can keep the lights on irrespective of weather conditions will be required for years.
The case for SSE to be allowed to develop a new gas fired power station at Peterhead has been strengthened after the UK Government agreed to provide £200m initial development funding for the Acorn carbon capture scheme. This will take emissions from the plant for storage in depleted reservoirs in the North Sea.
Friends of the Earth Scotland insists the Peterhead plant would be a climate disaster and has berated the Scottish Government for failing to properly interrogate SSE's assurances about related emissions.
The organisation is bitterly opposed to plans for the Scottish carbon capture cluster which it reckons could be used to excuse continued production of oil and gas.
The SNP Government, however, has spent years pressing UK ministers to fund the Scottish cluster, which could cost around £12bn to develop in full.
Scottish Gas owner Centrica recently underlined the scale of expected demand for gas by agreeing a £20 billion deal to secure supplies from Norway until 2035.
That deal may have been timely as oil and gas prices have soared in the wake of Israel launching attacks on Iran last week.
READ MORE: SNP Government oil hypocrisy shocking amid Scottish jobs cull
Against that backdrop it makes sense for the UK to maximise production of its own oil and gas.
The case for investing in nuclear plants that can provide baseload power is also reinforced by concerns about the UK's dependence on imports of oil and gas.
Nuclear plants take years to develop but could remain operational for decades. Add in the fact that work on a plant could create thousands of construction jobs and many more in the supply chain and it is little wonder the SNP Government is under pressure from trades unions to abandon its opposition to the development of nuclear power stations in Scotland.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
DAN HODGES: Keir Starmer's time as Prime Minister is over. This is everything I've heard about his U-turns, confusion and lack of leadership behind-the-scenes. Deep down, even he knows he's done
To be fair, Keir Starmer did better than Liz Truss. Her benighted premiership lasted 49 days. His has effectively ended after 11 months, almost six whole terms in Truss Years. But make no mistake, Starmer's premiership is indeed over. Yes, he'll stumble on, 'in office, but not in power' to borrow Norman Lamont's evergreen description of the steady, irreversible erosion of Prime Ministerial authority.
Powys County Times
3 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Starmer: Labour will not take away ‘safety net' from vulnerable people
Sir Keir Starmer has said 'everyone agrees' the welfare system needs to be fixed but that Labour will not 'take away the safety net' that vulnerable people rely on. In a speech to the Welsh Labour conference that came after a major U-turn on reforms in the face of a backbench rebellion, he said fixing the 'broken' system must be done in a 'Labour way'. 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work,' the Prime Minister said. 'Everyone agrees that our welfare system is broken: failing people every day, a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control. 'Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way.' He called Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan a 'fierce champion' and 'the best person to lead Wales into the future' to applause and cheers from the audience. Baroness Morgan had publicly criticised the welfare plans and called for Sir Keir to change tack on restrictions on winter fuel payments, which he also eventually reversed. Sir Keir Starmer told the BBC she was 'right to raise concerns' and promised to 'deliver on those as far as we can'. In her speech to the conference, Baroness Morgan said she was pleased the Government listened to her concerns and reversed planned welfare cuts. 'I'm glad the UK Government is a listening government and they heard our concerns and changed their approach to welfare cuts,' she said. 'We were really concerned about the impact these changes could have on some of our poorest and most vulnerable communities, and we made that clear to our colleagues in Westminster. 'And I am really glad they listened because that decision brings huge and welcome relief to thousands of people in Wales who rely on this support to live with dignity.' Farmers gathered outside the conference in Llandudno to protest ahead of Sir Keir's speech, with about 20 tractors parked on the promenade in the north Wales resort town by late morning. Later, some 150 protesters joined a march for Palestine outside the conference, walking solemnly to the venue where they stood for a few minutes to the beat of a drum. A small group of pro-Israel protesters shouted 'free the hostages' and held signs saying 'free Gazans from Hamas'. Sir Keir also said any deal between the Tories, Reform UK and Plaid Cymru at next year's key elections in Wales would amount to a 'backroom stitch-up'. The elections to the Senedd will use a proportional system for the first time, meaning coalitions are likely. The Prime Minister said it would risk a 'return to the chaos and division of the last decade' and risk rolling back the progress his party is starting to make. He told the Llandudno conference it would be 'working families left to pick up the bill'. 'Whether that's with Reform or with Plaid's determination to cut Wales off from the rest of the country, with no plan to put Wales back together,' he said. 'I know that these are the parties that talk a big game, but who is actually delivering?' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has not ruled out making deals with Plaid Cymru or Reform at the next Senedd election. Reform UK is eyeing an opportunity to end Labour's 26 years of domination in the Welsh Parliament. Labour performed poorly in this year's local elections in England, which saw Nigel Farage's party win a swathe of council seats. Sir Keir also took aim at Mr Farage, calling him a 'wolf in Wall Street clothing' who has 'no idea what he's talking about'. He said the Reform UK leader 'isn't interested in Wales' and has no viable plan for the blast furnaces at Port Talbot. More than half of voters think Labour has underperformed since Sir Keir became prime minister, polling released on Saturday showed. The Opinium survey showed 54% think Labour has done a worse job than expected, while 18% think the party has exceeded expectations.
North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
PM ‘incapable of sticking to a decision' after welfare U-turn
The reforms would only have made 'modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill', but Sir Keir Starmer was 'too weak to hold the line', the Conservative Party leader is expected to say. In a speech to the Local Government Association Annual Conference in Liverpool on Wednesday, Ms Badenoch will criticise Sir Keir for creating a 'punishing welfare trap that shuts people out of going back to work'. 'This week, the Prime Minister backed down on limited reforms that would have made modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill,' she will say. 'He was too weak to hold the line. 'The result? A punishing welfare trap that shuts people out of going back to work. 'Right now, Labour are making everything worse. And Keir Starmer sums up exactly what's wrong with politics today. 'Now that his backbenchers smell blood, there's almost certainly another climb down on the two-child benefit cap in the offing. 'Labour told us 'the adults were back in charge', but this is actually amateur hour. The Prime Minister is incapable of sticking to a decision. 'If he can't make relatively small savings to a benefits bill that is set to exceed £100 billion by 2030, how can we expect him to meet his promised 5% defence spending, or ever take the tough decisions necessary to bring down the national debt?' On Saturday, the Prime Minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'. In a speech to the Welsh Labour conference, he said: 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work,' the Prime Minister said. 'Everyone agrees that our welfare system is broken: failing people every day, a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control. 'Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way.'
