
US government proposes easing some restrictions on drones traveling long distances
The federal government had already approved 657 waivers to allow companies such as Amazon and major utilities to do this in certain circumstances, but the waiver process made it difficult.
The industry has long pressed for the rule because being able to operate drones out of sight opens up a multitude of possibilities for their use. Being able to do this enables more use of drones for deliveries, inspecting infrastructure like bridges and power lines and other uses in agriculture over thousands of acres on large farms.
'This draft rule is a critical step toward enabling drone operations that will enhance safety, transform commercial services, and strengthen public safety with drones as a force multiplier," said Michael Robbins, president & CEO of the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International trade group.
The rule spells out the circumstances drones can be used under while working to ensure they don't disrupt aviation and cause problems around airports, Federal Aviation Administration Administrator Bryan Bedford said.
'We are making the future of our aviation a reality and unleashing American drone dominance. From drones delivering medicine to unmanned aircraft surveying crops, this technology will fundamentally change the way we interact with the world,' Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said.
President Donald Trump issued executive orders in June directing the Transportation Department to quickly get this rule out. The orders also included restrictions meant to help protect against terrorism, espionage and public safety threats.
Drones are already used in a variety of ways, including bolstering search and rescue operations, applying fertilizer, inspecting power lines and railroad bridges, and even delivering packages.
But the war in Ukraine has highlighted how drones could be used in a military or terrorist attack — a concern as the World Cup and Olympics approach in the U.S. There also have been espionage cases where drones have been used to surveil sensitive sites. And White House officials said drones are being used to smuggle drugs over the border, and there are concerns about the potential for a disastrous collision between a drone and an airliner around an airport.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Richmond Confederate statues removed in 2020 head to LA
The peed-on Jefferson Davis statue that protesters took down in 2020 is temporarily moving out of Richmond. Why it matters: It's one of several of Richmond's Confederate monuments being shipped to Los Angeles for an exhibit about how these statues — and their recent removal from public spaces — have shaped American history. Driving the news: The Valentine announced Monday that the Confederate Statespresident's statue, displayed at the Richmond museum for over three years, is headed to the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art on Aug. 17. Then on Tuesday, the Black History Museum in Jackson Ward said it's also loaning the LA exhibit Confederate-era monuments that the city took down in 2020. These include the "Vindicatrix" sculpture known as "Miss Confederacy" that sat atop the Davis monument, the Matthew Fontaine Maury statue and globe, and granite slabs from different Confederate monument bases. The pieces will be "recontextualized" in the exhibit to "foster critical dialogue about their historical significance and the ideologies they represent," the museum said in a news release. Zoom out: The exhibit, which runs from October to April, starts months after the Trump administration ordered a federal review of the statues toppled in the wake of George Floyd's murder. The city owns the land where the Confederate monuments in Richmond, the former capital of the Confederacy, once stood. And most of the taken-down monuments remain in the city's wastewater treatment plant. What's next: The Valentine is closing its survey about people's feelings regarding the monuments' removal, and where they should be moved, on Aug. 18. Results will be shared by the end of October.


The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Watch live: Trump signs executive order on Olympics 2028 task force
President Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Tuesday afternoon to establish a task force ahead of the 2028 Olympic Games. The games will be held in Los Angeles, the first Olympics to be hosted in the U.S. since the 2002 Winter Games in Salt Lake City. Trump earlier this year signed another order to bar transgender athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports, fulfilling one of his campaign promises. Those individuals will also face exclusion from the 2028 Summer Olympics and Paralympics. 'The President considers it a great honor to oversee this global sporting spectacle in his second term,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. 'Sports is one of President Trump's greatest passions, and his athletic expertise, combined with his unmatched hospitality experience will make these Olympic events the most exciting and memorable in history.' The event is scheduled to begin at 4 p.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.


The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
The ‘Art of the Deal' author keeps getting out-negotiated by Putin and Xi
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me over and over? I might as well surrender. Back in the day, even before he took office for the first time in 2017, President-elect Trump sent a clear message to Communist China and the world that he was not one to be hindered by convention or well-established protocols that no longer made sense — at least to him. Thus, when he received a congratulatory telephone call from Taiwan's then-president Tsai Ing-wen, herself only in office for eight months, he accepted it routinely and graciously, like any of the other good wishes received from world leaders. He dismissed the cautions from his advisers that, ever since President Jimmy Carter broke off diplomatic relations in 1979 with the Republic of China (Taiwan's official name), high-ranking American officials simply do not have direct contact with Taiwanese counterparts. He brusquely told those with the raised eyebrows that he would speak with anyone he chose to. His refreshing message of defiance gave hope to Taiwanese and their supporters in the U.S. and around the world. The new sheriff in town, it seemed, would do a lot less diplomatic pussyfooting regarding Beijing's supposed sensitivities about all things Taiwan. For the next four years, Trump was supported in his more direct approach — toward both Taiwan and China — by a superb national security team of truth-telling China 'hawks.' These included Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, successive National Security Advisors John Bolton and Robert O'Brien, their deputy Matt Pottinger, Assistant Secretary Randy Shriver, and a range of other mid-level foreign policy and national security officials who shared clear-eyed views about the manifold threats posed by the regime of the Chinese Communist Party. After his second election, the new incoming Trump administration did not announce a congratulatory phone call from Taiwan's new president, William Lai Ching-te — either because Lai had been advised by U.S. officials not to initiate one and thereby irritate China, or because (less likely) the call occurred but was not publicized. A less ambiguous explanation pertains to the Trump team's decision not to allow Lai to make a New York stopover during his planned trip to South America, now canceled by the embarrassed Taiwanese president. Trump's rejection of Lai's brief pass-though visit breaks several years of U.S. tradition, a favorite Trump practice. But this disruption, instead of advancing Taiwan's short-term advantage and America's long-term interest, represents a significant step backward in the U.S.-Taiwan relationship. It was clearly taken to set the stage for Trump-Xi trade talks and Trump's hoped-for visit to Beijing. There may be an even more sinister explanation for cancellation of Lai's travel. Purely conjectural at this point is the possibility that intelligence sources detected a Chinese threat against Lai and recommended a prudent cancellation of his travel, with public reports from both the U.S. and Taiwan sides providing a convenient cover story. Even the most innocent explanation of Lai's aborted stopover is an inauspicious indication of how Trump will calculate his balancing of U.S. interests between China and Taiwan. It may also reflect the role of Trump's undersecretary of policy at the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, who long opposed the Biden administration's flow of arms to Ukraine as a diversion of resources Taiwan needs to deter or defend against Chinese aggression. At his confirmation hearing, Colby said that Taiwan is 'important' to U.S. interests, but 'not existential.' It is a new and cramped understanding of U.S. interests which depend heavily on the international perception of U.S. credibility and its incalculable value in reassuring allies and deterring adversaries. The danger of diminished credibility was demonstrated with Biden's disastrous abandonment of Afghanistan, which was followed within months by Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine. The harm to America's reputation was only partially undone by Trump's dramatic strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities last month. But doubts about U.S. credibility remain because the Iran operation, while hardly a pinprick like so many prior military strikes, may have been a one-off, not to be repeated, and Iran defiantly continues restoring and advancing its nuclear program. The dangerous Taiwan analogue would be, for example, a Chinese seizure of Quemoy or some other Taiwanese island, or a Chinese blockade, followed by a largely symbolic U.S. military strike that fails to convince Beijing to back off. Washington's dilemma then would be whether to escalate the kinetics and risk derailing the trade talks and Trump's Beijing visit, or to accept the new status quo. It illustrates the increased leverage Trump has foolishly granted Xi and the erosion of diplomatic standing he has gratuitously inflicted on Taiwan. China has its own cards to play, of course, including withholding rare-earth minerals critically-needed by the U.S. defense industry. The U.S. cannot afford to buckle under those pressures without further eroding overall security credibility. Trump only recently acknowledged that he was frequently taken in by Putin's empty promises about ending the war in Ukraine — just as he strongly implied in 2019 that Xi had deceived him about the nature and origins of COVID. Yet, in both cases, he returned time and again to placing his trust in the dictators' words and relying on their nonexistent good faith. Worse, the converse of his credulity with America's authoritarian adversaries is reflected in his apparent contempt for our democratic friends and allies in Ukraine and Taiwan. While Trump's recent comments indicate he may have finally seen the light on Putin, his pursuit of a trade deal and quest for a China invitation suggest another double-win for China. China has managed to achieve these so-called win-wins during every U.S. presidential trip since Richard Nixon's. In exchange for allowing a Trump visit this time, Beijing will extract added U.S. concessions during the trade talks–beyond, e.g., Trump's 'flexibility on Tik-Tok, at the same time it benefits from U.S. deference to China on Taiwan. To borrow Trump's assessment of most of his predecessors, this is the way to Make America 'Stupid' Again. The only way Trump can restore America's lost credibility and deter a tragic miscalculation by China is to declare clearly and publicly that he will commit all the military force necessary to defend Taiwan. Joseph A. Bosco served as China country director in the office of the secretary of defense,2005-2006. He is a member of the advisory board of the Vandenberg Coalition and the Global Taiwan Institute.