logo
SpaceX's Starship explodes in Texas during preparations for 10th test flight

SpaceX's Starship explodes in Texas during preparations for 10th test flight

Yahoo19-06-2025

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
SpaceX's newest Starship vehicle just went up in smoke.
The company was testing a Starship upper stage at its Starbase site in South Texas on Wednesday night (June 18), to prepare for the megarocket's upcoming 10th flight test.
But something went very wrong, as video captured by NASASpaceflight.com shows: The vehicle exploded, sending a massive fireball high into the dark Texas skies.
SpaceX acknowledged the incident in an X post early on Thursday morning (June 19), noting that it occurred around 11 p.m. local time (midnight EDT and 0400 GMT on June 19).
"A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for," SpaceX added in the post. "Our Starbase team is actively working to safe the test site and the immediate surrounding area in conjunction with local officials. There are no hazards to residents in surrounding communities, and we ask that individuals do not attempt to approach the area while safing operations continue."
SpaceX is developing Starship, the biggest and most powerful rocket ever built, to help humanity colonize Mars, among other ambitious exploration tasks.
The vehicle consists of two elements, both of which are designed to be fully and rapidly reusable — a first-stage booster called Super Heavy and a 171-foot-tall (52 meters) upper-stage spacecraft known as Starship, or simply Ship.
It was Ship that exploded on Wednesday night, on a test stand at Starbase's Massey site (not the orbital launch mount, from which Starship liftoffs occur). According to NASASpaceflight, which closely monitors Starship activity at Starbase, the anomaly occurred just before Ship was set to perform a static-fire test.
Static fires are common prelaunch tests, in which a rocket's engines are briefly ignited while the vehicle remains anchored to the ground. SpaceX had already conducted a static fire with this Ship, though that trial involved just one of its Raptor engines; this test may have been intended to fire up all six of them.
SpaceX has also already static-fired the Flight 10 Super Heavy booster, successfully igniting all 33 of its Raptors.
Related Stories:
— SpaceX reached space with Starship Flight 9 launch, then lost control of its giant spaceship (video)
— Starship and Super Heavy explained
— Elon Musk says SpaceX will launch its biggest Starship yet this year, but Mars in 2026 is '50/50'
Wednesday night's explosion continued a string of setbacks for Starship upper stages. Ship has broken apart on the last three Starship test flights, which launched in January, March and May of this year.
On Flight 7 and Flight 8, the "rapid unscheduled disassembly" occurred less than 10 minutes after liftoff. Ship flew significantly farther on Flight 9; SpaceX lost contact with the vehicle about 46 minutes after liftoff, and its pieces are likely resting on the Indian Ocean seabed.
Super Heavy has performed better. On Flight 7 and Flight 8, for example, the booster returned to Starbase after launch for a dramatic catch by the launch tower's "chopstick" arms. The Flight 7 Super Heavy flew again on Flight 9, notching a major reusability milestone for the Starship program. (SpaceX did not attempt to recover the booster on Flight 9, and it broke apart as it was coming in for a planned "hard splashdown" in the Gulf of Mexico.)
SpaceX is still looking into what happened on Flight 9, an investigation overseen by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. So there was not yet an official target launch date for Starship Flight 10 — and, if there had been, it would now have to be revised after the events of Wednesday night.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Moto G Stylus 2025 gets so much right that I don't miss my flagship
The Moto G Stylus 2025 gets so much right that I don't miss my flagship

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Moto G Stylus 2025 gets so much right that I don't miss my flagship

It's been two months since I reviewed the Moto G Stylus 2025, and I'm still impressed. I picked the phone back up last week to see what stood out to me after recently using flagship phones like the Motorola Razr Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. No one would confuse those more expensive devices with the midrange power found on the Moto G Stylus 2025, but you'd be surprised. I expected compromises when moving back to the Moto G Stylus, and they were there. But I was unbothered by them. Highlighting value in midrange and budget phones is what I enjoy most about my job, and the Moto G Stylus 2025 is a prime example of how much you can get for your money. If you're unsure which smartphone you should buy next, here's why this midrange Moto should be near the top of your list for $400. Motorola made efforts to improve durability across its entire 2025 lineup, and the Moto G Stylus is no exception. I would never confuse it with a flagship phone made from premium materials, but it can withstand a few drops without breaking apart. This year's G Stylus is IP68 dust- and water-resistant and MIL-STD-810H compliant for drop testing. Your best bet for protecting your phone is still a case, but sometimes I want to enjoy the design of my device, and Motorola has made that safer this year. I'm using the Samsung Galaxy A36 for an upcoming review. It features a high-quality AMOLED panel, but the Moto G Stylus 2025 has a vibrancy and brightness it can't match. Motorola fitted the G Stylus with a fantastic 6.7-inch OLED screen with a 1220 x 2712 Super HD resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate. It looks incredible, and I can say it's the most impressive display I've seen on a device under $400. It becomes even more remarkable when I consider that the Moto G Stylus will be available for most of its lifecycle for around $300 new. Moto puts the best displays on budget and midrange devices, and the G Stylus 2025 proves this. I'm pleased with the performance I get from the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 in the Moto G Stylus. The phone's 8GB of RAM also keeps things running smoothly, and I'm glad Motorola recognizes the importance of more RAM in budget phones. The aforementioned Galaxy A36 only has 6GB of RAM, and even with the same powerplant, I can tell the difference in performance — the G Stylus is snappier. If you're a big gamer, you might consider spending a few extra dollars on the OnePlus 13R or an older flagship, but for productivity apps and daily tasks, the G Stylus is excellent. I love that I can easily stretch my Moto G Stylus 2025's battery life for two days if needed, often ending a second day of mixed use with 20% battery remaining. Software's still a mixed bag with the Moto G Stylus, but it has nothing to do with Hello UI or Android 15. I enjoy Moto's flavor of Android, and the company does an excellent job balancing added features and a stock experience. I wish the company didn't lean so heavily on AI, as I think it's wasted effort at this point, but overall, Moto does a solid job. Unfortunately, software support is weak, and although I've made peace with it, it remains a negative aspect of the phone. You might not care, and if you're trading your phone in after two or three years, taking advantage of the next juicy Motorola carrier deal, it's not something that would prevent you from making a purchase. I love that I can easily stretch my Moto G Stylus 2025's battery life for two days if needed, often ending a second day of mixed use with 20% battery remaining. Its 5,000mAh cell combined with a power-efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 does the job, and I'm still getting similar performance two months later. The 68W wired charging helps me top off quickly, and the 15W wireless charging is an unexpected perk from a Motorola device in this price range. I'm impressed with the shots I get from the 50MP primary sensor on the G Stylus. Images are saturated and crisp in good lighting. Sure, the 13MP ultrawide photos fall off, but the 50MP main camera makes up for it, giving excellent, Instagram-ready photos that'll please your friends. It's not a Pixel, but I'm not expecting it to be, especially if I can grab one on a carrier deal or a sale later in the year. More people should consider using budget and midrange Motorola phones. The company does a fantastic job blending value and performance, and we need more competition here in the US. I promise that Samsung and Google aren't the only Android manufacturers making solid smartphones, and the Moto G Stylus 2025 is an excellent opportunity to break the cycle and try something new.

Bitcoin Soars, Altcoins Fade in $300 Billion Crypto Shakeout
Bitcoin Soars, Altcoins Fade in $300 Billion Crypto Shakeout

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bitcoin Soars, Altcoins Fade in $300 Billion Crypto Shakeout

(Bloomberg) -- On the face of it, 2025 looks like a banner year for crypto: Bitcoin hitting a record, an industry-boosting US president whose family is venturing headlong into the sector, and key legislation widely expected to be passed by Congress. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown But look beyond the bullish headlines and the rally in Bitcoin, and a vastly different landscape comes into view. Most of the so-called altcoins once touted as competitors to the original cryptoasset are nursing steep declines, with more than $300 billion of market value wiped out so far this year. The sea of red points to a wider malaise that's forcing parts of the industry to confront existential questions. Crypto was imagined by early enthusiasts as a universe where a host of coins competed for investor money, offering a diverse set of use cases. But as Bitcoin reigns supreme, that's giving way to predictions that large swathes of the sector will become a digital wasteland. 'I think they're just going to die, frankly,' Nick Philpott, co-founder of trading platform Zodia Markets, said of altcoins. 'They'll just wither away. Technically, a lot of this stuff will just sit there and gather dust in perpetuity.' Bitcoin's share of the total market value of cryptoassets has climbed by nine percentage points this year to 64%, the highest since January 2021, according to CoinMarketCap. Back then, cryptocurrencies were a largely unregulated space, crypto lending was roaring with few safeguards and nonfungible tokens were just starting to take off. In sharp contrast, altcoins — the catch-all term for all digital assets outside of Bitcoin and stablecoins — are faltering. A MarketVector index tracking the bottom half of the largest 100 digital assets, which more than doubled in the aftermath of Donald Trump's Nov. 5 election victory, has since given up all those gains and is down around 50% in 2025. With Bitcoin soaking up the bulk of capital flows from investors in exchange-traded funds, other parts of the market are increasingly left behind. Even Ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency, remains about 50% below its all-time high after a modest rebound fueled by inflows to spot ETFs investing in the token. 'Historically, Bitcoin's moved and then that's passed down into altcoins,' said Jake Ostrovskis, an OTC trader at Wintermute. 'We've not really seen that yet this cycle.' Crypto is no stranger to mass extinction events. The 2022 market crash, punctuated by the implosions of algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD and Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX exchange, led to the demise of hundreds of projects. Thousands of coins still exist on their blockchains, with little or no activity — relegated to the status of 'ghost chains' in crypto parlance. What's different this time is that crypto is becoming a more regulated, institutionally-driven marketplace, and that stablecoins appear to be the only tokens with a real shot at achieving means-of-payment status, due to the fact that they eliminate volatility. In the past year alone, the market value of stablecoins has swelled by $47 billion, and some of the world's largest banks are entering the field. The Wall Street Journal reported this month that Inc. is studying a potential stablecoin. That's putting pressure on altcoin projects to find ways to shore up their status and appeal to a wider base of investors. 'I've talked to a couple of projects that have been thinking about merging foundations, putting it up for governance, saying, 'Hey, we can now be governed under this other authority' — that authority being another altcoin community,' said Kanyi Maqubela, managing partner at venture capital firm Kindred Ventures. The shifting tides are also reflected in corporate behavior. Modeled on Michael Saylor's Strategy, a new breed of Bitcoin accumulators has emerged. In April, a special-purpose acquisition company affiliated with Cantor Fitzgerald LP partnered with Tether Holdings SA and SoftBank to launch Twenty One Capital Inc., seeded with nearly $4 billion in Bitcoin. The Trump family, which is also getting involved in Bitcoin mining, has raised $2.3 billion via Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. to create a Bitcoin treasury. While similar vehicles have been set up recently to accumulate smaller tokens like Ether, Solana and BNB, they are much smaller. Glimmers of Hope Not all altcoins are floundering. Tokens like Maker and Hyperliquid that are linked to thriving decentralized-finance protocols have notched big gains this year. 'There's certainly a subset of the market doing incredibly well — generally companies with real businesses, real revenues, and those revenues are being used to buy back tokens,' said Jeff Dorman, chief investment officer of digital asset investment firm Arca. There's also the prospect of more favorable regulations. The potential for US Securities and Exchange Commission approval of ETFs backed by coins like Solana are stirring hopes of wider adoption. Another possible catalyst is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, informally referred to as crypto's market structure bill. The CLARITY Act aims to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework, including delineating responsibilities between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the SEC. 'The Clarity Act has the potential to do for altcoins what ETFs did for Bitcoin and Ethereum: provide the regulatory legitimacy that unlocks real institutional capital,' said Ira Auerbach, a senior executive at Offchain Labs. Yet according to Maqubela, the issue ultimately boils down to utility. He compares Bitcoin to gold and Ether to copper — the former has a capped final supply and the latter's blockchain underpins much of crypto's functionality — and says most altcoins are stuck in a sort of twilight zone, underpinned by big promises and not much else. 'I think a lot of them are going to whittle down to zero because they were driven by speculation without that mimetic value like Bitcoin, and they tried to be utilitarian without achieving any real scale,' he said. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Does a Mamdani Victory and Bezos Blowback Mean Billionaires Beware? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Tool Predicts if Seniors with Cancer Can Stay Home Post Op
Tool Predicts if Seniors with Cancer Can Stay Home Post Op

Medscape

time38 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Tool Predicts if Seniors with Cancer Can Stay Home Post Op

TOPLINE: A novel predictive model named STAYHOME effectively estimated the risk of losing the ability to live at home among older adults after cancer surgery, demonstrating good calibration with minimal deviation from observed risks. The model predicted a 2.4% and 3.4% risk for admission to a nursing home at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. METHODOLOGY: Older adults prioritize long-term functional independence, and the ability to return and stay at home after cancer surgery remains a key concern. However, current prognostic tools focus on short-term outcomes, lacking individualized long-term risk estimates. To estimate the risk of losing the ability to live at home post-surgery, researchers developed and internally validated a risk prediction model, named STAYHOME, among 97,353 community-dwelling older adults (median age, 76 years) who underwent cancer surgery between 2007 and 2019. The predictive model included preoperative variables such as age, sex, rural residence, previous cancer diagnosis, surgery type, frailty, receipt of home care support, receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, cancer site, and cancer stage. The primary outcome was the inability to stay at home after cancer surgery, defined as the time to admission to a nursing home, and was measured at 6 months and 12 months. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 2658 patients (2.7%) at 6 months and 3746 (3.8%) at 12 months were admitted to a nursing home post-surgery. The mean predicted risk of not staying home was 2.4% at 6 months and 3.4% at 12 months. The STAYHOME tool demonstrated a strong predictive capability, with areas under the curve of 0.76 and 0.75 for 6- and 12-month predictions, respectively. The tool also demonstrated minimal deviation from the observed risk for 6-month (0.33 percentage point on average; calibration slope, 1.27) and 12-month (0.46 percentage point on average; calibration slope, 1.17) predictions. The model's calibration was excellent for most predictors at 6 months and 12 months, with a deviation of < 0.8 percentage points from the observed probability; only age older than 85 years (1.13%), preoperative frailty (1.16%), and receipt of preoperative home care support (1.25%) exceeded the deviation of 1 percentage point at 12 months. Across risk deciles, deviations between predicted and observed probabilities were 0.1%-1.5% at 6 months and 0.1%-1.9% at 12 months, reflecting good calibration. The deviation for the slight overestimation at or above the seventh decile remained under 2% for both timepoints. IN PRACTICE: 'The STAYHOME tool demonstrated good discrimination and was well calibrated. Thus, it may be a useful tool to identify a specific group of individuals at risk of not remaining home,' the authors wrote. '[The tool] used information readily available to patients, care partners, and healthcare professionals and may be implemented to provide them with individualized risk estimates and improve surgical oncology care delivery and experience for older adults,' they concluded. SOURCE: This study, led by Julie Hallet, MD, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, was published online in JAMA Surgery. LIMITATIONS: The STAYHOME tool showed slightly reduced discrimination for predictor levels of preoperative frailty, preoperative home care use, receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, and having stage IV disease. The model was also less well calibrated at the extremes of the risk distribution, with a slight overestimation in higher-risk categories. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by operating grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Ontario Cancer Research Institute, and ICES. One author reported receiving speaker fees from Ipsen, outside the submitted work. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store