
Sickness and starvation stalk Somalia's children in the ‘City of Death'
Skinny and underdeveloped for his age, Shariif sits blank-faced and still on Amina's lap, a pale mosquito net hanging over them like a cloud.
'He was so sick, I thought I would have to give up on him,' Amina, 22, says. She walked several miles from a displacement camp to get medical help.
'I prepared myself for the worst,' she says. 'I prayed to God.'
After twelve days of treatment, Shariif is now ready to be discharged. Doctors say they were able to save him only because of the specialised care offered at this main stabilisation centre.
Once known as the 'City of Death', Baidoa is the epicentre of Somalia's neglected and under-reported humanitarian crisis. When rains fail, or funding falters, the fragile infrastructure and sprawling camps quickly become the front line of hunger.
All along the colourless walls of the clinic, there are metal beds with mothers wrapped in long, vibrant hijabs, holding tiny malnourished infants.
The children are those too sick to be treated anywhere else – suffering from severe malnutrition coupled with deadly illnesses like diarrhoea, pneumonia, malaria or anaemia.
Yet, in the coming weeks, this vital lifeline may close its doors.
It is one of more than 120 health facilities across Somalia that are at risk due to cuts in international aid, according to Save the Children. Some have already shut, services have been scaled back, and supplies of medicine and therapeutic food are running perilously low.
President Donald Trump's administration abruptly froze large chunks of foreign aid in January and it was fragile places like Somalia that suffered first. Lifesaving projects were shuttered almost overnight, with vulnerable women and children paying the heaviest price.
The US Agency for International Development (USAID) was the world's biggest aid donor, accounting for around 40 per cent of the global humanitarian system and a fifth of development assistance.
The Lancet warned last month that the cuts could cause more than 14 million preventable deaths by 2030 – a third of them among children under five.
For those who were already living on the edge, the threat is real and immediate.
Shariif has already been admitted twice in the past few months for lifesaving nutritional care.
'He is much stronger than he was, but he needs therapy food,' said Dr Mustafa Mohammed. 'After this month, I don't know if he will have it.'
While Trump's cuts have been felt deeply across the globe, Somalia is among the most aid-dependent countries on Earth.
The country lies at a grim crossroads of deep poverty, protracted conflict and climate change, which brings both severe droughts and floods.
Large parts of Somalia remain under the control or influence of Al Shabaab, the al-Qaeda-linked militant group that has waged an insurgency for nearly two decades.
In areas under their rule, there is no access to healthcare or education, and farmers are burdened by crippling taxation.
This year, the conflict has intensified – deaths from fighting are soaring as the militants advance on multiple fronts. Foreign troops are poised to withdraw, or face an uncertain future, amid a refusal by Washington to guarantee financial support.
There are growing fears among observers that Mogadishu could fall to Al Shabab, leaving the fate of one the world's oldest state-building projects hanging in the balance. A key town fell to the rebels this week.
Meanwhile, local forces, backed by US and UAE airpower, have been waging an all-out war against ISIS in Puntland, a semi-autonomous region in the north.
The day before The Telegraph visited Baidoa, clashes erupted following an Al Shabaab suicide car bomb, with 15 were reportedly killed in the fighting.
Repeated famines have ravaged the country, driving millions into overcrowded displacement camps where poor sanitation means disease is rife. Nearly a fifth of the population are internally displaced.
Baidoa is scattered with hundreds of camps that house more than 800,000 people – clusters of patchwork tents, cobbled together from scavenged and donated material.
They are cramped and dangerous, and subject to tribal law.
Amina and Shariif live in a camp after fleeing Al Shabaab rule. She has no income and is dependent on humanitarian assistance like cash, food and healthcare.
That support has now all but dried up.
Moazzam Malik, CEO of Save the Children – the largest NGO provider of health and nutrition services to children in Somalia – told The Telegraph that it was the abrupt and unpredictable nature of the cuts that hurt the most.
USAID previously funded about 65 per cent of Somalia's humanitarian aid, and StC now has a funding shortfall of around 20 per cent.
'Children and vulnerable mothers are dying as a result of the aid cuts,' he said. 'We have documented that in South Sudan and we strongly suspect the same is happening here in Somalia.'
A rise in deaths is difficult to quantify. Clinics closing or scaling back means fewer people receive care or have their deaths recorded. Ongoing conflict makes much of the country inaccessible to foreign organisations.
Yet when US-funded feeding centres shut their doors, babies wasted away in their mothers' arms while older siblings roamed markets begging for work.
Health facilities were left operating only a few days a week, forcing dangerously long waits for care. Aid workers said clinics ran low on therapeutic food and vital drugs, forcing staff to make impossible choices.
Vital outreach teams who had been making significant ground were disbanded, while doctors fear preventable diseases could gain ground, preying on bodies weakened by hunger.
In Baidoa alone, Malik said, two-thirds of the charity's staff have already lost their jobs.
'There's every risk that these cuts could also stoke instability and tip over into conflict,' Malik continued. 'There's every risk that people could take desperate measures and look to migrate to places where they believe they can have a better future.'
The Telegraph visited a number of facilities around Baidoa, but they and the displaced people we spoke to could not be named for safety reasons.
Doctors said that around 30 per cent of local health services have already closed because of funding shortfalls, with another 30 per cent running at reduced capacity.
'It has affected women and children particularly badly,' he Dr Suleiman Adam, whose health centre used to open six days a week, but now operates only two. 'If a sick child spends three days waiting to see a doctor, that leads to potentially life-threatening complications.'
Dr Adam used to see seven to ten malnutrition cases daily, now he sees twenty and the caseload is becoming imaginable. Despite lay-offs, some health workers are working unpaid to assist.
'Death rates have increased,' he said. 'We used to be able to receive people from the poorest areas. Now they come, see the clinic is closed that day, and go back. They die in their tents.'
Nearly 4.4 million people – close to a quarter of Somalia's population – are facing severe hunger, a figure expected to rise as aid cuts bite deeper and if there are further failed rains – Somalia endured its worst drought on record between 2021 to 2023, with an unprecedented five consecutive failed rainy seasons.
The International Committee of the Red Cross reported 'surging' cases of severe malnutrition among children arriving at their centres across Somalia.
In March, the European Commission's Food Security Portal raised its 2025 forecast for acutely malnourished children in Somalia by 47,000 to 1.8 million. UNICEF estimates that almost half a million are at immediate risk of death without urgent care.
Malnutrition significantly raises the risk of disease, making children eleven times more likely to die from common childhood illnesses. Combined with the crushing impact of poverty, it can coincide with spikes in HIV, malaria, cholera, and respiratory infections.
It can deprive children of the ability to fully develop their brains and bodies, with many remaining shorter and physically weaker into adulthood. The younger the child is, the greater the impact will be.
Somalia was already one of the most dangerous places in the world to give birth, with a woman dying during one in every 162 deliveries.
At a malnutrition clinic, Bint Ahmed cradles her youngest son in her arms. He is malnourished with a skin infection behind his ear and she has brought him to see doctors.
At centres like this, mothers line up with their children to have them weighed in a bucket, and stretched out on wooden measuring boards. The dimensions of their tiny arms are recorded and they are given vaccinations.
In 2018, Bint Ahmed lost her first son to malnutrition. Each of her four subsequent children have needed nutrition support.
'I am so worried. My first child died and we may no longer get food for this one,' she said. 'I used to come here and get medication for him. They just give me a prescription now, but I don't have money to buy it.'
Doctors and midwives say they can no longer afford to feed non-critical patients, including new mothers who need nutrition to produce milk for their babies.
Baidoa's humanitarian workers say the fallout also has a social fallout – years of progress is being undone in education enrolment and gender-based violence.
With food and cash assistance programmes, poverty and crime have surged, including theft and violent robberies.
'Children of seven or eight walk around the market now asking for work,' said one aid worker. 'They no longer go to school and it has become a protection issue.'
Both of Baidoa's legal aid services, which used to help survivors of sexual violence seek justice, have closed. Support services that once provided legal help, psychosocial care and protection are vanishing.
It is leaving vulnerable women and girls without support or protection as violence and instability grow.
Outreach programmes to combat forced marriage and female genital mutilation have stalled.
'When people were getting assistance like cash and food, they would listen. But it is dangerous for our workers to visit these desperate communities now,' said gender-based violence case worker Samira Abdullahi Ali. 'These were not just projects. We are saving lives.'
'If you walk around the local markets,' one women's rights activist said, 'you hear women saying: 'Donald Trump caused these problems'.'
When Trump slashed foreign aid, he declared that America should stop spending on causes 'that are not fully aligned with the foreign policy of the President.' His retreat is part of a broader global pull-back.
France, Sweden, Belgium and Switzerland have all trimmed aid budgets in recent years. Germany has cut nearly €1 billion from humanitarian spending.
The UK, once the world's third-largest donor, plans to shrink its aid budget from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of national income by 2027, representing a cut of about £6 billion a year.
Even before Trump's sweeping reductions, the number of people the World Food Programme was able to reach a month in Somalia had been slashed by more than half.
Behind the figures lies a powerful political undercurrent – soaring inflation, ballooning debt and the cost of conflicts from Gaza to Ukraine have squeezed government coffers. Nationalist politics has fuelled scepticism about pouring money overseas.
Yet it is in stark contrast to attitudes of the past. In the 1990s, the US launched a military intervention, Operation Restore Hope, sending thousands of troops to protect food convoys when Somalia suffered an intense famine after the collapse of its government.
Images of skeletal children and bodies lining Baidoa's streets shocked the world.
'Back then, there was a sense of moral responsibility,' said Omar Mohammed, senior analyst at the International Crisis Group. 'Somalia was a test of America's role after the Cold War.'
The mission, however, ended in bloody disaster when eighteen US soldiers were killed in Mogadishu's Black Hawk Down battle. The scar still shapes American foreign policy today.
Now MAGA-era politics have turbocharged isolationism and hardened resistance to foreign aid, and to conflicts perceived as 'forever wars.'
'There's this narrative now that aid is wasteful or even harmful, and Somalia's caught up in that,' Mohammed said. 'People wonder why billions went into state-building with so little to show.'
Countries like Somalia have now fallen off the agenda, and Washington no longer sees Al Shabaab as an immediate threat to the homeland.
'It's become a niche interest,' said Mohammed.
Yet Dr Ali Said Fiqi, the acting President of the Baidoa region, warned that the shift could undermine US soft power and push disillusioned youth into crime or into the arms of extremist groups like Al Shabaab.
It could also drive more people to risk dangerous journeys abroad.
'Without humanitarian aid, people will be forced to go searching for a better life,' he said. 'These cuts will lead to more people trying to get to Europe. There's no future left for them.'
That comes with its own risks. Leila, 39, who was seeking help for her malnourished child in Baidoa, lost her husband six years ago after he attempted the migrant route to Europe.
'He couldn't find enough work here to feed us properly,' she said. 'I didn't hear anything for four months. Then we heard his boat had crashed and he had died,' she said.
She was left alone with four daughters.
It is the abruptness of Trump's sweeping aid cuts that threatens devastating consequences, with no one stepping in so far to fill the void. Yet many argue that simply plugging funding gaps will not be enough.
The entire aid system may need rethinking if fragile states like Somalia are to break free from chronic dependence.
The recent UN Development Conference in Seville ended without any solid commitments, with vulnerable women and children paying the price.
Malik, head of Save the Children, believes the traditional model of aid is broken.
The old donor-recipient approach, rooted in charity and voluntary pledges, no longer suits a world grappling with shared threats like conflict, pandemics and climate change.
Tens of billions of dollars have poured into Somalia since Operation Restore Hope, yet it remains a fragile state, with life expectancy under fifty and GDP per capita below five hundred dollars.
It is still one of the most dangerous and famine-prone places in the world, and the second most corrupt country in Africa, according to Transparency International.
Malik proposes a UN convention on international development to replace today's voluntary system with countries agreeing to mutual obligations and shared responsibility. It is about seeing aid as a global investment in security, prosperity and resilience.
'Negotiating that would be hard. It will take time,' he said. 'But this is the space we need to move into – where we live together on this planet and progress together.'
Such investment could also reduce migration pressures – a crucial political issue in an increasingly inward-looking world. Instead of Fortress Britain, Malik argues, we need to see that we are all connected and that investing in international cooperation is how we secure our future.
'This isn't just about money,' Malik said. 'This is a battle of ideas, it's about the shape of the world we want our children and grandchildren to grow up in.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Gaza hospitals say 18 killed by Israeli fire as aid site shootings continue to rise
Hospitals in Gaza say Israeli fire killed more than a dozen people on Saturday, eight of them while trying to get food, as malnutrition-related deaths continue to rise in the territory. The bloodshed comes a day after Donald Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, visited an aid distribution site run by the Israel and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Global outrage has grown over Israel's restrictions on aid and the deadly unrest surrounding the GHF sites, with daily reports of shootings at all four locations since the group took over aid distribution at the end of May. The UN says 859 Palestinians have been killed during that time in the vicinity of these sites, and more than 500 have been killed along the routes of food convoys. Health officials reported that Israeli airstrikes and gunfire killed at least 18 Palestinians on Saturday, including three who were in the area around a distribution site. Nasser Hospital also said Israeli forces killed five Palestinians who were among crowds awaiting aid in the south. In a statement to the Associated Press, GHF said 'nothing (happened) at or near our sites'. Both the GHF and the Israeli army have said they only shoot if there is a threat, or fire warning shots to disperse crowds. Doctors in Gaza have reported treating an increasing number of gunshot and shrapnel wounds in patients who were trying to get food at the aid sites. 'We weren't close to them [the troops] and there was no threat,' a witness, Abed Salah, who was among crowds close to the GHF site near Netzarim corridor, told AP. 'I escaped death miraculously.' Officials added that 10 of Saturday's casualties were killed by strikes in central and southern Gaza, with five people killed in two separate strikes on tents sheltering displaced people. The US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, who accompanied Witkoff on the trip on Friday, claimed the GHF sites were delivering 'more than one million meals a day' and called the distribution 'an incredible feat'. Reports from aid workers, doctors, and journalists in Gaza paint a different story, with UN-backed food security experts saying this week that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' is now playing out in Gaza. Seven Palestinians died of malnutrition-related causes over the past 24 hours, including a child, the territory's health ministry said on Saturday. This brings the total deaths among children from causes related to malnutrition in Gaza to 93 since the war began. Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion After international outcry, airdrops of aid have resumed, and several European countries have announced plans to join the Jordan-led coalition orchestrating the drops, but aid groups say this delivers only a fraction of what aid trucks can supply – and are also dangerous. What is really needed, they say, is to open the land borders and restore the full flow of aid. 'If there is political will to allow airdrops – which are highly costly, insufficient + inefficient, there should be similar political will to open the road crossings,' Philippe Lazzarini, the head of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, wrote on X on Saturday. The German government, traditionally a staunch ally of Israel, joined calls for Israel to deliver more aid on Saturday, saying that the current amount remains 'very insufficient'. The criticism came after the German military completed its first food airdrops into Gaza. In Tel Aviv, Witkoff joined families of hostages protesting, as they urged the Israeli government to end the war and release their loved ones. Yotam Cohen, brother of 21-year-old hostage Nimrod Cohen, told AFP: 'The war needs to end. The Israeli government will not end it willingly. It has refused to do so.' Negotiations between Hamas and Israel aimed at securing a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and a deal for the release of hostages ended in deadlock last week, with Witkoff blaming Hamas for a 'lack of desire to reach a ceasefire'. Hamas said on Saturday that it would not lay down arms unless an independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state is established.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Streeting should ‘channel Thatcher' and introduce prostate screening
Wes Streeting should 'channel Margaret Thatcher ' and introduce screening for prostate cancer without delay, one of the world's leading experts has said. Prof Jonathan Waxman, the founder of the charity Prostate Cancer UK, says the Health Secretary should learn from Thatcher's decision to introduce routine mammograms for women, which he said had saved 3,000 lives a year since they were introduced in 1988. The Telegraph has launched a campaign calling for the introduction of targeted screening for prostate cancer so those at high risk are automatically offered tests. Prostate Cancer UK has submitted evidence in favour of the policy to the UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC), which is currently considering the matter, with a decision expected later this year. Writing for The Telegraph, Prof Waxman said: 'There are interesting parallels between the prostate cancer and breast cancer screening stories. 'In the 1970s, before breast cancer screening was introduced by Government dictat, the medical consensus was, and, you have guessed it, that early diagnosis through screening mammography would not save lives. 'Mrs T, regardless of the medical consensus, waved her handbag at the doctors, ignored the consensus, and launched a screening programme for breast cancer. And the result? Screening mammography, together with treatment advances, has led to a massive improvement in survival from breast cancer. 'Before screening, just 65 per cent of patients with breast cancer survived and now over 80 per cent are cured as a result of early detection and better treatment. 'And how does this improvement manifest in the real world? Around 3,000 fewer women die each year in the UK from breast cancer than before the screening programme was introduced.' The emeritus professor at Imperial College London said Prostate Cancer UK led a consortium of men's health charities to collectively inform the committee on the importance of targeted screening for those at highest risk. But he said the NHS should act now so that GPs do far more to help men at risk of prostate cancer. He urged the NHS to rewrite its guidance so that family doctors are told to proactively start conversations with men about the PSA blood tests which can detect the disease. Current guidance says that men can ask for a test, though some GPs rebuff them. For younger men, including those with a family history of disease, offering a test is down to the clinical judgment of GPs about. In both cases, the onus is on patients to seek help in the first place, with many men including those with family histories of prostate cancer unaware they are at heightened risk of the disease. Prof Waxman said the NHS should rewrite its advice so that GPs are told that they should bring up prostate cancer with all patients who might be at extra risk. He added that the guidelines should suggest that GPs start conversations with men from the age of 45 at highest risk, so those who wish to can obtain a PSA test. 'This puts the power of informed choice back in the hands of men who need it the most and is a crucial step on the path to early diagnosis,' he says. In the past, screening advisers have rejected the practice on the grounds that the tests are too unreliable, and could result in too many men undergoing needless procedures. However, in recent years the back-up diagnostics used to confirm the initial test findings have significantly improved. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'This Government has been clear we would like to see screening in place, but the decision must be evidence-led. 'The UK National Screening Committee is looking at this as a priority – including reviewing the evidence for screening men with a family history of prostate cancer. 'While the review is taking place we are getting on with improving cancer treatment and prevention, as well as funding tens of millions of pounds of research – GPs should consider risk factors and use clinical judgment when considering if patients need a prostate cancer test.' Prostate cancer is a lot more than a nuisance By Jonathan Waxman Sixty years ago, around 10,000 people in the UK were diagnosed annually with prostate cancer. Currently over 50,000 men are diagnosed each year and prostate cancer has the dreadful distinction of being the commonest cancer in men. In parallel, the number of prostate cancer deaths has increased from 3,300 to over 12,000 men annually. So, what to do? We can hope that the treatment of prostate cancer will improve and improve, and cures are found. Treatment is getting better. Thankfully, in 2025, well over 80 per cent of men with prostate cancer that has not spread beyond the prostate will be cured and the duration of survival for men with cancer that has spread has doubled compared with 25 years ago. These improvements have come because of modern medicine's marvellous miracles, developing from brilliant university research and big pharma's R & D. Prostate Cancer UK has invested over £120m in research over the years. But clearly despite the gloss of shiny medical breakthroughs, prostate cancer remains a fundamentally unpleasant problem, and a lot more than a nuisance. What can be done? Find it early, you say? Yes, that would seem logical. How do we do this? Well, if we want to find prostate cancer early then the obvious answer is to screen for prostate cancer. There is no UK screening programme for the early detection of prostate cancer, a cancer which is often without symptoms. The National Screening Committee is currently considering the role of screening for prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer UK has led a consortium of men's health charities to collectively inform the committee, which advises government, on the importance of targeted screening for those at highest risk. There are interesting parallels between the prostate cancer and breast cancer screening stories. In the 1970s, before breast cancer screening was introduced by Government dictat, the medical consensus was, and, you have guessed it, that early diagnosis through screening mammography would not save lives. Mrs T, regardless of the medical consensus, waved her handbag at the doctors, ignored the consensus, and launched a screening programme for breast cancer. And the result? Screening mammography together with treatment advances have led to a massive improvement in survival from breast cancer. Before screening, just 65 per cent of patients with breast cancer survived and now over 80 per cent are cured as a result of early detection and better treatment. And how does this improvement manifest in the real world? Around 3000 fewer women die in the UK from breast cancer each year than before the screening programme was introduced. To return to the debate on screening for prostate cancer. We are now at a critical inflection point in the history of prostate cancer screening. Last year, Prostate Cancer UK published research that showed prostate cancer diagnosis is safer and more accurate than ever before, and this in part is thanks to research the charity funded leading to MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging – being introduced into the diagnostic pathway. The National Screening Committee, under the iron baton of its excellent chair, is currently deliberating on the evidence for and against screening for prostate cancer and will issue a report this year. In heavily trailed remarks, Wes Streeting has indicated that he is in favour of screening but not for everyone, just for selective high risk groups of men. We at Prostate Cancer UK welcome this ministerial support, for it is also our view that there is a need for screening, and we believe the evidence is now there for targeted screening. We welcome his remarks at a time when we are about to launch TRANSFORM, a multi-centre screening trial using sophisticated technologies based on current diagnostic tools, an adaptive trial that is open to new screening tests. Prostate Cancer UK's trial invests £42m in a very long-term campaign to assess the survival benefits of modern screening methods. So, who are Mr Streeting's selective high risk groups of men at increased risk of prostate cancer? These are men with family histories of prostate cancer who constitute 1 to 5 per cent of all diagnosed patients, and black men, who have a one in four risk of prostate cancer, which is twice the risk of white men. What to do whilst we await the Screening Committee's conclusions? Currently GP guidelines concerning testing for prostate cancer are outdated. We urgently need these NHS guidelines updated to empower GPs to proactively start conversations about PSA testing with men from the age of 45 at highest risk. This puts the power of informed choice back in the hands of men who need it the most and is a crucial step on the path to early diagnosis. So, yes, prostate cancer is a bit of a nuisance, but let us see if we can do something about that nuisance. Prof Jonathan Waxman OBE is the founder and president of Prostate Cancer UK


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
City of London sexual health clinic on Leadenhall Street to close
A sexual health clinic serving parts of east and central London is to close in the autumn, despite the catchment area including hotspots for sexually-transmitted infections (STIs).Homerton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust announced it would close 80 Leadenhall Street in the City of London, as the cost of the lease was rising and patient numbers had not returned to pre-pandemic levels. It comes after North East London NHS Integrated Care Board (ICB) reported a growing number of under-24s in Hackney and the City of London were seeking support around Hospital NHS Foundation Trust thanked its staff for providing "fast, discreet, and high-quality care" at the Leadenhall Street site. 'Unprecedented pressure' Last year, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), formerly Public Health England, recorded fewer diagnoses of STIs in NHS North East London found young people in the City and Hackney had sought more "interventions" for sexual health – mostly around STIs – than in the neighbouring boroughs of Tower Hamlets, Newham and Waltham to UKHSA, Hackney, Lambeth and Southwark had the highest rate of STIs in the capital, with each reporting at least 2,500 cases per 100,000 City of London followed behind, with 2,422 cases per 100,000. In the City and Hackney, face-to-face consultations had not returned to pre-pandemic levels "at least in part" because more people were using online opposes the nationwide trend, where despite a fall in all kinds of sexual health consultations, clinic visits had seen a slight increase, according to the response to the UKHSA's figures, the Local Government Association warned that sexual health services in England were grappling with "unprecedented pressure" and urged the government to carve out a 10-year strategy and invest more to deliver "expert, timely care".Homerton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust said the "professionalism, warmth and responsiveness" of staff at 80 Leadenhall would leave a "lasting impact".It said patients would still have access to treatment at other Homerton centres, including The Ivy at St Leonards Hospital, Clifden Centre and John Scott Health Centre.