Winnipeg MP Gazan seeks emergency debate on wildfires
Leah Gazan, who represents Winnipeg Centre, shared a letter with media organizations that she sent to Francis Scarpaleggia on Monday morning.
'Both Manitoba and Saskatchewan have declared states of emergency for the next month and are now appealing for international assistance to contain the fires. Despite the heroic efforts of front-line workers — firefighters, nurses, doctors and volunteers — the response system has proven inadequate in addressing the urgent needs of evacuees, particularly in Indigenous communities,' the NDP MP wrote.
'This is not the first time First Nations have been left behind during climate emergencies. The federal government has repeatedly failed to ensure that remote and northern communities have access to reliable emergency preparedness infrastructure and evacuation support.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
20 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: B.C.'s North Coast tanker ban is a line we should never cross
The people of B.C. live in a place where the ocean feeds us, where coastal jobs sustain entire communities, and where the laws we fought for reflect the values we share. The oil tanker moratorium on B.C.'s North Coast — which prohibits oil tankers carrying more than 12,500 metric tons of crude from stopping, loading or unloading at ports or marine installations — isn't just a policy, it's a promise. A promise to protect what we love, to honour Indigenous leadership, and to choose a thriving future over reckless risk. This week, alarm bells are ringing in B.C. as Prime Minister Mark Carney spent the first half of the week meeting privately with provincial premiers. The fear is that these talks will pave the way for a new oil pipeline and with it, the repeal of the hard-won moratorium that keeps oil tankers out of some of the most treacherous waters in the world. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has said a new project could be announced 'any day now.' Ontario Premier Doug Ford has called the tanker ban the craziest idea he's ever heard. But here's the thing: When politicians in other provinces talk about our coast, they forget something important. It's not theirs to give away. Premier David Eby might be outnumbered at the table — but he's not alone. He speaks for the people of B.C., and we've already made ourselves clear: no oil tankers here, not ever. The movement that made the tanker ban law didn't disappear after the ink dried. We're still here. And we're still ready to defend the North Coast. The coast hasn't changed. Hecate Strait remains one of the most dangerous waterways on Earth, where waves reach 20 meters high. An oil spill there wouldn't just poison marine life — it would shatter economies, wipe out jobs, and destroy a way of life. We don't need to imagine the cost. We've seen it play out in other places, like when the oil tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground in Prince William Sound, Alaska, spilling 11 million gallons of oil. We refuse to let that happen here. The Great Bear Sea — ten million hectares of thriving cold-water ecosystems — is not a sacrifice zone. It's a lifeline. It sustains all five species of Pacific salmon, provides food security for the region, and supports thousands of jobs. It is sacred to the many First Nations who've stewarded this coast since time immemorial. That doesn't change because a couple of premiers want to score political points. Let's be honest: fossil fuel executives want to make a buck at our expense. But British Columbians know better. We chose a different path when we pressured Ottawa to pass the North Coast Tanker Ban in 2019 — a future powered by clean energy, not oil spills. And that future is arriving fast. Renewable power is now the cheapest energy source on Earth. It creates jobs, lowers bills, and gives us control over our economic destiny. Why would we throw that away? We only get one shot at building what comes next. If we squander our skilled workers and public investment on another oil pipeline, we don't just risk the coast — we risk the best opportunity we've had in a generation to be leaders when it comes to clean energy and building real economic security. Our ability to withstand President Donald Trump's economic shocks depends on developing new industries like solar, wind, and a cross-country grid so that we can, as Carney so often likes to say, 'stand on our own two feet.' We must not trade a prosperous future with clean, cheap energy and a healthy coastal economy for pollution and profit for oil company shareholders. This is the moment to say it plainly: We won't trade our coast, our jobs, or our children's future for more profits for oil companies. Not now. Not ever. We drew the line for a reason. Let's hold it — and build what comes next. Shelley Luce is the associate director and campaigns director at Sierra Club B.C. She is based in North Vancouver.
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Braid: After big national meeting, not much hope for Premier Smith's pipeline dreams
Article content They're called Manitoba and British Columbia. Article content Article content The hard reality was obvious during the national premiers' meetings this week with Prime Minister Mark Carney. Article content Both provinces are run by NDP premiers who find themselves surrounded by conservative premiers. Article content We like to imagine, or hope, that partisanship is being set aside in the drive to get projects done. Its a wonderful dream. Article content Article content But after all the meetings and declarations, the omens are not positive for pipelines. Article content Article content On Monday, a memorandum of understanding on pipelines and energy development was signed by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, Ontario's Doug Ford and Scott Moe of Saskatchewan. Article content The three conservative premiers enthusiastically support pipelines to B.C.'s north coast and James Bay in Northern Ontario. Article content Asked if he'd been invited to sign on with the conservative premiers, B.C. Premier David Eby said brusquely: 'No.' Article content Further questioned on whether he would have signed if asked, he said 'I haven't read it.' Article content Eby did say, reluctantly, that he'll consider such a pipeline if a private proponent comes on the scene. Article content Smith didn't challenge Eby. Rather, she emphasized her support for LNG exports and various joint economic projects now being discussed with B.C. Article content Article content She seemed to agree that talks won't happen until a private pipeline proponent comes forward. Article content Both premiers know that no backer is likely to emerge until Ottawa lifts the north coast tanker ban implemented by ex-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2019. Article content Otherwise, how do you ship bitumen – by fishing boat? Article content Premier Smith keeps asking Prime Minister Carney to rescind the ban. He becomes very vague. Article content Even if the ban were to end, the B.C. NDP is likely to be as obstructive as they were when the late Premier John Horgan used 'every tool in the toolbox' – his words – to block the Trans Mountain expansion. Article content Eby now talks about how wickedly expensive the Trans Mountain line was ($34 billion) and how Ottawas was forced to buy it. Article content Article content But a huge part of that cost was directly caused by B.C. obstruction at every step of the way. Article content The province, various municipalities and activists dusted off every possible regulation, legal challenge and blockade to slow or halt progress.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Pierre Poilievre puts spotlight on Alberta riding ahead of federal byelection
The upcoming federal byelection in Battle River-Crowfoot has Jennifer Fossen in unknown territory. Fossen is the president of the Camrose & District Chamber of Commerce. In the April federal election, it held a candidate forum. Only one nominee showed up to speak to a half empty room. Three months later, Fossen is hosting another candidate forum, this time in a byelection race featuring Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, and the response is, well, off the hook. Fossen said phones at her office have been ringing constantly with people inquiring about the July 29 candidate debate. But all seats are booked and 10 candidates have signed up to speak. "[It] has definitely taken everything to the next level," Fossen said this week in an interview. "It's fantastic to see the voter engagement and just the interest in the democratic process." Poilievre is a vying to win the Aug. 18 vote in Battle River—Crowfoot, a sprawling rural riding that takes up the entire eastern side of Alberta from Edmonton to Calgary. The writ was dropped last month after Conservative Damien Kurek, who overwhelmingly won the seat in the April general election, stepped down to allow Poilievre to run. Poilievre lost his long-held Ottawa seat of Carleton in the April vote. WATCH | Over 100 candidates face off in rural Alta. federal by-election: The riding of Battle River-Crowfoot, explained Canada's next byelection is slated for Aug. 18 in the Alberta riding of Battle River-Crowfoot. Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre is running in a bid to return to the House of Commons but now finds himself in an increasingly crowded race. Poilievre's signs can be seen scattered on lawns and the farm gates along a highway leading into the city of Camrose, the riding's largest city. His party said he has opened his campaign office in Camrose and he has attended town halls, rodeos, parades and a car show in the riding in recent weeks. He said in a statement he's coming home ready to take the voices of the riding to Ottawa. "I am a born and bred Albertan, with strong Alberta values," he said. "As leader, I can take the fight for farmers, oil and gas workers, firearms owners, soldiers, for Albertans to the national stage. That means strong, forceful, representation for the people of Battle River—Crowfoot." The riding is rock-solid Conservative territory. Kurek won in April with about 83 per cent of the vote. But Poilievre is facing challengers who question not only him, but the idea of parachuting a candidate in from afar. Alongside the Poilievre signs are some for Independent Bonnie Critchley, a 44-year-old military veteran who spent time in Afghanistan. Critchley said she stepped out of retirement and threw her cowboy hat in the race because she cares about the issues concerning the people in the riding. She criticized Poilievre for running just to advance his political career. "I didn't think it was right that the guy we overwhelmingly voted for is now gone," said Critchley, who lives in Tofield, a town in the riding's north end. "I am running to be the voice for Battle River-Crowfoot in Ottawa. What this means is it will be my voice, but my neighbours' words. I want to take us back to a proper, true, representative democracy." She told the constituents who met her at their doors that it was important to "vote for a representative, not a party." Critchley said she is registered to attend the forum and Poilievre will be there too. Other candidates running in the byelection say criticism that Poilievre is a "parachute candidate" has dominated the conversations they've been having while door-knocking. Poilievre was born in Calgary and has lived in Ottawa for the past two decades. "It comes up almost every single time that people are kind of angry that the previous representative got switched on them," said Liberal candidate Darcy Spady, who is from Three Hills. "They're not happy with a drop-in from out of town with a background that's more national in focus." Kurek's exit also encouraged Independent Sarah Spanier to run. "I share that frustration," said Spanier. "We overwhelmingly voted to support Damien, only to have that choice ripped away on a whim because Pierre got fired and feels the need to use us as some type of political pawn because he assumes this going to be a guaranteed win. "I find that insulting." The byelection has become contentious in other ways in recent days. Spanier said she has stopped door-knocking due to death threats, and RCMP have put out notices reminding people to be kind and respect the democratic process. The byelection has also been in the spotlight due to the Longest Ballot Committee, which as of Wednesday, had registered more than 130 candidates under its banner to bring attention to the issue of electoral reform. Critchley, Spady and Spanier said they prefer staying focused on the issues in the riding. Critchley said she wants to make life more affordable for constituents by, for example, advocating for the federal government to invest in seed research for the farmers affected by drought. Spanier said she wants address food insecurity in the House of Commons. Libertarian Party of Canada candidate Michael Harris said he wants Poilievre to lose so a referendum on whether Alberta should separate from the rest of Canada can make headway if he wins. University of Calgary political scientist Lisa Young says although riding has historically voted conservative in provincial and federal elections, the byelection has become interesting because vocal Independent candidates have tapped into sentiment that only a leader who is rooted in the life of that riding and concerns should be elected. "It's going to be tricky for a lot of people in the riding because they are loyal conservatives," she said. "You've got a leader who lost his seat and now is looking for another seat but his future as party leader isn't assured. He faces a leadership review in January," she added. "This sets this kind of a contest between that notion of what a member of Parliament should be and should do versus the party loyalty."
