
Sask. author's anti-racism book is among 596 banned by U.S. Department of Defense for use in its schools
A Saskatoon author is still reeling after finding out his first non-fiction book has been banned by the U.S. Department of Defense for use in its schools.
Khodi Dill's Stay Up racism, resistance, and reclaiming Black freedom is a book aimed at young adults to act as a primer on anti-racism theory.
It first hit the shelves in the fall of 2023, and uses Dill's experience growing up a Black kid on the Prairies to shed light on how white supremacy functions in North America and to help readers understand how racism impacts their lives.
"A couple of days ago, one of my editors, Kari at Annick Press, reached out to me and told me that he hated to be the bearer of bad news," Dill said.
He was informed students at 161 schools run by the U.S. Department of Defense, would not have access to his book.
Dill's book is one of 596 that are banned on the department's list, which was made public earlier this month by a federal judge hearing the case of E.K. v. the Department of Defense.
Twelve students currently attending Department of Defense operated schools, are suing the department for "scrubbing references to race and gender from its libraries and lessons," according to an April court document.
The students are in grades ranging from pre-kindergarten to high school, within the United States and around the world, according to the document.
"If you were to look at the list of banned books, which is now publicly available, you'll see that a lot of the book titles revolve around things like racism, gender, things like, you know, trying to achieve equity within our society for different groups," Dill said.
"I have a feeling that those are the sorts of ideas that are a little bit more threatening to this administration that's in the U.S. right now."
Dill said a number of Saskatoon teachers have used his book as a tool in the classroom.
However, he has noticed further east, there tends to be a stricter "vetting process" when it comes to the books used for teaching — especially where the N-word is concerned — like in his book.
"Because it examines my experiences as a Black person and examines anti-Black racism in general, it does feature the use of the N-word, " Dill said, adding that when it is used, it's in a critical way or it's documenting its use against Black people.
Many schools have now implemented policies that have completely banned the use of the N-word for study, he said.
"How do you authentically represent that time period and those atrocities without addressing the language that was used?"
These types of policies contribute to the erasure of Black experiences, he said.
"Yeah, some censorship that might be well-intentioned, but that has some pretty dire consequences in terms of reckoning with the truth and the reality of what has happened and what continues to happen to Black people here in North America."
'Those are red flags': Rutgers professor of sociology
Arlene Stein, a professor of sociology from Rutgers University in New Jersey, said she has had a number of her books flagged for a potential ban by the local government.
Stein has written many research books on subjects relating to gender and sexuality — including one on a campaign in the U.S. against LGBTQ+ rights organized by a Christian organization.
"And in the course of that publication history … local government tried to ban my book," Stein said.
Years later, she was in the process of publishing her book Unbound, which told the story of a transgender man.
"The book was challenged by local library and school board in Galveston, Texas," she said.
Many of the people who make the decisions about these books are doing so in a "very ill-informed way.
"Often they don't even read the books," she said. "They look at titles, if race is in the title, if gender is in the title, if sexuality is in the title … those are red flags."
Stein again pointed to her book Unbound — which she said was not read before it was challenged.
"They didn't read it and they ended up deciding not to ban it because they didn't want to take the time to read it," she said.
Stein said having access to knowledge is important and that includes the critical knowledge about race — including books like Dill's Stand Up.
'A chilling effect': PEN America
Kasey Meehan, the program director for Freedom to Read at PEN America, said the organization has been tracking instances of book bans since 2021.
She said books that have been overwhelmingly targeted include those about race, racism, or include characters of colour, LGBTQ+ characters or talk about sexuality and gender or sexual experience.
This stems from "pressure put on school boards or state legislatures that are driving these initiatives down to the schools."
And more recently the federal government is getting involved, Meehan said.
"So it's exactly right that this list of nearly 600 books that have been removed from the Department of Defence schools comes in response to two executive orders that were passed by the Trump administration that restrict discussions of diversity, equity and inclusion."
The impacts have started to trickle down into the literature community, Meehan said.
"It certainly casts a chilling effect across the book industry and across writers and authors."
Public libraries and schools have become more nervous about buying books that may end up on these lists.
It also impacts the authors on these lists, she said. They begin to work under a soft censorship, thinking of how to adapt their work to fit into this atmosphere.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
12 minutes ago
- CTV News
How should Canada respond to Trump's 35% tariffs?
Canadian Affairs Manager Jay Goldberg says Canada should 'focus on getting to a deal' rather than retaliating with more tariffs.


CTV News
12 minutes ago
- CTV News
Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump
The U.S. Capitol building stands as people wait to watch fireworks near the Washington Monument during Fourth of July celebrations, in Washington, Friday, July 4, 2025. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul) WASHINGTON — The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a cornerstone of American culture for three generations, announced Friday it would begin taking steps toward its own closure after being defunded by Congress. This announcement marks the end of a nearly six-decade era in which it fueled the production of renowned educational programming, cultural content and even emergency alerts. The demise of the corporation, known as CPB, is a direct result of U.S. President Donald Trump's targeting of public media, which he has repeatedly said is spreading political and cultural views antithetical to those the United States should be espousing. The closure is expected to have a profound impact on the journalistic and cultural landscape — in particular, public radio and TV stations in small communities across the United States. CPB helps fund both PBS and NPR. The corporation also has deep ties to much of the nation's most familiar programming, from NPR's 'All Things Considered' to, historically, 'Sesame Street,' 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood' and the documentaries of Ken Burns. The corporation said its end, 58 years after being signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson, would come in an 'orderly wind-down.' In a statement, it said the decision came after the passage of a package that included defunding and the decision Thursday by the Senate Appropriations Committee to exclude funding for the corporation for the first time in over 50 years. The corporation had hoped that the new budget might restore its funding, but that did not happen. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' said Patricia Harrison, the corporation's president and CEO. ___ Ted Anthony And Kevin Freking, The Associated Press

CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Transport committee meeting to study B.C. Ferries' $1B loan for Chinese ships
Social Sharing Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland told MPs Friday she is "dismayed" by a $1 billion federal loan for B.C. Ferries' purchase of four new electric-diesel ships from a Chinese shipbuilder — but did not call for the contract's cancellation. The House of Commons transport committee launched a study of the Canada Infrastructure Bank loan today. B.C. Ferries announced in June that it had hired China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards to build the new ships after a five-year procurement process that did not include a Canadian bid. The Canada Infrastructure Bank contributed $1 billion to the deal and said in June that the new ferries "wouldn't likely be purchased" without this financing. In her opening remarks before the committee Friday, Freeland said she was troubled by the planned purchase and she believes in supporting Canadian jobs. She said she has sent 71 letters directing all organizations under the Transport Canada umbrella to prioritize Canadian content in their major procurements where feasible, particularly Canadian steel, aluminum, and lumber. When Canadian options aren't available, she said, the preferred option is to buy from countries with trade deals that include reciprocal procurement agreements. Freeland also said Transport Canada will be convening a meeting with provinces and territories, ferry owners and operators, shipyards, labour representatives and the steel industry. She said she's also assembling a second meeting with major rail operators. Freeland did not directly respond to questions from MPs about whether she would reject the loan. She said she agrees that this is a moment of crisis for the steel and aluminum sectors and they need the government's support. WATCH | Mayors say there's a pressing need for new ferries, no matter who builds them: Calls to cancel B.C. Ferries contract with China misguided, say some mayors 19 days ago Housing and Infrastructure Minister Gregor Robertson and the CEOs of B.C. Ferries and the Canada Infrastructure Bank are set to testify at the meeting later today. The Canada Infrastructure Bank is accountable to Parliament through Robertson. Jeff Groot, executive director of communications for B.C. Ferries, said the company signed the loan with the bank before the contract with the Chinese shipyard was finalized. Dan Albas, Conservative transport critic and committee co-chair, requested the study and has asked questions about why $1 billion in public funds was earmarked to finance overseas shipbuilding in the middle of a trade war with the U.S. Freeland sent her B.C. counterpart, Mike Farnworth, a letter in June saying she was disappointed that B.C. Ferries would choose a Chinese state-owned shipyard "in the current geopolitical context," and asking him to confirm that no federal funding would be diverted to purchase the ferries. Before Friday's meeting began, Bloc MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval said he'd like to see an apology from the government and from the Canada Infrastructure Bank. He said it's "unacceptable" and "problematic" that the government plans to invest in foreign infrastructure when Canada's steel industry is facing tariffs from the United States. The new vessels are expected to join the B.C. Ferries fleet between 2029 and 2031.