22 Florida companies make 2025 Fortune 500 list
Why it matters: Fortune 500 companies can boost Florida's economy, influence its policy priorities and power job growth.
Florida's top ten ranked companies, by fiscal year 2024 revenue are:
71. Publix Super Markets (Lakeland): $60.18 billion — up 1 spot from last year
106. World Kinect (Miami): $42.17B — down 13 spots
129. Lennar (Miami): $35.4B — down 3
136. GuideWell Mutual Holding (Jacksonville): $32.9B — no change
148. Jabil (St. Petersburg): $28.9B — down 23 spots
160. AutoNation (Fort Lauderdale): $26.8B — down five spots
172. Carrier Global (Palm Beach Gardens): $24.8B — up 12 spots
173. NextEra Energy (Juno Beach): $24.8B — down 21 points
203. L3Harris Technologies (Melbourne): $21.3B — up 6 spots
294. Raymond James Financial (St. Petersburg): $14.9B — up 18 spots
The big picture: Walmart topped the magazine's annual list for the 13th straight year. Amazon, UnitedHealth Group, Apple and CVS Health round out the top five.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Silicom Ltd (SILC) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Design Wins Amid Operating Losses
Release Date: July 31, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Silicom Ltd (NASDAQ:SILC) reported strong design win momentum, achieving five major new design wins since the beginning of the year. The company delivered revenue of $15 million, which was at the midpoint of their guidance range. Silicom Ltd (NASDAQ:SILC) has a strong balance sheet with $116 million in working capital and marketable securities, including $80 million in cash deposits and highly rated bonds with no debt. The company secured significant design wins with a Fortune 500 cloud-based service provider, a global network test equipment leader, and a US-based edge networking provider. Silicom Ltd (NASDAQ:SILC) is optimistic about achieving double-digit revenue growth in 2026 and beyond, supported by a robust pipeline and strategic execution. Negative Points Operating expenses increased to $7.2 million in Q2 2025, up from $6.7 million in Q2 2024, partly due to currency fluctuations. The company reported an operating loss of $2.4 million for the second quarter of 2025, consistent with the previous year's loss. Net loss for the quarter was $2 million, compared to a net loss of $0.9 million in the second quarter of 2024. Loss per share increased to $0.35, compared to a loss per share of $0.14 in the second quarter of the previous year. The financial impact of the current year's design wins is expected to be modest, with significant growth anticipated in future years. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with SILC. Q: Are there any changes in the security market affecting your opportunities, especially with recent acquisitions like Palo Alto's? A: Unidentified_3 (CEO): The security market remains crucial for us, and we don't see any negative impacts from recent consolidations. The cybersecurity market continues to grow, and we are well-positioned within it. Q: With F5's shift back to hardware solutions, how does this affect your opportunities in the ADC market? A: Unidentified_3 (CEO): The shift towards hardware is beneficial for us. We have new products in development, such as post-quantum ciphers, which will be essential in the future. The demand for hardware solutions is increasing, and we are prepared to meet these needs. Q: How does the shift towards AI clusters by big cloud builders affect your market opportunities? A: Unidentified_3 (CEO): AI presents significant opportunities for us. We have products that cater to AI infrastructure needs, particularly in FPGA solutions, which are crucial for new AI architectures. We are actively engaging with potential customers in this space. Q: Are there any shifts in the competitive environment impacting your gross margin expectations? A: Unidentified_3 (CEO): Currently, we do not see any significant changes in the competitive environment that would impact our gross margins. Q: Can you elaborate on the impact of currency fluctuations on your operating expenses? A: Unidentified_4 (CFO): Our operating expenses were higher due to the weaker US dollar against the Israeli shekel and Danish krone, which are the main currencies for our expenses. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
From Algorithms To Outcomes: 10 Lessons That Help AI Engineering Drive Growth In Modern Retail
Keshav Agrawal, Senior Director of Product, AI-Powered Search Experience, Fortune 10 Retailer. In today's commerce landscape, AI is everywhere—but tangible business impact is not. The real challenge for retail and customer experience (CX) leaders isn't whether to use AI, but how to engineer systems that consistently deliver business outcomes, not just insights or prototypes. Over the past decade, I've had the privilege of leading AI-powered engineering initiatives at a Fortune top-10 retailer, where I've helped scale intelligent search, transaction and e-commerce systems used by hundreds of millions of customers. Along the way, I've learned that turning AI into sustained growth requires more than model performance or the latest frameworks. It takes systems thinking, organizational clarity and an unwavering focus on customer outcomes. Here are 10 key lessons I've learned from the front lines—lessons that can help retailers and CX leaders transform AI from a buzzword into a results engine. 1. Start with customer problems, not data or models. Every successful AI initiative starts by solving a real customer pain point, not by deploying a model for its own sake. Is the shopper struggling with irrelevant search results? Are product filters too rigid? Is personalization creating a confusing experience? If we don't anchor our efforts in human problems, our solutions—no matter how sophisticated—risk being irrelevant. AI should reduce friction and increase delight. Period. 2. Define success by business outcomes, not model metrics. A model with a 92% accuracy rate might look great on paper, but what does that mean for the bottom line? Instead of celebrating precision or recall scores, I've learned to align teams around customer-centric key performance indicators (KPIs) like search abandonment rate, conversion, average order value (AOV) or customer satisfaction. If your AI investment doesn't move these needles, it's not delivering value—no matter how elegant the math behind it. 3. Think probabilistically, not deterministically. AI systems aren't designed to give perfect answers. They're designed to make informed predictions under uncertainty. The best-performing systems I've built—particularly in search and ranking—work by nudging decisions with a sense of probability, not absolute confidence. We trade black-and-white answers for flexible, context-sensitive suggestions. That's more aligned with how real customers behave, and ultimately leads to better outcomes. 4. Invest across three buckets for momentum and resilience. Not all AI bets pay off equally. I've found it helpful to allocate investments across three types. This approach has helped my teams achieve early wins to build trust while still making space for riskier, long-term breakthroughs. It's like managing a product portfolio—diversification matters. 1. High-confidence, medium-impact (e.g., summary generation) 2. Medium-confidence, high-impact (e.g., re-ranking with deep models) 3. Low-confidence, breakthrough potential (e.g., generative UX, multimodal intent inference) 5. Build automated feedback loops into the system. Every customer interaction is a learning opportunity if we design for it. Whether it's a shopper refining their search, abandoning a cart or clicking a similar item, their actions generate valuable behavioral signals. The best AI systems I've led don't just 'go live,' they get smarter every day. Continuous learning loops help align system behavior with evolving user intent, and are often the hidden driver behind compounding improvements in relevance and satisfaction. 6. Build for human-in-the-loop—not just automation. AI can fail quietly or spectacularly, especially in long tail or ambiguous use cases. This is why human-in-the-loop design is essential. In practice, this means building fallback mechanisms, surfacing model confidence levels and enabling business teams to intervene when needed. Humans remain vital for curating, escalating and auditing outputs. We don't eliminate human judgment—we scale it. 7. Evaluate models like you'd evaluate a business decision. Before greenlighting any new model or feature, ask: "Does it materially improve a business KPI?" "Does it introduce latency or complexity?" "Is it resilient under load or user diversity?" I've seen teams chase fractional accuracy gains that increased infra costs and decreased UX performance. AI systems should be judged like any major investment—through the lens of cost, risk and return. 8. Build infrastructure that supports experimentation. No matter how good your ideas are, they'll never ship without the right infrastructure. That's why I've championed early investments in machine learning operations (MLOps) tooling, model versioning, monitoring and rollback systems. At scale, experimentation velocity is everything. The ability to test, measure, learn and iterate safely has been a key differentiator in every AI win I've been part of. 9. Design org structure to accelerate AI learning cycles. AI is not just a technical function—it's a cross-functional discipline that thrives at the intersection of engineering, product, analytics and design. In the best setups I've seen (and built), these roles are co-located, aligned on shared metrics and empowered to iterate without handoffs. Structure either accelerates intelligence or strangles it. Choose wisely. 10. Make AI everyone's job—not just the data team's. Some of the most impactful moments in my AI career came not from engineers, but from product owners, designers or operations leads who asked the right questions. AI shouldn't live in a silo. It should be embedded in how your company thinks, solves problems and measures success. When everyone understands the 'why' behind a model's behavior and what it's optimizing for, your organization stops reacting to AI and starts steering it. AI in retail is not about novelty anymore—it's about execution. At a time when digital shoppers expect more and competition is only a click away, it's not enough to have intelligent models. You need intelligent systems, organizations and leadership. Whether you're a product executive, a CX strategist or a technologist, these lessons can help you move beyond theory and toward traction. AI's true power lies not in its complexity, but in its ability to generate outcomes that matter—to your customers and your business. When done right, AI can make your company faster, sharper and more responsive to what your customers need—often before they even ask. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
HPE's merger with Juniper Networks was approved by the White House for national security reasons: source
U.S. intelligence enabled the HPE-Juniper Networks merger—initially blocked by the DOJ—as a national security measure to counter Huawei's dominance, believing the combined U.S. firm would be better able to compete globally against its Chinese rival, according to a source familiar with the events. The move stemmed from concerns over Huawei's ties to the CCP and prompted an unexplained intervention by the activist Laura Loomer. The $14 billion merger between computer networking giants Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Juniper Networks was allowed to go ahead after U.S. intelligence intervened to make it happen as a matter of national security, a source familiar with the events tells Fortune. The feeling within the federal government was that a combined HPE-Juniper offering in the marketplace would act as a 'bulwark' against Huawei in markets where the Chinese company might otherwise be more dominant because it offers a single complete tech stack, the source said. The intervention of unspecified intelligence officials in the merger, which had been blocked by Department of Justice antitrust litigation, was first reported by Axios. Fortune can confirm, however, that fear of Huawei was the issue that triggered the approval for the merger. 'Huawei is very widely known to be closely tied to the Chinese Communist Party and its products have repeatedly been identified in the U.S. and many other countries as a threat to national security,' the source said. 'Competition is global and a combined HPE-Juniper is a stronger bulwark against that, against Huawei. It will be the only U.S.-based company that provides the entire technology stack that Huawei do.' Huawei and HPE both declined comment when reached. Huawei has long-denied that its tech is used by China to conduct surveillance on the West. The process leading to the deal's approval, which was linked to two senior DOJ officials losing their jobs, briefly drew the ire of Laura Loomer, the right-wing online provocateur. On social media, she alleged that HPE had paid two consultants allied to President Trump $1 million each to engage in 'influence peddling.' Loomer later deleted the allegation. Two sources told Fortune they were baffled by Loomer's intervention. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
