Government aims for zero deaths in upcoming winter initiation season
As South Africa enters the traditional winter initiation season, the government is setting an ambitious target: zero deaths among initiates. This comes after a tragic season last year, when at least 93 young boys lost their lives during cultural initiation rites across the country.
On Friday, Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs Velenkosini Hlabisa officially launched the 2025 Winter Initiation Season, emphasising that the safety and dignity of initiates must be the top priority.
Speaking at the launch event, Minister Hlabisa acknowledged the challenges ahead but stressed that every life must be protected. 'We cannot accept any more deaths. We owe it to these young men and their families to ensure their journey into adulthood is safe, dignified, and respected,' he said.
The winter season, which typically sees a spike in the number of initiation ceremonies — especially in provinces like the Eastern Cape and Limpopo — has often been marred by incidents of dehydration, sepsis, physical abuse, and, in some cases, illegal schools operating without proper oversight.
To change this, Hlabisa called for stronger collaboration between traditional leaders, government departments, health professionals, and local communities. 'This is not a challenge for one sector to tackle alone. It requires all of us — government, traditional councils, families, and community members — to work together,' he said.
The initiative has received backing from Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Health. Chairperson Dr. Sibongiseni Dhlomo said the committee supports the minister's zero-death goal and stressed the importance of accountability within traditional structures.
'We must continue engaging with our traditional leaders, because the role they play in overseeing these schools is crucial,' said Dr Dhlomo. 'We need to ensure that initiation practices are monitored, regulated, and rooted in both cultural integrity and safety.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
5 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Government still has no plan to replace US HIV funding, Health organisations are demanding action
'We are determined not to let people die,' reads a letter from the Global HIV Treatment Coalition and civil society organisations sent to the presidency and health minister Aaron Motsoaledi. The letter demands that the government gets its act together on a fully costed emergency plan to deal with the loss of HIV funding. This follows billions of rand for HIV and TB programmes being withdrawn after the Trump administration cut funding for USAID and the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in January. In 2024, PEPFAR provided about R7.5 billion to South Africa. Vulnerable people, known as 'key populations ', such as sex workers have lost access to vital HIV programmes that delivered ARVs, USAID-funded clinics have closed down, and health workers have been retrenched. HIV activists say the health department has 'not taken concerted action' to address these funding cuts, and that 'Parliament, the National and Provincial AIDS Councils, and everyone else in the country are in the dark regarding the emergency plan and action required'. The letter is signed by Zackie Achmat and Anneke Meerkotter on behalf of the Global HIV Treatment Coalition. About 200 people, including leading activists, doctors and public health advocates, as well as over 70 organisations have endorsed it. The country's HIV programmes are also facing a further blow to funding after The Global Fund announced that its allocations would be reduced. The letter demands that the health minister provides information on the impact of US funding cuts and details of the national and provincial government's emergency plans. It calls for the government to meet with civil society and health sector leaders to review the plan. A month ago, activists warned Parliament's health portfolio committee about the looming health crisis and that people were struggling to access antiretrovirals. The letter refers to a study which estimates that from 2025 to 2028, the discontinuation of PEPFAR could result in a 29% to 56% increase in new HIV infections, and 56,000 to 65,000 additional AIDS-related deaths. Neither the presidency nor national health department responded to a request for comment. In his budget speech in May, the finance minister, Enoch Godongwana, stated that no new allocations are being made to deal with the withdrawal of US funding for HIV-related services. But he stated that such funding may be issued later in the year. We reported at the time: Officials from the National Health Department have been in negotiations with Treasury over the last few months about securing emergency funding in order to cover the PEPFAR cuts. The emergency funds could come from Treasury's contingency reserve, which exists partially in order to cover unexpected funding shortfalls. It may also be financed through borrowing. The health department's proposal for emergency funding had apparently been insufficiently detailed. It needed to provide more information about how the money would actually be spent. We understand that the health department has also put in a separate application to the National Treasury to cover the cuts to research funding by the US. This follows a decision by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) to effectively cancel grants to researchers in South Africa (see a detailed explanation here). Two large private donors have offered to assist with this if the government puts up a certain amount. To understand the effects of the US funding cuts, GroundUp and Spotlight made a request on 25 June to the National Health Laboratory Service under the Promotion of Access to Information Act for data going back to 2015, including the monthly number of HIV viral load, CD4, TB and syphilis tests. This article first appeared on GroundUp. Read the original article here.
Eyewitness News
24-06-2025
- Eyewitness News
EC flooding death toll rises to 97 as COGTA warns MPs that the numbers may rise
CAPE TOWN - The cooperative governance department has told Parliament that two more people have been confirmed dead in the devastating floods in the Eastern Cape, warning that the numbers may rise. Doctor Bongani Sithole, head of the National Disaster Management Centre, briefed the portfolio committee on cooperative governance and traditional affairs on Tuesday morning on their multi-departmental consolidated report on the province, which is still reeling from the devastating floods. Sithole also gave an update on the death toll, which now stands at 97. "Ninety-five people had been confirmed dead. This morning, we've since received an update but the HOD will confirm later. The number is 97, 23 of which are schoolgoing children." With the death toll rising, he said that the Eastern Cape would also require no less than R5 billion to repair the damage caused by the floods. Sithole said that the province suffered damage across several sectors and municipalities. "The cost of repairing damaged infrastructure is estimated at R5.1 billion and then R3.2 billion across sector departments and R1.8 billion for municipal infrastructure."
eNCA
17-06-2025
- eNCA
E-cigarettes at a crossroads: Will SA's Tobacco Bill embrace harm-reduction?
CAPE TOWN - South Africa stands at a pivotal moment in tobacco regulation, as Parliament revisits the controversial Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill. The proposed legislation has sparked intense debate between health experts, industry players and policymakers over whether smoke-free alternatives like e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products should be treated as tools for harm-reduction or subjected to the same strict regulations as conventional cigarettes. The bill in its current form would impose sweeping new rules, including plain olive-brown packaging for tobacco products, with graphic health warnings covering 65% of the surface; a complete ban on all tobacco advertising and promotions; restrictions to only tobacco and menthol flavours for vaping products; and prohibitions on public vaping wherever smoking is banned. Crucially, it makes no distinction between traditional cigarettes and cigarette alternatives. Philip Morris International (PMI), which manufactures the IQOS heated tobacco products, has emerged as a leading voice calling for regulatory differentiation. Supplied The company cites peer-reviewed studies showing its products release significantly fewer toxicants than traditional cigarettes. "The science is clear; these products are not risk-free, but they are a better alternative for smokers who won't quit," says PMI vice-president for Sub-Saharan Africa, Branislav Bibic. On the sidelines of the company's Technovation conference in Cape Town, Bibic said the plan was to replace cigarettes with smoke-free products. PMI director of external affairs for Southern Africa, Themba Mathebula, has been vocal about the potential consequences of the bill in its current form. He says by 'applying the same restrictions to scientifically proven reduced-risk products as we do to cigarettes, we're essentially telling smokers there's no reason to switch". PMI argues that South Africa could follow the example of countries such as the UK and Japan, where differentiated regulation has coincided with accelerated declines in smoking rates. Supplied However, health advocacy groups remain sceptical. They point to concerns about youth vaping and argue there is insufficient long-term data on the safety of e-cigarettes. Some lawmakers are also hesitant to embrace products claiming harm-reduction without a formal report from the National Economic Development and Labour Council on the science behind these alternatives. The tobacco debate comes at a critical juncture for South Africa's public health and economy. Proponents of harm-reducing products warn that treating all nicotine products equally could stifle innovation and keep safer alternatives out of reach. Critics counter that lax regulation could lead to new public health challenges. South Africa, therefore, faces a fundamental question: Will it join the growing number of countries incorporating harm-reduction into tobacco control, or will it take a more restrictive path? Whatever decision it makes will have lasting implications for millions of South African smokers and the country's public health landscape.
