logo
IAS Smita Sabharwal vs IAS Tina Dabi: Who scored more marks in Class 12? They studied at..., passed their 12th grade in...

IAS Smita Sabharwal vs IAS Tina Dabi: Who scored more marks in Class 12? They studied at..., passed their 12th grade in...

India.com19-05-2025
The results for CBSE, CISCE, and various state boards have been announced recently. This year, several students have performed exceptionally well, with many scoring more than 90 percent. Meanwhile, class 12th marksheets have gone viral on social media platforms. IAS officers Smita Sabharwal and Tina Dabi's class 12 marksheet has gone viral.
IAS officers Tina Dabi and Smita Saberwal excel in their respective fields. Both are also quite active on social media, where they share glimpses of their personal and professional lives. Both IAS officers Tina Dabi and Smita Saberwal have cracked the Civil Services Examination(CSE), conducted by the Union Public Service Commission(UPSC). Both are widely admired and with a strong following on social media.
At the age of 23, in her reportedly second attempt, Smita secured an impressive All India Rank of 4 in the 2000 UPSC CSE. Tina Dabi obtained an impressive All India Rank(AIR) of 1 in the UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination, 2015. But who scored more marks in Class 12? Read below…
Smita Sabharwal finished the Indian School Certificate (ISC) Examination(Class 12), in 1995. Her school was affiliated with the Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE), New Delhi. She secured a Grade A in the SUPW & Community Service. Her subject combination included English, Hindi, Economics, Structure of Commerce, and Principles of Accounts — a well-rounded mix that laid a solid foundation for her future in civil services.
According to her CISCE ISC(Class 12th)mark sheet, Smita Sabharwal scored 94 out of 100 in both English and Hindi. She scored 90 out of 100 in Economics in her CISCE Indian School Certificate Examination of 1995. Smita Sabharwal excelled in her Class 12 board exams, scoring 86 out of 100 in Structure of Commerce and an impressive 97 in Principles of Accounts, earning an 'A' grade.
If the best of five subjects are considered, Smita secured 92.2% in her Class 12 exams. This means that the sum of her marks in the top five subjects, when divided by five, gave an average of 92.2%. She scored 461 out of 500.
If the best of four subjects are considered, Smita secured 93.75% in her Class 12 exams. This means that the sum of her marks in the top four subjects, when divided by four, gave an average of 93.75%. She scored 375 out of 400.
On the other hand, Tina Dabi completed her schooling at Jesus and Mary School in Delhi and went on to graduate from Lady Shri Ram College, Delhi University, with a degree in Political Science.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Under India's presidency, we will work on redefining Brics, says Modi at summit
Under India's presidency, we will work on redefining Brics, says Modi at summit

Hindustan Times

time4 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Under India's presidency, we will work on redefining Brics, says Modi at summit

NEW DELHI: India's presidency of the Brics grouping next year will focus on building resilience and using innovation for sustainability while simultaneously giving priority to the issues of the Global South, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said at the Brics Summit in Rio de Janeiro on Monday. In this image via PMO on July 7, 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi attends a session during the 17th annual BRICS Summit in Brazil. (PMO) Addressing a session of the summit devoted to the environment and global health, Modi said India will adopt a people-centric approach to redefine Brics and widen the agenda of the grouping, just as it had done while chairing the G20 in 2023. The session was attended by leaders of the 10 member states of Brics, including Brazil, China, Indonesia and South Africa, and representatives of partner countries. 'Under India's Brics chairmanship, we will work on redefining Brics. Brics will mean 'Building Resilience and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability',' he said, speaking in Hindi. 'Just as during our presidency, we gave breadth to the G20 and gave priority to issues of the Global South in the agenda, similarly, during our presidency of Brics, we will take this forum forward in the spirit of people-centricity and humanity first.' Modi's remarks came hours after US President Donald Trump threatened to slap additional tariffs on countries that align themselves with the policies of the Brics grouping. There was no official response from the Indian side to Trump's threat made in a social media post. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,' Trump said, without specifying which policies he was referring to. The leaders' declaration adopted at the Brics Summit on Sunday had — without directly referring to the US — said indiscriminate and unilateral tariffs are reducing global trade, disrupting supply chains and introducing uncertainty into international trade activities. The declaration had also condemned last month's military strikes against Iran. Modi emphasised the need for collective global action to tackle pressing issues such as sustainable development and climate transition and highlighted the steps taken by India during its G20 presidency to tackle such matters. 'During India's G20 presidency, we had emphasised sustainable development and reducing the North-South gap,' he said pointing to the Green Development Pact and the Green Credits Initiative. 'For India, climate justice is not an option but a moral duty. India believes that without technology transfer and affordable financing to countries in need, climate action will remain limited to climate talks.' Developed countries, Modi said, have a special responsibility in reducing the gap between climate ambition and financing. 'We have to take along all those countries which are facing food, fuel, fertiliser and financial crises due to various stresses…Sustainable and inclusive development of humanity is not possible without any kind of double standards,' he said. Modi said the health of the planet and humans are interconnected and India has increased cooperation with all countries with the motto of 'One Earth, One Health'. He offered to share India's expertise in areas such as the world's largest insurance scheme or Ayushman Bharat and digital health services. 'The Covid pandemic has taught us that viruses do not come with visas and solutions are not chosen based on passports. Common challenges can only be solved through joint efforts,' he said. The Brics leaders' statement on a partnership for elimination of socially determined diseases, issued on Monday, will provide new impetus to strengthen cooperation on health. Dammu Ravi, secretary (economic relations) in the external affairs ministry, told a media briefing that India's presidency of Brics will be an opportunity to press for the reform of global institutions such as the UN Security Council. 'This is what everybody is saying…that [the voice of the] Global South…should be amplified and adequately captured in the multilateral discourse and decision-making,' he said. India's presidency of Brics will also help put the issues of the Global South at the forefront of global discussions, Ravi said. 'We are already thinking about an agenda in terms of sustainability [and] resilience. These are again very important because in a disruptive world today, both in terms of trade…geopolitical tensions, the supply chain disruptions, you need to have resilience [and] sustainability,' he said. 'You will see a momentum and continuity in the way the Brics will evolve in terms of [taking] up the issues of the Global South,' Ravi said.

Census 2027: Data will be collected in English, Hindi and regional languages, citizens can self-enumerate through web portal
Census 2027: Data will be collected in English, Hindi and regional languages, citizens can self-enumerate through web portal

Indian Express

time9 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Census 2027: Data will be collected in English, Hindi and regional languages, citizens can self-enumerate through web portal

Data will be collected using mobile apps available in English, Hindi, and various regional languages during Census 2027, and citizens will have an option for 'self-enumeration' through a dedicated web portal, the Centre announced Monday. 'Census 2027 will be the first digital census in the country and data will be collected using mobile apps – both android and iOS – in English, Hindi and regional languages. Enumerators/Supervisors will use their own mobile device for data collection,' the Registrar General and Census Commissioner under the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) posted on X. #Census2027 will be the 1st Digital Census in the country. Data will be collected using Mobile Apps (both Android & iOS) in English, Hindi and regional languages. Enumerators/Supervisors will use their own mobile device for data collection. (6/10) — Census India 2027 (@CensusIndia2027) July 7, 2025 Last month, the government formally announced that the 16th Census of India will take place in two phases, with the reference dates set as March 1, 2027, for most of the country, and October 1, 2026, for snow-bound and remote regions such as Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand. This census will also include the first nationwide caste enumeration since 1931. 'Census will be conducted in two phases, phase first; Houselisting and Housing Census (HLO) will start from April 2026 and phase two; Population Enumeration (PE) will be conducted. Enumeration of Caste: Caste of household members will be enumerated in ensuing Census,' the post said. The option of self-enumeration through a web portal will be available for both phases: HLO and PE. 'Digital Census initiative is a transformational step towards modernising the Census process. For the first time, technology will be used to collect data and send it electronically to the central server. This will result in early availability of Census data,' the Registrar General said on X. The Registrar General has established a three-tier training structure: national trainer, master trainer, and field trainer, to provide focused and need-based training for each phase of Census 2027. Field trainers will impart training to around 34 lakh enumerators and supervisors, the post added. 'Census 2027 will have a focused publicity campaign for nationwide awareness, inclusive participation, last-mile engagement and support for field operations. It will emphasize on sharing accurate, authentic and timely information ensuring cohesive and effective outreach effort,' it said. For Census 2027, administrative boundaries across India will be frozen on January 1, 2026. States and Union Territories have been requested not to make changes to administrative boundaries between January 1, 2026, and March 31, 2027. In a letter to all states and Union Territories, Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India Mritunjay Kumar Narayan told them to make any proposed changes to the boundaries of administrative units before December 31, 2025, when they will be considered final for the census exercise. He said all villages and towns are divided into uniform enumeration blocks, and for each block, an enumerator is assigned to avoid any miss or repetition during the population count.

Why economics should abjure ethics
Why economics should abjure ethics

Time of India

time9 hours ago

  • Time of India

Why economics should abjure ethics

The blog is named after Seeing the Invisible, the title of a book on economics for children that Sanjeev wrote in 2018. Economics involves the study of incentives, motivations and information flows which are invisible. Likewise, self-seeking ministers and bureaucrats often work invisibly (and insidiously) against the public interest - more so in socialist countries like India where governments take on many unnecessary functions. On the other hand, self-interested businesses – through their competition for our custom – end up fostering the public interest. This blog straddles a range of autobiographical, governance and policy topics, including the experience working in the IAS, letting go of the Indian bureaucracy and learning new things in different countries, and attempting to build a liberal party for India. LESS ... MORE In 2023, I suggested why public health ethics is useless at best, harmful at worst. In 2024 I explained why, in my view, ethics must be expunged from public health. In doing so I also cited broader problems with the concept of ethics which make it unsuitable to inform public policy. A recent paper by Jim Dorn argued that the best argument for free trade is its morality. The economist Donald Boudreaux supported this: 'Jim Dorn is correct: The ultimate justification for free trade is that protectionism is unethical. What right do producers A, B, and C have to the income that you earn that you wish to spend purchasing imports? The answer is none.' I believe that Don Boudreaux is one of the finest economists of our time but I disagree with such rhetoric. Morality operates in an irrational world and carries the risk of being used to drive entirely opposing arguments. I will attempt to show in this piece that not just public health, economics must also abjure ethics. Ethics provides no tools to assess public policy Ethical analysis is fully justified for individual-level medical interventions. That's why we have the Hippocratic oath. Individual-level ethics also tells us why enslaving someone is bad or why trading in children is bad. But ethics doesn't make sense for society-wide policy such as property rights (private or public), lockdowns, or vaccine mandates. That's because ethics has no methodology to assess and then aggregate harms and benefits across millions of people. Instead, it forces us to look within, to use the guidance of our 'soul', thus switching off the rational circuits of our brain. The Nobel laureate George Stigler wrote in 1980 that an economist 'needs no ethical system to criticize error: he is simply a well-trained political arithmetician'. For society-wide policy, only empirical, rational methods, such as a cost-benefit analysis, are justified. There is a good reason why there is no economics textbook on theology and ethics but many textbooks on how to identify costs and benefits of policy. Economists can readily demonstrate that free trade provides a net benefit to society while socialism, which confiscates property and destroys trade, causes more harm than good. Once the net benefits of capitalism and free trade are proven, readers can draw their own conclusion. We don't need to embellish our already powerful arguments with ethics. Ethics is often the first resort of the scoundrel There's an aphorism in India: 'Munh mein Ram, bagal mein churi'. It cautions us against those who proclaim loudly to be ethical (chanting the name of God at every step), for such people are capable of plunging a knife into our back when we are not watching. In 2024, I elaborated how 'ethics is a devious concept that has often been deployed since antiquity by elites to justify their misdemeanours'. In 2023 I showed how : 'Every soldier's God is on his side. Ethics is the most malleable instrument of human imagination. It is always misused by zealots.' Socialists and fascists lay claim to their superior ethics. In a chapter on 'Hitler's Ethics' in his 2004 book, From Darwin to Hitler, Richard Weikart explained that: '[I]t is clear from Hitler's writings and speeches that he was not amoral at all. On the contrary, he was highly moralistic and consistently applied his vision of morality to policy decisions'. Even when he was losing the war, in January 1945, Hitler said: 'The insight into the moral value of our conviction and the resulting objectives of our struggle for life give us and, above all, give me the strength to continue to wage this fight in the most difficult hours with the strongest faith'. In describing Marx's ethical goals, Frederick Engels wrote in his 1877 book, Anti-Duhring, about how communism would achieve '[a] really human morality which stands above class antagonisms and above any remembrance of them'. Who could object to such warm and fuzzy goals? But we know what communism actually does. Likewise, the founding Fabian socialist, Dr Havelock Ellis wrote in 1922 that 'The inspiring appeal of Socialism to ardent minds is no doubt ethical.' R. H. Tawney, a British Christian socialist, is reported to have believed that 'socialism…involves a moral transformation, not just an economic one'. In his 1949 essay advocating socialism, Albert Einstein plied the ethical argument: 'socialism is directed towards a social-ethical end. ….there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy'. In his 2012 book, How China became Capitalist, Ronald Coase noted that socialism was considered by China's leadership as the moral way 'to stamp out economic inequality, the perceived root of all social evils'. Socialism brings an abrupt end to private property rights, markets and free trade because doing so is said to be ethical. John Rawls's social justice arguments for confiscation of private property are likewise based on ethics. But Jim Dorn claims that it is free trade, instead, that is ethical! So, who is right? None of them. Because ethics can't give us a unique, objective answer. It is unfit for purpose. Socialists need to resort to the subterfuge of morality to persuade others because of overwhelming empirical evidence against socialism. Let them do so. We can easily refute them with objectively measurable rational facts. Conflating private ethics with society-wide policy When people ask me what drives me, I cite 'nishkama karma', i.e. doing the right thing with no regard to the consequences. I'm not religious by the remotest stretch of imagination but this phrase from the Gita works for me. Everyone, however, differ on their understandings of 'right action'. We might think highly of our personal moral standards but that doesn't give us the authority to tell others how the world should be run. Instead, we should first rationally confirm that our beliefs do actually provide a net benefit to society, and then share these proofs with others. Objective, empirical proofs have a higher chance of persuading others than appeals to morality. Nobel prize winning economist cautioned economists from using arguments other than purely rational ones. In his 1960 book, The Constitution of Liberty, he noted that 'noble sentiments' have often been 'mobilized in the service of greatly perverted aims'. He explained that using such (moral) sentiments is 'neither a safe guide nor a certain protection against error'. Let's stick with empirical, rational arguments and not divert economics into the capricious and often deadly swamp of morality. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store