logo
'Grass is playing like clay' - Wimbledon's 'slow' courts

'Grass is playing like clay' - Wimbledon's 'slow' courts

BBC News12 hours ago
Wimbledon 2025Venue: All England Club Dates: 30 June-13 JulyCoverage: Live across BBC TV, radio and online with extensive coverage on BBC iPlayer, Red Button, Connected TVs and mobile app. Full coverage guide.
Conditions have been tough for the players at Wimbledon, but for some it is not just the high temperatures making things difficult - it is also the grass they are playing on.Several of those competing at the Grand Slam this week have said the balls are bouncing differently, while one player said it is like playing on clay - traditionally a much slower surface.It has been an especially hot start to the tournament, with Monday setting a record for the warmest opening day when the temperature reached 32.3C, while the mercury rose to 33.4C on Tuesday.Defending women's champion Barbora Krejcikova voiced her thoughts on the surface after battling back to win her opening match against Alexandra Eala."There's not enough water, and it gets really, really yellow, very, very fast," she said."I think with the heat, yes, the grass is more like stopping. The game is just different [to] what you are normally used to."
'This isn't grass anymore' - what have players said?
Canadian Denis Shapovalov, the number 27 seed at Wimbledon, was knocked out by Argentina's Mariano Navone in the first round.He was broken six times by his opponent as he suffered his earliest exit at the tournament since 2019."The balls are the worst, the grass tour has turned into a joke," he said after his defeat."This isn't grass anymore, the court is slower than a clay one. It's not even grass."Two-time champion Petra Kvitova said things had changed over the years."I'm not sure if it's only grass," she said after her final appearance at the All England Club ended in a defeat by 10th seed Emma Navarro. "Maybe it's the balls, as well. Overall it's getting slower."Eight top-10 seeded players have exited in the first round - the highest tally at a single Grand Slam event in the Open era.Among those to be knocked out was American third seed Jessica Pegula, who said the courts at Wimbledon "felt different" but added: "That's grass – they're all kind of different. It's a living surface, they're not going to play the same."Poland's former world number one Iga Swiatek, who beat Russian Polina Kudermetova 7-5 6-1 in her first-round match, feels the Wimbledon courts are playing slower but expects things to change in the coming days."It [Wimbledon] was slower, and kind of more slippery with the movement," she said. "But also with the heat and everything the ball bounced differently than how it will in the coming days, so I'm not really focusing on that. "With the change of the weather we will have to adjust every day to the different conditions."
What is the effect of slower courts?
Slower courts lead to longer rallies as players have more time on the ball. It can therefore also lead to longer matches, which can be more physically draining for players.Former doubles player Dom Inglot told BBC Sport that courts had been getting slower since 2001. Before that, you would see players hitting serve and volley predominantly rather than the long baseline rallies you more often see now.He believes part of the change is down to Wimbledon wanting to make the courts more aesthetically appealing after years where the courts looked very worn by the second week, while also wanting to deliver a better spectacle for fans."The idea was Wimbledon had to compete with the great rallies you were seeing at the Australian Open, US Open, French Open," he said. "Serve and volley all the time was getting a bit mundane so they wanted more rallies and so there was discussion of do you change balls, do you change the court and I think they went with both."Inglot has been playing with this year's Wimbledon ball on hard courts and has found it is playing differently to last year's, and therefore expects that to be the case on grass.He also said the surfaces at different grass tournaments would play differently - including at the Wimbledon qualifying event at Roehampton and Queen's - and so doing well on those surfaces may not translate to doing well at the All England Club. A slower surface means players need to adapt their tactics. "It was ridiculous to think you could hit a kick serve that would jump off the surface like a kick works on clay or hard courts – that was not imaginable 10 years ago, now kick is working," he said."It used to be slice serves and flat serves but now you're using kick serves because you're starting to get the ball moving away from opponents."
What type of grass is used at Wimbledon?
Wimbledon has not commented on whether this year's courts are slower than in previous years. Since 2001 the Wimbledon grass is comprised of perennial pyegrass, which is said to have the durability and strength to withstand the wear of the modern game.Wimbledon's official website says that during the tournament the height of grass is eight millimetres and is cut every day, while a "little bit of water" is put on the courts overnight.A number of factors affect the speed of a court which include the compacting of the soil over time, as well as the weather before and during the event.Warm and dry days should make a ball lighter and faster, while cold and damp days would make it seem heavier and slower.The soil, it says, largely determines the bounce of ball, not the grass.There have been no changes to the specification of the ball since 1995, when there was a very minimal alteration in compression.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ben Stokes reveals he was bed-bound following ‘exhausting' first India Test
Ben Stokes reveals he was bed-bound following ‘exhausting' first India Test

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Ben Stokes reveals he was bed-bound following ‘exhausting' first India Test

Ben Stokes revealed he was bed-bound for two days due to exhaustion following the England vs India first test match. Speaking on BBC Radio 4, Stokes described feeling "very tired physically and mentally" after the five-day game. He noted that teammate Brydon Carse also experienced significant fatigue, underscoring the demanding nature of test cricket. England, led by Stokes, secured a five-wicket victory at Headingley, giving them a 1-0 lead in the five-match series. Watch the video in full above.

Saving Jasprit Bumrah for Lord's is ridiculous by India
Saving Jasprit Bumrah for Lord's is ridiculous by India

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Saving Jasprit Bumrah for Lord's is ridiculous by India

Ben Stokes played a straight bat. 'Their choice,' he said bluntly, when asked about India's selection for the second Test at Edgbaston. But behind the steely stare, the England captain must have been jumping for joy, for India had left out Jasprit Bumrah, one of the great fast bowlers in Test history. It is a baffling decision to headline a fudged selection. Bumrah is delicate, of course, and a heavy workload across five Tests in Australia eventually saw him break down in Sydney. He cannot be expected to play all five Tests in this series, coming as thick and fast as they do. India have bizarrely telegraphed that Bumrah will only play three. But the second, at Edgbaston, simply had to be one of them. India are 1-0 down, having lost a game they could and should have won at Headingley. They have been very clear that he is fit and available for the match, but they have left him out. Ravi Shastri, who was a very fine coach of India, could not believe it. 'You have the best fast bowler in the world and you make him sit out after seven days' rest. It's something very hard to believe and I can't agree with it.' Bumrah had a big workload at Headingley, bowling 43.4 overs, more than any other seamer in the game. He was the outstanding bowler on show, and was devastating in the first innings, if neutered a little in the second. But since, he has had a full week off to rest up for this challenge. The official reason given by the captain Shubman Gill is that India are 'managing his workload'. He continued: 'This is an important match for us, but the third match being at Lord's, we thought there might be a bit more in the wicket than here.' There are two reasons saving Bumrah for Lord's is wrong-headed. The first is that their series is hanging by a thread; lose at Edgbaston and it will be as good as gone. As England learnt the hard way in the 2023 Ashes, coming back from 2-0 down is nigh on impossible. India's handling of Bumrah is reminiscent of England's muddled shuffling of their bowlers in the 2021/22 Ashes. Mark Wood was their best bowler in the first Test at Brisbane, but was then rested at Adelaide. By the time he returned for the final three Tests, England were toast. There is little point in any of Bumrah's three Tests in this series being once it is lost. The second is that the flat pitch at Edgbaston is actually more reason to play Bumrah. He is the one quick on either side with the skill to take the surface out of the equation. India have other decent seam bowlers, who have caused England trouble in the past, but none like him. There is no guarantee that the Lord's pitch will have anything more in it than Edgbaston, even if the slope is always helpful for quicks, especially those as awkward as Bumrah. Alas, the sense is that there is sentimentality involved in this decision. Bumrah, like all visiting Test players, wants to play at the Home of Cricket, because of its prestige, and the allure of a place on the hallowed honours board. Bumrah has played one previous Test at Lord's, in 2021, the most memorable moment of which was his no-balls to Jimmy Anderson late on the third day. But he took three vital wickets on day five; enough to drive India to victory, but not enough to get on the honours board. India's selection more widely felt a total fudge, and very confused. Once they had decided to leave out Bumrah, surely the brilliantly tricksy left-arm wrist-spinner Kuldeep Yadav's case for inclusion grew even stronger. Instead, they played it safe, packing the batting by picking the off-spinning all-rounder Washington Sundar. India should forget that their tail was blown away in Leeds, and instead concentrate on picking their most dangerous bowlers in order to take 20 wickets. They dropped the coming man, Sai Sudharsan, and did not even gamble on the uncapped Arshdeep Singh's left-arm pace. They may have stumbled upon a magic formula, and could still win at Edgbaston, especially if they hold their catches. But the sense is that they have made their job so much harder than it needs to be.

Former British No.1 tennis player banned from Wimbledon grounds
Former British No.1 tennis player banned from Wimbledon grounds

Wales Online

time29 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Former British No.1 tennis player banned from Wimbledon grounds

Former British No.1 tennis player banned from Wimbledon grounds Christopher 'Buster' Mottram was Britain's leading male player in the late 1970s and early 80s, but has been barred from Wimbledon since 2023 following 'misdemeanours' Buster Mottram, pictured during his tennis career, has been banned by Wimbledon (Image: MSI ) A divisive former tennis star has reportedly been excluded from Wimbledon. Christopher Mottram, known widely as 'Buster', was Britain's leading male player in the late 1970s and early 80s as well as representing his country in the Davis Cup. However, he has been barred from SW19 since 2023, fellow former British tennis star Roger Taylor has revealed. ‌ Taylor made the claim in his recently-released book, The Man Who Saved Wimbledon, per the Daily Mail's Eden Confidential column. Now 70, Mottram was seen as a controversial figure. ‌ He once wrote a letter in support of then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher during her battles with the trade unions in the 80s, even signing it on behalf of the Davis Cup team, which left the tennis authorities fuming. Additionally, he faced allegations of racism due to his backing of Enoch Powell, a far-right politician notorious for his 'Rivers of Blood' speech about mass immigration in the late-60s. Taylor, 83, wrote: "His antics and beliefs saw him frozen out by the establishment. He never became a permanent member of the All England Club which, for player with his record, would usually be guaranteed. In 2023, following further misdemeanours, he was banned from the place altogether." Article continues below Mottram is said to be no longer welcome at SW19 (Image:) When approached for comment, a Wimbledon spokesperson said: "I'm afraid we don't comment on our membership." Mottram has been left feeling despondent by his expulsion, although Taylor attributed the ban primarily to his own conduct. He wrote: "Buster spent more time there than just about anyone else and it's been very sad to watch his decline and exclusion, even if much of it has been down to his own failings." ‌ In his heyday, Mottram soared to 15th in the world rankings in 1978 and 1983, with his most notable Wimbledon achievement being reaching the fourth round in 1982. He made it to the fourth round at both the French Open and the US Open as well. He was also a member of the British Davis Cup team that was runner-up to the United States in 1978. A young Mottram in action (Image: Getty ) ‌ Mottram abruptly hung up his racket in 1983, blaming the continuous "hassle" of participating in year-round tournaments. He later ventured into right-wing politics but found himself ejected from UKIP for fraternising with the British National Party (BNP) and its leader Nick Griffin. After attempting to broker a pact between UKIP and the BNP, Mottram was ejected from the party, then under Nigel Farage's leadership. Farage said at the time: "There are no circumstances, no possible situations, in which we would even consider doing any type of deal with the BNP whatsoever. "I'm simply amazed that the BNP thought we would even consider such a thing, given that we are a non-racist, non-sectarian party." Article continues below Griffin had entertained hopes of forming an agreement to prevent BNP and UKIP candidates from competing against one another in the forthcoming European elections.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store