
China is spending billions to become an AI superpower
OpenAI
blocked
China
's access to its advanced artificial intelligence systems last July, Chinese coders shrugged. They would rely instead on open-source systems, where the underlying technology is shared publicly for others to build on.
At the time, that mostly meant turning to another popular American product made by Meta.
But in the year since, there has been a major shift in the global race to develop advanced AI. Chinese companies such as
DeepSeek
and
Alibaba
have churned out open-source AI systems of their own that rank among the world's top performers.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giá vàng đang tăng mạnh trong năm 2025 — Các nhà giao dịch thông minh đã tham gia
IC Markets
Tìm hiểu thêm
Undo
China is quickly closing the gap with the United States in the contest to make technologies that rival the human brain. This is not an accident. The Chinese government has spent a decade funneling resources toward becoming an
AI superpower
, using the same strategy it used to dominate the electric vehicle and solar power industries.
"China is applying state support across the entire AI tech stack, from chips and data centers down to energy," said Kyle Chan, an adjunct researcher at the RAND Corp., a think tank.
Live Events
For the past 10 years, Beijing has pushed Chinese companies to build manufacturing capabilities in high-tech industries for which the country previously depended on imports. That approach helped China become the maker of a third of the world's manufactured goods and a leader in electric vehicles, batteries and solar panels. And it has also been applied to the essential building blocks of advanced AI systems: computing power, skilled engineers and data resources.
China pushed that industrial policy approach as three presidential administrations in Washington tried to hold back its ability to make technologies such as artificial intelligence, including by restricting sales of chips made by Nvidia, America's leading AI chipmaker.
On Monday, Nvidia said the U.S. government had approved sales, with a license, of a China-specific chip known as the H20. But with Beijing's backing, Chinese companies like
Huawei
have been racing to develop alternatives to Nvidia's technology.
Beijing's approach to AI is intended to help Chinese tech companies make advancements despite Washington's restrictions.
In the United States, companies including Google and Meta have spent billions on data centers. But in China, it is the government that has played a major role in financing AI infrastructure and hardware, including data centers, high-capacity servers and semiconductors.
To concentrate the country's engineering talent, the Chinese government also financed a network of labs where much of its most advanced AI research takes place, often in collaboration with big tech companies such as Alibaba and ByteDance.
Beijing has also directed banks and local governments to go on a lending spree that fueled hundreds of startups. Since 2014, the government has spent nearly $100 billion on a fund to grow the semiconductor industry, and in April said it would allocate $8.5 billion for young AI startups.
Local governments have set up entire neighborhoods that function as startup incubators, like Dream Town in Hangzhou, a city in China's south that is home to Alibaba and DeepSeek and is known as a hot spot for AI talent.
"For the government to help us cover even 10 or 15% of our early-stage research costs, that's a huge benefit," said Jia Haojun, the founder of Deep Principle, a Hangzhou startup focused on using AI for chemical research that raised $10 million last year.
Different city districts offer competing incentives to lure startups to their areas. Deep Principle received a $2.5 million subsidy from a district in Hangzhou when the startup moved to the city, Jia said. A local official helped him find office space and employee housing.
American AI systems were built using information from all types of websites, including some that are inaccessible on China's censored internet, such as Reddit and Wikipedia. But Chinese companies need to make sure that any AI products used by the general public comply with Beijing's controls on information. So the government has created data resources that contain approved information for companies to use to train their AI systems, including one based on state media articles that is called "the mainstream values corpus."
Chinese tech companies also have an enormous amount of data on how people use the internet, which has helped companies such as ByteDance, the parent of TikTok, develop some of the country's most popular AI systems.
Yet Beijing's industrial policy approach to AI has also been inefficient. An abundance of AI startups are vying for their piece of a cutthroat market, competing to offer their models at low rates to engineers.
This top-down approach also makes it burdensome to shift resources quickly as technology changes. Chinese companies spent years working on AI technologies such as facial recognition but were caught off-guard by the advances in generative AI behind ChatGPT.
"It can be difficult to figure out where to invest and allocate resources," said Chan, the RAND researcher. "AI is not like traditional industries like steel or shipbuilding, where the technology is fairly stable."
Much of the government funding has gone to China's leading chipmaker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp., which manufactures chips designed by companies including Huawei and Qualcomm. SMIC has raced to produce AI chips for Huawei that are intended to compete with ones made by Nvidia.
While Huawei chips may be good enough for some tasks, they cannot do everything Nvidia chips can do. Companies are also reluctant to make the switch because it is difficult for SMIC to manufacture them in large quantities.
"The idea is that in the event of being cut off, there is some viable alternative -- even if it is lagging in performance -- so China's AI industry can continue to make some progress instead of being stopped altogether," Chan said.
Chinese companies are turning to open-source AI systems as the fastest way to catch up to rivals in Silicon Valley, which are thought to have at least a few months' lead over China's most advanced technology.
In the past year, Alibaba has released several popular open-source systems. ByteDance, which spent $11 billion last year on data centers and other AI infrastructure, also published details about how it built some of its technology. This month, Huawei released an open-source system. Even Baidu, a Chinese internet company that previously praised the "monetization potential" of closed AI products, recently released open-source versions of some of its systems.
While OpenAI and Google charge a premium for access to their closed AI systems, the Chinese approach of making models publicly available has made it easier for engineers around the world to build on their systems.
OpenAI has warned that
Chinese AI
companies such as DeepSeek could block American competitors from markets around the world, giving them the chance to set standards for how the new technology is used.
Sam Altman, OpenAI's CEO, has framed the competition between American and Chinese AI companies as ideological and said he wants to "make sure democratic AI wins over authoritarian AI."
The thinking is that China's approach may appeal to more engineers around the world.
"Open-source is a source of technological soft power," said Kevin Xu, the U.S.-based founder of Interconnected Capital, a hedge fund that invests in AI technologies. "It is effectively the Hollywood movie or the Big Mac of technology."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Microsoft joins $4 trillion club
NEW YORK: Microsoft soared past $4 trillion in market valuation on Thursday, becoming the second publicly traded company after Nvidia to surpass the milestone following a blockbuster earnings technology behemoth forecast a record $30 billion in capital spending for the first quarter of the current fiscal year to meet soaring AI demand and reported booming sales in its Azure cloud computing business on Wednesday. Shares of Microsoft were up 6.6% at $546.33 in morning trading. "It is in the process of becoming more of a cloud infrastructure business and a leader in enterprise AI, doing so very profitably and cash generatively despite the heavy AI capital expenditures," said Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager, Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity Fund. Redmond, Washington-headquartered Microsoft first cracked the $1-trillion mark in April 2019. Its move to $3 trillion was more measured than technology giants Nvidia and Apple, with AI-bellwether Nvidia tripling its value in just about a year and clinching the $4-trillion milestone before any other company on July 9. Apple was last valued at $3.11 trillion.

The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India must build a stronger framework for scientific talent
Last December, China unveiled images of its prototype sixth-generation fighter jets, sending ripples across global defence circles. Weeks later, its home-grown DeepSeek AI matched OpenAI's GPT-4 on international benchmarks. These milestones are not isolated achievements. They represent the momentum of a country that has been investing deeply and consistently in scientific talent and ecosystems. Among the early accelerators of this momentum was its 'Thousand Talents Plan', launched in 2008 to bring leading global researchers into Chinese institutions, though it later drew scrutiny, particularly from the West on issues of transparency and intellectual property. However, it demonstrated how talent strategies, when backed by long-term vision, can influence a nation's scientific trajectory. China's progress is also the result of parallel investments in research infrastructure and coordinated doctoral training. Its leading universities now routinely appear higher in global rankings. India, too, has reason for confidence. Its scientists are globally respected. Our institutions have trained generations of high-impact researchers, many of whom now lead labs, departments, and innovation hubs across the world. National missions in artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and biotechnology reflect India's growing strategic focus on frontier science. Yet to translate this momentum into long-term leadership, the country needs a sharper framework for scientific talent, one that helps India not just retain but also actively attract and integrate the world's best minds. This cannot be achieved through incremental initiatives or those in silos. It calls for distributed ambition and the ability to act decisively, across institutions, disciplines, and borders. Talent zones A good starting point could be to designate select cities such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Pune, Hyderabad, and Kolkata, having a high density of research and industrial institutions, as science talent zones. Within these zones, participating universities and research centres could be enabled to hire global faculty, initiate joint labs, and offer co-supervised Ph.D.s with international partners, using fast-track, peer-reviewed processes. Institutions such as Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and Seoul National University in South Korea have demonstrated how institutional agility and targeted hiring can rapidly elevate research output and visibility. India needs to rethink how long-term scientific careers are structured. Institutions should be encouraged to establish global tenure tracks, open to both Indian-origin and international scientists. These could be evaluated through international peer review and tied to performance in research, mentorship, or innovation. Models such as Tel Aviv University's diaspora-led faculty recruitment drive could be looked for inspiration. Talent relocation, particularly at the mid-career or senior level, depends on much more than funding. Institutions would need to be supported through outcome-linked incentives to build their own onboarding systems for housing, schooling, lab infrastructure, and spousal employment. This is essential to encourage relocation. To sustain momentum, the existing national missions could go further by embedding convergence science tracks within their architecture. The future of innovation lies at the interface of disciplines. AI for new materials, quantum sensing for climate resilience, or genomics for agricultural adaptation all require teams that span traditional departments and even institutions. Internationally, convergence institutes are being created that assemble such teams by design. India's missions can support similar efforts by enabling proposals that cross scientific domains and are reviewed by interdisciplinary panels. The private sector could also be encouraged to jointly co-invest in specific projects, with the incentive architectures built-in for them to also reap benefits. India must also streamline entry. A global science residency card, tied to institutional affiliation and academic review, could offer five-year residency with the option of permanent settlement. Authorised institutions, especially those participating in national missions, could be given the discretion to fast-track eligible candidates and remove procedural delays. Finally, engagement with India's vast scientific diaspora must evolve from episodic outreach to structured collaboration. Peer networks, virtual sabbaticals, co-supervised doctoral programmes, and shared research infrastructure can keep overseas scientists meaningfully connected to India's knowledge ecosystem, without necessarily requiring relocation. Countries such as Israel have shown how alumni-driven platforms can support returning researchers with professional and personal transitions, building long-term loyalty and exchange. None of these steps require large new structures. What they demand is coordination, clarity, and a shift in posture, specifically institutional empowerment. India already has the raw ingredients, including good scientists, increasingly capable universities, and national missions aligned with long-term goals. What we now need is a system that makes it easy for talent to arrive, thrive, and lead. The global race for scientific leadership is no longer just about infrastructure or capital. It is about people. Nations that succeed will be those that build environments where the most ambitious minds want to belong. India has the opportunity to be one, however it must act with clarity, ambition as well as urgency. Swapan Bhattacharya is the Director of TCG CREST (Deemed to be University), Kolkata; views expressed are personal.


Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Democratic senator proposes new safeguards to keep TikTok online
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Democratic Senator Ed Markey on Thursday proposed new national security safeguards that would ensure TikTok could remain online as the fate of the short video app used by 170 million Americans remains last year passed legislation to force China's ByteDance to divest TikTok by January 19 or face a ban, but President Donald Trump has directed the Justice Department not to enforce the proposal would eliminate the requirement that ByteDance sell TikTok's US operations if it establishes transparency requirements about content and limits foreign access to the data of TikTok's American month, Trump extended by 90 days to September 17 a deadline for ByteDance to divest the US assets of Democratic lawmakers including Markey argue Trump has no legal authority to extend the deadline and have suggested the deal under consideration would not meet legal requirements."For months, I have been urging my colleagues to find an alternative path to the TikTok ban that keeps TikTok online without jeopardizing national security," Markey said. "With Trump continuing to illegally extend the divestment deadline, it's time for Congress to reassert its legislative power, fix its mistake, and consider a new approach to TikTok."A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese Secretary Howard Lutnick said last week TikTok will have to stop operating in the United States if China does not approve a deal for the sale of the Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday said the future of TikTok did not come up in recent trade talks with has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January.