Tunisia president's far-reaching clampdown targets opponents – DW – 07/11/2025
The latest mass trial in Tunis' primary court has ensured that President Kais Saied won't have to worry about dissent from 21 of his fiercest political opponents for many years to come.
On Tuesday, politicians and officials, including opposition leader Rached Ghannouchi, were variously sentenced to 12 to 35 years in prison.
Ghannouchi, the 86-year-old leader of Tunisia's Islamist Ennahda party and former speaker of the parliament, refused to appear in court, where he was given a 14-year sentence for forming a "secret security apparatus."
By staying in his cell, where he has been since April 2023, he upheld his boycott of Tunisia's judiciary, which he deems politically manipulated. Together with the latest verdict, his prison time now adds up to 27 years.Ten of those convicted for charges of terrorism, violence, or attempts to overthrow the government are already in jail.
The other 11 convicted politicians have already left the country. Among them are Tunisia's former Prime Minister Youssef Chahed, former Foreign Minister Rafik Abdessalem, Nadia Akacha, Saied's former chief of staff, and Tasnim and Mouadh Ghannouchi, the children of Rached Ghannouchi.
However, as they would be arrested upon return, the verdicts essentially bar them from entering the country or becoming politically active in Tunisia for decades.
"The verdicts issued in the latest 'Conspiring Case 2' are a new wave of persecution of the opposition and an attempt to isolate and marginalize it," Riad Chaibi, a Tunisian politician and advisor of Rached Ghannouchi, told DW.
"The judiciary's subservience to political directives means that these verdicts do not reflect the supremacy of the law, nor do they reflect justice and the conditions of a fair trial," he said.
In his view, the verdicts issued in this and other cases have a purely political background.
Also Bassam Khawaja, Deputy Director of the Middle East and North Africa Division at Human Rights Watch regards the latest verdicts as part of a broader pattern in which the Tunisian authorities target the political opposition.
"We haven't seen all of the evidence in these cases, but the authorities are frequently using corruption or financial crimes' accusations to go after political opponents, activists, journalists, human rights defenders in a way that's very clearly abusive," Khawaja told DW.
"At this point it is very obvious that these trials are not fair," he said, adding that "essentially they are clearing the field to ensure that there is no political opposition within Tunisia."
Saied's increasing crackdown on Tunisia's opposition stands in stark contrast with his views when he became president in 2019.
At the time, the politically independent former law professor garnered a majority of 72% and broad public support for his vows to tackle corruption, and to modernize the state while upholding Tunisia's democracy.
However, after two unremarkable years, Saied developed a taste forpower consolidation . Since then, the now 67-year-old has dismantled most democratic bodies, including the country's judiciary.
In late 2024, Saied secured a second term in a vote that observers deemed neither free nor democratic. Tunisia's rights situation has also taken a turn for the worse. Most candidates were either not admitted or imprisoned. Scores of journalists and activists were jailed.
In Saied's view, however, all of these steps are justified to shore up the country's "war of national liberation" and to end corruption.
For Riccardo Fabiani, director of the North Africa Project at the conflict-prevention NGO International Crisis Group, points out that Tunisia's "structural corruption problem" has deep roots.
"Undoubtedly there are a lot of politicians and entrepreneurs in Tunisia that have broken rules and bribed whoever they needed to bribe to achieve their goals, whether these were political or business goals," he said, adding that the current clampdown was not motivated by an honest urge to uproot corruption.
"By using the accusation of corruption, the president is trying to stifle the opposition," Fabiani said, describing corruption as "a pretext."
Meanwhile, Saied is under no pressure to alter his increasingly undemocratic course.
"There is not strong enough internal mobilization against him and his increasingly authoritarian rule," said Fabiani. "There is no external pressure whatsoever, particularly from Europe, given that the European Union and European governments are benefiting from Tunisia's role controlling migration."
Despite this, Ghannouchi's advisor and oppositional politician Riad Chaibi stresses that he is not going to give up. "We will continue the struggle to restore the democratic process and release all political prisoners," he told DW. "There are many voices in this country... We believe that our path will ultimately triumph."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Syria Deploys Forces After Dozens Killed In Bedouin-Druze Clashes
Syria deployed security forces Monday in the southern province of Sweida after at least 50 people were killed in clashes between Sunni Bedouin tribes and Druze fighters, a monitor said. The outbreak of sectarian violence underscores the challenges facing the administration of interim leader Ahmad al-Sharaa, whose Islamist forces overthrew president Bashar al-Assad in December, in a country reeling from 14 years of war. The latest fighting, which began Sunday, continued sporadically into Monday in several villages, said the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights war monitor and the Suwayda 24 news outlet. The clashes reportedly erupted when a Druze vegetable vendor was seized by armed Bedouins on the main highway linking Sweida to Damascus. The incident triggered a series of retaliatory abductions by both sides. Suwayda 24 said those abducted were released Sunday night. The Observatory raised its death toll Monday to 50, including 34 Druze -- among them two children -- 10 Bedouins and six members of the security forces. State television confirmed six deaths among the security forces. The highway between Damascus and Sweida remained closed, said the Britain-based monitor, which relies on a network of sources on the ground. The defence ministry put the toll at 30 dead and around 100 wounded. Dozens more have been wounded amid armed clashes and mortar fire in Sweida city and nearby villages. Syria's defence and interior ministries announced the deployment of military units to the affected areas, the establishment of safe corridors for civilians, and a commitment to "end the clashes quickly and decisively". "The lack of state, military and security institutions is a major reason for the ongoing tensions in Sweida," Interior Minister Anas Khattab said Sunday on X. "The only solution is to reactivate these institutions to ensure civil peace," he added. The latest unrest follows deadly violence in April and May, when clashes between Druze fighters and security forces in Druze-populated areas near Damascus and Sweida killed more than 100 people. The Observatory said members of Bedouin tribes, who are Sunni Muslim, had sided with security forces during earlier confrontations. Local leaders and religious figures brokered agreements at the time to de-escalate the tensions, putting Druze fighters in charge of local security in Sweida since May, though armed Bedouins remain present in several areas. On Sunday, Sweida governor Mustapha al-Bakur urged his constituents to "exercise self-restraint", while Druze community leaders urged authorities to step in. In response to the violence, the education ministry announced the postponement of Monday's scheduled secondary school exams in the province. Syria's pre-civil war Druze population numbers around 700,000, many in Sweida province. The Druze, followers of an esoteric religion that split from Shiite Islam, are mainly found in Syria, Lebanon and Israel. Bedouin and Druze factions have a longstanding feud in Sweida, and violence occasionally erupts between the two. A surge in violence in March targeting the Alawite community -- with more than 1,700 killed -- and the subsequent attacks on Druze areas have undermined confidence in the new Syrian authorities' ability to protect minorities. In the wake of those incidents, Israel -- which has occupied part of Syria's Golan Heights since 1967 -- cited the protection of the Druze to justify several strikes, including one in early May near the presidential palace in Damascus. Israel is home to around 152,000 Druze, according to the latest available data, including 24,000 living in the Israeli-occupied Golan, of whom fewer than five percent hold Israeli citizenship.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Can debt-laden NATO members spend billions more on defense? – DW – 07/14/2025
NATO members recently agreed to increase defense spending to 5% by 2035 — a "quantum leap," according to the military alliance's chief, Mark Rutte. But can its indebted members really afford the hike? The NATO summit at the end of June left Donald Trump happy. The US President called it "tremendous" that the military alliance's 32 members had agreed to ramp up defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. He has been pressuring them to do so for years. However, he reserved his customary ire for one member: Spain. After vocal opposition from the country's prime minister, Pedro Sanchez, the Spanish government found a way out of the 5% commitment by claiming it could meet its defense obligations by spending much less. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump said the decision was "very terrible" and that they would be made "pay twice as much." Sanchez argued the 5% target — which is broken down into 3.5% on defence and 1.5% on defense-related infrastructure — was unreasonable and that diverting public spending in such a way could damage the economy. In the end, Spain secured an agreement with NATO that granted it an effective opt-out. That has raised questions about the extent to which many member nations will ultimately be able to afford the spending pledges they have made. "The choice to ringfence and prioritize defense amidst public spending cuts is politically challenging and will need strong public messaging to be accepted by the electorate and indeed across governments in office," Fenella McGerty, senior fellow for defense economics at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), told DW. She points out that when Spain previously signaled a hike in defense spending in April, Sanchez was keen to emphasize that it would not add to the country's debt pile or impact social spending. Ilke Toygür, director of the global policy center at Madrid's IE University, thinks Spain's position was partly about having an "open conversation" on the fact that prioritizing defense spending would impact other key areas of national budgets and could lead to a damaging backlash. "If there is no understanding about the importance of the fight against climate change or on other social issues, for example, housing or support for health or education, then this [defense spending hike] will create the contrary effect that European leaders are trying to get," she told DW. At the end of the day, what Europe really needs is a "sustained defense investment that will make the continent more secure," she said, adding that a "sustained public backlash could create the opposite effect." NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has hailed the 5% increase as a "quantum leap" and said it "laid the foundations for a stronger, fairer and more lethal NATO." McGerty believes the 2035 pledge is a "significant commitment," particularly if European members manage to "increase core defense spending to 3.5% of GDP" — up from the current average of 2%. The NATO agreement specifies that 3.5% of GDP should "resource core defense requirements" and meet so-called NATO capability targets — a list of specific defense-preparedness goals, from air defense to land maneuvers. According to NATO, the extra 1.5% of spending will, among other things, "protect critical infrastructure, defend networks, ensure civil preparedness and resilience, innovate, and strengthen the defense industrial base." McGerty acknowledges that the pledge to bolster spending comes "at a time of considerable fiscal pressures" for member states. However, she thinks the 1.5% infrastructure element has a "broad definition" to give countries flexibility. "Many countries are likely already spending this much on such funding areas," said McGerty. Yet, there are still substantial doubts over the capacity of some member states to hit the agreed levels. According to NATO's most recent defense spending figures from 2024, all but eight of the alliance's members were hitting the existing 2% target. A few have caught up in the meantime. However, those furthest behind in terms of military spending — Spain, Belgium, Canada, Italy and Portugal — also have the problem of having high government debt of close to or even over 100% of their gross domestic product (GDP). Greece is an outlier in that it has the highest debt level of all, but it already spends more than 3% on its defense. Ilke Toygür is sceptical if some northern European countries, who during the 2008/2009 financial crisis decried the debt levels of some southern European countries, understand the scale of the challenge for economies ramping up defense spending while managing high existing debt levels. "What will happen if these countries use the next 5-10 years to increase their defense spending. Does it mean more private sector investment is needed?" she wonders. In her opinion, a "fairer assessment of the debt question and the overall impact on the European economy at large" is needed. McGerty argues that countries with strong fiscal positions, such as Germany, can borrow to meet the targets but those with longer-term debt issues will be reluctant to add to that debt. If those still lagging behind the 2% mark are to have "any hope of meeting the 5% target without borrowing more," she noted, they would have to make the kind of dramatic choices abhorred by Sanchez, or hope the private sector comes to the rescue. Increases in military spending would have to be funded through other means, McGerty believes, including, for example, "higher taxation, cuts to other areas of public spending or via other creative funding options including special funds administered by central banks or treasuries, multilateral lending instruments, or mobilizing private investment." While leaders like Sanchez and others are concerned about borrowing and potential cuts, experts say the writing has been on the wall for a while. McGerty noted that NATO chief Rutte stated already in December 2024 that increases in European defense spending would necessarily impact spending on pensions, education and health care, Yet ramping up military spending brings its own financial risks. As Europe rushes to build up its own arms sector, rising inflation in the defense industry, supply chain delays, and labor issues mean ever more money is being needed to meet the same ends. So, Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank (ECB), warned in March that higher defense spending itself could contribute to inflation — yet another reminder that for many countries, the rush to make Europe safer, will come at a high price.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Ukraine updates: US special envoy Kellogg arrives in Kyiv – DW – 07/14/2025
Keith Kellogg, US President Donald Trump's special envoy for Ukraine, has started his visit to Kyiv. Earlier, Trump announced that the US would send Patriot air defense systems to thw war-torn country. DW has more. Amid rising tensions between the United States and Russia, Keith Kellogg, the US president's Ukraine envoy, arrived in Kyiv to discuss security and sanctions against Moscow. Kellogg's visit is expected to last about a week. It follows Trump's announcement that the US would send Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine. The US president's announcement of the weapons for Ukraine came after he said he would deliver a "major statement... on Russia" on special envoy Keith Kellogg arrived in Kyiv for an almost week-long visit focused on defense and sanctions talks. Andriy Yermak, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's top aide, posted a video on X showing his welcome of Kellogg at the Kyiv railway station. "We welcome US Special Representative Keith Kellogg to Ukraine," Yermak wrote on Telegram, adding "peace through strength is the principle of US President Donald Trump, and we support this approach." "Defense, strengthening security, weapons, sanctions, protecting our people, strengthening cooperation between Ukraine and the United States — there are many topics to discuss," Yermak wrote. In his evening address on Sunday, Zelenskyy said that he had instructed military commanders to present Kellogg with information on Russia's capabilities and Ukraine's prospects. Earlier this month, Washington said it would pause some arms deliveries to Kyiv, but Trump recently changed course, criticizing Russian President Vladimir Putin for intensifying attacks as US-led peace talks stalled. Welcome to DW's coverage of the latest developments in Russia's war in Ukraine. As Russia continues its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, US special envoy Keith Kellogg arrived in Kyiv for defense talks. On Sunday, President Donald Trump announced that the United States would send Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine. This announcement marked an abrupt change in Trump's position, as just two weeks ago the US paused the delivery of weapons to Ukraine. Stay tuned for more news and analysis.
