logo
Torture, Threats And Arbitrary Arrests: UN Warns Of ‘Serious Abuses' Against Afghans Forced To Return

Torture, Threats And Arbitrary Arrests: UN Warns Of ‘Serious Abuses' Against Afghans Forced To Return

Scoop3 days ago
24 July 2025
These abuses include threats, cases of torture, mistreatment and arbitrary arrest and detention, according to the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
The report said these violations were committed against Afghans 'based on their profile' and targeted women, media workers and civil society members as well as individuals affiliated with the former government that fell in 2021 and its security forces, despite the Taliban's claims that such individuals benefit from an amnesty.
' No one should be returned to a country where they are at risk of being persecuted because of their identity or personal history,' said Volker Türk, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
'In Afghanistan, this situation is even more pronounced for women and girls, who are subjected to a series of measures that amount to persecution solely on the basis of their gender.'
Since 2023 and the start of large-scale deportation campaigns launched by Iran and Pakistan, millions of Afghans have returned to their country. In 2025 alone, more than 1.8 million people have returned to Afghanistan, 1.5 million of them from Iran.
Women under house arrest
The UN refugee agency, UNHCR, recently estimated that the total could reach three million by the end of the year, returning to a country facing a severe humanitarian crisis.
The situation of women forcibly returned is particularly dire. A former television journalist, who left the country after the Taliban's takeover in August 2021, described how, after being involuntarily returned to Afghanistan, she saw her prospects vanish.
'I am very worried for my personal safety and feel immense frustration with the current situation imposed on women in [my province]. I can unequivocally say that I am effectively under house arrest. There are no job opportunities, no freedom of movement and no access to education – whether to learn or to teach – for women and girls,' she testified.
Many people are also forced to live in hiding since returning to Afghanistan due to real or feared threats from the de facto authorities. This is the case for individuals affiliated with the former government and its security forces, who have had to go into hiding for fear of reprisals, despite the public amnesty announced by the de facto authorities.
Living in hiding
A former official described how, after returning in 2023, he was detained for two nights in a house where he was severely tortured, beaten with sticks, cables and wood, subjected to water torture and faced a mock execution.
Other refugees returned from Iran must frequently change locations to avoid being identified, such as one former judge.
' I try to stay hidden because I know that the prisoners who were detained because of my decisions are now senior government officials and are still looking for me. If they find me, I'm sure they'll kill me. They already threatened me when I was a judge,' they said.
Faced with these serious abuses, the UN is urging States not to return anyone to Afghanistan who faces a real risk of serious human rights violations.
' Member States should expand resettlement opportunities for at-risk Afghans and ensure their protection, giving priority to those most likely to suffer human rights violations if returned to Afghanistan, including women and girls, individuals affiliated with the former government and security forces, media professionals, civil society activists and human rights defenders,' the report said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UN Experts Urge Brazil To Halt Serious Regression On Environmental Licensing
UN Experts Urge Brazil To Halt Serious Regression On Environmental Licensing

Scoop

time19 hours ago

  • Scoop

UN Experts Urge Brazil To Halt Serious Regression On Environmental Licensing

UN human rights experts* today expressed grave concern over Brazil's General Environmental Licensing Bill approved by the Chamber of Deputies on 17 July and by the Senate last May. The law is pending presidential enactment. 'The bill introduces significant regressions to Brazil's environmental licensing system and threatens the human rights to life, health, an adequate standard of living, and a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment,' the experts said. The approved licensing bill PL No. 2159/2021 includes measures such as simplified environmental licensing through developers' self-declarations and automatic renewal of permits. Several activities would also be exempt from licensing despite potentially severe environmental and human rights impacts, including industrial agriculture and energy-related infrastructure. 'These changes risk exacerbating the planetary crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, toxic pollution, and worsening inequalities. They would also weaken the rights to access to information, public participation, and access to justice, particularly for marginalised peoples and groups,' the experts said. They stressed that the licensing amendments would disproportionately affect Indigenous Peoples, and Quilombola Afro-descendant communities, who are already severely impacted by environmental and climate harms, violating Brazil's obligations of non-discrimination. 'While procedural efficiency in environmental licensing is important, it must not be achieved at the expense of effective regulations, controls and monitoring, and accountability, and human rights and environmental protections,' the experts said. They noted that Brazil's obligations to prevent significant environmental harm by public and private actors, including to prevent transboundary environmental harm, encompasses conducting comprehensive and integral environmental, social and human rights impact assessments before authorising any activity that threatens human rights or the environment. 'This legislative rollback contradicts Brazil's international legal obligations,' the experts said. 'It is paradoxical that this law might be enacted shortly after historic Advisory Opinions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which clarified States' obligations to adopt all necessary measures to respond to the climate emergency and prevent harm by all actors, including effective regulation and supervision relating to fossil fuels, agriculture and deforestation.' The experts reaffirmed that the principle of non-regression is fundamental to international human rights and environmental law, requiring States to refrain from weakening existing legal protections. 'As the ICJ and the IACtHR underscored, States have an enhanced due diligence obligation to protect the climate system and the environment on which all human rights depend, and must prevent irreversible harm to the climate and life-supporting systems,' they said. The experts warned that the bill would undermine Brazil's credibility as the host of the upcoming COP30, the 2025 UN Climate Change Conference in Belém. As a global climate leader, Brazil must ensure that its domestic legislation is aligned with its international commitments, including under the Paris Agreement. We call on President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to veto parts of the licensing bill that contradict Brazil's constitutional and international obligations. Protecting the environment is essential to safeguarding the rights and dignity of present and future generations. * Experts: Astrid Puentes Riaño, the Special Rapporteur on the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment; Pedro Arrojo-Agudo, the Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation ; Elisa Morgera, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change; Bina D'Costa, the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent; Albert K. Barume, the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; Pichamon Yeophantong, the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises

Thailand, Cambodia agree in principle to ceasefire amid deadly conflict
Thailand, Cambodia agree in principle to ceasefire amid deadly conflict

NZ Herald

time20 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Thailand, Cambodia agree in principle to ceasefire amid deadly conflict

It said Phumtham requested Trump to 'convey to the Cambodian side that Thailand wants to convene a bilateral dialogue as soon as possible to bring forth measures and procedures for the ceasefire and the eventual peaceful resolution of the conflict'. A woman who fled her home near the border between Cambodia and Thailand, sits on a hammock at a pagoda in Oddar Meanchey province. Photo / Tang Chhin Sothy, AFP Hours earlier, clashes broke out in the countries' coastal regions where they meet on the Gulf of Thailand, around 250km southwest of the main front lines, thumping with blasts on Saturday afternoon. 'It feels like I'm escaping a war zone,' 76-year-old Samlee Sornchai told AFP at a temple shelter for evacuees in the Thai town of Kanthararom, after abandoning his farm near the embattled frontier. A long-running border dispute erupted into combat this week with jets, tanks and ground troops. Tensions initially flared over long-contested ancient temple sites before fighting spread along the rural border region, marked by a ridge of hills surrounded by wild jungle and agricultural land where locals farm rubber and rice. 'Tragic and unnecessary' While each side has expressed openness to a truce, they have accused one another of undermining armistice efforts. Cambodia's defence ministry said 13 people have been confirmed killed in the fighting since Thursday, including eight civilians and five soldiers, with 71 people wounded. A pagoda damaged by Thai artillery is pictured in Oddar Meanchey province. Photo / AFP Thai authorities say 13 civilians and seven soldiers have died on their side, taking the toll across both nations higher than it was in the last major round of fighting between 2008 and 2011. Both sides reported a coastline clash early Saturday, with Cambodia accusing Thai forces of firing 'five heavy artillery shells' into Pursat province, bordering Thailand's Trat province. The conflict has forced more than 138,000 people to be evacuated from Thailand's border regions, and more than 35,000 driven from their homes in Cambodia. After an urgent United Nations Security Council meeting on Friday in New York, Cambodia's UN ambassador Chhea Keo said his country wanted 'an immediate ceasefire' and a peaceful solution of the dispute. Cambodian soldiers stand on a military truck with an anti-aircraft gun in Oddar Meanchey province. Photo / Tang Chhin Sothy, AFP UN chief Antonio Guterres remained deeply concerned about the armed clashes and urged both sides Saturday to 'immediately agree to a ceasefire' and hold talks to find a lasting solution. 'The Secretary-General condemns the tragic and unnecessary loss of lives, injuries to civilians and the damage to homes and infrastructure on both sides,' his deputy spokesman Farhan Haq said in a statement. Scramble for dialogue Both sides have blamed the other for firing first. Additionally, Cambodia has accused Thai forces of using cluster munitions, while Thailand accused Cambodia of targeting civilian infrastructure, including a hospital hit by shells. The fighting marks a dramatic escalation in a long-running dispute between the neighbours – both popular destinations for millions of foreign tourists – over their shared 800km border where dozens of kilometres are contested. A UN court ruling in 2013 settled the matter for more than a decade, but the current crisis erupted in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a border clash. Relations soured dramatically when Cambodia's influential ex-leader Hun Sen last month released a recording of a call with Thailand's then-Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra focused on the row. The leak triggered a political crisis in Thailand as Paetongtarn was accused of not standing up for Thailand enough, and of criticising her own army. She was suspended from office by a court order. – Agence France-Presse

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store