logo
Ontario introducing legislation to connect data centres to energy more easily

Ontario introducing legislation to connect data centres to energy more easily

Global News03-06-2025
Ontario is introducing legislation that will allow the agency that manages the province's energy grid to prioritize projects — including data centres — that meet economic growth criteria, among other changes.
On Tuesday, Minister of Energy and Mines Stephen Lecce unveiled new legislation he said would support the growth of the province's energy sector.
The proposed Protect Ontario by Securing Affordable Energy for Generations Act includes clauses to allow the Independent Electricity System Operator to prioritize certain projects for connection to the grid, lean into made-in-Canada energy technology for security and increase the emphasis on hydrogen.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'As global competition intensifies, energy demand surges, and affordability becomes more important than ever, Ontario isn't standing still — we're stepping up,' Lecce said in a statement.
The government is particularly pointing to the emergence of data centres — large computing buildings that store cloud information and manage artificial intelligence operations — as a reason for the tweak.
Story continues below advertisement
Currently, all projects are connected to the grid with equal importance, according to the government. The tweak would allow the IESO to prioritize projects of economic importance, like data centres.
The government's calculations show 6,500 megawatts of power is currently needed for data centres. The figure is equivalent to 30 per cent of peak demand for the province.
'That's a ton of power,' Lecce said. 'That's three Pickerings, that's almost two Darlingtons of power just for data centres.'
The proposed legislation would remove the non-discriminatory clause that governs Ontario's grid.
The law is not expected to pass until after the legislature returns in the fall.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ontario trustee has ignored requests to repay share of $145K Italy trip, government says
Ontario trustee has ignored requests to repay share of $145K Italy trip, government says

Global News

time3 hours ago

  • Global News

Ontario trustee has ignored requests to repay share of $145K Italy trip, government says

The government says an Ontario school board trustee has not acknowledged requests to repay more than $11,000 in expenses from a controversial trip to Italy, despite a threat from the Minister of Education to 'fire' him if he does not settle up. Last July, Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board trustee Mark Watson was one of four elected education officials who went on a trip to Italy to purchase artwork. The total cost of the trip was roughly $45,000, with a further $100,000 spent on artwork. The overseas mission sparked widespread outrage and led to an apology from the board. The government ordered an official investigation into the trip. It revealed several expenses, including a visit by the four trustees to an Italian Michelin star restaurant where they ordered four courses priced at €126.00 each, along with €216 on wine. Managing the fallout of the trip cost another $63,000 in legal fees. Story continues below advertisement In December, after the public furor, the four trustees agreed to repay around $12,000 each. Each signed up for payment plans of roughly $130 to $250, stretching their final repayment deadlines to between 2026 and 2028. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy After he was appointed minister of education in March, however, Calandra said he wouldn't accept the long-term repayments. He ordered the trustees to repay the full amount by May 23, 2025. The minister's office confirmed to Global News on Monday afternoon three of the four trustees met that deadline. They said that Watson, however, has not completed his repayment or responded to any attempts from the government to contact him. Speaking at the end of June, Calandra said he had outlined a clear threat to Watson if the money was not repaid in full. 'We are still waiting on one trustee who has made the decision he is not going to be repaying the cost of his trip,' the education minister said on June 27. 'As I said last time to this trustee, you have an opportunity to pay back, but if he has not paid back, I will be bringing forward legislation, and I will vacate that seat. And I will fire that trustee. I will not allow parents and students to be shortchanged.' The ministry's report shows, as of March 6, Watson had repaid $1,216.71 of $12,370. It is not clear if he has made any payments since that date. Story continues below advertisement Watson did not respond to questions from Global News sent through his contact form on the school board's website and to his campaign email address. Calandra said he thought Watson should be removed from his post — to which he was elected in 2022. 'Teachers going to Dollarama to buy (supplies) while this guy refuses to pay back his $11,000. And a former educator at that!' Calandra said. 'I think he deserves to be fired if he doesn't do the right thing.' The Ontario legislature is not set to resume until Oct. 20, 2025, meaning Calandra will not be able to table legislation to potentially remove Watson before then.

B.C. grocer avoids selling U.S. produce for 117 days in what expert calls a ‘real' boycott
B.C. grocer avoids selling U.S. produce for 117 days in what expert calls a ‘real' boycott

Global News

time11 hours ago

  • Global News

B.C. grocer avoids selling U.S. produce for 117 days in what expert calls a ‘real' boycott

A grocery store in Victoria, B.C., has avoided selling U.S. produce for 117 days. Garth Green, general manager of Urban Grocer, says when U.S. Donald Trump launched his trade war on Canada in March, they decided to pull all U.S.-grown produce from the shelves. And so far, it's been a big success. 'We're, you know, just really trying to promote the local farms,' he said. 'And the Canadian farms. And so it's been very, very good for us. The customers have been very appreciative of it.' The experiment has not been without its challenges. When Green found out they could only get cauliflower from the U.S., he realized it was currently cauliflower season in Holland. Story continues below advertisement 'So we reached out to a few suppliers and said, 'Hey, can you get Holland cauliflower for us?'' he said. 'We ended up finding some, brought it in, and you know it's a little bit more expensive to bring in because you're flying it in. But we just took, you know, a less margin, sell it at a regular price and be able to give the customer something that they can buy until B.C. cauliflower was available.' 6:19 50% tariffs to hit Canadian copper imports to the U.S. Green said local farmers are now reaching out to offer produce to their customers. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'There's people every day almost that come in here and say, 'You know, we hear what you're doing and we love it and we'd love to join on board with you and really shop here,''' he added. Green added that it is unfortunate that it took something like the trade war to make this change but he is happy it has been so successful. Story continues below advertisement 'We've got a Canada-first motto that we like to push, but, you know, we're also not blind to the fact that you can't get everything from Canada, right?' he said. 'And so, you know, even across the store, we are working towards trying to go all Canadian if possible. It's going to be a lot harder, but we've started the process and started to weed out some of the suppliers that we don't need.' 0:27 Business response to Trump's 35% tariff threat Sylvain Charlebois, with the Faculty of Management at Dalhousie University, researches food distribution, security and safety. He told Global News that what Urban Grocer is doing points to a broader movement against American products at the grocery store. 'What's really interesting is that people haven't really boycotted chains like Walmart or Costco, but they're boycotting products,' he said. Story continues below advertisement 'And the boycott naturally worked. If you look at the data, not surveys, actual sales data, according to NielsenIQ, by volume, sales for American food products are down about 8.5 per cent.' Charlebois said in the food retail business, that number is huge. 'That's a boycott. That's the boycott now,' he added. Charlebois added that while consumers are seeing fewer U.S. products, they are seeing more products from around the world so it does not necessarily mean that Canadian product companies are benefiting from the boycott. 'The boycott is absolutely real. So this boutique store is a good, strong case study for what actually is happening across the country.'

University of Saskatchewan's Student Union calls for repeal on Bill 137
University of Saskatchewan's Student Union calls for repeal on Bill 137

Global News

time13 hours ago

  • Global News

University of Saskatchewan's Student Union calls for repeal on Bill 137

In October of 2023, the government of Saskatchewan passed Bill 137, otherwise known as 'The Parent's Bill of Rights'. The law prevents children under the age of 16 from changing their names or pronouns at school without a parent's consent. The bill also allows parents to prohibit their children from receiving sexual education at school. When the bill first passed, education minister Jeremy Cockrill shared in a statement that parents have the right to know what is being taught at their child's school. 'The Parents' Bill of Rights' is an inclusionary policy that ensures that parents are at the forefront of every important decision in their child's life.' said Cockrill. Now, almost two years later, the University of Saskatchewan Student Union (USSU) has used their platform to bring awareness to this bill once again. The USSU, alongside the University's Pride Centre and Women's Centre, wrote a letter explaining why Bill 137 is harmful for students. Story continues below advertisement 'Bill 137 continues to directly harm and enact violence on youth whose understandings of self do not conform to perspective colonial binaries of gender identity and gender expression.' the letter states. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The letter also shares why access to sexual education is an important resource for students to have. 'According to the Executive Director of Sexual Assault Services of Saskatchewan (SASS), Saskatchewan has the second-highest rate of sexual violence amongst all other Canadian provinces. Moreover, Saskatchewan is consistently reported to have one of the highest provincial increases in HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.' Access to the USSU's full letter can be found on their Instagram page. USSU Pride Centre coordinator Wren Dahl says they see the effect the bill has had on students who were in school when the bill passed. They shared that once at the University of Saskatchewan, those students will be able to live freely and have safe spaces and support on campus. 'No matter what their high school experience was or will be, this will be a safe space that champions those rights.' shares Dahl. In a statement made to Global News, the Saskatchewan provincial government says it maintains that parents and guardians have a key role in protecting and supporting their children as they grow and develop. Story continues below advertisement 'The Parent's Bill of Rights introduced amendments to The Education Act, 1995, including the provision that students under the age of 16 receive parental or guardian consent if they want teachers and staff to use a gender-related preferred name or gender identity at school,' the statement reads. 'If it is reasonably expected that obtaining parental consent is likely to result in harm to the student, schools must acquire the appropriate professional resources to support and assist the student in developing a plan to address the student's request with their parent(s) or guardian(s). 'Requiring parental consent for students under 16 years of age and ensuring schools provide the resources necessary to safely receive that consent will help ensure the student is adequately supported both in the school and at their home.' The Government of Saskatchewan used the notwithstanding clause to pass the law, but the court of appeal is still considering whether it violates Charter rights.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store