B&B owner who raped young guest fails in appeal against his conviction
A Sligo B&B owner who raped a guest nearly 40 years his junior and claimed it was consensual has failed in an appeal against his conviction.
'There is no reason to suppose that the jury did not faithfully apply the principles of law,' said Mr Justice Patrick McCarthy at the Court of Appeal today, rejecting an appeal by Thomas Wymbs (68).
Wymbs was found guilty by a jury of one count of raping the woman between February 22 and 23 2020 following a Central Criminal Court trial in February 2024.
Wymbs was living at and was the proprietor of Atlantic Haven B&B, Moneygold, Mount Temple, Co Sligo at the time the offence took place.
Ms Justice Mary Ellen Ring sentenced him to seven and a half years with the final 18 months suspended on July 31, 2024.
Stock image
Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 28th
The sentencing court heard that the complainant in the case, a European woman in her 20s, had been staying at the B&B. At the time in question, she was the only guest.
On the night of February 22, 2020, Wymbs invited her to join him for a drink. Her last recollection was around midnight, before she woke in the middle of the night to find herself in Wymbs' bedroom and he was raping her.
Launching an appeal against his conviction earlier this month, Michael Bowman SC, for Wymbs, said the trial judge had made an error in refusing requests by the defence to address the jury on two issues.
He said the first related to comments made in the prosecution's closing speech and the second was linked to evidence given by an expert witness from Forensic Science Ireland in relation to alcohol consumption and its effects.
Mr Bowman said during the prosecution's closing speech, the jury were invited to consider why the injured party might have made the complaint. He said the question posed by the prosecution was why she would make up this story.
In delivering the court's judgement today, Mr Justice McCarthy said that at the core of the case was the prosecution contention that the complainant was incapable of consenting because of the effect of alcohol, giving rise to sleep.
He said that a forensic scientist conducted analyses of the complainant's blood and urine, going on to say that the court did not think that the trial judge's failure or omission to summarise this expert evidence in his charge to the jury gave rise to a deficient charge.
He said that the trial was a short one, and the evidence of this witness could only have been fresh in the minds of the jurors since that evidence was given on the previous day.
Mr Justice McCarthy said that there was no disagreement about the high level of intoxication of the victim and the statistical evidence merely bore that fact out.
Concerning the second ground of appeal, Mr Justice McCarthy said that the defence had the opportunity to respond to the prosecution's closing speech. He also said that the trial judge referred to the standard and burden of proof and told the jury not to speculate in any way when deciding the case.
'There is no reason to suppose that the jury did not faithfully apply the principles of law elaborated in the charge,' he said, adding that the court did not think the prosecuting counsel invited speculation in his closing speech.
In summary, the court rejected the appeal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
2 days ago
- Extra.ie
Frustrated farmers take on illegal campers in viral video
A group of farmers took matters into their own hands in recent months when police failed to intervene when illegal campers refused to leave their fields. A viral clip shows the farmers in France combatting hoards of caravans allegedly illegally parked up. It is believed that the farmers did contact the police, who were unhelpful so they took control of the situation themselves. A group of farmers took matters into their own hands in recent months when police failed to intervene when illegal campers refused to leave their fields. Pic: X Video footage shows the farmers driving their tractors in the field and begin to spread what one could only assume is slurry. Those staying in the caravans seem quite vexed and some even begin to chase the tractors — with one even managing to climb up to the tractor. Farmers, culchies and people who live nearby a farm will know that slurry is very smelly and is a combination of cow faeces and water which is used to help crops grow — or to prevent illegal campers, like in this case. After not receiving any help from the police, French farmers decided to take matters into their own hands to get rid of an illegal gypsy camp that had set up on their land. It has become increasingly difficult for people to evict trespassers in many European countries
Sunday World
2 days ago
- Sunday World
Nikita Hand sues Conor McGregor and her two former neighbours
Action lodged against MMA fighter and two former neighbours Nikita Hand speaks to the media outside the High Court last week. Photo: Collins Courts Nikita Hand is seeking aggravated and punitive damages against MMA fighter Conor McGregor over his conduct in his appeal of a jury's verdict. Ms Hand has already successfully sued McGregor in the civil courts, claiming that she was raped, with the jury finding that McGregor assaulted her. On Thursday, after the Court of Appeal threw out McGregor's appeal, Ms Hand lodged a new action against McGregor and two of her former neighbours. Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins The neighbours, Samantha O'Reilly and her partner Steven Cummins, had signed affidavits alleging that Hand was assaulted by her then partner on the night of the alleged rape by McGregor in December 2018. McGregor had sought to introduce new evidence from Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins, but these witnesses were dramatically pulled from the appeal case at the last minute. Ms Hand had filed an affidavit saying she did not understand why the couple were telling 'lies' about her. Punitive damages seek to punish a wrongdoer by ensuring they will not repeat the same conduct again The new case filed by Ms Hand in the High Court seeks damages for 'malicious abuse of the process of the court by the defendants, and each of them, their respective agents and/or agents'. The cause of action in the case is listed a 'malicious prosecution'. As well as general damages, Ms Hand is seeking aggravated and punitive damages against the three defendants. Aggravated damages can be awarded where it is found that injury to the plaintiff has been exacerbated by the conduct of the defendant. It may be awarded when a court is satisfied that hurt was caused by 'outrageous', 'arrogant' or cavalier conduct by a defendant. Punitive damages seek to punish a wrongdoer by ensuring they will not repeat the same conduct again. These damages do not seek to compensate a plaintiff, but seek to publicly mark a court's disapproval of the defendant's conduct. These damages often relate to the defendant's conduct during legal proceedings. Conor McGregor lost his civil rape case appeal. Photo: PA In a statement after the Court of Appeal ruling on Thursday, Ms Hand said the appeal had 'retraumatised me over and over again'. After the verdict last November, Ms Hand's legal team complained that posts by McGregor and his fiancee Dee Devlin, which attacked the jury's verdict, could amount to contempt of court. Ms Hand later made an application to injunct McGregor from posting CCTV evidence from the case online after an Italian stout distributor business partner of McGregor's claimed the footage would be posted online in order to change the public's view of the case. Judge Alexander Owens ordered McGregor to destroy or return all copies of the CCTV footage that he had from the case. McGregor gave an undertaking not to distribute the footage. Ms Hand was awarded €248,603.60 in damages by the High Court last November, and McGregor was also ordered to pay about €1.3m of her legal costs. He will also have to pay her legal costs in relation to his failed appeal. McGregor claimed not to know why his legal team pulled Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins from giving evidence The Court of Appeal judges decided to refer papers in the case to the Director of Public Prosecutions following an application from Ms Hand's counsel John Gordon SC, who alleged there had been perjury by Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins, as well as subornation of perjury by McGregor. McGregor's friend James Lawrence, who was also sued by Ms Hand but was found by a jury not to have raped her, had appealed against the High Court's decision not to award him costs. This was also rejected by the Court of the Appeal, which cited evidence in the trial that McGregor was paying his friend's costs. Nikita Hand speaks to the media outside the High Court last week. Photo: Collins Courts News in 90 Seconds - Monday, August 4th On a social media post on X last week, McGregor claimed not to know why his legal team pulled Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins from giving evidence. He also said people were 'out of your f**king mind' if they thought he would be paying Mr Lawrence's legal costs. He wrote that he was in a 'world of fog' during the civil trial when he was asked on the stand if he was paying Mr Lawrence's legal bill and said 'I didn't know if I was'. A transcript of the trial shows McGregor said 'I believe I did', when the trial judge asked if he had paid Mr Lawrence's legal fees. In a post-verdict hearing on costs last December 5, Remy Farrell, senior counsel for McGregor, told the judge that Ms Hand's side were 'correct' to say that McGregor was paying Mr Lawrence's legal costs. Nikita Hand leaves the Four Courts last week after Conor McGregor lost his appeal. Photo: PA Mr McGregor's post said he would 'fight on with the truth and will continue to defend myself'. Meanwhile, the DPP is considering whether to refer a booklet of documents relating to Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins to gardaí. The documents include the affidavits both witnesses swore for the appeal, as well as new material that Ms Hand's legal team intended to put to Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins during their cross-examination, had both not pulled out. According to garda sources familiar with perjury investigations, the DPP is expected to refer the documents to the Garda Commissioner, who will most likely assign the file to the Garda National Bureau of Criminal Investigations. Such investigations typically involve corroborating the facts outlined in both sworn statements, and any allegations contained in any other documentation. It is likely the suspects will be interviewed as part of the investigation, although this is not always the case. Perjury files have been forwarded to the DPP based on an analysis without the suspect's knowledge, as was the case with Marie Farrell, once the garda's key witness in the garda investigation into the murder of Sophie Toscan Du Plantier. Ms Farrell was investigated for perjury after a High Court judge sent the DPP conflicting statements that Ms Farrell had made in evidence. She was giving evidence in the High Court in 2014 in a case where Ian Bailey sued the State for wrongful arrest. Following a garda investigation, the DPP decided Ms Farrell should not face charges. Attempts to contact Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins for comment at their home in Ballyfermot yesterday were unsuccessful.
Sunday World
2 days ago
- Sunday World
Extreme online porn is ‘radicalising' young men into sexual violence, Garda Commissioner says
'We see this manifest in serious sexual assaults where, literally, it has to be explained to them what they did was wrong' Extreme online pornography is 'radicalising' some young men into normalising violence against women, Garda Commissioner Drew Harris has said. Mr Harris said in some cases gardaí have had to explain to perpetrators of violent sexual assaults why what they did was wrong. Mr Harris will step down as commissioner in September after seven years in the post. On Thursday, he addressed his final meeting of the Policing Authority. Speaking to the media afterwards he explained his concerns about the prevalence of online pornography. He said: 'I think the use of the expression hard-core is no longer relevant. 'The pornography which is readily accessible on the internet is extreme in the violence that it perpetrates, mostly against women. 'What happens then is that young men see this and this is a major influence on them in terms of what they think a sexual relationship is. 'We see this manifest in serious sexual assaults where, literally, it has to be explained to them what they did was wrong. 'Because seeing this violent behaviour has become so normalised.' He added: 'There is a trend in the violent behaviour of the offending which you can relate back to the imagery which is in pornography, which is so prevalent on the internet. 'That has been also observed by the various studies, Women's Aid recently released a report and that was their conclusion as well. 'My analysis of this is probably more anecdotal. 'As I look at the incidents and what is described, but also what the responses of the various assailants, perpetrators are, one can see that they have become normalised to the violence that they are seeing online.' Mr Harris said some men's view of a normal sexual relationship had become 'completely distorted'. He added: 'You can say almost that they have been radicalised. 'I do think there is an education piece for this. We have heard a lot over the last few weeks about limiting the access of children to all sorts of violent imagery, I think that's a good thing. 'It has to be faced up as well that there is a multibillion industry behind this that we are not going to defeat by attacking it, what we have to do is make sure people are educated and understand what a proper relationship is.' The commissioner said: 'What I am saying is one can see the trend, it is backed up by academic research. 'We can see the trend ourselves and it is evident then when we consider some of the crimes that come through our courts in recent years.' News in 90 Seconds - Sunday, August 3rd
