logo
South Australia on high alert for shot-hole borer infestations

South Australia on high alert for shot-hole borer infestations

South Australians have been asked to keep an eye out for an invasive pest that has the potential to wipe out thousands of street and parkland trees, as well as some crops, if it spreads into the state.
A national plan is being developed to manage the beetle — the polyphagous shot-hole borer — which was detected in Western Australia in 2021 and has spread through trees in the Perth region.
The WA government recently said it would stop trying to eradicate the beetle, which has put authorities in other states on high alert for its presence.
South Australian Forest Products Association chief executive Nathan Paine said he was disappointed to see authorities "give up" the fight to eradicate a pest that could cause "untold damage across our urban landscapes and across Australia".
"Once a pest is in the country, we need to work as hard as we can, like we have here in SA with fruit fly, to ensure that pest is eradicated," Mr Paine said.
He said the state's pine plantations were not under threat, but Tasmanian bluegum plantations, native forests, street trees and botanic gardens were.
"If we can stop this now in WA before it becomes significant … we need to make this happen."
South Australia's Department of Primary Industries (PIRSA) director of plant and invasive species, Nick Secomb, said the borer had the potential to enter the state from WA in timber, mulch or established trees.
He said PIRSA had been monitoring about 500 sites, mainly within metropolitan Adelaide, for signs of the pest.
"The real risk for us is that it might get picked and brought here, and so we've had movement controls in place for a while now in our plant quarantine standard," Mr Secomb said.
"Luckily we've got that one road in from WA, we've got the Ceduna quarantine station, so all those things get checked."
Mr Secomb said PIRSA would work with local councils and nurseries to help identify signs of the shot-hole borer.
There is no known treatment beyond removing infected trees and, along with native and ornamental trees, the borer can affect crops including avocados, pears, apples, macadamia and mango.
Riverland avocado grower George Loffler said the pest could potentially wipe out SA's avocado industry.
"[If it gets here] I don't really see how we're going to stop it, and that's probably one of the scary things," Mr Loffler said.
"We don't want pesticides and chemicals affecting our fruit, and it could be a situation where we might have to abandon our harvest if we have to use those options to control the pest.
"Where does that leave us as a business and as a family, and where does it leave everyone else along the supply chain that relies on us for avocado supply?"
He said the pest was a threat to "every single person out there with a backyard" and everyone had a role in keeping it out of SA.
"I guess once they've finished destroying all those, they'll come and eat our avocados."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Young Aussie woman's confession about housing and children triggers passionate debate online
Young Aussie woman's confession about housing and children triggers passionate debate online

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Young Aussie woman's confession about housing and children triggers passionate debate online

A young woman's blunt assessment of her future in Sydney has captured a growing sentiment shared by Australians under 40. As soaring living costs and stagnant wages continue to crush household budgets and reshape life decisions, Australia is quickly joining an ominous club on the world stage. The nation's birth rate has experienced a massive decline over the past six decades and there is absolutely no sign of it stopping any time soon. Young Australians are clearly fed up about the cost of existing in the nation's biggest cities and it's rapidly reshaping how they view their future. 'We don't want to leave. But we're being priced out to the point where I can't afford it here anymore,' the young woman told the ABC in a now-viral video clip. 'I work a full-time job and I also study part time. I also tutor on the side just to make it, so I can afford living in Sydney. 'It's not just housing. You have to pay for your food, and hanging out with your friends. Do you not want us to socialise anymore?' Another young man said the idea of having kids was completely off the table. 'Too expensive,' he said. 'I wouldn't have kids just for the simple (fact) that I wouldn't have time to give to them under my current economic position. Even though it is something that would bring me a lot of joy, and something I would love to do.' The young woman agreed. 'Just look at how our society is built. We don't even have the housing that can give us the security to even have children.' Her confession about not having enough financial security to have children struck a chord online. 'Tough love' solution doesn't cut it 'Maybe move out of Sydney if you can't afford it,' one man wrote. 'Both my parents left Sydney to move somewhere more affordable. The concept is nothing new,' added another. 'Affordable is just a little further out now. You either adapt and do what you can or wait for big daddy govt. to save the day,' he continued. But for those suggesting a tough-love solution, urging young people to 'suck it up' or 'make more money', experts say there is a catch. And it has nothing to do with 'interest rates being higher in the 80s'. By and large, the baby boomer generation, and even some of the next, was able to build a family on a single wage. They were also able to capitalise on dirt-cheap real estate, use it to leverage more purchases, and then profit from historically unprecedented price rises. That idea is a fever dream for young Aussies today, unless they've somehow landed themselves a quarter-million-per-year job or fallen into a trust fund or inheritance. Associate Professor at the University of Sydney Gareth Bryant explains that the housing 'phenomenon' in the early 2000s saw a rapid increase in the home-price-to-income ratio that has never been rectified. He says that the high interest rates of the late 80s and 90s meant home ownership was hard, but it was mostly an 'income issue', meaning you could eventually work your way up to a position to afford high rates. But now, with the average dwelling costing seven to 10 times the average Aussie wage, it's become more than just an income issue. 'The problem now is you still need high income but a reasonable amount of wealth to have the deposit,' Prof. Bryant told 'It used to be much more possible for those with good jobs to save for a deposit. 'For a lot of people in decent jobs, it's really difficult to save, unless you've got some kind of additional assistance.' He says the rise in housing has naturally forced millions to enter the housing market later in life, or not at all. 'There's a delay. People are buying and forming families later, there are many who will be lifelong renters, or 'generation rent'.' In 1980, Australian households typically spent about 60 per cent of their disposable income on essential living expenses, including housing, food, transport, and utilities. This left a modest buffer for savings or discretionary spending. Almost one in two households were single-income, with one partner typically staying at home. By 2025, despite higher average incomes, the proportion of income required for living costs has increased significantly. Rising housing costs, particularly in major cities, have forced many households to allocate a larger share of their income to essentials. Today, around 73 per cent of families with children under 15 have both parents employed. We have also seen the great devaluing of tertiary education. In 1980, approximately 5 per cent of Australians aged 15-74 held a bachelor's degree or higher. By 2024, this figure had risen to a whopping 33 per cent. In the 80s, you could build a family on one income, even if you were among the outstanding majority (95 per cent) of those without university qualifications. Today, the story is the opposite, with several couples claiming their monthly expenses are too high to consider children, despite both working in fields requiring tertiary educations. Put it into perspective Let's say we have a couple, both 35, earning $100,000 each, in line with the national average. They sacrifice a lot throughout their 20s to save over a quarter million ($292,000) for a deposit. But that deposit can only land them a three-bedroom home in Sydney's western suburbs selling for the city's current median price. For a $1,168,000 loan over 30 years at 6.0 per cent interest, the minimum monthly repayment is approximately $7,010 per month, or $84,120 per year. This still fits into their after-tax income (60 per cent of $140,000) but it's tight unless they keep expenses extremely low. If they only make minimum repayments, they will pay off the loan in 30 years at age 65, paying a total of $2.52 million including $1.35 million in interest. That is the stress the current Australian trying to buy the average home must sign up for, with or without kids. 'The working assumption in 'modern Australia' is that you will sacrifice all for a dwelling and that you work your life to pay a mortgage,' economist Alex Joiner says. 'Children are jammed into that equation as an afterthought, where parents are encouraged to get back to work ASAP and make the assumption that costly child care is an appropriate stop gap measure to facilitate this.' How much are birthrates actually falling? You may see a few friends starting families and acquaintances posting baby bumps but the reality is, Australia is moving backwards compared to 60 years ago. In 1964, during the post-war baby boom, the total fertility rate (TFR) in Australia was approximately 3.1 births per woman. That contributed to rapid population growth during the latter half of the 20th century, where Western powers enjoyed an era of relative peace compare to the 50 years preceding. It was coupled with an unprecedented economic boom, largely driven by banking schemes and the rapid development on technology which helped trade and business. By 1984, the TFR had decreased to around 1.9 births per woman, indicating a substantial decline over two decades. This reduction was influenced by various factors, including increased participation of women in the workforce. In 2004, the TFR further declined to 1.77 births per woman. This period saw continued trends of delayed child-bearing and smaller family sizes, but still only marked a slight decline over the 20-year period. The most recent data from 2023 indicates that the TFR has reached a record low of 1.50 births per woman. This is the lowest rate ever recorded, and is below the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman needed to maintain a stable population. It's still a far cry from the global low (0.72) held by South Korea, but the trend paints a bleak picture for the decades ahead with no fix in sight. Peter Costello's famous 'have one for Mum, one for Dad, and one for the country' line in response to growing concerns over Australia's falling birthrate and ageing population seems like a lifetime away. But for millions of young Aussies entering the workforce, many acquiring large HECS debts just so they can become employable, the idea of 'working to build the dream' feels like a scam ... like the charade stopped years ago but everyone is still playing the same game.

Seniors who call Shark Bay in Western Australia home trade caravans for a house
Seniors who call Shark Bay in Western Australia home trade caravans for a house

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

Seniors who call Shark Bay in Western Australia home trade caravans for a house

Nearly everywhere in Australia is grappling with a lack of affordable housing. The small West Australian coastal hamlet of Shark Bay, with fewer than 900 residents, is no different. Bronwyn Hook has lived in the area for 11 years in a caravan. "There was nowhere else to live … I couldn't afford rent," she said. So when the state government and Shire of Shark Bay finished construction of 12 social homes for people over 60, Ms Hook could not contain her excitement. "I've got a toilet … this shower is more than twice the size of [mine]," Ms Hook said. "I'll be able to stretch my arms and move without hitting the walls. "Being able to afford it … it means a lot to the older folks. They don't have to leave town." Denham is the main town in the shire, 830 kilometres north of Perth. At the time of publication, there were no homes for sale or rent in Denham on any real estate websites. The 12 homes were constructed and designed for people aged 60 and over with a connection to the town. Shire of Shark Bay president Cheryl Cowell said the new homes freed up some places for private rentals, but they were not enough to solve the issue. "We've certainly got no shortage of new applicants for the remaining units," she said. The primary reasons people left town were a lack of housing, medical services and education. "We really lack medical facilities … we only have a doctor, if we're lucky, one day a week," Cr Cowell said. Growing the town of Denham has been a balancing act, with a lack of services slowing growth as well as a lack of properties to attract doctors and teachers. Cr Cowell said after 20 years of no new Government Regional Officer Housing (GROH) houses in Denham, they would see six constructed. "We'll be looking at more GROH housing if we can get the government funding," she said. "We were way behind the eight ball. "That should open up a great chunk of more rentals for people wanting to come up here." Another challenge for the shire was being able to get builders to come and stay. "Builders are pretty short on the ground. Tradies are so hard to keep," Cr Cowell said. And with tourism the biggest industry for the area, the shire had no plans to crack down on holiday home rentals. "I'd say probably at least half, maybe a bit more of the people actually own their own property here," Cr Cowell said. "There are the elements of wanting to move here when they retire, so they're building and renting out in the meantime. "We're more than happy to carry on in that regard because we don't really have any other major industries." Ms Hook said for many locals, the balancing act had not been reached. "There are a lot of houses that are accommodation for tourists," she said. "It would be good if some of them were more for people who were living here, like families that need accommodation if they're working here." Long-time resident Gloria Whitby also just moved into one of the new social houses. "[It's] a little sense of community with all the people in the same place, same phase of life," she said. Ms Whitby wanted to stay in Shark Bay for the rest of her life but wanted to see the education shortages addressed so her family could stay as well. "That's the only thing I'd like to see. A nice big high school here," she said. Her granddaughter, Brittany, seriously considered leaving the area because she could not get a rental and she wanted her children to access better education. "We did have to almost leave town because it took us a while to get a rental," Brittany said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store