logo
Newfoundland and Labrador offshore oil industry hoping election brings sea change

Newfoundland and Labrador offshore oil industry hoping election brings sea change

ST. JOHN'S – Members of Newfoundland and Labrador's offshore oil industry are hoping a new federal government focused on Canadian economic sovereignty will reignite a sector they say has been stymied by unfavourable policy.
Charlene Johnson, chief executive of the sector's industry association, Energy N.L., says policies from the Liberal government under former prime minister Justin Trudeau have had a chilling effect on oil and gas development in the province.
However, she says energy security is now top of mind for Canadians as trade tensions persist with United States President Donald Trump, and there are untapped oil and gas resources in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Johnson sent a letter to the three major parties asking for their stance on issues such as proposed legislation that would force oil and gas companies to slash their greenhouse gas emissions.
She got a response from two parties: the NDP, whose answers focused on renewable energy, and the Conservatives, who vowed to scrap the proposed emission rules and shorten approval times.
Johnson says she was disappointed that the Liberals didn't respond, but she's been encouraged by comments from party leader Mark Carney that suggest his approach to oil and gas will be different from his predecessor's.
During Elections
Get campaign news, insight, analysis and commentary delivered to your inbox during Canada's 2025 election.
Industry consultant Rob Strong was blunt, saying the positions and policies of Steven Guilbeault — Trudeau's environment minister — and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson have got to go.
This story by The Canadian Press was first published on April 25, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump slaps tariffs on key allies as global trade talks intensify
Trump slaps tariffs on key allies as global trade talks intensify

Canada News.Net

time34 minutes ago

  • Canada News.Net

Trump slaps tariffs on key allies as global trade talks intensify

WASHINGTON, D.C.: With the clock ticking toward a self-imposed trade deal deadline, U.S. President Donald Trump has announced steep tariffs on dozens of countries, escalating his efforts to reshape the global trade landscape. Through an executive order issued this week, Trump imposed new import duties ranging from 10 percent to 50 percent on goods from 69 trading partners, including Canada, Brazil, India, Taiwan, and Switzerland. The tariffs will take effect in seven days, just ahead of the August 1 deadline. The measures include a 35 percent tariff on many Canadian goods, 50 percent for Brazil, 25 percent for India, and 20 percent for Taiwan. An exception has been granted for shipments already in transit. Goods from countries not listed will face a blanket 10 percent U.S. import tax, potentially more in the future, Trump indicated. "Some trading partners, despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances," the executive order stated, adding some also failed to align with U.S. economic and national-security priorities. Markets reacted with relative calm, a contrast to the selloff that followed Trump's earlier tariff threats in April. Still, stocks and equity futures edged lower in Asian trading. The administration says additional trade deals are in the works as part of a broader strategy to close trade deficits and support U.S. manufacturing. Canada was hit particularly hard. Trump raised tariffs on Canadian goods tied to fentanyl-related enforcement to 35 percent, up from 25 percent, claiming Ottawa had "failed to cooperate" on narcotics enforcement. "Canada has been very poorly led," Trump told reporters. Canada's government has not yet responded, but it previously contested the basis for such tariffs. Mexico, meanwhile, received a reprieve. Trump granted a 90-day delay on new 30 percent tariffs for most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), following a call with President Claudia Sheinbaum. "We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow," Sheinbaum posted on X, calling the call with Trump "very good." However, U.S. tariffs on Mexican steel, aluminum, copper, and non-USMCA-compliant autos remain in place. India now faces a 25 percent tariff following stalled negotiations over agricultural market access. Trump also raised concerns about India's purchases of Russian oil. Talks are ongoing, but New Delhi has pledged to protect its farm sector. The news triggered backlash from India's opposition and a drop in the rupee. Brazil was hit with a 50 percent tariff amid tensions over the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. Still, specific sectors such as energy, aircraft, and orange juice were spared. Commerce Department data showed that tariffs may already be driving up prices: home furnishings rose 1.3 percent in June, recreational goods 0.9 percent, and clothing and footwear 0.4 percent. Meanwhile, Trump's legal justification, using the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, faced tough questioning in federal court. Judges appeared skeptical that trade deficits and fentanyl enforcement constitute emergencies under the law. Following preliminary progress in earlier talks, China now has until August 12 to finalize a broader tariff agreement with Washington.

EDITORIAL: Justice system not above criticism
EDITORIAL: Justice system not above criticism

Toronto Sun

time6 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

EDITORIAL: Justice system not above criticism

The exterior of the Ontario Court of Justice in downtown Windsor is shown on April 22, 2021. Photo by Dan Janisse / Windsor Star A country where the decisions of judges and prosecutors can never be criticized is a country that is not a democracy. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Every Canadian citizen — not just politicians and media commentators — has the right to publicly agree or disagree with decisions made by judges and prosecutors. As long as they do not threaten their safety and are critical of their decisions, as opposed to personal attacks on those delivering them, they are legitimate forms of public expression and debate. Last week, the president of the Ontario Crown Attorneys' Association said 'attacks' by 'politicians, media and members of the public' in the context of two high-profile criminal cases were 'affronts to the rule of law.' This was in reference to the Crown's submissions for sentences for Freedom Convoy organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber on mischief charges, and the fallout from the acquittal of five former junior hockey players on charges of sexual assault. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. No doubt many agreed with Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who tweeted on X in response to the Crown's submission to sentence Lich and Barber to seven and eight years respectively: 'Let's get this straight: while rampant violent offenders are released hours after their most recent charges and antisemitic rioters vandalize businesses, terrorize daycares and block traffic without consequences, the Crown wants seven years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich and Barber.' Poilievre's tweet failed to note the final decision on sentencing will be made by a judge. Others will argue his argument is misguided. But it was hardly an attack on the rule of law. A similar controversy erupted in the wake of the decision by Ontario Superior Court Judge Maria Carroccia to acquit five former junior hockey plays of sexual assault in the Hockey Canada trial. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Her ruling prompted public reactions from high praise to scathing criticism for the judge — much of it from lawyers — but all of it fair comment, as long as it did not stoop to threats or attacks on the judge's character. In our view, robust public debates about the decisions made in our courtrooms do not undermine the rule of law in Canada. To the contrary, they contribute to how our laws evolve over time and are a measure of our commitment to democracy. Read More Toronto Blue Jays Toronto & GTA Columnists Toronto & GTA Columnists

Winnipeg students hope to develop Canada-EU AI literacy
Winnipeg students hope to develop Canada-EU AI literacy

Winnipeg Free Press

time6 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Winnipeg students hope to develop Canada-EU AI literacy

A duo of local students has won a trip abroad to pitch diplomats on their made-in-Manitoba plan to bolster artificial intelligence literacy in Canada and the European Union. The University of Manitoba's Divya Sharma and Emily Katsman were named winners of the 2025 Schuman Challenge last week. 'It's a little bit surreal. I'm still taking it in,' said Katsman, noting the 20-somethings are the first Manitobans to enter the foreign policy competition put on by the EU Delegation to Canada. 'We are a province that has a lot of talent, but we sometimes get overlooked — especially when it comes to these high-level government and political competitions and policy settings.' The national contest calls on undergraduate students to brainstorm ways to strengthen the relationship between their home country and the EU. AI was the theme of this year's event, the third of its kind, which drew a total of 19 submissions from across the country. Sharma, 20, and Katsman, 21, were recognized for their proposal to create a Canada-EU roadmap for AI literacy in post-secondary education. 'By working together, Canada and the EU can create the shared infrastructure, standards, and trust needed to shape an AI-literate generation. One that will fuel future breakthroughs in health, climate, defence, and the digital economy,' they argued in a nine-page essay. 'From classrooms to NATO command centres, students in Canada and the EU must speak the same digital language.' Their recommendations to make that happen? Launch a joint AI literacy taskforce, standardized educator certification initiative and a research and student exchange program. 'AI is the future. There's no turning back,' Sharma said. Katsman echoed those comments. However, despite Canada's reputation as a world leader in AI research excellence, local universities have shied away from embracing the technology in classrooms due to plagiarism concerns, she noted. Their essay deemed this situation 'Canada's AI paradox,' and argued the lack of AI integration on post-secondary campuses is a major issue for the workforce and innovation at large. Canadian students are not being prepared to use AI tools effectively or responsibly — a stark contrast to what's happening in Estonia, they argued. Estonia's 'AI Leap' pilot aims to equip 20,000 high school students in northern Europe with lessons on how to use AI tools. A total of 3,000 teachers in that country are receiving training to leverage the technology for educational purposes this fall. Policymakers are working with Anthropic and OpenAI, alongside other partners, to create a related curriculum and workshops. Wednesdays Sent weekly from the heart of Turtle Island, an exploration of Indigenous voices, perspectives and experiences. Sharma and Katsman suggested Canada and the EU learn from Estonia and develop a roadmap accordingly. The U of M students are slated to visit Brussels in the fall to share their ideas with European leaders. Katsman said they are hopeful they will meet Kaja Kallas, who resigned as Estonia's prime minister last year to join the EU government. EU representatives visited Winnipeg in April on a 'Team Europe mission' to the Prairies. Maggie MacintoshEducation reporter Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Free Press. Originally from Hamilton, Ont., she first reported for the Free Press in 2017. Read more about Maggie. Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative. Every piece of reporting Maggie produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store