Fury as Mauritius uses UK Chagos deal cash to pay for debts instead of indigenous resettlement
The agreement, signed last month, will see the UK give up sovereignty of the island territory to Mauritius and lease back the US-UK military base on Diego Garcia at a cost of £101m per year for 99 years.
Under the deal, a £40 million 'Future Fund' trust was established by the UK, to help resettle indigenous Chagossians and 'create wealth for future generations', after hundreds of people native to the islands were deported more than half a century ago when the British and US governments built the military base there.
It is set to be funded by the UK and established by Mauritius, but the Mauritian budget for 2025/26 indicates ministers will use any money for the trust fund until three years into the agreement.
The budget, presented to the Mauritian parliament on Wednesday, stated 'the revenue from Chagos… will be used for debt repayment for the first 3 years'.
It adds that the government will 'start the groundwork to set up a Future Fund, to which receipts from the Chagos deal will be transferred as from year four. But the budget contains no details of how much money will be put towards it each year.
The revelation comes despite both countries saying they wanted to 'recognis[e] the wrongs of the past' and are 'conscious that past treatment of Chagossians has left a deeply regrettable legacy, and [they are] committed to supporting the welfare of all Chagossians'.
There are none left on the islands to consult or to take part in a referendum. In a shameful episode during decolonisation, they were deported, with most settling in Mauritius, the Seychelles and the UK. Many oppose the deal, but their legal actions have failed.
Jean Francois-Nellan, of campaign group Chagossian Voices, told The Independent he is 'appalled but not surprised'.
'Chagossians are being erased from both the history and future of Mauritius. The government is more interested in using our suffering to balance its books than in delivering justice,' he said.
'Instead, the budget outlines development priorities for Rodrigues and Agalega regions, rightly deserving of investment, but completely omits the Chagossians, the very people whose displacement gave rise to the international legal fight Mauritius continues to wage.'
He added: 'Despite repeated claims of sovereignty and responsibility over the Chagos archipelago, the government of Mauritius has once again failed to acknowledge or prioritise the rights and welfare of the Chagossian people in its 2025/26 national budget.'
The case, being brought to the UN by campaigners Bernadette Dugasse and Bertrice Pompe, criticises the UK-Mauritian deal for having been 'negotiated and concluded without the participation or consent of the Chagossian people, who remain displaced from their homeland since the orchestrated deportation carried out between 1965 and 1973'.
The campaigners add: 'It explicitly bars their return to Diego Garcia, historically the most populous island, and entrenches the colonial and strategic use of the territory by leasing it for up to 99 years to the United States.
'The agreement constitutes the crystallisation of a historical injustice and threatens to make permanent the exclusion of an entire people from their native land.'
While the committee's decision is not legally binding, it carries significant moral and legal authority.
As a quasi-judicial body, its rulings shape international legal norms and state obligations - meaning that if they rule in favour of the Chagossians, it would significantly undermine the government's decision to sign the treaty.
Ms Pompe said: 'The fight is not over. There is nothing in that treaty for Chagossians and we will fight.'
She added: 'I pity the poor souls in the No.10 Press Office who are being ordered to justify Keir Starmer's betrayal of the Chagossian people. We're looking forward to the explanation of why the UN Human Rights Committee doesn't matter. Not pausing the Chagos deal until the Committee rules is indefensible.'
The deal was signed in May after months of legal wrangling, and even an overnight legal challenge the night before brought by indigenous campaigners, which initially put the treaty on pause but was later dismissed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Mayor announces underground trains and trams plan for Manchester
A new underground system for trains and trams is being planned for Manchester city centre, the mayor has said. As he outlined the region's 10-year strategy, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham said it was "essential" to the city's future economic prosperity that a transport system was built said he envisaged two lines in the city - one running from North to South and the other East to West - with Manchester Piccadilly Station at the centre as the "Kings Cross of the north of England"."This isn't a pipe dream - we will not accept anything else," he said. He said planning needed to start now for an underground system "as we get towards the 2040s going towards the 2050s".The mayor said the development would see a new underground station in Manchester Piccadilly alongside the new Liverpool-Manchester railway line. He told BBC Radio Manchester: "I don't feel adventurous saying this - it is essential."This city is the fastest growing in the UK and my message to government is that you can't take this growth for granted.""We've got a bigger and bigger economy - every year more people are working here, more people are studying here and more people visiting here."The mayor said going underground was the only option as the land above was needed for development and attracting businesses."You would be creating a source of business rates for decades," he said. 'Heart of northern economy' Burnham said this could create the kind of regeneration at Manchester Piccadilly that has taken place around London's Kings Cross added: "Piccadilly should be the Kings Cross of the north of England - it could be the beating heart of the northern economy."Manchester politicians have previously toyed with an underground plan from Piccadilly to Victoria stations with a subterranean tunnel in the 1970s nicknamed "Picc-Vic" which was ultimately he outlined the new plan on Wednesday night, Burnham said: "I want TfGM [Transport for Greater Manchester] to start preparing the original, first concept for what an underground for Manchester might look like. I'm going to open the earliest conversation with the government on what the funding mechanism will look like."The BBC has contacted the Department for Transport for a comment. Other pledges made by Burnham included the introduction of half-price bus travel for 18-21 year olds from September and a free 24-hour bus travel pilot program for older and disabled people to begin in August.A new tram stop to service new homes in Victoria North, the extension of Metrolink to Stockport and commuter lines being brought into the Bee Network have also been included. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Kemi Badenoch says 'banana republic' Tories toying with defecting to Reform are welcome to 'jump ship' after ex-chair Jake Berry backs Nigel Farage
Kemi Badenoch told former Tory politicians thinking of defecting to Reform they are welcome to 'jump ship' and stop holding back her party today. The opposition leader lashed out at 'banana republic' politicians trying to save their careers after Sir Jake Berry, the former Conservative Party chairman, became the latest ex-MP to join up with Nigel Farage. The 46-year-old, who was a Tory MP for 14 years, claimed Mr Farage was 'someone the country can actually trust' and could arrest the nation's 'decline'. He is the latest former minister to join Reform, following ex Welsh secretary David Jones last week. But asked about the slew of minor former ministers dripping from the Tories to Reform today Mrs Badenoch said: 'There are a lot of people who come into politics just to play the game of politics, and they will follow polls and defect wherever they can, like they do in banana republics, to wherever they think that they can win.' After giving a speech about welfare reform she said the Tories were the only party that 'wants people to live within their means' - a jib as Mr Farage's support for increasing benefits. 'If people who want more welfare and higher taxes and more spend, they are very welcome to go to those parties that are offering that,' she added. 'But we are the Conservative Party, and if there are people who are not Conservatives, people who have probably been holding us back for a long time, then they should go to other parties that fit in with their values.' Mrs Badenoch today ramped up her attacks on Reform, using her speech at the Centre for Social Justice to attack Mr Farage's populist economic policies. In a speech on welfare she accused him of being 'Jeremy Corbyn with a pint and a cigarette ... promising unaffordable giveaways with no plan to fix the system'. Sir Jake, who was Conservative Party chairman during Liz Truss 's short disastrous leadership, announced he was ditching his former colleagues a year after losing his seat at the general election. 'For 14 of those years, I served as an MP. I even sat at the Cabinet table twice. I believed in it. I gave it everything. Because I believed politics could still make this country better,' he said. 'But let's not kid ourselves. Britain is broken. It didn't start with Labour. The Conservative governments I was part of share the blame.... 'If you were deliberately trying to wreck the country, you'd be hard-pressed to do a better job than the last two decades of Labour and Tory rule.' But his decision prompted claims from Tory sources that he has had 'more positions than the Karma Sutra'. Sir Jake backed Remain before the 2016 referendum and was a loud supporter of Net Zero when in office as minister for levelling up, before backing 'woman of action' Ms Truss to replace Boris Johnson. The local Conservative Party in his former Rossendale and Darwen seat hit out at his decision as 'the culmination of a long drift' away from the party. In a statement it said: 'The truth is that Jake never truly recovered from the downfall of Liz Truss - a prime minister whose brief and chaotic tenure he enthusiastically supported.' He follows Lee Anderson, the MP for Ashfield, and Marco Longhi and Dame Andrea Jenkyns, the latter two of whom were also ejected from the Commons by voters at the general election. Since his loss, Sir Jake has worked in broadcasting, hosting a show on Talk TV. Before serving in Ms Truss's government, he was a minister during both Boris Johnson and Theresa May's premierships, with responsibilities focused on the Northern Powerhouse and levelling up. Former Tory MP Mark Jenkinson tweeted: 'Another Remainer joins the Brexit Party.' Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper said his defection made Reform look like a 'Truss tribute act'. 'Nigel Farage needs to immediately rule out Liz Truss joining Reform following the defection of yet another one of her mini-budget buddies,' she said. A Labour Party spokeswoman added: 'Not content with taking advice from Liz Truss, Nigel Farage has now tempted her Tory Party Chairman into his ranks. 'It's clear Farage wants Liz Truss's reckless economics, which crashed our economy and sent mortgages spiralling, to be Reform's blueprint for Britain.'
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Civil servants accused of fresh Post Office cover-up
Senior civil servants have been accused of covering up a report that could have exonerated sub-postmasters wrongly accused of theft. According to newly released emails, government officials removed any reference to a secret report that contained 'explosive' evidence about vulnerabilities in the Horizon computer system and bullying by Post Office prosecutors in correspondence with the National Audit Office (NAO). The report, which was compiled by Sir Jonathan Swift KC in 2016, was previously found to have been buried by the Post Office as it prepared to fight a legal case against more than 500 former sub-postmasters. However, The Telegraph can now reveal that civil servants at the UK Government Investments (UKGI) department, which manages the state shareholding in the Post Office, also kept the Swift review secret from the NAO. The revelation comes after the official inquiry into the Post Office Horizon scandal said it was likely 13 people took their own lives as a result of the miscarriage of justice. Sir Wyn Williams, the chairman of the public inquiry, said Post Office bosses knew Fujitsu's Horizon software was faulty but had 'maintained the fiction' that a version of it 'was always, always accurate'. In emails seen by The Telegraph from November 2018, UKGI officials recommended deleting reference to the Swift review in correspondence with the National Audit Office (NAO), the Government's financial watchdog. The Swift review was critical of the Post Office's tactic of pressuring sub-postmasters into pleading guilty to false accounting. The NAO asked UKGI for information while it was investigating the Post Office's decision to use public money to defend a lawsuit led by the former postmasters in 2018. This prompted immediate concern among UKGI officials, who raised fears internally about how documents could be used. Following a meeting to discuss the issue, a UKGI official sent an email to Richard Callard, head of risk and compliance, and Richard Watson, UKGI's general counsel, that said: 'I would not include specific reference to Jonathan Swift in the timeline for the NAO as I am not sure this was made public. 'Just say the Chair (Tim Parker) undertook a review, and that when you talk to the NAO, you can say you understand he took some independent legal advice as part of it or something.' Two minutes later, Mr Watson replied: 'I would just remove the reference entirely. As I understand it, the Swift review was never concluded.' Soon after, the UKGI civil servant responded: 'Thanks Richard. I will remove the Swift review then.' The Government has since claimed that UKGI did not have access to the Swift report until 2020. However, officials' awareness of its existence and decision to delete reference to it will raise questions about their decision-making, particularly as lawyers and former ministers claim that suppression of the Swift Report contributed to the biggest miscarriage of justice in British history. 'This new disclosure is very important,' said Paul Marshall, a barrister who acted for three sub-postmasters in their appeals against their criminal convictions. 'It tends to confirm a view I have held for a long time that it is possible the Government and civil servants were complicit in a cover-up.' It will also support claims by Baroness Neville-Rolfe, a former Post Office minister, who previously told a government inquiry that the 'explosive' Swift review had been 'buried and suppressed'. 'Airbrushed from the narrative' The internal UKGI emails were obtained by Eleanor Shaikh, a teaching assistant who has campaigned for justice for the sub-postmasters, under the Freedom of Information Act. She told The Telegraph: 'Instead of an impartial and transparent response to the NAO, the UKGI officials buried a document which threatened the very foundation of the Post Office's defence. Their carefully crafted communications allowed for plausible deniability. 'They knew the Swift review existed but actively colluded to airbrush it from the narrative. They were acting in the interests not of justice but of the Government.'
