American kids have become increasingly unhealthy over nearly two decades, new study finds
Much of what researchers found was already known, but the study paints a comprehensive picture by examining various aspects of children's physical and mental health at the same time.
'The surprising part of the study wasn't any with any single statistic; it was that there's 170 indicators, eight data sources, all showing the same thing: a generalized decline in kids' health,' said Dr. Christopher Forrest, one of the authors of the study published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has brought children's health to the forefront of the national policy conversation, unveiling in May a much-anticipated 'Make America Healthy Again' report that described kids as undernourished and overmedicated, and raised concerns about their lack of physical activity. But the Trump administration's actions — including cuts to federal health agencies, Medicaid and scientific research — are not likely to reverse the trend, according to outside experts who reviewed Monday's study.
'The health of kids in America is not as good as it should be, not as good as the other countries, and the current policies of this administration are definitely going to make it worse,' said Dr. Frederick Rivara, a pediatrician and researcher at the Seattle Children's Hospital and UW Medicine in Seattle. He co-authored an editorial accompanying the new study.
Forrest and his colleagues analyzed surveys, electronic health records from 10 pediatric health systems and international mortality statistics. Among their findings:
1. Obesity rates for U.S. children 2-19 years old rose from 17% in 2007-2008 to about 21% in 2021-2023.
2. A U.S. child in 2023 was 15% to 20% more likely than a U.S. child in 2011 to have a chronic condition such as anxiety, depression or sleep apnea, according to data reported by parents and doctors.
3. Annual prevalence rates for 97 chronic conditions recorded by doctors rose from about 40% in 2011 to about 46% in 2023.
4. Early onset of menstruation, trouble sleeping, limitations in activity, physical symptoms, depressive symptoms and loneliness also increased among American kids during the study period.
5. American children were around 1.8 times more likely to die than kids in other high-income countries from 2007-2022. Being born premature and sudden unexpected death were much higher among U.S. infants, and firearm-related incidents and motor vehicle crashes were much more common among 1-19-year-old American kids than among those the same age in other countries examined.
The research points to bigger problems with America's health, said Forrest, who is a pediatrician at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
'Kids are the canaries in the coal mine,' he said. ' When kids' health changes, it's because they're at increased vulnerability, and it reflects what's happening in society at large.'
The timing of the study, he said, is 'completely fortuitous.' Well before the 2024 presidential election, Forrest was working on a book about thriving over the life span and couldn't find this sort of comprehensive data on children's health.
The datasets analyzed have some limitations and may not be applicable to the full U.S. population, noted Dr. James Perrin, a pediatrician and spokesman for the American Academy of Pediatrics, who wasn't involved in the study.
'The basic finding is true,' he said.
The editorial published alongside the study said while the administration's MAHA movement is bringing welcome attention to chronic diseases, 'it is pursuing other policies that will work against the interests of children.' Those include eliminating injury prevention and maternal health programs, canceling investments in a campaign addressing sudden infant death and 'fueling vaccine hesitancy among parents that may lead to a resurgence of deadly vaccine-preventable diseases,' authors wrote.
Wednesdays
Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture.
Officials from the U.S. Health and Human Services Department did not respond to a request for comment.
Forrest said risks highlighted by the MAHA report, such as eating too much ultra-processed food, are real but miss the complex reality driving trends in children's health.
'We have to step back and take some lessons from the ecological sustainability community and say: Let's look at the ecosystem that kids are growing up in. And let's start on a kind of neighborhood-by-neighborhood, city-by-city basis, examining it,' he said.
____
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
a day ago
- Toronto Star
RFK Jr. promoted a food company he says will make Americans healthy. Their meals are ultraprocessed
WASHINGTON (AP) — Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday praised a company that makes $7-a-pop meals that are delivered directly to the homes of Medicaid and Medicare enrollees. He even thanked Mom's Meals for sending taxpayer-funded meals 'without additives' to the homes of sick or elderly Americans. The spreads include chicken bacon ranch pasta for dinner and French toast sticks with fruit or ham patties.
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
RFK Jr. promoted a food company he says will make Americans healthy. Their meals are ultraprocessed
WASHINGTON (AP) — Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday praised a company that makes $7-a-pop meals that are delivered directly to the homes of Medicaid and Medicare enrollees. He even thanked Mom's Meals for sending taxpayer-funded meals 'without additives' to the homes of sick or elderly Americans. The spreads include chicken bacon ranch pasta for dinner and French toast sticks with fruit or ham patties. 'This is really one of the solutions for making our country healthy again,' Kennedy said in the video, posted to his official health secretary account, after he toured the company's Oklahoma facility last week. But an Associated Press review of Mom's Meals menu, including the ingredients and nutrition labels, shows that the company's foods are the type of heat-and-eat, ultraprocessed food that Kennedy routinely criticizes for making people sick. The meals contain chemical additives that would render them impossible to recreate at home in your kitchen, said Marion Nestle, a nutritionist at New York University and food policy expert, who reviewed the menu for The AP. Many menu items are high in sodium, and some are high in sugar or saturated fats, she said. 'It is perfectly possible to make meals like this with real foods and no ultra-processing additives but every one of the meals I looked at is loaded with such additives,' Nestle said. 'What's so sad is that they don't have to be this way. Other companies are able to produce much better products, but of course they cost more.' Mom's Meals do not have the artificial, petroleum dyes that Kennedy has pressured companies to remove from products, she noted. Mom's Meals said in an emailed response that its food products 'do not include ingredients that are commonly found in ultra-processed foods.' The company does not use synthetic food dyes, high fructose corn syrup, certain sweeteners or synthetic preservatives that are banned in Europe, said Teresa Roof, a company spokeswoman. The meals are a 'healthy alternative' to what many people would find in their grocery stores, said Andrew Nixon, U.S. Health and Human Services spokesman, in response to questions about Mom's Meals. Mom's Meals is one of several companies across the U.S. that deliver 'medically tailored' at-home meals. The meal programs are covered by Medicaid for some enrollees, including people who are sick with cancer or diabetes, as well as some older Americans who are enrolled in certain Medicare health insurance plans. Patients recently discharged from the hospital can also have the meals delivered, according to the company's website. It's unclear how much federal taxpayers spend on providing meals through Medicaid and Medicare every year. An investigation by STAT news last year found that some states were spending millions of dollars to provide medically tailored meals to Medicaid enrollees that were marketed as healthy and 'dietician approved.' But many companies served up meals loaded with salt, fat or sugar — all staples of an unhealthy American's diet, the report concluded. Defining ultraprocessed foods can be tricky. Most U.S. foods are processed, whether it's by freezing, grinding, fermentation, pasteurization or other means. Foods created through industrial processes and with ingredients such as additives, colors and preservatives that you couldn't duplicate in a home kitchen are considered the most processed. Kennedy has said healthier U.S. diets are key to his vision to 'Make America Healthy Again.' His call for Americans to increase whole foods in their diets has helped Kennedy build his unique coalition of Trump loyalists and suburban moms who have branded themselves as 'MAHA.' In a recent social media post where he criticized the vast amount of ultraprocessed foods in American diets, Kennedy urged Americans to make healthier choices. 'This country has lost the most basic of all freedoms — the freedom that comes from being healthy,' Kennedy said. — Aleccia reported from Temecula, Calif.
Canada News.Net
a day ago
- Canada News.Net
Rural healthcare workers fear ER, clinic closures with Medicaid cuts
OMAHA, Nebraska: With Congress considering cuts totaling around US$1 trillion to Medicaid over the next decade, concerns are rising among healthcare professionals, particularly nurses in rural hospitals. They fear that these cuts could result in the loss of essential services for small communities, such as emergency rooms, clinics, and nursing homes. Tyler Sherman, a nurse at Webster County Community Hospital in Red Cloud, Nebraska, highlights the implications of these cuts for the region's elderly population, particularly farmers who often postpone medical care until emergencies arise. With Medicaid reimbursements being vital for the hospital's financial viability, Sherman states, "Our budget is pretty heavily reliant on Medicaid reimbursement, so if we see a cut, it'll be difficult to keep the doors open." If local healthcare facilities do close, residents might have to travel nearly an hour to access comparable services instead of a five-minute trip to Webster County Hospital. Sherman emphasizes the danger in this increased travel time: "That's a long way for an emergency. Some won't make it." Advocacy groups and state officials warn that slashing Medicaid, a program crucial for millions of low-income and disabled Americans, would particularly harm rural hospitals, potentially forcing hundreds to shut down and leaving many people in remote areas without nearby emergency care. According to a study by the Cecil G. Sheps Center at the University of North Carolina, over 300 rural hospitals could face closure due to the proposed Medicaid cuts. The situation is already dire; for instance, a health clinic in Curtis, Nebraska, recently announced it would shut down in anticipation of these cuts. Meanwhile, in Connecticut, Bruce Shay, 70, expresses his anxiety about the potential loss of local healthcare options. Despite being in good health, he understands that emergencies can strike at any moment, and nearby facilities like Day Kimball Hospital, which has been dealing with financial challenges, might not be able to withstand further strain. For Day Kimball Hospital, with approximately 30 percent of its patients on Medicaid, the impact of federal funding cuts could significantly undermine its operations. CEO R. Kyle Kramer asserts, "A Senate bill—estimated to cut federal Medicaid spending in rural areas by $155 billion over 10 years—would further hurt our bottom line." Shay acknowledges that if Day Kimball were to close, thousands of residents would face longer travel times for care, exacerbating an already stressed healthcare system. Rural hospitals have been operating on the financial edge for years, especially as Medicaid payments have consistently fallen short of actual healthcare costs. Notably, more than 20 percent of Americans live in rural areas, where Medicaid covers about one in four adults, as highlighted by the nonprofit KFF. The recent $4.5 trillion tax cuts and spending bill, which included massive cuts to Medicaid and social safety nets, has further complicated the survival of rural hospitals. While the legislation provides an additional $10 billion annually to support rural hospitals, many advocates remain skeptical that this will sufficiently address the funding gap. Carrie Cochran-McClain, the chief policy officer for the National Rural Health Association, notes that rural hospitals operate on thin margins. According to her, "Any cut to Medicaid, which constitutes a significant portion of rural provider funding, is consequential to their ability to provide services or even remain operational." A KFF report highlights that 36 states could lose more than $1 billion in Medicaid funding for rural areas under the proposed Republican bill, even with the added rural fund. Kentucky appears to be the hardest hit, projected to lose an alarming $12.3 billion due to changes in its Medicaid reimbursement structure. Governor Andy Beshear warns that such cuts could close 35 hospitals within the state and deprive 200,000 residents of health coverage. He lamented, "Half of Kentucky's kids are covered under Medicaid. Losing that coverage disrupts lives and could harm our economy deeply." This sentiment speaks to a broader concern about the cascading effects that Medicaid cuts could have on health outcomes and access across the nation.
