Attorneys get more time to argue over contested copper mine on land sacred to Apaches
Judge Dominic Lanza in a ruling issued Monday denied motions that sought to halt the transfer pending the outcome of the case. However, he did preclude the U.S. Forest Service from proceeding with the land exchange until 60 days after the agency issues a required environmental review.
Lanza said that would give the parties more time to analyze the environmental report and file amended complaints. He said granting a preliminary injunction now would be premature since the review will differ in some ways from the one that spurred the legal challenge four years ago.
'It is unfortunate that the result of this order will be to force the parties to engage in another stressful, abbreviated round of briefing and litigation activity' when the new review is issued, he said, acknowledging the unusual circumstances.
Attorneys for the federal government and the mining company agreed during a recent hearing to the 60-day delay. That time frame also is specified in the legislation that Congress passed and then-President Barack Obama signed in 2014 authorizing the exchange.
The group Apache Stronghold, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and others welcomed more time to fight for Oak Flat, an area they consider as holy.
'In this critical moment, we call on the Trump administration and Congress to halt the transfer to a Chinese-owned mine, and honor what is sacred,' said Wendsler Nosie Sr., leader of Apache Stronghold. 'As we continue to fight in court, know this: Nothing will turn us away from defending the spiritual essence of our people, the lifeblood that connects us to the creator and this land.'
A statement from Resolution Cooper said the ruling is consistent with prior decisions and gives the parties time to review the final environmental impact statement that will be issued later this month.
'We are confident the project satisfies all applicable legal requirements,' said Resolution president and general manager Vicky Peacey.
She added that years of consultation with tribes and communities resulted in changes to the mining plan to reduce potential effects.
The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land exchange was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014.
San Carlos Apache Chairman Terry Rambler said Monday that the bill was not in the best interest of the American people, Arizona or his tribe. He said concerns persist about the mine's use of groundwater and the pending obliteration of the culturally significant site.
Apache Stronghold and the tribe sued the U.S. government in 2021 to protect the place tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, which is dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion. The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected an appeal by the Apache group, letting lower court rulings stand.
The project has support in nearby Superior and other traditional mining towns in the area. The company — a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — estimates the mine will generate $1 billion a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
16 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
A more patriotic Canada Day in the age of Trump
By Cannon blasts rang out across Montreal's Old Port as dozens marked the moment they became Canadian citizens. Among the crowd, Dave and Yvonne Kyba — already Canadian — stood out in matching T-shirts they had printed at a local mall, bearing a message they felt had taken on greater urgency in the past year: 'Canada's Not For Sale.' 'We were so fired up after the comments were made initially, yeah, that we went out and got the shirts,' said Dave Kyba, referring to the latest remarks by U.S. President Donald Trump about annexing Canada. 'We should be more positive, which is generally our character,' he added, 'but we just felt impassioned to say something back: no, we're not.' 'We don't want to be the 51st state. Point finale,' said Yvonne Kyba. This year's Canada Day has played out amid a trade war with the U.S. and a steady stream of jabs from its president. Thousands gathered at the Old Port, some waving maple leaf flags, others decked out in red and white. The Kybas said they came not to become Canadian, but to witness the ceremony and welcome newcomers. 'Trump has awakened everyone,' said Paulina Ambrose, who stood alongside the couple. Ambrose moved to Montreal in 1976 and had come to watch the event, too. 'People were sleeping. Now they're awake,' she said. Trump's offhand comments about Canada becoming 'the 51st state' have sparked a wide range of reactions, even as analysts continue to debate whether they're strategic or simply performative. Boycotts of Florida vacations and American-made goods have made headlines. At several public events this year, Canadian crowds have even booed the U.S. national anthem. 'There's a real sense of national pride that wasn't there before,' said Chrissy Krahn, also at the ceremony. A former British Columbian who moved to Montreal six years ago, she added: 'Because we're very nice, right? We're Canadians. But this has really awakened a little bit of a beast.' Amid the rhetoric from Trump, political changes in Ottawa have also followed this year. Though the governing Liberal Party held onto power in the April election, it did so under a new leader — Prime Minister Mark Carney — whose campaign emphasized standing firm in Canada's relationship with the United States. That stance has already been tested. On his first visit to the White House, Carney stated plainly: some things are 'never for sale.' But just this week, Carney withdrew a proposed digital services tax that would have targeted American tech companies, after Trump called for its removal. The White House described the move as 'caving.' However, Dave said he's hopeful the relationship can improve. 'There's always optimism that we're going to return to some sense of normalcy at some point,' he said. Asked why they think Trump keeps returning to the idea of absorbing Canada, Yvonne paused. 'I don't know what's going on between those two ears on his head,' she said. 'Maybe it's historical. I think that desire to overtake Canada has always been there.' Or perhaps, she said, 'he just doesn't like a more socialist attitude being successful. Our social programs, I think, should be lauded and appreciated — especially our health care.' Ambrose added: 'I want to ask him this question: why do you want to make Canada the 51st state when Canada is much larger than the whole of the United States? 'It just can't happen.' Despite the political backdrop, the mood in Montreal was upbeat. 'It's a ceremony we've never really seen before,' said Yvonne. 'And it's kind of like, why not? Let's go see what it's all about and welcome new Canadians with open arms.' 'I think it goes back to that whole idea of a mosaic, rather than the melting pot south of the border,' said Dave. 'Trudeau senior called it more of a tapestry. We're interwoven. We rely on each other. I think we should value that.'
Toronto Star
18 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Carney says values being tested by attacks on democracy in Canada Day speech
OTTAWA - Ottawa's Canada Day ceremony featured leaders touting national unity in a world shaken by wars, American threats and economic uncertainty. 'We've decided not to pull apart and fight, but to come together and to build. Because that's the Canadian way,' Prime Minister Mark Carney said to thousands of Canadians gathered in the nation's capital.
Winnipeg Free Press
34 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Billions in grants for summer school, English instruction delayed during Trump administration review
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is withholding more than $6 billion in federal grants for afterschool and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more as part of a review to ensure grants align with President Donald Trump's priorities. The move leaves states and schools in limbo as they budget for programs this summer and in the upcoming school year, introducing new uncertainty about when — or if — they will receive the money. It also sets the stage for a clash with Democrats, who say the administration is flouting the law by holding back money Congress appropriated. Without the money, schools say they won't be able to provide free or affordable afterschool care for low-income kids while their parents work, and they may not be able to hire staff to teach children who are learning English. Programs that rely on the funding were expecting it to be distributed July 1, but an Education Department notice issued Monday announced the money would not be released while the programs are under review. The department did not provide a timeline and warned 'decisions have not yet been made' on grants for the upcoming school year. 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities,' Education Department officials wrote in the notice, which was obtained by The Associated Press. The department referred questions to the Office of Management and Budget, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Some advocates fear the grants are being targeted for elimination, which could force schools to cut programs and teachers. Trump's 2026 budget proposal called for Congress to zero out all of the programs under review, signaling the administration sees them as unnecessary. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., pressed the administration to spend the money as Congress intended. 'Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on afterschool programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed,' Murray said in a statement. A national organization for afterschool programs called the department's action a 'stunning betrayal.' 'Withholding these funds will cause lasting harm to students and families, and to our education system, our future workforce, and our economy,' said Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance. The six grant programs under review includes one known as 21st Century Community Learning Centers. It's the primary federal funding source for afterschool and summer learning programs and supports more than 10,000 local programs nationwide, according to the alliance. Every state runs its own competition to distribute the grants, which totaled $1.3 billion this fiscal year. Also under review are $2 billion in grants for teachers' professional development and efforts to reduce class size; $1 billion for academic enrichment grants, often used for science and math education and accelerated learning; $890 million for students who are learning English; $376 million to educate the children of migrant workers; and $715 million to teach adults how to read. California's education agency said it was notified Monday that it wouldn't be receiving money from those programs. 'Trump is illegally impounding billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to serve students this fiscal year,' Tony Thurmond, California's state superintendent, said in a statement. 'The Administration is punishing children when states refuse to cater to Trump's political ideology.' The administration had signaled its desire to cut much of the money in an April letter to Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations. In that letter, Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, said cutting money for teaching kids to speak English would help 'end overreach from Washington and restore the rightful role of State oversight in education.' 'They're trying to send a message,' said Amaya Garcia, who oversees education research at New America, a left-leaning think tank. 'They don't believe that taxpayer funding should be used for these children.' ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
