logo
War, lies, and amapiano

War, lies, and amapiano

IOL Newsa day ago
President Bill Clinton must have been a lucky man. In his first term of office, he met with the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, following the latter's election as his country's head of government.
Image: Bebeto Matthews/File/AP
IT could have been Aeschylus, the Greek tragedian or Phillip Gibbs, the journalist who covered the First World War, who probably coined the all-time enduring aphorism. During war, the first casualty is the truth.
Whoever it was is purely academic. It is the prophetic accuracy of the quote attributed to both which is the hallmark of the US empire.
The energy that fuels the current global order is wholly predicated on layers and layers of quasi-truths, catechismic recitations and just pure unadulterated lies. After all, with so much military power, lies rank least in the hierarchy of the empire's problems.
These opaque reams of deception have compacted for so long, they have ossified into concrete like plinths that support the unipolar facade.
Yarn upon yarn, they have been spun at such dizzying frequencies and complexity of detail that time has hardened their surface. And in the absence of contradicting counter narratives, especially with the dominance of the legacy media, so many generations of men and women post the two world wars have come to depend on the refined glib of their manufactured consent and the rhetoric of the captured academic institutions that shape societal consciousness.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
And for lack of alternatives, it has become intractably difficult to view the world from any other vantage. The are two alternating sides, the one far less likely than its mendacious counterpart. The more absurd and aggressive the lie is, the greater the opportunity for its acceptability. Any timid yet truthful variety cannot conceivably compete.
Mark Twain was right. A lie gets halfway round the world before the truth gets the chance to put its pants on. There are little lies, ostensibly told without fear of consequence. And there are big lies, reserved no doubt, to start wars or casually justify them.
However, there are many other frequent deceptive quips randomly churned out by the system's inbred algorithms designed to embellish the insidiousness of the US hegemony.
President Bill Clinton must have been a lucky man. In his first term of office, he met with the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, following the latter's election as his country's head of government. In that much-reported encounter, Clinton is said to have famously retorted, 'who the hell is the superpower here?', a rebuke which must have incensed his visitor. So soon thereafter, he literally survived two Epstein-esque operations.
Every so often, when Monica Lewinsky returned from Tel Aviv, she would meet her 'friend', a deep state Pentagon operative named Linda Tripp. After a dress with a sputtering of what was vaunted as Presidential spermatozoids got paraded before the media, and many tape recordings between Monica and Linda nestled in the hands of Bibi Netanyahu, President Clinton narrowly survived an impeachment attempt.
Whether or not the beret-wearing intern was consciously party to an intel operation or was a mole herself is both unclear and possibly irrelevant. Nor can it be said with prescience that it was an operation at all, notwithstanding the causality and sequentiality of events.
For the damsel in distress, however, she casually sauntered out of the scene and landed herself a job in Tel-a-Viv. Epstein 1.0. Check!
With the mission unaccomplished, the real Epstein showed up on a 2.0 version on steroids, replete with private jets, verdant islands and many more exotic offerings besides. The problem is, this Epstein fellow is said to have relinquished his task without honours and exited the stage in a huff. And Patel, not of the Glengarry leads, is sternly corroborated by Bongino, his deputy at the FBI, that Jeffrey, the scion of the Epsteins, egressed unassisted.
The American blend of hegemony has a distinguishably strong flavour, as deceitful as it is violent. When Great Britain's empire was underway, as equally deceitful as it was similarly violent, it had other competing powers in other hemispheres. France and Spain come to mind.
For its coverage and influence, the British imperialist footprint lent depth to the definition of hegemony, an attribution which could not be enjoyed by Portugal, Spain or France, for that matter. Their collective reach on other hemispheres marked the tolerance and strategic restraint of British dominance in trade and warfare.
The US hegemony has other plans, however. Unlike the British experiment, it has no margin of tolerance for competition at all. If the Monroe doctrine defined the need for an American near abroad and spheres of influence, Wolfowitz for his part, redefined the concept in his own image, and turned the entire globe into an American near abroad.
For that redefinition to hold, the United States of America, the only country called 'America' among 35 countries dotting the two eponymously named hemispheres, needs acres and acres of lies to sustain it.
Donald J Trump has a name for it, whose prosaic brilliance betrays the hubris of the empire's adventurism. 'Obliterated!'
The essence of the furore that ensues from 'obliterated', or its meaning, is playing out in the United States with ferocity. And it has united all the warring parties instead of dividing them. With the exception of a few, it confirms the US hatred for Iran and the US administration's commitment to its military project called Israel. Joe Biden, even in his much publicised fog of senility, was convinced that if there was no Israel, America would create one.
On the one side of the obliteration divide are Trump's acolytes, who claim that Iran's nuclear sites and capabilities are gone forever. And perhaps that would eschew Trump from going back to Iran for other targeted strikes. And on the same side, too, are the more rational intellectual voices which can appreciate the dilemma of the tyranny of deception. For them, the obliteration lie must go on so that no war must be contemplated against the people of Iran.
The other side of that divide is inhabited by neocons and war mongers. They don't believe the three nuclear sites were obliterated, nor that the resolve of the mullahs was definitively attenuated. Dead scientists or not, they are convinced that Iran is getting ready to restart the fissile centrifuges in a quick turnaround.
After all, they point out with conviction that the Highly Enriched Uranium is nowhere to be found. Therefore, the US must return to Iran and finish the job. A lie that holds an entire nation together is both fragile and dangerous. It renders the entire adhesive fabric of that society fragile and their politicians dangerous. But as they say, in America, whoever you vote for, you get John McCain!
Yet the opportunity to fan the flames can never be missed. Rafael Grossi, the Director General of the IAEA has a brash, aggressive and fiercely pro-Zionist President, Javier Milei. Grossi, the Argentinian diplomat, found himself in a maelstrom of accusations that he has been secretly providing intelligence on the Iranian nuclear sites, technical progression, and other sensitive geolocation information to Israeli intelligence. After the obliteration declaration by Trump, the Iranians have banned the IAEA from monitoring their sites.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks ‘immediately'
Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks ‘immediately'

The Citizen

time3 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks ‘immediately'

Two previous ceasefires mediated by Qatar, Egypt and the United States have seen temporary halts in fighting. Boys inspect the rubble of a destroyed building that was hit by Israeli bombardment in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on 18 April 2025. Picture: Bashar Taleb / AFP Israel was mulling its response on Saturday after Hamas said it was ready to start talks 'immediately' on a US-sponsored proposal for a Gaza ceasefire. The security cabinet was expected to meet after the end of the Jewish sabbath at sundown to discuss Israel's next steps as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepares to leave for Washington for talks on Monday with US President Donald Trump. Trump has been making a renewed push for an end to nearly 21 months of war in Gaza, where the civil defence agency said 32 people were killed in Israeli military operations on Saturday. 'No decision has been made yet on that issue,' an Israeli government official told AFP when asked about Hamas's positive response to the latest ceasefire proposal. ALSO READ: Israel bombs café during children's birthday party in Gaza — 39 killed Hamas made its announcement late Friday after holding consultations with other Palestinian factions. 'The movement is ready to engage immediately and seriously in a cycle of negotiations on the mechanism to put in place' the terms of the US-backed truce proposal, the militant group said in a statement. Hamas ally Islamic Jihad said it supported ceasefire talks, but demanded 'guarantees' that Israel 'will not resume its aggression' once hostages held in Gaza are freed. Trump, when asked about Hamas's response aboard Air Force One, said: 'That's good. They haven't briefed me on it. We have to get it over with. We have to do something about Gaza.' The war in Gaza began with Hamas's October 2023 attack, which sparked a massive Israeli offensive aimed at destroying Hamas and bringing home all the hostages seized by Palestinian militants. Two previous ceasefires mediated by Qatar, Egypt and the United States have seen temporary halts in fighting, coupled with the return of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. 60-day truce proposal Efforts to broker a new truce have repeatedly failed, with the primary point of contention being Israel's rejection of Hamas's demand for guarantees that any new ceasefire will be lasting. A Palestinian source familiar with the negotiations told AFP earlier this week that the latest proposal included 'a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release half of the living Israeli captives in the Gaza Strip' – thought to number 22 – 'in exchange for Israel releasing a number of Palestinian prisoners and detainees'. Out of 251 hostages seized by Palestinian militants during the October 2023 attack, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Nearly 21 months of war have created dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people in the Gaza Strip, where Israel has recently expanded its military operations. A US- and Israel-backed group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, took the lead in food distributions in the territory in late May when Israel eased a more than two month blockade on aid deliveries. READ MORE: Six Israelis detained for attacking soldiers in West Bank The group said two of its US staff were wounded in an 'attack' on one of its aid centres in southern Gaza on Saturday. 'This morning, two American aid workers were injured in a targeted terrorist attack during food distribution activities at SDS-3 in Khan Yunis,' the organisation said, adding that reports indicated it was carried out by 'two assailants who threw two grenades at the Americans'. UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the GHF over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. Its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli fire on people waiting to collect rations. UN human rights office spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said Friday that more than 500 people have been killed waiting to access food from GHF distribution points. GHF's chairman Johnnie Moore, a Christian evangelical leader allied to Trump, on Wednesday rejected calls for the lead role in Gaza aid distributions to revert to UN agencies. 'We will not be shut down. We have one job to do. It's very simple, every day to provide free food to the people of Gaza,' he told reporters. Civil defence says schools hit Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said Israeli military operations killed 32 people across the war-battered territory on Saturday. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency. Bassal said Saturday's dead included eight people killed in two strikes on schools in Gaza City. Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military said it could not comment on specific strikes without precise coordinates. The Hamas attack of October 2023 resulted in the deaths of 1 219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 57 268 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers the figures reliable. NOW READ: Israel accused of starving Gaza 'by design' — South Africa addresses ICJ

Trump says Iran has not agreed to inspections, give up enrichment
Trump says Iran has not agreed to inspections, give up enrichment

TimesLIVE

time9 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Trump says Iran has not agreed to inspections, give up enrichment

US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Iran had not agreed to inspections of its nuclear programme or to give up enriching uranium. He told reporters aboard Air Force One that he believed Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back permanently though Iran could restart it at a different location. Trump said he would discuss Iran with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he visits the White House on Monday. 'I would say it's set back permanently,' Trump said as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House. 'I would think they'd have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem.' Trump said he would not allow Tehran to resume its nuclear programme, adding that Iran did want to meet him. The UN nuclear watchdog said on Friday it had pulled its last remaining inspectors from Iran as a standoff deepens over their return to the country's nuclear facilities bombed by the US and Israel. The US and Israel say Iran was enriching uranium to build nuclear weapons. Tehran insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in a 12-day war with the Islamic Republic three weeks ago. The International Atomic Energy Agency's inspectors have not been able to inspect Iran's facilities since then, even though IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said that is his top priority. Iran's parliament has passed a law suspending co-operation with the IAEA until the safety of its nuclear facilities can be guaranteed. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency's inspectors will be able to return to Iran. Iran has accused the agency of effectively paving the way for the bombings by issuing a damning report on May 31 that led to a resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. The US and Israeli military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran's three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what has happened to much of Iran's nine tonnes of enriched uranium, especially the more than 400kg enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.

Hamas says it responds to Gaza ceasefire proposal in 'a positive spirit'
Hamas says it responds to Gaza ceasefire proposal in 'a positive spirit'

TimesLIVE

time10 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Hamas says it responds to Gaza ceasefire proposal in 'a positive spirit'

Hamas said it had responded on Friday in 'a positive spirit' to a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire proposal and was prepared to enter into talks on implementing the deal, which envisages a release of hostages and negotiations on ending the conflict. US President Donald Trump had announced a 'final proposal' for a 60-day ceasefire in the nearly 21-month-old war between Israel and Hamas, saying he anticipated a reply from the parties in coming hours. Hamas wrote on its official website: 'The Hamas movement has completed its internal consultations as well as discussions with Palestinian factions and forces regarding the latest proposal by the mediators to halt the aggression against our people in Gaza. 'The movement has delivered its response to the brotherly mediators, which was characterised by a positive spirit. Hamas is fully prepared, with all seriousness, to immediately enter a new round of negotiations on the mechanism for implementing this framework,' the statement said. In a sign of potential challenges still facing the sides, a Palestinian official of a militant group allied with Hamas said concerns remained over humanitarian aid, passage through the Rafah crossing to Egypt and clarity over a timetable of Israeli troop withdrawals. Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalise' a 60-day ceasefire, during which efforts would be made to end the US ally's war in the Palestinian enclave. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is due to meet Trump in Washington on Monday, has yet to comment on Trump's announcement, and in their public statements the two sides remain far apart. Netanyahu has repeatedly said Hamas must be disarmed, a position the militant group, which is thought to be holding 20 living hostages, has so far refused to discuss. Israeli media cited an Israeli official as saying that Israel had received and was looking into Hamas' response to the ceasefire proposal. Trump expressed optimism late on Friday to reporters aboard Air Force One, who asked about Hamas' response. 'They said they gave me a positive response? Well, that's good,' Trump said, adding that he had not yet been briefed. 'There could be a Gaza deal next week.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store