Health secretary won't give timing for dental contract reform
The dental contract was recently highlighted by the Public Accounts Committee as one of the main reasons for the NHS dentistry access crisisSpeaking on a visit to a GP surgery in Leighton Buzzard, Streeting told the BBC he was "hesitant to make specific promises about dates and deadlines" unless he knew he could fulfil them."There's one thing that is in even shorter supply than dentists and money in this country and that's trust in politicians," he said.The government's newly published 10-year health plan said by 2035 a new dental contract would be at the heart of a "transformed" NHS system.But Streeting said in the short term it would concentrate efforts on creating urgent dental appointments for people without a dentist and rolling out tooth brushing in schools.He stressed that the NHS was the "standout" winner in the recent spending review, giving the health department "a bit of extra capacity".But he admitted the situation was "challenging" and said he was looking at existing budgets to see how he could release money that was being "wasted".To reduce what it called "bureaucracy", the government has decided to abolish NHS England. Forty-two integrated care boards across the country have also been told to reduce their running costs by 50% by the end of the year and thousands of support roles are going at NHS trusts including hospitals.
Counties such as Norfolk have been labelled "dental deserts" because of the shortage of NHS Dentists.Pamela Widdison, a retired teacher from Watton, said she was in pain for seven months. She managed to get an emergency appointment for a tooth extraction but had to travel 20 miles to King's Lynn and still did not have an NHS dentist. "It's a two-tier system in this country," she said. "I'm sick of MP's promising us the earth... why should we have to suffer? We've got an increased population where I live, there should be equality of care. "I do not want anyone to experience what I have been through."She said she believed dentistry was a "vital infrastructure" and could not understand why the NHS was paying for weight loss injections while her town did not have an NHS dentist.
To improve access, the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich has been lobbying for the first dental training school in the east of England.Pro-vice-chancellor for medicine, Prof Philip Baker, admitted it would not solve everything overnight but would be "one contributor to really make a difference".
The nearest dental school to Norwich is 100 miles away in London. The UEA had its course approved by the General Dental Council but needed the government to rubber-stamp its application.The 10-year-plan said that newly-qualified dentists could be required to practice in the NHS for a minimum period of three years.Prof Baker said the UEA would do all it could to convince trainees to stay in the NHS permanently."Our dental graduates will understand the needs of their communities, understand how important having an NHS dental service is to the region."I guess we really want to instil that pride and that loyalty to the community."Streeting said he "would consider the case very carefully."
Follow East of England news on X, Instagram and Facebook: BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks, BBC Cambridgeshire, BBC Essex, BBC Norfolk, BBC Northamptonshire or BBC Suffolk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Leominster campaigner says miscarriage leave change is 'amazing'
A woman who campaigned for changes to bereavement leave after having three miscarriages said it was "amazing" that a planned law would cover more government is set to amend the Employment Rights Bill, which is making its way through Parliament, to give parents a legal right to time off work if they experience pregnancy loss at any leave is currently only available to parents who lose an unborn child after 24 weeks of pregnancy."For anybody in the future who does have to go through [a miscarriage], all that stress and that campaigning has been worth it," said Tash Allin, from Leominster, who was nine weeks pregnant when she had her third miscarriage. "It's crucial - to be able to get over such an upsetting life experience, you need that time," she told BBC Radio Hereford & added that she was one of many women and men who had campaigned on the issue and it felt "amazing" to have helped bring about change. 'Bottled up emotions' The proposed extended right to leave would be unpaid and last for at least one week, though the exact length is still being consulted details, including who will be eligible and whether a doctor's note would be required, will also be decided following a Allin said she had a supportive employer when she had her most recent miscarriage, but she had harder experiences during some of her pregnancy losses."It was very much, 'I'm so sorry to hear it, but when are you coming back?' That was how the conversation went," she said."When your boss is saying that, you do feel pressure to go back and therefore you just kind of have to bottle up your emotions."Ms Allin, who has two children, added that she hoped the final bill would contain a right to leave that lasted more than one week. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Netflix features Essex Hospitals in new medical series
Hospital staff across a county will feature in a new medical TV series by Netflix, an NHS trust has announced. The six-part series, called Critical: Between Life and Death, documents patients and the decision-making of the trauma teams at Broomfield Hospital and Southend University Hospital in staff will feature in two episodes of the series, which is due to be released on 23 July. Matthew Hopkins, the chief executive of Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, said: "Programmes like this give a real insight into some of the truly amazing work our staff at the trust do day-in and day-out for our patients." The episodes show staff from Broomfield Hospital work to reattach a finger of a young patient by using state-of-the-art procedures and Hopkins continued: "It's fantastic to see them at the centre of two episodes of such a powerful and exciting series that will see NHS staff showcase their caring skills and dedication to saving lives to a global audience." Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘A Trojan horse': how toxic sewage sludge became a threat to the future of British farming
For decades, sewage sludge has been quietly spread across Britain's farmland, marketed as a nutrient-rich fertiliser. But insiders and scientists warn that hidden within it is a mix of household and industrial chemicals such as Pfas ('forever chemicals'), pharmaceuticals, pesticides, hormone-damaging chemicals and microplastics, threatening the long-term health of the land. Every year, 768,000 tonnes of this byproduct of wastewater treatment is spread over 150,000 hectares of agricultural land in England. The practice is banned in some countries, such as Switzerland, but in the UK it continues with little scrutiny and has become a covert route for dumping toxic industrial waste, experts say. 'It's a Trojan horse,' said a water sector insider. 'Pfas, pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors and microplastics hidden in sludge threaten the long-term sustainability of humanity's farmland.' These pollutants are not tested for under current regulations, which only require screening for a handful of heavy metals. Spreading sludge is incentivised because it is the cheapest disposal method. 'It would cost water companies a lot to get rid of it themselves,' said an Environment Agency (EA) officer, who asked to remain anonymous. 'So they're happy to give it to farmers cheaply or for free.' For farmers, rising fertiliser costs make it appear a win-win. 'It's a closed loop where everyone absolves themselves of costs,' the officer said. Industries also benefit by sending liquid waste to wastewater plants, which is cheaper than incineration or other methods. 'Some water companies have made big business decisions around taking industrial wastewater and getting paid for it,' said a second EA insider. Both sources are concerned about using sewage works to dispose of hazardous waste – especially landfill leachate, which is often added to systems unequipped to treat it. 'As soon as you let industrial waste into your sewer network, your sewage becomes hazardous waste,' said the first EA officer. 'Masking it as sludge and calling it fertiliser is a problem.' The result is a system that financially benefits water companies, farmers and industry – but not the public or the environment. 'If it's seen to be given away it could be viewed as a waste, and they absolutely abhor the waste label,' said the second EA source. 'The water companies say they can make a profit from it but they are very reluctant to give us any hard data – they claim commercial confidentiality.' Dr David Tompkins, a soil and waste expert at the consultancy WSP, said: 'It's what's in it – and what we don't remove – that's the problem. We're dealing with Pfas, microplastics, flame retardants and other hazards.' Regulations set in 1989 are no longer fit for purpose, the second EA source said. 'Metal levels have dropped, so the system says 'great, we're fine' – but everything else is ignored.' Oversight is weak, they said. 'We won't know when or how much sludge is going to be spread. Records are kept by the water industry, and they like it that way.' 'Digesters are continuous systems and are designed to remove pathogens, not these chemicals,' said a water expert. Even then, 'new sludge mixes with old, and some is removed before it's fully digested', they said. 'A portion of what goes to land is not properly treated.' Scientists suspect these contaminants are entering the food chain. 'We've seen Pfas and pharmaceuticals accumulate in crops and livestock,' said the expert. But there is no requirement to test food for these substances and therefore little data on it. The EA has long known sludge contains pollutants. A 2017 internal report warned of physical contaminants 'potentially resulting in soils becoming unsuitable for agriculture'. That information was not shared with farmers. 'Quite the opposite,' said Georgia Elliott-Smith of the campaign group Fighting Dirty. 'In 2022, farmers were incentivised by Defra to spread sewage sludge as part of the sustainable farming initiative.' Defra says it encouraged organic matter use generally, without specifying sludge. 'At a time when British farming is on its knees,' Elliott-Smith added, 'the government has again prioritised corporate interests. Farmers now face a hopeless choice: cheap but toxic sludge, or costly agrochemicals.' In Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands, sludge spreading on farmland has been reduced or banned. Switzerland incinerates all its sludge and stores the ash for phosphorus recovery. Tompkins noted: 'They know it's expensive. But they've decided it's necessary.' In the UK, political will is lacking. 'It's regulation by inertia,' Tompkins added. 'The Environment Agency is working within tight budgets that can limit its monitoring capacity.' Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Richard Benwell, the CEO of Wildlife and Countryside Link, said: 'Other countries are paying attention, with bans in some US states on Pfas-polluted sludge, as well as in several European countries. It's time for the UK government to set tough standards to stop this chemical pollutant ending up on farms, along with action to cut down on these harmful chemicals at their source.' For Tompkins, 'we need to price food and water properly. Regulations tend toward the minimum baseline. If we want better, we'll have to pay for it. Sludge has value but the way we manage it destroys that value.' Critics also point to the voluntary 'safe sludge matrix', a guide developed by industry and consultants, as a fig leaf. 'There is nothing safe about the safe sludge matrix,' said one industry expert. 'It's a PR exercise,' said the second EA insider. 'It was designed to protect [water companies'] access to the land bank. They don't want retailers or farmers losing confidence in spreading.' The consultants ADAS were involved in the creation of the matrix. A spokesperson said it was introduced to address food safety and human health risks from microbial pathogens after a year of intensive consultations. The agreement was made between Water UK and the British Retail Consortium, and included inputs from a range of interested parties including the EA, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, as well as the National Farmers' Union, Country Land and Business Association, food manufacturers and food processors, it said. Martin Lines, the CEO of the Nature Friendly Farming Network, said: 'Farmers want to protect their soils and grow safe food, but they're being put in a tough position. Sewage sludge is being spread with little testing or transparency. Contaminants like Pfas and microplastics shouldn't be anywhere near farmland. Without proper regulation, this isn't a circular economy – it's a failure of oversight.' A long-promised regulatory overhaul through environmental permitting regulations was due in 2023, but the deadline passed with no new date in sight. Experts say a better system would start upstream, controlling what enters treatment plants. New EU rules will require pharmaceutical and personal care product makers to pay 80% of waste treatment costs, but the UK has no such mechanism. 'We're not in control of the life cycle of the molecules we create,' said a water expert. 'They go out into the biosphere and build up. All these substances are accumulating.' Some argue the legal tools already exist. According to Tompkins, 'there's a clause that could be interpreted to say 'anything hazardous' should be checked. So if we wanted to look for all these other things, we could.' Ultimately, said the first EA source, 'once you let industrial waste into your works, what comes out isn't sewage sludge. It's hazardous waste.' Water UK said spreading bioresources was a longstanding, regulated practice that helps farmers and reduces reliance on chemical fertilisers. While some contain Pfas or microplastics, it said, legal standards and test methods were lacking and had to be set by government. It said water companies were supporting research and trialling uses like biofuels. The Environment Agency said sludge must not harm soil or water and that it enforced strict rules, with thousands of farm inspections each year. Defra said it wanted sludge to be used safely and sustainably and had launched an independent water commission to review the rules.
