logo
Supreme Court lets Trump fire hundreds of Education Department workers and dismantle the agency

Supreme Court lets Trump fire hundreds of Education Department workers and dismantle the agency

Yahoo3 days ago
WASHINGTON − An ideologically divided Supreme Court on July 14 allowed the Trump administration to fire hundreds of workers from the Education Department and continue other efforts to dismantle the agency.
The court's three liberal justices opposed the order, the latest win for President Donald Trump at the high court.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the majority handed Trump the power to repeal laws passed by Congress 'by firing all those necessary to carry them out.'
'The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve,' Sotomayor wrote in her 19-page dissent, 'but either way the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is great.'
The majority did not explain its decision in the brief, unsigned order.
The decision came a week after the court allowed the administration to move forward with large-scale staffing cuts at multiple agencies.
Trump is trying to fulfill his campaign promise to end the Education Department and move school policy to the states.
'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies," Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement.
She said the administration will continue to perform education-related functions required by law while "empowering families and teachers by reducing education bureaucracy."
The Education Department workers were placed on administrative leave in March and were to stop receiving salaries on June 9 before a judge intervened at the request of Democratic-led states, school districts and teachers' unions. The government has been spending more than $7 million a month to continue paying the employees who remain unable to work, according to the American Federation of Government Employees.
U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Massachusetts said the White House's decision to fire more than 1,300 workers has prevented the federal government from effectively implementing legally required programs and services. Such changes can't be made without the approval of Congress, which created the department in 1979, Joun ruled in May.
The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals backed that decision. The court said the administration provided no evidence to counter Joun's "record-based findings about the disabling impact" of the mass firings and the transfer of some functions to other agencies.
The Justice Department said the Constitution gives the executive branch, not the courts, the authority to decide how many employees are needed.
"The Department of Education has determined that it can carry out its statutorily mandated functions with a pared-down staff and that many discretionary functions are better left to the States," Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court.
An executive order Trump signed in March directed McMahon to "facilitate the closure of the Department of Education."
Republicans have long accused the federal government of holding too much power over local and state education policy, even though the federal government has no control over school curriculum.
McMahon announced roughly half the agency's workforce would be eliminated through a combination of mass layoffs and voluntary buyouts. That would have reduced the staff from 4,133 workers when Trump began his second term in January to 2,183 workers.
The administration also wants the Small Business Administration to take over student loans and move special education services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Joun's May 22 order blocked the administration from transferring those functions and required the department to reinstate fired workers.
The appeals court said Trump doesn't have to employ as many Education Department workers as the previous administration but can't cut so many that the agency can't function as Congress intended.
States challenging the moves said the administration removed nearly all the workers who certify whether colleges and universities qualify for federal student aid programs. And it gutted the department in charge of the data used to allocate billions of dollars to states, lawyers for New York and other states told the Supreme Court.
Unless the firings are reversed while the courts are deciding if the administration is acting legally, "it will be effectively impossible to undo much of the damage caused," lawyers for the Democracy Forward Foundation had told the Supreme Court.
After the court's decision, Skye Peryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, said the group will "aggressively pursue every legal option as this case proceeds to ensure that all children in this country have access to the public education they deserve."
The Justice Department had told the Supreme Court that the harms to the government from having to rehire the workers as the litigation continues are greater than any harms the challengers said they'll suffer from diminished department services. The department also opposed the challenge on procedural grounds.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court says Trump can fire Education Department workers
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump could open up your 401(k) to private equity. Why market experts say it's a bad idea.
Trump could open up your 401(k) to private equity. Why market experts say it's a bad idea.

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump could open up your 401(k) to private equity. Why market experts say it's a bad idea.

Trump could reportedly sign an executive order soon allowing retirement plans to invest in private equity. Private equity firms have lobbied the administration for access to the $12 trillion 401(k) market. Experts are concerned about the added risk that private equity investments could introduce to retirement portfolios. Thanks to President Donald Trump, your retirement plan could soon include a mix of stocks, bonds—and private equity investments. The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that Trump is expected to sign an executive order in the coming days allowing 401(k) plans to invest their assets in private equity. It's a proposal that's raising red flags among some investment experts, who say a 401(k) should typically be a simple and relatively low-risk investment vehicle. Private equity investments, meanwhile, are often concentrated in a small number of portfolio companies, illiquid, and carry valuations that can be difficult to measure day-to-day. They're also much less liquid than stocks and bonds. Trump's green light doesn't come as a surprise to those monitoring the private equity space, but it's concerning nonetheless. "Private equity kind of always gets what it wants in Congress, but I think it's a bad idea," Jeffrey Hooke, professor at the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, said. "It's illiquid, the fees are very high. Private equity funds, for the most part, don't beat the stock market." "I don't think it's a good investment for the rank and file retail market," Hooke added. An inevitable development The push to include private equity in retirement plans is just the latest development in a long-running trend of combining public and private markets. The private equity industry experienced explosive growth during the pandemic as firms bought up portfolio companies with cheap debt. But now, as higher rates stymie private equity dealmaking, firms are eyeing a liquidity opportunity: gaining access to the $12 trillion 401(k) market. Brian Payne, chief private markets and alternatives strategist at BCA Research, described this development as "an exit ramp for the current situation going on for private equity." Traditional exit opportunities — such as selling to a public company, another private equity firm, or going public — have dried up. According to a PwC analysis, between 4,000 to 6,500 private equity exits have been delayed in the last two years, and the firm believes funds will soon be forced to sell off their portfolio companies as limited partners demand capital distributions. As a result, private equity firms have been lobbying the Trump administration for access to retirement vehicles. It won't just be private equity looking for retail exposure — Hooke expects other alternatives like private credit and real estate to follow suit. Increased risk Private equity tends to generates higher returns than the market as a result of the illiquid nature of the asset class, as investments can be locked up for a decade or longer. Retail investors require more liquidity, which will eat into private equity returns over the long term, according to Payne. Private equity investments also come with steep management fees that could decrease returns. "It'll make the retirement plans suboptimal," Hooke said. "When people retire 20 to 30 years after investing in private equity, returns are going to be a little less than one would expect." While retirement vehicles typically have longer timelines, reducing the need for immediate liquidity, Payne sees a risk if an economic downturn increases unemployment and forces more people to tap into their 401(k)s. Moody's Investors Service recently raised a similar concern, noting that retail investor participation in the private markets poses systemic risks. While Payne and Hooke are skeptical about the increased presence of private equity in retail portfolios, it's unlikely that private equity will comprise a large portion of people's retirement plans. Experts project around 10% of retirement assets could go toward private equity over time, which means Americans will probably be shielded from dramatic price swings. Glenn Schorr, senior research analyst at Evercore ISI, wrote in a note on Wednesday that corporate sponsors may also be hesitant to invest in private equity vehicles. However, mixing complicated assets like private equity into retirement vehicles is certainly a risky choice. "When you get retail involved in opaque markets, with very different liquidity structures, very different risk, and ultimately different assets and strategies, it doesn't end well," Payne said. Read the original article on Business Insider

80 Years After the Trinity Atomic Blast, New Mexico's Downwinders May Finally See Reparations
80 Years After the Trinity Atomic Blast, New Mexico's Downwinders May Finally See Reparations

Gizmodo

time25 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

80 Years After the Trinity Atomic Blast, New Mexico's Downwinders May Finally See Reparations

Eighty years after the Trinity Test brought nuclear fallout to their communities, New Mexico residents living downstream of the test may finally be eligible for long-sought reparations. In the early hours of July 16, 1945, the U.S. Army detonated the world's first atomic bomb as part of the Manhattan Project, near Alamogordo, New Mexico. Radioactive ash soon began to fall over large swaths of the surrounding regions. Since then, survivors of the U.S. federal government's nuclear testing program and the state's uranium mining industries have watched their friends and family members die from rare cancers. Multiple generations affected by the nuclear program have spent decades seeking recognition and reparations. A measure in the recently passed Republican spending bill expands eligibility for a program that compensates those with health problems linked to radiation exposure, including downwinders of the Trinity Test. The Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), first passed in 1990, provided compensation to people who contracted certain cancers and other diseases due to radiation exposure from its many nuclear weapons tests or uranium mining. It initially excluded New Mexico residents downwind of the Trinity Test, many of whom were Hispanic residents and Mescalero Apache tribal members, as well as those who worked in the industry after RECA's coverage period (post-1971). RECA expired last year, even after survivors advocated for its expansion. In a statement released ahead of the anniversary of the test, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M), who has worked to pass legislation expanding RECA, wrote that there are 'eight decades of pain, loss, and injustice for the victims still living with the fallout of nuclear testing and uranium mining.' The U.S. government never warned the communities near the blast site, never evacuated residents, nor informed them about the potential health consequences. The military described the blast as an accident involving ammunition and pyrotechnics at the time. Those living near the blast only learned about the test after the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Advocates say the new extension isn't enough. 'The two-year extension will not be long enough for us to get everybody enrolled that should be enrolled, and the health care coverage was stripped out,' Tina Cordova, co-founder of the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, said on a call with reporters last week, according to USA Today. Under the new extension, Trinity survivors can apply for $100,000 in damages. On its website, the U.S. Justice Department is advising the public to wait 'for further guidance' before filing a claim. 'My dad should still be here; $100,000 pales in comparison to who he was, and who he used to be to us,' Cordova told Source NM. 'I don't want to sound ungrateful, I don't want to minimize what it means, but that's not justice. That's the beginning of justice—it's a step forward in the right direction.'

Attorney General Bondi visits Alcatraz as Trump floats idea of reopening the former federal prison
Attorney General Bondi visits Alcatraz as Trump floats idea of reopening the former federal prison

CNN

time26 minutes ago

  • CNN

Attorney General Bondi visits Alcatraz as Trump floats idea of reopening the former federal prison

Attorney General Pam Bondi is touring former Alcatraz prison and the surrounding island, as the Trump administration pushes the idea of re-establishing it as a prison more than 60 years after it was closed. Bondi is there to with Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to receive a briefing on the facility, a Justice Department official said, and is 'discussing facilities with Park Police on the ground, and directing staff to collaborate on the necessary planning to rehabilitate and reopen the facility.' Bondi was spotted by a TV helicopter tracking the visit. President Donald Trump floated the idea of rebuilding and reopening Alcatraz earlier this year. Bondi's visit comes as the attorney general continues to face questions about her handling of files connected to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Justice Department last week released a memo that there was no Epstein 'client list,' and the Trump administration announced that it didn't plan to release any more documents in the investigation. That announcement has only fueled calls from Trump allies and Democrats for additional disclosures. This story is breaking and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store