logo
Australian and NZ anti-corruption bosses embroiled in 'chaos' at ICAC PNG

Australian and NZ anti-corruption bosses embroiled in 'chaos' at ICAC PNG

Papua New Guinea's peak anti-corruption body is on the brink of implosion, senior staff say, as its three commissioners, who hail from Australia and New Zealand, level criminal allegations at each other.
The country's Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) began operating in 2023 but has been hamstrung by feverish leadership tensions.
Deputy commissioners Graham Gill and Daniel Baulch have accused commissioner Andrew Forbes of suspected corruption and abuse of power, alleging in a letter that he secretly manipulated ICAC legislation to give himself exclusive power over key agency functions.
Meanwhile, Mr Forbes has referred his deputies to police for alleged misconduct involving the authorisation of travel and accommodation costs.
Several sources have told the ABC almost all the agency's expatriate staff, including multiple Australians, are likely to resign, stripping the organisation of expertise needed to fight corruption.
They have described an environment of "chaos".
One staff member, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the situation was "disgraceful" and the organisation had become "completely dysfunctional".
It comes at a crucial time, as Papua New Guinea fights desperately to avoid being grey-listed by an international anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing watchdog.
Kerenga Kua, an opposition MP and former head of the PNG law society, told the ABC the paralysation of ICAC was disappointing for PNG, which may lose more than a billion dollars to corruption each year.
"After many, many years of decay and decadence at the hands of white-collar crime … we were looking forward to a bigger, better and brighter future," Mr Kua said.
"The whole thing, the way it's been handled at the ICAC level and at the Appointments Committee level is truly regrettable."
When the ICAC was set up two years ago, there were high hopes it would mark a turning point for PNG in combating corruption.
The commissioners were selected by a group — chaired by PNG Prime Minister James Marape with representatives from the opposition, the judiciary, the Public Services Commission and churches — known as the Appointments Committee.
But things at PNG ICAC turned south when the agency began to investigate its own commissioner, Andrew Forbes, early last year.
"We reasonably suspect that the commissioner has engaged in a course of corrupt conduct," Mr Gill and Mr Baulch wrote in a letter to the Appointments Committee last July.
The next month, ICAC PNG commenced a formal investigation into Mr Forbes, codenamed "Operation North".
The investigation culminated in an arrest warrant being authorised last November, accusing Mr Forbes of abusing "the authority of his office".
Operation North alleged Mr Forbes misused his position to secretly change laws, effectively giving himself exclusive power to probe politicians and public officials, according to a copy of the warrant seen by the ABC.
The warrant said Mr Forbes allegedly changed the wording of key ICAC regulations so that only qualified lawyers could conduct hearings and make orders, directions and summons.
Mr Forbes was the only commission member who fit that description, the warrant said, which meant those changes effectively gave him singular powers and stripped the ability of the deputy commissioners to carry out core responsibilities.
It further alleged that Mr Forbes deliberately concealed the changes to the regulations from the deputy commissioners and other ICAC staff.
The letter to the Appointments Committee also accused Mr Forbes of using his personal email address to message a senior public servant who was being investigated by the commission.
The commissioner did not respond to the ABC's request for comment.
Mr Forbes is a lawyer from Brisbane who was previously a partner at the commercial law firm Turks Legal and has no apparent prior experience in anti-corruption work.
His LinkedIn page states that his areas of expertise include commercial litigation, administrative and regulatory law.
After the arrest warrant was authorised, Mr Forbes obtained a court injunction stopping ICAC and the police from arresting him and conducting investigations into the matter while it was before the Appointments Committee.
Over the weekend, Mr Forbes reported deputy commissioners Graham Gill and Dan Baulch to police for alleged financial misconduct.
The ABC understands Mr Gill and Mr Baulch have since left PNG.
Mr Baulch is a former detective with Victoria Police in Australia and Mr Gill was a senior executive in charge of evaluation, intelligence and corporate affairs at the Serious Fraud Office in New Zealand.
The fraud and anti-corruption squad confirmed it was investigating "serious allegations" related to fraudulent approval of travel and accommodation expenses.
In a written response to the ABC, the deputy commissioners said they believed they had been "subjected to retaliatory behaviour" and that they would strongly defend the allegations".
In a media release, Mr Forbes said he "did not tolerate misconduct at any level" but did not provide further details about the deputies' alleged misconduct.
It is not the first accusation levelled against a deputy commissioner.
In August last year, two weeks after the complaint against him was lodged, Mr Forbes referred Mr Baulch to the Appointments Committee.
He claimed Mr Baulch failed to disclose a prior criminal charge in his application for a PNG visa and other immigration documents.
He also accused Mr Baulch of bullying and harassing Mr Forbes's assistant when she was interviewed by Mr Baulch as part of the Operation North investigation.
The commissioner further claimed Mr Baulch falsely made out he was authorised to approve ICAC requisitions and expenses.
Almost a year since the matters against Mr Forbes and Mr Baulch were referred to the Appointments Committee, no decision has been reached.
Several ICAC insiders have told the ABC they believe the Appointments Committee failed disastrously in its handling of the allegations against the deputy commissioners.
"It's been terribly handled," one source said, speaking anonymously.
"I think if they'd done their job properly then it wouldn't have got to the extent is has."
Peter Aitsi, who chairs anti-corruption organisation Transparency International PNG, said when serious allegations of misconduct are made, the "right thing for individuals to do is step aside".
Do you know more about this story? Contact Faa.Marian@abc.net.au.
Mr Aitsi said an oversight committee should be appointed to resolve the issues as quickly as possible and restore ICAC's functions.
Prime Minister James Marape did not respond directly to the ABC's questions.
In a public media statement, he said the Appointments Committee had asked for a detailed report and legal review to be submitted to PNG's cabinet for consideration.
"Once recommendations are endorsed, cabinet will take swift and responsible action to restore stability within ICAC," he said.
"This institution must not fall. It was created to be a cornerstone in the fight against corruption — not a battleground of personalities and power struggles."
Many are concerned the recent issues within ICAC could worsen PNG's already-bleak chances of being grey-listed by the international anti-money laundering watchdog, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
FATF "grey lists" countries it believes have weaknesses in its regimes for combating money laundering and terrorist financing.
The country has already been put on notice by FATF and faces a review in October this year.
Stephen Howes, an economist at the Lowy Institute in Australia, said PNG was grey-listed in 2014 — but removed quickly because it passed legislation the following year to strengthen the anti-corruption framework in the financial sector.
"But now the view is that not enough has been done to implement that legislation," he said.
"The recent ICAC implosion will do nothing to dispel that impression."
Professor Howes said being grey-listed would make it harder for PNG's new banks to operate internationally.
Grey-listing would also be a reputational blow for PNG, which marks its 50th anniversary of Independence in September this year.
Despite the concerns, Transparency International's Peter Aitsi said the PNG public still had a strong belief in the value of ICAC.
"We need to work quickly to reset and restore that trust again," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pauline Hanson calls on Coalition to back urgency motion on net zero
Pauline Hanson calls on Coalition to back urgency motion on net zero

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Pauline Hanson calls on Coalition to back urgency motion on net zero

One Nation senator Pauline Hanson is seizing on division in the Coalition to push through an urgency motion calling for Australia to abandon its net zero target. Senator Hanson, a long-time climate change denier, will introduce the motion on Monday following Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce's private members bill calling for the same thing. Aware of the divide in the Coalition, Senator Hanson said her motion would out opposition 'cowards'. 'They're gutless, you know, they're cowards,' she told Sky News when asked about the prospect of Coalition senators not backing her motion. 'Because a lot of these people on the floor of parliament have no understanding, cannot debate you about climate change. 'They don't even know anything about it. 'They're making decisions and voting on it.' 'Scam' She went on to say Australians have 'been hoodwinked'. 'It's a scam going on and if we head down this path, what will happen to Australians?' Senator Hanson said. 'You will be restricted where you travel, where you go, what you eat, and it will be based on your carbon emissions.' Australia's renewables targets do not impose restrictions on freedom of movement or diets. Earlier, Mr Joyce asked Australia's big-city residents if they are 'prepared to hurt the poor' by pursuing a carbon neutral future. Mr Joyce, who was banished to the backbench after the Coalition's brief post-election break-up, kicked off the second sitting week of the new parliament by introducing his Repeal Net Zero Bill. Unless Sussan Ley drastically changes course in rebuilding the Coalition as a moderate opposition, the private member's bill will not get far. But as a former Nationals leader, Mr Joyce holds clout within the party and his split from more green-minded Liberal Party colleagues has grown into somewhat of a backbench rebellion. Mr Joyce said on Monday there needed to be more give and take between city-living Australians and their rural and regional counterparts, saying there 'are certain things' the regions could do but do not 'because we're trying to be reasonable'. 'There's absolutely no reason that Mascot Airport can't work 24/7,' he told reporters, flanked by fellow Coalition rebels and disgruntled community members. 'But we understand that people don't want planes flying over themselves in the middle of the night … but we don't want transmission lines over our head either. 'We don't want wind towers either, so there's got to be a form of good pro quo.' Mr Joyce said the question 'affluent suburbs' needed to be asked was: 'Are you prepared to hurt the poor?' 'Are you prepared to hurt them and I don't think if you really explain the issue that people do want to hurt them,' he said. 'You don't feel virtuous if you're hurting people.' Mr Joyce's Bill proposes to abandon Australia's carbon-neutral target by 2050. The target is in line with goals set by other developed economies, but the task has been complicated by rapid energy demands from emerging economies and global disruptions driven by increased conflicts, such as Russia's war in Ukraine. Among Mr Joyce's supporters gathered outside Parliament House was fellow former Nationals leader Michael McCormack, another hefty voice in the party. Liberal MP Garth Hamilton also joined him, making him the only member of the senior Coalition partner to do so.

Tasmanian Liberals accused of breaching caretaker conventions over Marinus Link and TT-line borrowing limit
Tasmanian Liberals accused of breaching caretaker conventions over Marinus Link and TT-line borrowing limit

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Tasmanian Liberals accused of breaching caretaker conventions over Marinus Link and TT-line borrowing limit

As votes continue to be counted and both major parties continue discussions with crossbenchers to form government following Tasmania's snap election, the government is being accused of breaching caretaker conventions. Tasmania's Labor opposition has claimed the government's handling of two policy decisions — an increase in the borrowing limit for ferry operator TT-Line and the yet-to-be-made decision on whether to proceed with the Marinus Link undersea power cable — have contravened caretaker conventions. The government said it would follow all relevant caretaker conventions and that it had briefed Labor on the TT-Line decision, and would consult with Labor on the Marinus decision "in due course". When the House of Assembly is dissolved for a general election, the government is placed in what is called a caretaker period. Caretaker conventions outline how the government should operate during the period. According to the guidelines, the conventions are "neither legally binding nor hard and fast rules" and they should be applied to individual cases with "sound judgement and common sense". Professor emerita Anne Twomey, a constitutional law expert at the University of Sydney, said the conventions were developed "as a matter of fairness". "The idea is that during that [caretaker] period, after parliament has been dissolved, where governments are no longer actively responsible to parliament because there's no parliament in existence, then they should be a lot more careful about what they do. "You don't want to bind a new government, which may have completely different policies, by entering into a whole lot of commitments immediately beforehand to make life difficult for them," Professor Twomey said. Professor Twomey said it "comes down to the people". "It's really a political matter as to how effective they are. So, it comes down to the people, particularly when they vote, in terms of deciding whether the government has behaved appropriately," she said. Under the guidelines, governments are encouraged to avoid making major policy decisions that are likely to commit an incoming government. However, this is not always possible, Professor Twomey said. "There is an additional principle that says, if you have to make a major decision in that period, then you should consult the other side as well and try to reach an agreed position," she said. The government does not require endorsement from the opposition during consultation. "Ultimately, it's the government that makes decisions. "But it's better to try and get some kind of agreement between both sides in order to progress matters that are significant and would have an impact on an incoming government," Professor Twomey said. Labor is calling on the government to release the business case for the Marinus Link undersea power cable project, saying that withholding it is a breach of caretaker conventions. Marinus would be a second electricity interconnector between Tasmania and Victoria. A decision by the Tasmanian, Victorian and federal governments on whether to proceed with the project is due by the end of July. A whole-of-state business case was provided to the government by Treasury in May. The government promised to release the case 30 days before its final investment decision, however said the release has been delayed due to the early election. Labor MLC Sarah Lovell said the premier needed to release the business case "as soon as possible". "These are major financial decisions that will be made by the government. "These are long-term decisions and under caretaker conventions one of the prerequisites is that decisions that are being made that will impact on future governments need [to have] all that information released to both the opposition and the government, and we're not seeing that from the premier," Ms Lovell said. On Saturday, Liberal MP Felix Ellis said Labor had not been briefed yet "because no final decision has been made" on Marinus Link. "We'll continue to work through the process. This is an important investment for our state, and we'll be updating the public as well as the opposition in due course," Mr Ellis said. State Energy Minister Nick Duigan also said on Saturday that "all relevant information will be publicly released" only once a decision on the project is finalised. Professor Twomey said the government did not have to be "undecided" before it consulted. "It's fair enough for a government to take a view as to what it wants to do before engaging in consultation," she said. "But if you're saying a decision means that's our final decision and we're not going to pay one iota of attention to anything you say, that would be rather pre-empting the consultation and making it pointless." At the weekend, the government agreed to support a temporary $410 million increase to Bass Strait ferry operator TT-Line's borrowing capacity. Treasurer Guy Barnett said the government received advice from Treasury on July 25 "recommending TT-Line's guaranteed borrowing limit be increased". "[Opposition treasury spokesperson] Josh Willie was briefed on July 26, and the decision was announced the same day," Mr Barnett said. Mr Willie said he received a call just over an hour before the decision was announced. "Jeremy Rockliff's idea of 'consultation' is a last-minute phone call. That's not consultation — that's a courtesy call after the decision had already been made. "When a major policy decision is being made during the caretaker period — especially one that would bind a future government — Labor must be consulted before the decision is made," Mr Willie said. Professor Twomey said caretaker conventions did not outline specific requirements for adequate consultation, rather that was "a matter for the relevant parties to decide". "Telling someone something an hour before you publicise it does seem to be perfunctory in terms of genuine consultation," she said. "As a general principle, that would be something that you would think would not be adequate consultation. "But, again, these are not binding rules. They're just conventions and it's a matter for the political parties to decide how they want to interpret them."

For many Muslim women in Australia, Islamophobia feels inevitable
For many Muslim women in Australia, Islamophobia feels inevitable

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

For many Muslim women in Australia, Islamophobia feels inevitable

Dr Nora Amath, Executive Director of the Islamophobia Register, observed a 'dramatic surge' in Islamophobic incidents, following the October 7 th attacks in 2023. She said women and girls were disproportionately targeted, making up about 75 per cent of victims. Dr Amath said geopolitical events can serve as a catalyst for Islamophobia in Australia, but they're not the only contributing factor. 'Political rhetoric is very important to whether we see a rise or a decrease in incidents reported to us.' In this episode of Understanding Hate , we look at Islamophobia in Australia today.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store