New Smarsh UK Survey Shows AI Adoption Surges in Financial Services—But Employees Demand Stronger Guardrails
Balancing innovation with risk from the bottom up
The study, based on responses from 2000 UK employees in financial services and insurance, highlights how AI is now a pivotal part of daily business, with over a third often using AI tools for work purposes. However, 55% of employees say that they have never received any official training for using such tools. The research also reveals that: Over a third (37%) say that they often use public AI tools – like ChatGPT or Microsoft 365 Copilot – for work purposes
A further 38% are not sure whether their organisation has tools and processes to capture and monitor the outputs of AI tools, with a further 21% explicitly saying that they know that their firm does not
Over two thirds (69%) would feel more confident using AI tools if all outputs were captured and monitored for transparency
'AI adoption in financial services has accelerated rapidly, with employees embracing these tools to boost productivity,' said Tom Padgett, President, Enterprise Business at Smarsh . 'But with innovation comes responsibility. Firms must establish the right guardrails to prevent data leaks and misconduct. The good news is that employees are on board—welcoming a safe, compliant AI environment that builds trust and unlocks long-term growth.'
Licence to Skill? Employees unsure of AI Agent compliance
The research also reveals employees' views around AI tools that are being used within their organisation for public, customer-facing tasks. Specifically, AI Agents – systems that are able to perform specific tasks without human intervention, i.e. a chatbot. The research shows that: Almost half (43%) say that their organisation uses AI Agents for customer communications, including personalised financial advice
A quarter (22%) indicated that their firm is using the technology for investment activities, like trade recommendations and portfolio management
Yet a third (31%) have concerns around their organisation's ability to meet or apply regulatory obligations to AI Agents
A further 29% worry that they don't know where potentially sensitive information is going when AI Agents are used
The findings come as the FCA is set to give UK financial services firms the greenlight on ambitious proposals for AI innovation with an AI live testing service , aimed at supporting firms with implementing consumer-facing AI tools.
'Using public Al tools without controls is digital negligence,' said Paul Taylor, Vice President of Product at Smarsh. 'You're effectively feeding your crown jewels into a black box you don't own, where the data can't be deleted, and the logic can't be explained. It's reckless. Private tools like Microsoft 365 Copilot and ChatGPT Enterprise are a step in the right direction. Still, if companies aren't actively capturing and auditing usage, they're not securing innovation- they're sleepwalking into a compliance nightmare.
Companies In This Post
Smarsh
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
No new policies in next year's budget, says Mark Drakeford
Finance Secretary Mark Drakeford will try to avoid political wrangling before next year's Senedd election by writing a "neutral" told Senedd members his final budget before the election will repeat this year's spending will not pay for new policies because that "will be for political parties to put before the Welsh electorate", Drakeford said it showed the "fragility" of Labour, which runs a minority government and has lost support in recent opinion polls. A draft budget for 2026/27 will be published in October, with MSs voting on a final budget in a statement, Drakeford said he did not want to tie the hands of the next parliament by publishing spending plans in the final weeks of a five-year Senedd the cabinet had agreed to plan "a business-as-usual budget", rising in line with he added he was "open to the possibility of working with other political parties who believe a more ambitious budget could be agreed".Taxpayer funding for public services falls if the Senedd cannot pass a budget - something that would have a "catastrophic impact", Drakeford cabinet's decision to restate this year's budget "is designed to maximise the chances that that risk can be avoided", he said."The politically neutral approach I have set out this afternoon is an attempt to secure stability and certainty for our public services and for our constituents," he said. 'Loss of authority' Drakeford said the next government will inherit a £400m fund to spend on what it wants after the Labour one seat short of a majority in the Senedd chamber, Drakeford needed the support of the Senedd's sole Liberal Democrat MP to pass a budget for this financial year. The Conservatives and Plaid Cymru voted against it in polls suggest a hung parliament is likely again after next May's election, with no party winning an outright MS Sam Rowlands said the "roll-over budget" was "an acknowledgement that there is a real risk of Labour not being in government after the next Senedd election"."I believe that's an admission of fragility and loss of authority by the Labour Party here in Wales," he Cymru MS Heledd Fychan said some voluntary groups and charities "are facing perhaps closure, so will be concerned and looking to next year's budget to see if they can survive or not".
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Zero-hours contacts will be illegal in two years
The government's landmark Employment Rights Bill, described by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer as a significant upgrade to workers' rights, will be implemented through a phased rollout extending until 2027. Key provisions, such as a ban on exploitative zero-hours contracts and 'day-one' protections against unfair dismissal, are scheduled to come into full effect in 2027. Immediate changes upon the Bill's royal assent include the repeal of Conservative-era industrial action restrictions and new protections for striking workers. Further reforms, including enhanced sick pay, 'day-one' paternity leave, and measures to end 'fire and rehire' practices, are slated for April and October 2026. The phased approach aims to give businesses ample time to prepare, a move welcomed by business groups, while union leaders urge earlier adoption of the changes and the Conservative opposition criticises the delay.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Macquarie digs deeper for redemption at Southern Water. There was no alternative
Many took the view in 2021 that Macquarie should have been run out of town, rather than be allowed to own another English water company. The giant Australian financial outfit's former outing, remember, was at Thames Water from 2006 to 2017, which was when the absurd games of financial leverage began at the UK's biggest water company. The then-chair of Ofwat later told MPs he asked himself the question 'What do we do here, with that reputation?' when Macquarie made the best financial offer to rescue Southern Water. The deal was done eventually with Ofwat's blessing. Macquarie-managed funds injected £1bn to take control and its infrastructure boss declared in an open letter that the firm would be 'a responsible long-term steward of Southern Water and believes it can help the company deliver the transformation it requires'. Part of that statement – the bit about being in it for the long term – is clearly true. Macquarie is now rescuing Southern for a third time, in effect. An extra £550m was injected in 2023. Now its consortium (of which it and its managed funds are about 90%) is putting in up to £1.2bn in equity to recapitalise Southern's operating company. The process is convoluted since only £655m is binding; a further £245m is intended to follow by the end of the year and the balance of £300m depends of the outcome of Southern's appeal to try to secure bigger bill increases than the 53% allowed by Ofwat. But, in the shoes of the regulator or a fearful secretary of state, Steve Reed, you'd be breathing a sigh of relief. Their nightmare was the thought that the current refinancing crisis at Thames would spill over to Southern, the next most stressed operator. Instead, Southern should now have sufficient capital to get it through the current five-year regulatory period. Unlike at Thames, the fisticuffs with bondholders took place behind closed doors. Lenders are taking a write-down from £865m to £415m across the complicated holding company group structure in what is a mini debt-for-equity swap to supplement the new capital. Macquarie's approach to transparency didn't extend to giving a leverage ratio for the regulated entity in recapitalised form – a critical metric – but the ratio is obviously lower than it was before the deal. Yet the Australian attempt at watery redemption is not quite the upbeat tale of emerging success presented in Tuesday's announcement. The claimed 'good progress' with Southern's transformation plan requires a large helping of context. Yes, pollution incidents may be down by 40%, but the top executives are still on Reed's banned list for bonuses on account of spills. Meanwhile, the company got a two-star rating in the Environment Agency's last assessment report – better than the one star Macquarie inherited, but still equal bottom-of-the-table. Ofwat's separate performance scorecard noted that in 2023-24 Southern 'reported the largest percentage net underperformance payment for a fourth consecutive year.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Those regulatory reports are almost a year old, so maybe the next annual crop will provide evidence of the 'momentum' behind the turnaround. Until then, however, Macquarie has merely demonstrated it can cough up capital when there is no realistic alternative. On-the-ground operational delivery is what counts. There is a long way to go. If the exercise is costing more than Macquarie expected in 2021, sympathy may be limited.
