
The top towns Aussies are fleeing to in droves and the surprising group that's leaving the big cities for a lifestyle change
Aussies fleeing the housing affordability crisis in Sydney and Melbourne are choosing to settle in more affordable regional centres that are still within reach of capital cities.
Those making a sea or tree change from a major city are choosing destinations like Newcastle, Geelong, and the Sunshine Coast as their new home, based on Commonwealth Bank customer data shared with the Regional Australia Institute.
These three towns are within two hours of Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane respectively and share some of the delights of Australia's biggest cities - just without the same prohibitive cost.
'They're bigger centres ... they come with the amenity that can sometimes be a barrier for other regional locations,' said Liz Ritchie, CEO of the Regional Australia Institute.
'It's a big decision to move and so (they have) closer proximity, where they know that they can drive within a couple of hours back to see family or friends back in that capital city.
'It makes sense that your first move might just be dipping your toe in the water.'
It is clear that many Australians are moving - with New South Wales reporting an exodus of 28,000 residents this year, while cheaper south east Queensland gained 26,000 residents.
However, just over 3,200 people leave Victoria every year, suggesting many leaving Melbourne are heading to a regional area a short drive away rather than another state with warmer weather.
In Victoria, Geelong received the largest share of migration from another part of Australia with a generous 9.3 per cent share, Regional Australia Institute data showed.
The neighbouring Moorabool council area, north of Geelong, gets 3.7 per cent of interstate migration while Ballarat attracts 2.4 per cent of Australians relocating.
Queensland gets the biggest number of Australians moving from another state with the Sunshine Coast north of Brisbane getting an 8.9 per cent of movers.
Surprisingly, the Gold Coast is no longer the hotspot for interstate migration it once was, attracting just one per cent of Aussie movers.
'Having spoken to many people who live there, it was very popular in the Covid period, then we felt that it was starting to experience some of the growing pains,' Ms Ritchie said.
'Even just getting around, driving regular sort of errands, became quite difficult.
'As price rises increase, places become too hot.'
Instead, the Fraser Coast - which includes Hervey Bay - was the second most popular place to move to, getting 3.3 per cent of relocators.
Nearby Gympie is the third most popular tree change destination, with a two per cent share.
In New South Wales, areas near Newcastle are the magnets for those moving to a regional area.
Lake Macquarie attracted 5.3 per cent of people moving from another part of Australia while nearby Maitland took in 3.5 per cent of movers.
The Shoalhaven council area - covering Nowra and Ulladulla on the south coast - was the third most popular place to resettle in NSW, getting 2.6 per cent of interstate migration.
When it came to making the move to a regional area, Millennials born from 1981 to 1996 were the most enthusiastic about change.
More than half or 57 per cent of Millennials are considering such a move, a YouGov poll of 1,028 people for the Regional Australia Institute found.
In a break with recent decades, those in their thirties and forties raising children are now actively considering a regional area, where they could afford a house with a backyard and be close to nature.
'What was once not happening is now happening and so they're taking over,' Ms Ritchie said.
'The housing's more affordable, cheaper cost of living and you don't have the commute.
'Because of the hip pocket, high inflation, high interest rates - the issues we've been reading about daily for the last two years, this is driving these decisions.'
Moving to a regional area also gives young people the chance to be more involved with the community they live in.
'Not only do they want to buy a house, they also want to coach the local football team or be part of the local community group, whatever it is that makes them tick,' she said.
'So you do have more time and more space and more connection to each other and more connection to the environment.'
Generation Z adults - born from 1997 onwards - were also open minded about moving, with 40 per cent inclined to make the move, putting it well ahead of the 25 per cent of boomers considering a change.
The e61 Institute think tank noted Millennial and Gen Z Australians - aged 25 to 34 - were particularly struggling to buy a home, like their parents were able to do at the same age 'with this disparity greater in capital cities'.
'Regardless of occupation, Millennials are leaving Sydney and, more recently, Melbourne, as traditional milestones like owning a home may no longer be seen as attainable to many young Australians living in these major cities,' it said.
'Whether home ownership rates will converge with age remains to be seen.'
The ability of white collar professionals to work from home is also accelerating the move to regional areas among younger people.
Some 47 per cent of those able to work from home say they would consider moving and continuing in their current role on a remote or hybrid basis.
Ms Ritchie suggested working from home was now embedded in Australia's workplace culture, and could accelerate the shift to regional areas among the young.
'It tells us that this is here to stay,' she said.
'They're moving because they want to bring the job that they're in, they want to work remotely.
'Look at how our technology and connectivity has emerged and the pace of change - with that technology uplift, younger people are taking advantage of those opportunities.'
The number of Millennials moving to a regional area grew by 54,000 between the 2016 and 2021 Census surveys, a Regional Australia Institute analysis showed.
Even before Covid, a major shift was underway.
'Probably you have to go back to the mid-1950s - so a massive change really in a short period.'
To illustrate this point, house prices in regional areas rose by 5.4 per cent over the year to May, CoreLogic data showed.
This outpaced the three per cent growth pace of capital cities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Auto Blog
36 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
Lamborghini Just Joined These Top Automakers to Save the Gas Engine
Keeping combustion alive is in the best interest of brands that favor V12 and V8 engines Electrification isn't the only way forward for vehicles. One of the most popular alternatives, particularly among enthusiasts, is synthetic fuels. Synthetic fuels blend the charm and familiarity of internal combustion with, ideally, the environmental benefits of curbing gasoline use. While objectively not as clean running as a battery-powered vehicle, synthetic fuels have distinct practical advantages. Performance brands, particularly, are leading the charge, and Lamborghini is the latest automaker to show support. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:10 Full screen 2025 Audi S3 VS 2025 Mercedes-AMG CLA 35: Which one comes out on top? Watch More Lamborghini Temerario Lamborghini Temerario Lamborghini Temerario For performance brands with lots of heritage attached to their combustion motors, synthetic fuels are one way to retain what makes their cars special. Rouven Mohr, Chief Technical Officer at Lamborghini, seems to recognize that. In an interview with Australian outlet CarExpert, Mohr is more than optimistic. 'I'm not saying that synthetic fuel is better than fossil fuel,' he starts. 'But it could be the savior of the combustion engine.' Speaking specifically of the V8 powering the newest hybrid Lamborghini, the Temerario, Mohr explains what makes the combustion engine nigh irreplaceable. 'It starts with the sound, but it's not only about that – it's also about the vibration that we feel, the shifting perception, how the car is rotating in the corner.' Lamborghini is far from the first brand to endorse synthetic fuels, and with good reason Mohr waxed poetic about the V8 powering the Lamborghini Temerario. 'If you ask me the emotion side at the moment, like I said before, I don't see the [electric] solution that is convincing now,' he said to CarExpert. It's hard to disagree; the soundtrack and response of a combustion engine is still something EVs can't replicate. Of course, there are more practical benefits, too. For one, it gives a road forward for the literally billions of gas-powered vehicles already on the planet's roads. Carbon-neutral synthetic fuels, sometimes referred to as biofuels or e-fuels, also provide a way for automakers to sell combustion-powered models in the EU past 2035, the current goalpost banning emission-producing vehicles. 2025 Porsche Macan Electric Turbo — Source: Porsche There's extra oomph behind the CTO's words when you consider other brands under the VW Group's ownership, like Porsche, have already been hard at work developing synthetic fuel options. Synthetic fuel is also being handled as a serious option outside the immediate VW family. Toyota, Mazda, and Subaru have all invested in the synthetic fuel game, most recently when they committed to working with synthetic fuel developer ENEOS to showcase synthetic-friendly engines at Expo 2025 Osaka. Another proponent is Formula 1, for fairly obvious reasons. Arguably, the largest impact synthetic fuel might have is in shipping and aviation applications, which, despite being the largest sources of emissions, won't be going electric anytime in the near (or even distant) future. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 2025 Porsche 911 GTS T-Hybrid — Source: Porsche Final thoughts Despite automakers predominantly focusing on electrification, synthetic fuel has enjoyed a steady burn in the background. Expect more and more automakers to start looking to cleaner-burning fuel in the second half of the decade. While battery power is objectively more efficient from a cost and energy perspective, it won't solve everything. Synthetic fuel is almost the only answer to the looming question of what to do with all of the gas cars we already have, but we're hopeful for a future of combustion-powered V8s and V12s, too. About the Author Steven Paul View Profile


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Could the M6 be Sydney's unbuildable motorway due to sinkholes and a reverse fault?
A 245-metre section of a new Sydney motorway tunnel plagued by sinkholes and a 'challenging' geological feature will bring a $3.1bn transport project to a grinding halt unless an eleventh-hour deal is reached. The M6's new twin 4km tunnels, connecting Sydney's south to the wider motorway network, were approved in 2019 and scheduled to open in 2025. That date was pushed back to 2028 after two large sinkholes opened above the tunnel and below an industrial estate in Rockdale in March 2024. But even that extended timeline is now in doubt after the consortium charged with the tunnels' construction between Kogarah and Arncliffe has said it will down tools from 30 June after the discovery of a 'high-angle reverse fault' in the bedrock close to the sinkholes. In an email to staff published by the Sydney Morning Herald in May, David Jackson, the director of the first stage of the M6 project – a joint venture of CPB, Ghella and UGL, known collectively as CGU – said CGU was pulling out. Jackson stated the design and construct contract had become 'frustrated' and was 'terminated by operation of the law'. He wrote that the tunnel 'excavation … has been on hold for almost a year now due to the impact of unique adverse ground conditions caused by a complex faulting zone, including a high-angle reverse fault (never seen before in the Sydney basin)'. 'The presence of such ground conditions could not have been anticipated by anyone,' he said, adding that they were only discovered once tunnel excavation was carried out. 'It is now apparent that a compliant design solution cannot be achieved to overcome these challenging ground conditions.' The government was made aware of CGU's intention to walk away before the email was sent to staff, a Transport for NSW (TfNSW) spokesperson told Guardian Australia. The project is otherwise 90% completed. Above-ground work by CGU in Kogarah may continue and could be completed by the end of the year. The New South Wales premier, Chris Minns, has criticised the unilateral move, claiming that the contractor remains responsible for designing and building the tunnels. 'My best advice to the contractor today is to send the lawyers home and bring back the engineers,' he told reporters in May. 'I'm not going to allow NSW taxpayers to be put over a barrel for these big projects.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email A TfNSW spokesperson says the department remains 'optimistic' about reaching an agreement with CGU. They previously said the government was working with the contractor 'to identify a technical solution to the issues encountered' on the project and claimed the consortium had not demonstrated it had exhausted all technical options to move forward with the works. 'It is unfortunate CGU now appears to have determined it is in their commercial interest to down tools instead. We're considering Transport's position in relation to the contract given the unilateral steps taken by CGU,' TfNSW said. As part of the tender process for the major project, potential contractors were given geotechnical reports of the ground where the works would be carried out, TfNSW says. It was unable to provide geotechnical reports from any stage of the project to Guardian Australia. CPB, as lead contractor for CGU, says it cannot comment further. Grahame Campbell, an engineer who project managed the M4 – which was finished in half the forecast time and budget – has written a paper for the Centre for Independent Studies about 'bungles' that lead to cost and time blowouts on major infrastructure projects in Australia. He is confident the M6 will be completed eventually, but believes it will be over budget – like other major projects including Sydney's metro and light rail builds and Melbourne's North East Link. 'Of course it can be finished and it's a matter of doing it correctly and doing it with the right team,' he says. Speaking generally, Campbell says blowouts have not always been so common. They can be caused by various factors, including contractors starting construction before finishing designs, changes to designs, governments handing responsibility for risks to contractors, and a lack of expertise within government or at the contractor level. 'A contractor is pretty good at throwing concrete in the ground and putting pitching on the soil,' he says. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'But they're [sometimes] not particularly good at project management. Keep your mind open and understand the broadest issues and deal with them. Unfortunately, those concepts aren't very big in government … at the moment and they get into these messes. 'You would think that having lost billions of dollars over decades, [governments] would have learned by now – but unfortunately it doesn't seem like they have.' Setting up and decommissioning work sites is expensive but it's not unusual for contractors to change midway through builds, Campbell says. Stakeholders should learn from previous large projects, he argues. 'Thousands of projects have been built in the Sydney basin. You know, you could go back and see how they were managed.' Soil or geological abnormalities should ideally be discovered before works begin. Water management – which can lead to sinkholes – is 'always the biggest problem' in major projects, Campbell says. Prof Behzad Fatahi, a professor of civil engineering at the University of Technology Sydney, says the city is home to fault zones, most of which are classified as 'normal'. 'Reverse faults', where a layer of rock is forced upwards and over another layer, are less common and hard to detect because the fault angle is often very steep. Boreholes drilled into the ground five to 10 metres apart may miss a reverse fault, the professor says. Fatahi says survey techniques, including seismic surveys, are not 'bulletproof … There is always a chance of missing things.' The danger of building a tunnel at the site of a rock fault stems from potential movement at the fault zone. While Sydney is not a highly seismic area, even a tiny amount of rock movement could compromise a tunnel, he says. A novel way to protect underground pipelines from land movements involves cushioning pipes with foam, his research has shown. Solutions to prevent sinkholes include grouting, tunnel lining and freezing the ground before excavating. All civil geotech designs come with some unknowns, he says. 'There is no zero-risk … but this doesn't mean that there will be big surprises'. The two sinkholes that opened up above the M6 tunnel were not a normal risk associated with digging, Dr Francois Guillard says. The senior lecturer in the school of civil engineering at the University of Sydney says sinkholes can happen anywhere water penetrates the ground, although karstic regions – often made of soluble limestone – are typically more prone to sinkholes. Sydney is not especially prone to the phenomenon, given its mainly sandstone geology, Guillard says. For a sinkhole to develop, material under the ground's surface needs to be removed, usually by water erosion or chemical decomposition. In urban areas, disturbance of usual water drainage patterns can lead to sinkhole formation under the surface of tarmac. He agrees that investigations of soil and geology from the surface are 'not perfect'. Guillard says human-made sinkholes, triggered by engineering or building works, are 'rare' – as are urban sinkholes generally. 'I would not recommend people be worried, it's low risk,' he says.


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why boomers are holding on to their massive homes - even if they want to downsize
Aussie boomers are often criticised for not downsizing, but there's a good reason why they're holding onto their big properties. New data from the Regional Australia Institute shows that only 25 per cent of Boomers - aged 65 and older - are open to moving from a capital city to a regional area - the lowest of any age group. In contrast, 57 per cent of Millennials and 37 per cent of Gen Xers are more willing to make a tree change. Selling a $2million home in Sydney could allow a couple to buy a $1million property in coastal towns like Port Macquarie or Coffs Harbour - leaving them with $1million in cash. But that windfall could affect their eligibility for the age pension due to the government's assets test. While the family home is exempt from the test, any leftover funds, whether held in cash or superannuation, are counted. As a result, many older couples are choosing to stay in their large homes to protect their pension entitlements, despite no longer needing the space. Financial adviser and author Helen Baker said older Australians are delaying selling their homes to ensure that they maximise their pensions. They usually only sell when they've run out of super and downsizing is their back-up option to release more cash. A couple with $1million in cash, after selling the family home, could potentially put that money into super and live off an income stream known as an annuity. But having access to the age pension, or a part age pension, can help with bills ranging from electricity to health costs, plus travel. 'There are benefits in even getting a part age pension,' Ms Baker said. The Association of Super Funds of Australia says couples need $73,875 a year for a 'comfortable' retirement which includes an overseas holiday every seven years. But with access to an age pension, it's possible for those aged 65 to 84 to live on $43,753 a year. When it came to younger Australians who don't own a home Ms Baker, the founder of On Your Own Two Feet, suggested they consider purchasing an investment property with a friend or a sibling to at least get into the housing market. 'I think the problem for younger people now is they don't get in,' she said. 'It's likely that property will continue to rise over the short-term, maybe, and even definitely the medium, long-term.' Australia's median capital city house price of $1.026million is beyond the reach of the average, full-time worker on a $102,742 salary. That's because the banks are reluctant to lend someone more than 5.2 times their salary before tax. This means an average-income worker would only be able to buy a $665,000 apartment with a 20 per cent mortgage deposit. Those wanting a house would have to do so with a friend or sibling if they weren't married or in a long-term relationship, unless they were in a highly-paid job. 'The nurses, the teachers, aged care workers, childcare workers, hairdressers, for these people, it's incredibly difficult for them to purchase a property but those who are in more executive positions, or even tradies these days with what they're earning, they have more of an opportunity,' Ms Baker said. 'Are they willing to make the sacrifices in other things that they're spending their money on - to meet the obligations of their mortgage?' The e61 Institute think tank said unaffordable house prices meant younger Australians were delaying key milestones like buying a house or starting a family. 'Today's young Australians are navigating a different economic and social landscape than the generations before them,' it said. 'While young people always face a degree of precarity as they transition into adulthood, there are social and economic changes, as well as changing preferences, that are pushing key life milestones – like buying a home, moving out of the family home and starting a family further down the track. 'Today's 25 to 34-year-olds have a lower home ownership rate compared to their parents when they were the same age – with this disparity greater in capital cities.' This is also particularly the case for those unable to access the Bank of Mum and Dad to get into the housing market. Millennials are increasingly relying on their boomer parents to set themselves up financially, including with that 20 per cent mortgage deposit. Ms Baker said this was now the new divide between the haves and have-nots. 'There's a lot of talk about getting some early inheritance from the Bank of Mum and Dad,' she said. 'To me, this deposit for a house and buying a property, it's become the new private school.' Those boomers helping their children - by selling their family home - are also making a financial sacrifice by comprimising their ability to get the age pension.