More South Africans are relying on personal loans as cost of living soars
Image: TungArt7/Pixabay
Although consumer confidence has improved and the rollout of the 'two-pot' retirement system has provided some financial relief, more South Africans than ever are using personal loans to make up the shortfall between income and the rising cost of living.
The newly released DebtBusters Q1 2025 Debt Index shows that a staggering 91% of consumers who sought debt counselling in the first quarter of the year reported having a personal loan.
DebtBusters executive head, Benay Sager, said it is clear that while consumers may feel a little more positive, personal loans, especially one-month loans, remain a lifeline for many, because income has not kept pace with rising expenses.
The past nine years have seen staggering increases in essential costs: electricity tariffs have skyrocketed by 135%, petrol prices have surged by 88%, and cumulative inflation hovers at 52%. As a result, consumers who pursued debt counselling in Q1 2025 needed, on average, a daunting 69% of their take-home pay to service their debts—the highest percentage observed since 2017.
Strikingly, those earning R5,000 or less monthly utilise an overwhelming 76% of their income to pay down debt, while individuals with earnings above R35,000 allocate an astonishing 77% for the same purpose. These figures represent the highest debt-servicing ratios recorded since DebtBusters began analysing consumer behaviour in 2016.
Comparing today's consumers to those in 2016 reveals a concerning decline in purchasing power, which is now 53% lower. Although inflationary pressures appear to have lessened, the average nominal incomes for incoming cohorts remain 1% below 2016 levels. Conversely, there is a silver lining for top earners, as those making R35,000 or more have experienced an 11% increase in nominal income since 2016 for the first time in several years.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Unfortunately, the burden of debt remains pervasive across most income brackets. Consumers are diverting 25% of their disposable income—after servicing their debts—toward essential expenses such as water, electricity, rates, and transport. In the wake of food inflation, many families have been forced to forgo crucial insurance and assurance cover. Lower-income groups particularly feel the pinch, facing 2% to 4% higher inflation over recent years, predominantly due to the rising cost of staple food items.
Top earners, too, grapple with unsustainable levels of unsecured debt. On average, this demographic's unsecured debt has soared by 34% over the last nine years, with a staggering 90% increase observed among those earning R35,000 or more—the highest level recorded to date.
Sager notes that interest in debt counselling has been 'a bit muted' compared to previous years, attributing this to a mix of uncertainty about the macroeconomic landscape, access to retirement funds, and negative perceptions surrounding debt counselling. Nevertheless, he stresses that debt counselling remains the best option for consumers seeking to restructure their debts effectively.
'While the average interest rate for unsecured debt has decreased from an eight-year high to 25.3%, under debt counselling, it can be reduced to approximately 2.5% per annum,' Sager explains. This reduction not only allows consumers to repay cripplingly expensive debt more swiftly but also mitigates the burden of vehicle debt and balloon payments by negotiating interest rates on financed vehicles down from 14.9% a year to a more manageable level.
The trend towards proactive debt management is beginning to change the narrative, as the number of consumers completing debt counselling has increased elevenfold since 2016. In Q1 2025, those who received clearance certificates managed to repay over R700 million to their creditors, signalling a positive shift in financial responsibility.
Amidst a growing concern, interest in online debt management tools has surged by 6% compared to the same period last year, with subscriptions to DebtBusters' proprietary online tools, Debt Radar and Debt Sustainability Indicator, surpassing a remarkable 1 million.
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
43 minutes ago
- The Citizen
The tenant who won't leave
Another tale of a victim of rental fraud and the legal system that allowed the occupant to stay. The owner of a Parkwood home estimates that her direct loss already exceeds R500 000, excluding legal fees and unpaid municipal charges. Picture: AdobeStock South Africans are no strangers to bureaucratic indifference. But sometimes a single story reveals just how deeply systemic failure has set in. A Moneyweb reader – at her wits' end – shared her sad tale of losing more than R500 000 after a tenant moved into her house under false pretences, then refused to pay rent and won't leave. The email describes the owner's serious dilemma and highlights the risks of investing in rental property. She says the elaborate scam involves fake documents, visa violations, falsified payslips and a brazen abuse of legal processes. The reader owns a R4.5 million property in Parkwood and she says almost every institution charged with protecting honest citizens – including the Rental Housing Tribunal, the police, SA Revenue Services (Sars), the Department of Home Affairs, banks and the courts – has failed to act. 'This isn't just about me,' she says. 'This is happening to people all over the country. Just because we are ordinary South Africans, we are expected to absorb the loss and move on. 'Must we accept that this is just the way things are? I have the evidence to show how to thrive illegally in this country and get away with it,' she says. The facts are straightforward. The owner leased her property to a man who arrived in a Land Rover, claiming to run multiple businesses. He promised to pay six months' rent upfront into a trust account. Needless to say, that never happened. ALSO READ: How to evict tenants 'He paid rent for the first three months. Then nothing. After a protracted battle, I managed to extract another three months' payment. Since then, for more than seven months, not a cent. 'Meanwhile, rates and taxes have gone unpaid, my bond with Investec is under pressure and my overdraft facility has been threatened,' she says. The reader says she had to sell her car, take on extra consulting work, and drained her savings to keep the house from being repossessed. Despite the clear breach of contract, her efforts to get rid of the defaulting tenant were unsuccessful. She alleges that the Gauteng Rental Housing Tribunal has refused to enforce the lease's termination clause or allow eviction proceedings. 'Instead, they insist on inspecting the house to determine whether the tenant's 'comfort' has been adequately prioritised. 'The tenant has refused entry to me as the owner and landlord as well as the rental agents – and even the inspectors that were appointed by the tribunal. Nonetheless, the tribunal has imposed maintenance obligations on me, but I cannot access my own property to do the work. 'They told me that my notice of termination means nothing. They say we must wait for another inspector. Or another tribunal officer. Or another counterclaim. Each one delays the case for months,' she says. ALSO READ: More South Africans rent, but arrears and tenant risk rise False documents According to the homeowner, the tenant submitted false payslips with tax deductions that do not match standard Sars tax tables. His visa documents appear fraudulent – a claim the owner says has been (verbally) confirmed by Home Affairs officials. Despite this, officers at the Rosebank Police Station refused to open a case of fraud. When she tried to remove her furniture from the property, the police were called and stopped her. She says the tenant's personal bank account, held at RMB Private Bank, has seen more than R2 million in activity over just two months, based on the copy of the bank statements she insisted on when considering the lease. 'He lives on the premises with his girlfriend and at least two other men who are not SA citizens. He claims to run several businesses, but I could not find any confirmation that any of the businesses exist. None are registered with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC). 'He writes his own legal letters, which a real law firm then forwards on their official letterhead. He knows the system better than anyone,' the homeowner claims. 'He knows that all you need is a delay. Just say 'I submitted a counterclaim', and the tribunal will postpone again. No one checks anything.' She believes the bank statements the tenant offered are fake. 'But RMB has ignored my repeated emails asking for verification.' ALSO READ: Your rights when you rent a place to stay Institutions in silos What's striking in this case is how every institution involved seems either unwilling or unable to act. There appears to be no coordination between Home Affairs, Sars, CIPC, the banks or the tribunal. The homeowner has done a lot of research about the errant tenant. She says he has a student and a working visa, a contradiction in itself. 'He apparently operates businesses in clear violation of his immigration status. He is not Vat registered, has no visible employees, and does not file tax returns. His companies' addresses cannot be verified. 'And yet, the banks have not flagged his transactions under anti-money laundering or Fica (Financial Intelligence Centre Act) rules. Home Affairs will not intervene unless he is found on a public street or place of business. The tribunal demands that the landlord comply with obligations, even while being denied access to the property. 'I've contacted every institution I can think of,' she says. This is not just a personal nightmare. It points to a national governance failure that affects thousands of property owners, particularly middle-income landlords who cannot afford long legal battles. South African law appears to offer tenants near-absolute protection, while offering landlords almost no practical recourse when contracts are ignored or fraud is involved. This imbalance is often justified as protecting vulnerable tenants, but the unintended result is that unscrupulous operators, including illegal immigrants and con artists, can exploit the system with impunity. 'What is the point of the law if someone with fraudulent documents can move into a house, refuse to pay rent, violate immigration law and still be protected?' the aggrieved landlord asks. ALSO READ: Here's a list of what your landlord is responsible for in your rented flat Legal delays The economic cost is real. The property owner estimates that her direct loss already exceeds R500 000, excluding legal fees and unpaid municipal charges. Multiply that across similar cases nationwide, and the scale becomes obvious. 'This tenant lives rent free in a R4.5 million home with a permanent 'guard' who's not South African. Meanwhile, I've had to sell my car to pay rates.' The homeowner adds that the system fails to protect landlords and actively penalises them for trying to enforce legal agreements. She argues that her problem highlights significant gaps in the legal system: Rental Tribunal: There must be clearer legal boundaries regarding the tribunal's powers. Leases must matter; otherwise, why have contracts at all? There is no coordination between institutions. Visa status, tax compliance, business registration and tenant behaviour must be cross-checked in cases of alleged fraud. Bank oversight: Financial institutions must be held accountable for monitoring and flagging suspicious activity. 'It cannot fall on private citizens to investigate a bank's clients,' the homeowner says. She also asks that landlords get some support. 'Middle-income landlords need legal mechanisms and government-backed structures to address tenant abuse without being forced into expensive court battles.' The landlord says her crooked tenant 'is smart, charming, eloquent, and knows the law better than most lawyers. He is completely without accountability. The system seems to reward his behaviour'. However, she's not giving up, even if she knows she's unlikely to recover her losses. 'This isn't just my story. It's a SA story. It is playing out, house by house, lease by lease.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
South African Lens: Pakistan's Divorce Laws Leave Women in Financial Limbo
As it stands, Pakistan follows a model where property remains separate unless jointly titled—regardless of a woman's unpaid contributions to the household or her support for her husband's career. This issue has been spotlighted in Pakistan's courts. Image: Supplied In many societies, divorce is not just a personal rupture but a financial reckoning — especially for women. This is starkly true in Pakistan, where the legal system fails to recognise a woman's right to marital property, often leaving divorced wives with little more than the clothes on their backs. For South Africans watching global gender justice trends, Pakistan's legal landscape raises urgent questions about how tradition, law and social norms can entrench inequality in the private sphere. Despite Islam's emphasis on justice and the protection of the vulnerable, Pakistani women who exit a marriage often do so without any claim to assets acquired during the relationship. This is because Pakistan does not currently have legislation that guarantees women a share in property accumulated while married. As it stands, the country follows a model where property remains separate unless jointly titled, regardless of a woman's unpaid contributions to the household or her support for her husband's career. This issue has been spotlighted in Pakistan's courts. The Lahore High Court recently instructed the federal government to consult on a proposed amendment to the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance of 1961. The amendment, initially brought forward by Senator Barrister Syed Ali Zafar, introduces terms such as 'matrimonial asset' and seeks to give women fairer recognition of their contributions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The court's intervention may become a turning point, as public discourse grows around the injustice of women leaving long marriages with nothing, despite having raised children, run households and sacrificed careers. To understand the impact, it helps to look beyond Pakistan's borders. Countries such as Turkey, Malaysia and Morocco — Muslim-majority states like Pakistan—have adopted laws that balance Islamic principles with modern family realities. In Turkey, marital assets are presumed to be jointly owned unless otherwise agreed. Malaysia takes both financial and non-financial contributions into account when dividing property. Morocco's Family Code permits couples to decide beforehand how to share property, with the law recognising joint management during the marriage. These countries demonstrate that religious values and women's rights need not be in conflict. Legal frameworks can uphold the dignity and equality of both spouses, particularly when marriages dissolve. Currently, Pakistan's system mirrors what legal scholars call a pure separate property regime. Under this model, property belongs only to the person who earned or acquired it. There is no assumption that marriage creates an economic partnership, and courts generally require strict proof of ownership. This often disadvantages women who have worked in the home or made indirect contributions, as they lack titles or formal income records. South Africa, by contrast, provides multiple options when couples marry, including community of property, which assumes equal ownership of assets acquired during the marriage. This legal approach acknowledges that both spouses contribute to the financial foundation of the household, even if in different ways. South African courts, when dividing property, also take into account each partner's needs, contributions and the duration of the marriage. It is a system far more aligned with the complex social reality of marriage than Pakistan's outdated laws. The cost of inaction in Pakistan is high. Women who divorce often lose access to shelter and income. Even where they have invested years in managing the home or caring for children, the law offers no recourse. Many end up dependent on their families or feel pressured into remarriage for economic survival. This perpetuates gendered cycles of poverty and limits women's agency. Pakistan has ratified the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which requires states to ensure equality in marriage and family relations, including property rights. CEDAW's guidance calls for equal access to marital assets. Other Muslim-majority countries have made strides toward compliance. Tunisia and Iran, for instance, have introduced property-sharing rules that acknowledge both partners' roles in a marriage. Pakistan, however, remains out of step. Legal reform is not only a technical matter. It is about recognising that women are equal partners in family life, deserving of financial security when that partnership ends. Amending the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance to define and protect matrimonial property would help courts provide more consistent, fair outcomes. It would also signal that Pakistan is serious about its commitments to gender equality, both to its citizens and the global community. For South Africans, watching this debate unfold is a chance to reflect on how far we have come and how far others still need to go. In a world where women's rights are constantly under pressure, the battle for fairness within the family is as important as any public policy reform. Pakistan stands at a fork in the road. One path leads to continued injustice and economic hardship for women. The other leads to fairness, dignity and the recognition of women's work — paid or unpaid—as valuable and deserving of protection. The choice, now, is in the hands of lawmakers.
The Star
14 hours ago
- The Star
COSATU urges unity as racial rhetoric threatens South Africa's AGOA trade benefits
Thabo Makwakwa | Published 2 days ago The Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) has issued a strong call for organisations across the country to tone down on divisive and destructive rhetoric that fuels racial tensions. The organisation stressed the importance of unity as South Africa seeks to renew the African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA) with the United States. In a statement released on Friday, COSATU's parliamentary coordinator, Mathews Parks, highlighted the potential consequences of inflammatory discourse, warning that "the malicious decampaigning of South Africa in the US will come at a real cost to all South Africans, particularly Afrikaans farmers and workers." COSATU's call comes amid the US' annual review of AGOA member eligibility, a critical process determining whether South Africa and other nations will retain preferential trade benefits. Parks expressed the federation's support for renewing AGOA before its expiry at the end of September, highlighting its significance for South Africa's economy. 'AGOA has been an important stimulant for key jobs and revenue-rich sectors such as mining, agriculture, motor manufacturing, and more,' Parks said. 'It has facilitated trade and investment between the US and South Africa, with over 600 American companies invested here and 500,000 South African jobs linked to US trade. It's a framework that benefits both nations and the continent.' He further noted that South African vehicle exports, including components like steering racks from Tunisia and rubber from Côte d'Ivoire, demonstrate the interconnectedness of regional trade, which AGOA has helped to facilitate. Parks stated the importance of a mutually beneficial trade agreement, highlighting opportunities for expanding product inclusion, supporting emerging sectors, and strengthening cooperation on the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). COSATU expressed the positive reception of its proposals in Washington and lauded the solidarity shared with American labor movements, especially the AFL-CIO. The federation pledged to continue working closely with the South African government, business sectors, and US counterparts to deepen bilateral relations—while respecting sovereignty and promoting sustainable economic growth. 'Progress under President Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership to reset bilateral relations is encouraging,' Parks stated. 'However, it is vital that all parties support these efforts and refrain from inflammatory language that undermines social cohesion.' The federation strongly urged organisations such as AfriForum, NEASA, Sakeliga, and the Freedom Front Plus to prioritise national unity over partisan point-scoring. 'Whilst social media clicks may entertain friends over a braai, the malicious decampaigning of South Africa in the US will come at a real cost to all South Africans, in particular Afrikaans farmers and workers.' Parks stated that legitimate grievances should be addressed through constitutional and legal channels like Parliament, the judiciary, or law enforcement, rather than through rhetoric that incites racial divisions. 'Now is the time to shed narrow racial interests and place the nation's needs first,' he asserted. 'Partisanship has its place during elections, but the current climate demands maturity and responsibility from all stakeholders. Meanwhile, In a letter dated February 11, 2025 Republican congressmen Andrew Ogles, Tom Tiffany, Joe Wilson and Don Bacon asked President Donald Trump to revoke South Africa's access to the US market through AGOA and diplomatic relations alleging that South Africa had a vendetta against Israel, allegedly committing human rights violations and was friendly with China's Community Party. [email protected] IOL Politics
