logo
UC Regent Jay Sures' Brentwood home vandalized in pro-Palestinian rally

UC Regent Jay Sures' Brentwood home vandalized in pro-Palestinian rally

Yahoo06-02-2025
Pro-Palestinian protesters rallied outside the Brentwood home of UC Regent Jonathan "Jay" Sures on Wednesday morning, hanging banners on his hedges and leaving handprints smeared in red on his walls, according to local reports and photos shared on social media.
The protest lasted from 6 to 8 a.m. and was organized by Graduate Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA, according to reporting from the Daily Bruin. The student group shared video of the protest on its Instagram account as well as a post of Sures' face, calling him an "opp," slang for an enemy, and "one of the unelected officials responsible for protecting UC investments in genocide and weapons manufacturing."
L.A. police responded to a call regarding pro-Palestinian protesters on a residential street in Brentwood around 6:15 a.m. Wednesday, according to an LAPD spokesperson. Upon arriving, officers found a group of 50 to 100 protesters blocking the street and driveway and remained to monitor the situation. The UCLA Police Department took a report of vandalism, the spokesperson said.
Sures, who is Jewish, told Deadline he believes he was targeted because of his outspoken support for the state of Israel and for protecting Jewish students. He said this was the first time protesters had come to his home, and he thought they had crossed a line.
'It's one thing to peacefully protest, but to go to an administrator or a regent's house to violate the hundred-foot rule, which is what it is in Los Angeles, to disturb the entire neighborhood by pounding on drums, to surround my wife's car and prevent her from free movement, and to put up signs, threatening my family and my life and vandalize the house, that is a big escalation," he told Deadline.
Read more: L.A. City Council tightens law around protests outside private homes
Videos and photos shared on social media showed LAPD officers at the protest, where a crowd gathered wearing masks, chanting and beating drums. The banner attached to Sures' hedge read, "Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest," a popular rallying cry for those who believe in divesting from companies that do business with the state of Israel.
Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, described the morning's protest as "boldfaced bigotry" and called on law enforcement to investigate and prosecutors to charge those responsible, in a statement shared on X.
"Once again, a public servant is targeted for harassment and intimidation, and once again, it is a Jewish regent being targeted," said Greenblatt. "Protestors calling for the elimination of the state of Israel in front of the home of UC Regent Jay Sures is unacceptable."
Sures is the vice chairman of United Talent Agency and one of the 18 members appointed to the University of California Board of Regents by the governor.
Sures also told Deadline he believes the recent protests directed toward him are connected to a letter he wrote to the UC Board of Regents in 2023, condemning a letter the UC Ethnic Studies Faculty Council had written to the board accusing UCLA of biased communications after the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war.
Read more: Hundreds of pro-Palestinian protesters rally in L.A. ahead of Oct. 7 anniversary
The faculty council wrote that UCLA's administrative communications "distort and misrepresent the unfolding genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and thereby contribute to the racist and dehumanizing erasure of Palestinian daily reality."
In response, Sures wrote that the letter was "rife with falsehoods about Israel and seeks to legitimize and defend the horrific savagery of the Hamas massacre of October 7.'
On Wednesday, Graduate Students for Justice in Palestine wrote on Instagram that Sures is "the embodiment of how the Regents profit off genocide and police dissent on our campuses."
Members of the student group have long demanded that the regents support their call for the university system to boycott and divest from all companies that do business with Israel — a demand the UC system opposes.
"The University of California has consistently opposed calls for boycott against and divestment from Israel," the office of the UC president said in an April 2024 statement. "While the University affirms the right of our community members to express diverse viewpoints, a boycott of this sort impinges on the academic freedom of our students and faculty and the unfettered exchange of ideas on our campuses.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zohran Mamdani's NYC could look like Sadiq Khan's far-left London
Zohran Mamdani's NYC could look like Sadiq Khan's far-left London

New York Post

time14 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Zohran Mamdani's NYC could look like Sadiq Khan's far-left London

Many of my friends and former neighbors in New York — where I lived for 27 years — are anxious about the city's future if it elects as mayor a self-proclaimed Muslim socialist. Another great world capital already offers a glimpse of what might lie ahead: London, under its far-left mayor, Sadiq Khan. I recently returned to my native London for the first time in more than two decades. What I found wasn't the inclusive, cosmopolitan capital I had known and loved but a city so altered in tone and appearance that I scarcely recognized it. Over the course of a fortnight in June, neighborhood after neighborhood left me feeling not just like a visitor, but like a stranger in my own birthplace. At times, I felt more as though I was in Dubai rather than London. Mayor Sadiq Khan — a Muslim of Pakistani heritage — has aggressively pursued a pro-immigration agenda during his last eight years. Kahn's London offers housing and social services that are a magnet for the record number of illegal immigrants flooding into Britain. Kahn was reelected for a third term in May 2024. Advertisement 5 Many of my friends and former neighbors in New York — where I lived for 27 years — are anxious about the city's future if it elects as mayor a self-proclaimed Muslim socialist, says author Patricia Posner. This isn't about race or immigration alone. Nor is it nostalgia for some imagined golden era. I'm the daughter of first-generation Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe and grew up in multicultural London during the 1950s and '60s. My childhood circle included Afro-Caribbean and Persian friends. Our high street bustled with South Asian-owned shops and takeaways run by newly arrived strivers from former British colonies. My father's kosher tailor shop stood proudly on Brick Lane, even as the East End transformed from a Jewish enclave into a Bangladeshi stronghold. These shifts felt organic —imperfect, yes, but cohesive. There was a sense of shared direction. The antisemitic bullying I experienced at school came exclusively from native-born white Britons — not immigrants. This time, the transformation felt fundamentally different. Advertisement What struck me wasn't just the arrival of new communities but the visible dominance in many neighborhoods of conservative Middle Eastern and Muslim cultural norms. It wasn't just demographic change but a palpable shift in the very atmosphere of public life. In shops, pharmacies, cafés, and on the Tube, I repeatedly encountered women in full niqab and men in traditional thawbs. What was missing was the gradual integration I remembered from my youth. I saw no sign these communities were blending into the broader civic culture — or even being encouraged to. What I saw wasn't diversity but cultural segregation. Not integration, but parallel societies. 5 London Mayor Sadiq Khan speaks to the media ahead of the open Iftar in Trafalgar Square on April 08, 2024 in London, England. Getty Images Advertisement Some have suggested my timing — arriving during Eid al-Adha — might have skewed my impression. Perhaps. But while that might explain the Rolls-Royces and Lamborghinis with Emirati plates outside Mayfair hotels, it doesn't explain the sense of dislocation I felt in ordinary boroughs, far from the luxury districts. I wore my Star of David necklace every day, as I always do. Given the alarming rise in antisemitic incidents in Britain since Oct. 7, I was prepared to feel uneasy. I avoided the large pro-Hamas marches that openly call for the expulsion of Jews from the UK. I was warned about no-go zones governed by informal sharia norms, where Western faces are unwelcome. Even so, in public spaces, when someone spotted my necklace, I noticed sidelong glances, whispered comments, the occasional nudge. It was subtle — but unmistakable. 5 A woman walks past as a man believed to be an asylum seeker stands outside of a hotel in protest at the condition of his accommodation, in London, Britain, June 2, 2023. REUTERS Advertisement At the Wallace Collection museum in upscale Marylebone, I struck a conversation with a small group of fellow Brits who were there admiring the art. When I happened to mention that I was Jewish, things took an awkward turn. 'I hope that doesn't make anyone uncomfortable,' I joked. What followed was a long, brittle pause — then a few polite smiles and the obligatory, 'Of course not.' But the silence said far more than the words. This is not the London I left in 1978, when I moved to the United States. Nor is it the city I returned to often in the '80s and '90s for extended family visits. Back then, London had become a truly global capital — vibrant, polyglot, and mostly harmonious. I never lived in a bubble. 5 Zohran Mamdani rides the subway following a campaigning stop in NYC on April 1. REUTERS While I now live in Miami, I've followed UK news closely and stayed in touch with friends and relatives. I knew London had changed. What I did not expect was how alienated and unwelcome I felt in the city that raised me. To express these concerns is to risk accusations of bigotry or reactionary nostalgia. But acknowledging what many Britons — of all backgrounds — quietly feel is not an act of prejudice. It's an act of candor. I write this not to stoke division but to urge honest dialogue. The promise of a pluralistic society isn't that we live side-by-side in self-contained silos but that we build a common life together. Advertisement 5 People on the water in blue pedaloes on the Serpentine in Hyde Park in Londonon July 30. In Pictures via Getty Images A Zohran Mamdani New York will not be transformed overnight. But if Mamdani moves to double down on sanctuary policies for undocumented migrants while driving out the tax base needed to fund his socialist ambitions, the city I love could soon follow London's path. London's diversity once made me proud. I still believe in its potential. But I say this with sorrow, not anger: London no longer feels like home. It has been taken over. Advertisement Is New York next? Patricia Posner is the executive director of Antisemitism Watch.

Trump demurs on pardoning disgraced former Rep. George Santos: ‘He lied like hell'
Trump demurs on pardoning disgraced former Rep. George Santos: ‘He lied like hell'

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Trump demurs on pardoning disgraced former Rep. George Santos: ‘He lied like hell'

President Trump demurred on whether he'll pardon disgraced former Long Island Rep. George Santos, who kicked off a seven-year prison sentence for fraud last week. Despite Santos' claims he had been privately lobbying for a pardon, Trump indicated the push to give the fabulist some sort of clemency was news to him. 'He lied like hell, I have to tell you. And I didn't know him, but he was 100% for Trump. I might have met him, maybe, maybe not, I don't know,' Trump told Newsmax host Rob Finnerty on Friday. 'Nobody has talked to me about it,' Trump said of a Santos pardon, before taking note of the former Congressman's prison sentence. 'It's a long time.' Advertisement Santos, 37, pleaded guilty in August 2024 to aggravated identity theft charges and wire fraud for swindling donors to bankroll his campaign for Congress. 3 George Santos is serving out a seven-year sentence for wire fraud and identity theft. Bloomberg via Getty Images 3 President Trump was amused by George Santos' lies but didn't rule out a pardon. Advertisement Prosecutors accused Santos of falsely claiming he had $250,000 in donations to qualify for the National Republican Congressional Committee's 'Young Guns' program. Santos also preyed upon elderly donors and charged credit cards without authorization for frivolous expenses, authorities said. Some of the charges billed to donors include Botox treatments, OnlyFans purchases, jaunts to Atlantic City casinos, French fashion attire, and more, prosecutors said. Santos denied some of the accusations made by prosecutors and blamed others on his former treasurer Nancy Marks, who cooperated with authorities. 'But he was a congressman and his vote was solid; it sounds like a lot. You know, you could blame the other side for not checking him out,' Trump added. Advertisement 'You could say the media misses. Everybody missed it. They found out about it after the election was won.' Trump was referencing the series of scandals against Santos after he was caught lying about vast swaths of his personal backstory, including falsely claiming he was a star volleyball player at New York University even though he never attended the school; that he worked for Citigroup and Goldman Sachs and that his Jewish grandparents fled prosecution in Europe. In reality, his grandparents were born in Brazil, and he has since described himself as 'Jew-ish.' Santos, who was ousted in a late 2023 bipartisan vote, was the sixth House lawmaker to be expelled from the lower chamber. Advertisement 3 George Santos had to report to prison after turning 37. Dennis A. Clark Since then, he's launched a podcast, titled 'Pants on Fire,' and revealed he had been pressing behind the scenes for some form of clemency from Trump, though in May, Santos said he dropped that pursuit. 'Even though I initially considered the prospect of petitioning the president with a pardon application I have seized that approach as I will not spend the last 61 days I have of life scrambling on how to get past a bunch of guard dogs,' he said. In his remaining weeks before reporting to prison, Santos made several media appearances including on the 'Tucker Carlson Show,' in which he admitted to being terrified of winding up behind bars. 'I'm not suicidal. I'm not depressed. I have no intentions of harming myself, and I will not willingly engage in any sexual activity while I'm in there,' Santos wrote on X earlier this month. Trump also acknowledged that Sean 'Diddy' Combs' allies have pushed for a pardon, but was noncommittal about pardoning him or Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.

Top Industries That Attract 'Terrible' People
Top Industries That Attract 'Terrible' People

Buzz Feed

timean hour ago

  • Buzz Feed

Top Industries That Attract 'Terrible' People

If you've ever wondered if other people perceive your job negatively, this post is for you. In one Reddit thread (which you can see here), people discussed the career fields they think have the most "terrible" people, and there were some very interesting takes. I've rounded up 18 different answers – let's see if your industry made this list: "I think, while not all people in Human Resources are terrible, the field does attract the kind of people who are looking to lord it over others. Busybodies, gossips, insecure people who let a little bit of power go to their heads." "HOA Management. Almost cost me my sanity. Thank goodness I left that field." "Spammers and scammers." –Express_Gas2416 "Cops. Even most of my buddies who were good guys before becoming cops became douchebags." "Nurses are either the sweetest people on earth or the devil." "Fitness, especially those who think they are 'influencers.' Bunch of narcissists and fake personas." –Superb-Attitude9606 "Anti-union consultants." "I used to work in meteorology, and while I met some good people in the field, I met A LOT of condescending assholes. That's a big reason why I no longer work in that field. It was taking a huge toll on my mental health." "For a year, I worked in loan sales (predatory max-interest loans targeting people who can't get loans anywhere else), and about 75% of my job was collecting. Skip tracing, digging through their social media, calling family members, etc. They wanted me to take over my own branch, and the money would have been great. I just could not do it." "Paparazzi." –Gizm00 "My mom was a home nurse who was also sometimes sent to do elderly care at aged care facilities. She would frequently get upset at both some of the staff and some of the management because of how badly some elders were treated." "Corrections officers. A lot of them are narcissistic predators, especially in my experience as a former CO who worked in 2 different maximum-security state prisons." "Marketing. I've been working in the industry for more than a decade, have had roles all around the world, and the overwhelming majority of people I've worked with have been immature, insecure, conceited, irascible, narcissistic, antagonistic, and, above all, pathologically self-absorbed. An absolute nightmare to be around." "That girl from high school who slides in your DMs on Instagram with the 'hey girly!' trying to sell you her fit tea." "Surgeons. I say this as someone who wants to be one. You need the perfect mix of insanity and egomania even to think you'll make it there, and the prestige of the career only further attracts those people." "The money only adds to it, as does the reaction when you tell others what you do. I'd say the douchebaggery of a surgeon is 40% learned from the pressure and abuse of academia/training, 20% internal ego, 10% how others treat them, and maybe 30% totally justified."–RegionEducational366 "Real estate. Narcissism runs rampant." "Lawyer here. We're a bunch of pretentious assholes who really like to argue about minutia and get paid to do it. Here's a dirty secret: half of the time, we don't actually agree with our client. But since they pay us to argue for them, argue we will!" And finally, "Entertainment industry. Far too many stories of rich people with too much power subjecting young and weak individuals at the bottom of the barrel to sexual harassment and promising success based on lies and promises that they don't intend to keep." What else belongs on this list? Let me know in the comments!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store