logo
Now scientists blame REDUCTIONS in air pollution in China for the acceleration in global warming

Now scientists blame REDUCTIONS in air pollution in China for the acceleration in global warming

Daily Mail​a day ago
Reductions in air pollution might sound like a positive thing.
But scientists now say that reductions in East Asia are actually to blame for the sudden, rapid acceleration in global warming.
While air pollution kills millions, it also whitens clouds.
In turn, this makes the clouds reflect more sunlight back into space - helping to keep our planet cool.
As China and other nations slash their emissions, they are inadvertently removing the artificial shade that has been holding back the full force of climate change, experts from the University of Reading say.
Co-author Professor Laura Wilcox, from the University of Reading, told MailOnline: 'This shading effect from air pollution has offset some of the warming we should have seen due to increasing greenhouse gases.
'As we improve air quality, we remove some of this shading effect, unmasking more warming from greenhouse gases.
'Reducing our aerosol emissions isn't causing warming directly, but revealing more of the effects of greenhouse gas emissions.'
Since 1970, the world has been warming by around 0.18°C (0.32°F) per decade, but this suddenly increased to around 0.24°C (0.43°F) starting from around 2010.
For some researchers, this led to the worrying conclusion that the planet's climate sensitivity - how much warming is produced by a given amount of CO2 - might be at the higher end of estimates.
However, Dr Wilcox and her co-authors have proposed an alternative theory.
They noticed that the sudden increase in warming coincided very closely with East Asia's rapid air pollution cleanup.
In the last few decades, countries in East Asia have undergone dramatic transformations to clean up their air.
China, where air pollution is responsible for one million premature deaths per year, was responsible for three-quarters of all global air pollution reductions in the last decade.
This has led to a 75 per cent reduction in sulphur dioxide emissions over the past 15 years.
When pollutants like sulphur dioxide are released into the atmosphere, they form a fine mist of tiny particles called sulfate aerosols, which drift up into the atmosphere.
These particles reflect sunlight themselves and influence the way clouds form to make them whiter and more long-lasting.
This acts as a 'cooling sunshade' which prevents some solar radiation from reaching Earth and being trapped by the greenhouse effect.
While the cleanup is absolutely necessary to save millions of lives, it also has the unintentional consequence of producing a temporary spike in warming.
Previous studies predicted that our planet would become 0.23°C (0.37°F) warmer, but the planet actually warmed by 0.33°C (0.55°F).
Using 160 computer simulations, the researchers showed that the East Asian cleanup produced almost all of the extra warming over the last 15 years.
These simulations showed that East Asia's rapid cleanup is responsible for 0.07°C (0.12°F) of this increase.
Overall, there has been so much pollution in the air that it has kept human-caused warming in check by up to 0.5°C (0.84°F) over the last century.
While this is a very small amount compared to total human-caused warming, around 1.3°C (2.2°F) since 1850, it shows that Earth's climate sensitivity is lower than some feared.
From this, it might be tempting to conclude that climate change is not really as bad as some scientists had thought.
Now that air pollution has been largely reduced, CO2 will once again take over as the main driver of global warming and will not stop warming the planet on its current trend (illustrated) until CO2 levels are reduced
However, the researchers say their study proves the complete opposite.
Lead-author Dr Bjørn Samset, from the CICERO Centre for International Climate Research, told MailOnline: 'In one sense it means that global warming is worse than before.'
Air pollution has been hiding the warming that CO2 levels should have produced, and the planet is only now catching up to where it should be.
The worst of the catch-up period may now be over, but the planet will continue to warm as greenhouse gas emissions take over as the main driver of change.
'The majority of the warming is still, and will continue to be, from greenhouse gas emissions, and the planet will keep warming until we manage to reach net zero CO2 emissions,' says Dr Samset.
'We were always going to need to face up to the full effects of global warming.
'In fact, in order to keep to the targets of the Paris agreement, we now have to work even harder to rapidly cut our greenhouse gas emissions, since the acceleration has put us closer to 1.5 degrees of global warming even quicker than feared.'
The invisible dangers of poor air quality
Poor air quality is the largest environmental risk factor for early deaths leading to an estimated 8 million deaths per year globally, according to recent analysis by the World Bank and the World Economic Forum.
The World Health Organisation recently stated that almost every organ in the body can be impacted by air pollution and that due to their small size, some pollutants penetrate the bloodstream via the lungs and circulate throughout the entire body, leading to systemic inflammation and carcinogenicity.
Exposure to air pollution can lead to strokes, ischaemic heart disease, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, pneumonia, diabetes, cognitive impairment, dementia and neurological diseases.
There is also some evidence linking air pollution exposure to the increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as low birth weight.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It pays to turn on the waterworks…but only if you're a man: 'Crocodile tears' are more believable from MEN, study finds - here's how to spot them
It pays to turn on the waterworks…but only if you're a man: 'Crocodile tears' are more believable from MEN, study finds - here's how to spot them

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

It pays to turn on the waterworks…but only if you're a man: 'Crocodile tears' are more believable from MEN, study finds - here's how to spot them

Whether it's forgetting to do the washing up, or accidentally buying an awful birthday present, there are often times when men annoy their partners. But if you're in the bad books, then scientists have simple solution for you - turn on the waterworks. A new study has shown that so-called 'crocodile tears' are more believable when they come from men than from women. Researchers asked thousands of participants to look at photographs that had been edited to appear tearful. The faces varied in how much warmth they conveyed, with both male and female faces included. People were asked to share their perceptions of the faces and how 'honest' they thought the tears were. Analysis revealed crocodile tears were most believable from people least expected to cry. This was mainly men, as well as women who ranked lower for 'warmth'. Writing in the journal Plos One the team, from the University of Lodz in Poland, said: 'Emotional tears have been considered honest and sincere signals, most likely because they are difficult to shed on demand. 'At the same time, people acknowledge that tears can be strategically used to manipulate others - so-called crocodile tears. 'Hence, the question arises under what circumstances tears are perceived as honest signals and when as crocodile tears.' They explained their results show that tears are not universally seen as 'sincere' because it depends on who is crying and in what situation. 'Most importantly, we found that tears might be more socially beneficial when shed by people less expected to do so - for instance, by men or low-warmth people,' they added. 'Possibly, when men or low-warmth people tear up, which is quite unexpected, observers assume that there must be a genuine reason to do so.' Previous research has provided clues on how to spot crocodile tears from the real thing. Scientists found that those who fake remorse show a greater range of emotional expressions and swing from one emotion to the other very quickly - a phenomenon known as 'emotional turbulence'. People faking remorse also speak with more hesitation, they found. The phrase 'crocodile tears' comes from an old myth that the large reptiles cry while eating. To determine whether there was any truth to this, researchers carried out experiments which involved feeding captive caimans and alligators. They found that crocodiles really do bawl while banqueting - but for physiological reasons rather than from feeling sad. The team said they believe the tears may occur as a result of the animals hissing and huffing, a behaviour that often accompanies feeding. Air forced through the sinuses may trigger tear ducts, which empty into the eye, they said. Where did the phrase 'crocodile tears' come from? Saying that someone is crying 'crocodile tears' indicates they're faking their remorse. The phrase stems from the idea that the reptiles cry when they tear the meat off their prey. The idea even appears in the 14th century book 'The Travels of Sir John Mandeville,' which documents a knight's travels throughout the globe. 'In that country be a general plenty of serpents slay men and they eat them weeping,' a passage from the book reads. The idea that the reptiles shed tears while eating was proven by a researcher at the University of Florida's Zoology department. Analysis of four captive caimans and three alligators found that five out of seven reptiles welled up while eating, with their eyes foaming and gushing. This is likely triggered by their hissing and puffing, which is a common habit while eating.

Scientists witness birth of solar system in unique spectacle
Scientists witness birth of solar system in unique spectacle

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Scientists witness birth of solar system in unique spectacle

Scientists have for the first time observed a solar system in the earliest stages of its formation. Using a powerful telescope, researchers witnessed the initial material clumping together to form planets. This breakthrough offers new insights into how solar systems, including our own, develop. The nascent system is forming around HOPS-315, a young star approximately 1300 light-years from Earth. The observations captured the very beginning of planet formation within the star's protoplanetary disc.

Gabapentin users may face 85% higher cognitive impairment risk
Gabapentin users may face 85% higher cognitive impairment risk

Medical News Today

time9 hours ago

  • Medical News Today

Gabapentin users may face 85% higher cognitive impairment risk

Gabapentin is a medication that, in the United States, is approved to treat seizures and shingles-related neuralgia. It is also used off-label to treat other health issues, including low back pain. Past studies have also found that using gabapentin may increase a person's risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia. A new study reports that people who receive six or more prescriptions of gabapentin for lower back pain are at a higher risk of developing dementia and mild cognitive found these risks were more than doubled in adults between the ages of 35 to 49 is a medication that is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of some epileptic seizures, moderate-to-severe restless legs syndrome, and postherpetic neuralgia, which is a nerve pain associated with shingles. Additionally, gabapentin is sometimes prescribed off-label for anxiety disorders, insomnia, hot flashes, alcohol use disorder, akathisia, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and lower back pain. Like all medications, gabapentin has some potential side effects, including dizziness, tiredness, water retention, and dry mouth. Past studies have also found that using gabapentin may cause breathing difficulties, and may increase a person's risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia. Now, a new study published in the journal Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine reports that people who receive six or more prescriptions of gabapentin for lower back pain are at a higher risk of developing dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Scientists also discovered these risks were more than doubled in adults between the ages of 35 to 49 How does it affect dementia, MCI risk?For this study, researchers analyzed data from more than 26,000 adults through the federated health research network selected participants who had a diagnosis of chronic pain, chronic pain syndrome, lumbar radiculopathy, and chronic low back pain. They also categorized study participants into different age groups: 18–64, 18–34, 35–49, 50–64, and 65 or older. Researchers assess 10-year outcomes on study participants to see what percentage developed dementia, generally, or specifically Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, or MCI. 'Currently, there is a discrepancy on whether taking gabapentin increases a patient's risk for developing dementia,' Nafis B. Eghrari, a 4th-year medical student at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine in Cleveland, OH, and first author of this study, told Medical News Today.'Moreover, there lacks a strong understanding of how gabapentin impacts cognitive function and whether it contributes to neurodegenerative processes. Previous studies have shown mixed findings on this topic. Thus, we decided to explore this gap in the field,' explained Eghrari.6 or more gabapentin prescriptions linked to 85% higher MCI riskUpon analysis, researchers found that study participants who received six or more gabapentin prescriptions had a 29% higher risk of developing dementia, and an 85% greater chance of being diagnosed with MCI.'The significance of this finding is an association between gabapentin prescription and dementia on a nationwide level,' Eghrari explained. 'Though this does not imply causation, this warrants further investigation on the drug's long-term effects.''In terms of clinical significance, I recommend that physicians prescribing gabapentin for chronic pain perform cognitive exams on a regular basis when seeing patients,' he continued.'I'd also advise patients who are taking this drug to alert their physician if they notice any cognitive deficits, including confusion, poor memory, or slowed thinking,' said the doubled in 35–49-year-oldsEghrari and his team also discovered that when looking at participants by age groups, the risks for dementia more than doubled and more than tripled for MCI in people who were 35 to 49 years old. 'We were surprised to find this relatively higher risk in the non-elderly population,' Eghrari said.'These results indicate that gabapentin may have a greater cognitive impact on non-elderly individuals, as elderly individuals are already at risk for neurodegeneration due to their older age. This finding warrants further investigation into the underlying mechanism of how gabapentin may impact cognition.' – Nafis B. Eghrari'The key takeaway of this study is that patients prescribed gabapentin for chronic back pain should be closely monitored by their physician for cognitive decline,' he continued. 'Moreover, gabapentin should be prescribed with caution due to the associated risk of dementia/cognitive impairment.''We hope to carry this research forward and explore whether there is a true causative relationship between gabapentin and cognitive impairment,' Eghrari added. 'We also plan to investigate the underlying mechanisms of how the drug may impact cognition.'What are the drawbacks of large dataset studies?MNT had the opportunity to speak with Neel Anand, MD, MCh Orth, a board-certified orthopedic spine surgeon and director of the Cedars-Sinai Spine Center in Los Angeles, about this study. Anand, who was not involved in the research, commented that there are pros and cons to studies with big data sets as there are many variables and it is hard to determine the true causative little or no information was provided on any other illnesses participants may have had or other medications they were taking.'The best thing I would take from the study is […] [that] there's not a single drug without a side effect — they all have some issues,' Anand pointed out. 'So the answer is, if you're chronically going to take something, you better watch out — something's [potentially] going to go wrong somewhere.'Anand said the best way to prove anything is to take a cohort of study participants who take a specific medication and nothing else, and compare them to another cohort who does not take the medication. And researchers need to ensure that participants take the medication if it is prescribed to noted that, in some cases, patients do not follow the doctor's indications regarding prescription medication. 'Sometimes they do more, sometimes they'll take less,' Anand said. 'The only way to actually study [the real-life effects of long-term drug use] would be to literally take a thousand people and give them gabapentin and nothing else, and a thousand you don't, and then follow them over 5 years or more,' he he admitted that 'at least we can be cognizant' that there may be a heightened risk of dementia with prolonged gabapentin is 'a possibility that [doctors] needs to be aware [of] or at least counsel our patients [on] — that's fair,' Anand added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store