Snacks like M&M's, Skittles, and Doritos ‘Not recommended for human consumption' in US? Here's what the Texas Bill proposes
Governor's Office Reviewing the Legislation
Live Events
Food Industry Pushes Back
Consumer Groups Warn of Confusion and Costs
FAQs
What is Senate Bill 25 in Texas?
What would the warning label say?
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A new legislative move in Texas has ignited nationwide debate as the state's GOP-majority legislature advances a bill requiring warning labels on various processed food products, including popular snacks such as M&M's, Skittles, and Doritos. The proposed labels would declare these items as 'not recommended for human consumption' if they contain additives restricted or banned in countries like the UK, Canada, Australia, or the European Union, as per a report by the New York Post.Titled Senate Bill 25 , the measure mandates that beginning in 2027, any food or beverage product sold in Texas containing synthetic dyes, bleached flour, or other controversial ingredients must carry a clearly visible warning label. The label would read: 'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.'The legislation is part of a broader initiative supported by U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has made food transparency a cornerstone of his 'Make America Healthy Again' campaign. 'We are committed to protecting public health by ensuring families know what's in their food,' Kennedy stated earlier, as mentioned in a report by the New York Post.With the legislative session having concluded on Monday, Governor Greg Abbott now has 20 days to sign or veto the measure. A spokesperson from the Governor's office said that Abbott is carefully examining the implications of the bill. 'Governor Abbott will continue to work with the legislature to ensure Texans have access to healthy foods to care for themselves and their families,' said press secretary Andrew Mahaleris.If enacted, the bill would require warning labels to be printed at a font size no smaller than the smallest existing FDA-mandated text on packaging. It also calls for the label to be prominently displayed with sufficient contrast for visibility.The proposed labeling rule has met resistance from major corporations. In a joint letter dated May 19, industry leaders including PepsiCo, Mondelez, Coca-Cola, Conagra Brands, and Walmart urged Texas lawmakers to reconsider the bill, citing its sweeping scope and potential confusion for consumers.'The food labeling provision in this bill casts an incredibly wide net — triggering warning labels on everyday grocery items based on foreign standards, not on regulations from Texas authorities or the U.S. FDA,' the letter argued.Walmart, which was among the signatories, issued a statement saying it is closely tracking legislative developments and deferred further comment to the Texas Retailers Association, which also contributed input during bill discussions.A consultant representing the retail association noted, 'Texas retailers and our members including Walmart worked hard on this bill, made some changes, and we'll see how it develops over the next 20 days.'Industry experts and advocacy groups warn the proposed law could bring unintended consequences. John Hewitt, senior vice president of the Consumer Brands Association, has called for Governor Abbott to veto the measure. 'The ingredients used in the U.S. food supply are safe and have been rigorously evaluated,' Hewitt said. 'This legislation could result in inaccurate warning language, legal risks, and unnecessary alarm among consumers.'As the state awaits Abbott's decision, the future of household snack names like Skittles, M&M's, and Doritos in Texas grocery aisles remains uncertain. If passed, Texas would become the first U.S. state to mandate such foreign-comparison warning labels on processed foods.It's a proposed law that mandates warning labels on foods containing additives banned or restricted in the UK, EU, Canada, or Australia, targeting products like M&M's, Doritos, and Skittles.The label would read: 'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
‘Unjustified, unreasonable': India responds to Trump remark on raising tariffs over Russian oil purchase
The MEA described the criticism of India's trade policy as 'unjustified and unreasonable,' asserting that India will take necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security. According to the MEA, India's imports from Russia are driven by necessity and aimed at ensuring predictable and affordable energy costs for Indian consumers. New Delhi: The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Monday came out strongly in defence of the country's decision to import oil from Russia, despite criticism from the United States and European Union. In a statement, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) clarified that India's crude imports from Russia were prompted by disruptions in traditional supply chains after the conflict in Ukraine began. The MEA emphasised that New Delhi's energy imports are a sovereign decision driven by national interest and market realities. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' the MEA statement read. 'India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy market stability,' it added. The MEA further noted that the European Union had a bilateral trade of EUR67.5 billion in goods and EUR17.2 billion in services with Russia in 2023, significantly more than India's total trade with Russia. The EU's LNG imports from Russia reached a record 16.5 million tonnes in 2024. Moreover, the US continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its electric vehicle industry, fertilisers, and chemicals from Russia, read MEA release. India's energy import strategy prioritises energy security and affordability. The country has diversified its energy imports, increasing reliance on countries like Russia to meet its growing energy demands. The MEA's response came after President Trump, in a post on Truth Social, accused India of buying 'massive amounts' of Russian oil and reselling it for profit, claiming this undermined efforts to end the Ukraine conflict and, as a result, he would 'substantially raise the tariff paid by India to the USA'. The MEA, in the statement, stressed that these imports are guided by the need to ensure predictable and affordable energy prices for its citizens, while noting that Western nations criticising India are themselves engaged in far larger trade with Russia, despite no such compelling energy insecurity. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by the global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion,' the statement read. (ANI) This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also Read: Trump announces 25% tariffs for India, will impose additional penalties for purchase of Russian oil
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
India Is Not A "Tariff King": US Claims vs Reality
US President Donald Trump has labelled India as the "Tariff King" and an "abuser" of trade duties, suggesting the country unfairly protects its markets through high customs duties. But a closer look at the facts reveals the claim doesn't hold up against actual trade data and global comparisons. While India's simple average tariff is approximately 15.98%, the trade-weighted average, which better reflects the duties actually applied on traded goods, is only 4.6%, as per World Bank data, much lower than what is commonly believed. Simple vs Weighted Average Tariffs Simple Average Tariffs give equal weight to every product, even those hardly traded. Trade-Weighted Average Tariffs measure the actual duties paid based on trade volume. In India's case: Simple Average Tariff: 15.98% Trade-Weighted Average Tariff: 4.6% This means that most of India's high tariffs apply to sectors with low import volumes, such as agriculture or automobiles. In contrast, the bulk of US exports to India - pharmaceuticals, energy products, machinery, and chemicals - face much lower duties, typically 5-8%, as per official data. A significant portion of India's imports enter duty-free, thanks to various schemes like: Special Economic Zones (SEZs) Export-Oriented Units (EOUs) Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) India's Actual Tariffs On US Goods In FY 2023-24, India imported over $42.2 billion worth of goods from the United States. Nearly 75% of this trade came from only 100 key product categories, and most of these faced low or minimal tariffs. Examples - Crude Oil and LNG: Import duty of Rs. 1.1/tonne and 2.75%, accounting for 18.25% of US imports to India. Industrial Machinery: Tariff of 7.5%, making up 9.75% of imports. Coal: 5% duty, contributing to 8.8% of imports. Medical Equipment: Duties between 5% and 7.5%, with a 4.6% import share. Aircraft and Parts: Low tariff of 2.5%, with 3% of total imports. Fertilisers: Tariff ranging from 7.5% to 10%, making up 1% of imports. Compared To Other Countries When stacked against other countries, both developed and developing, India's tariffs are far from extreme, sources say. As per data from the World Trade Organisation: Electronics And Technology India: 0% on most semiconductors, IT hardware, and computers Vietnam: Up to 50% China: Up to 25% Indonesia: Up to 30% Agricultural Products India: Average 33%, max up to 110-150% European Union: Up to 261% Japan: Up to 298% South Korea: Over 800% on some items While India's simple average tariff stands at 15.98%, as per the WTO, this figure is well within the range of tariffs maintained by other developing nations. For instance: Bangladesh: 14.1% Turkiye: 16.2% Argentina: 13.4% By this measure, India's weighted average is just 4.6%, which is: Lower than Vietnam (5.1%) and Indonesia (5.7%) Nearly equal to the European Union (5%) India Has Been Reducing Tariffs For Decades In 1990, India's average tariff was as high as 80.9%. Following economic reforms in the early 1990s, tariffs were gradually reduced, falling to 33% by 1999. By 2023, India's simple average tariff dropped further to 15.98%, while the trade-weighted average stood at 4.6%. In January, India implemented extra tariff cuts on key US products: Motorcycles above 1600cc: reduced from 50% to 30% Motorcycles up to 1600cc: cut from 50% to 40% Bourbon whiskey: slashed from 150% to 100% Carrier-grade Ethernet switches: halved from 20% to 10% Synthetic flavouring essences and mixtures: steeply reduced from 100% to 20% Fish hydrolysate: lowered from 15% to 5% Equalisation Levy on online services: 6% levy abolished after last year's removal of an additional 2% - significant for the US tech firms In 2023, India removed retaliatory tariffs on major US agricultural exports like apples, almonds, and walnuts after resolving trade disputes. High-tech goods and solar equipment have seen reduced or zero duties in line with India's strategic green energy and digital transition goals. Crucially, major US exports like aircraft and LNG continue to enjoy a low duty regime, facilitating over $5 billion in annual trade. These reductions reflect not only India's broader trade liberalisation over the decades, but also a calibrated effort to strengthen economic ties with the United States through deliberate tariff concessions. India's Non-Tariff Barriers India's regulatory and safety standards are generally less restrictive than those of countries like the EU, Japan, or China. India's Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for food products are either matching or less stringent than international Codex standards in 24 out of 32 cases, compared to only 15 out of 52 MRLs in Japan and 6 out of 58 in the EU, as per sources. India's rules on biotech products and veterinary health certification are designed to be transparent, science-based, and consistent with global norms. In contrast, China has over 2,600 non-tariff measures (NTMs), many of which are complex, unpredictable, and create difficulties for foreign exporters, sources said. US Tariffs The United States itself imposes very high duties on several important products. These tariffs, many exceeding 100% are applied across a range of products, including dairy, agriculture, textiles, and autos, reflecting deep-rooted domestic concerns similar to those seen in countries like India. Developed countries like Switzerland (28.5%), Norway (31.1%), and South Korea (57%) also maintain very high agricultural tariffs, often exceeding India's levels, underscoring that protecting agriculture is a global norm. India's tariff policy, especially in agriculture, is thus in line with international norms aimed at safeguarding domestic farmers and ensuring food security, sources said.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Bangladesh to hold elections in February 2026, says interim leader Muhammad Yunus
Bangladesh will hold elections in February 2026, interim leader Muhammad Yunus said Tuesday (August 5, 2025), the first polls since a mass uprising overthrew the government last year. 'On behalf of the interim government, I will write a letter to the Chief Election Commissioner requesting that the election be arranged before Ramadan in February 2026,' Mr. Yunus said in a broadcast on the one-year anniversary of the ousting of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Nobel Peace Prize winner Mr. Yunus, 85, is leading the caretaker government as its chief adviser until elections, and has said he will step down after the vote. 'We will step into the final and most important phase after delivering this speech to you, and that is the transfer of power to an elected government', he said. Mr. Yunus had earlier said elections would be held in April, but key political parties have been demanding he hold them earlier, and before the Islamic holy month of Ramadan in the Muslim-majority nation of 170 million people. 'I urge you all to pray for us so that we can hold a fair and smooth election, enabling all citizens to move forward successfully in building a 'New Bangladesh'', he added. 'On behalf of the government, we will extend all necessary support to ensure that the election is free, peaceful and celebratory in spirit.'
