Global economy on track for worst decade since 1960s, World Bank warns
Global economic growth is on track for its weakest decade since the 1960s, according to a new analysis by the World Bank, which cites U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war as a major factor weighing on economies worldwide.
The World Bank expects Trump's barrage of new tariffs on America's trading partners to whittle down global economic growth to its lowest level since the 2008 financial crisis when discounting worldwide recessions, according to a report released Tuesday.
While the Washington, D.C.-based institution does not expect another global recession due to the tariffs, it said in a press release that — should its projections for global growth come to pass this year and next — 'average global growth in the first seven years of the 2020s will be the slowest of any decade since the 1960s.'
In its report, the World Bank downgraded its expectation for global GDP growth this year to 2.3% from the 2.7% it had forecast in January. That's based on the assumption that tariffs worldwide will remain at their late-May levels.
That puts the world economy on course for its weakest pace of growth in 17 years, excluding two global recessions — the first in 2009, following the financial crisis; and the second in 2020, the first year of the coronavirus pandemic. Those years saw global economic growth contract by 1.3% and 2.9%, respectively, according to World Bank data.
'The sharp increase in tariffs and the ensuing uncertainty are contributing to a broad-based growth slowdown and deteriorating prospects in most of the world's economies,' the institution said in the report.
It added that the 'turmoil' unleashed by 'heightened trade tensions' had prompted it to cut its growth forecasts for almost 70% of economies worldwide — across all regions and income groups. The anticipated slowdown in developing economies will also be influenced by long-running trends such as ballooning government debt levels, the institution noted.
Fitch Ratings said Tuesday that it had downgraded its outlook for global government bonds this year from a 'neutral' status to 'deteriorating,' citing the impact of tariff hikes and trade policy uncertainty.
'The escalation in the global trade war, uncertainty over the endpoint for tariffs and their impact on global trade volumes, supply chains, investment and international relations is a significant adverse global economic shock,' the credit rating agency said in a report.
Since retaking office in January, Trump has hiked import duties on most of America's trading partners and on key goods, including cars and steel. A round of punishingly high 'reciprocal tariffs' is set to whack many of America's trading partners from July 9 unless they can strike a deal with Washington — and despite the levies hitting a legal stumbling block last month.
Fresh trade negotiations between the United States and China kicked off in London on Monday, and continued on Tuesday, with both sides attempting to preserve a fragile truce brokered last month.
Despite ongoing talks, the tariffs, their erratic implementation and the unpredictability that both have injected into the global economy, are weighing on many businesses and consumers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Buy This AI Stock That Soared 800% Last Year and Has a $140 Billion Total Addressable Market?
Key Points This company has reported accelerating revenue growth in recent quarters, and in the latest period, revenue soared more than 150%. After great gains last year, the stock slipped 45% in the first half of this year. Last year was a big one for artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, with companies in the sector leading all three major benchmarks to gains. Though the momentum halted temporarily earlier this year, as investors worried about the impact of import tariffs on the economy, this positive energy has returned. Investors are optimistic that trade talks will result in lower-than-expected tariffs, limiting the negative effects on companies, and that has buoyed interest in growth players, including AI stocks. Some AI stocks, though, have yet to feel the rebound. Considering the long-term AI growth story hasn't changed, these players may offer you bargain buying opportunities today. Let's consider one in particular. This AI stock surged more than 800% in 2024 but dropped 45% in the first half of this year. Meanwhile, it's a specialist in its field, one with a total addressable market of more than $140 billion. Is this player a buy right now? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » More than 190 patents The AI stock I'm talking about is SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN), a company with expertise in voice AI, reinforced by more than 190 granted patents. Though other companies, even big players such as Amazon or Microsoft, are involved in the field, SoundHound stands out thanks to its speech-to-meaning technology. The company translates speech directly to meaning, bypassing the common step of translating speech to text first, therefore gaining in speed and quality. Customers clearly like SoundHound's offerings, as revenue has taken off, and the company has signed deals across industries. This is a key point because, in its earlier days, SoundHound primarily served the automobile industry. This strength in fields such as healthcare, retail, travel, and more, as well as the fact that no customer represents more than 10% of revenue, greatly reduces SoundHound's risk. That's because if one customer or industry cuts spending, others may compensate. SoundHound's revenue in the recent quarter advanced 151% to about $29 million, which is great. But what's even better is that the company still has plenty of room for growth, considering its current revenue level and the total addressable market of $140 billion, which spans 14 different industries. And the company has three ways to generate revenue: through royalties on its products, subscriptions for services, and taking additional revenue from the use of its products and services. The risk of competition Of course, despite SoundHound's expertise in the field, the company still faces the risk of major rivals, such as those mentioned above, gaining market share due to their immense resources. That's what makes SoundHound a stock that carries some risk right now, and even though the stock has slipped this year, the decline looks small compared to the gain posted last year. These factors could limit SoundHound's growth in the near term. Still, the company has seen growth accelerate in recent quarters, from 89% in the third quarter of last year to 101% in the fourth quarter and even higher in the most recent period. Further, as mentioned above, SoundHound may still be in its early stages of growth. So, what does this mean for you as an investor? Should you buy SoundHound now on the dip? The answer depends on your investment strategy. If you're a cautious investor, you're probably better off buying a larger, well-established player, such as Amazon or Microsoft, that may benefit from voice AI but also from broader, profitable businesses. Over time, they've proven their earnings and stock performance strengths. If you're an aggressive investor, though, SoundHound looks like a fantastic AI buy right now. The stock has slipped from its high, offering you a lower entry point. Revenue has clearly accelerated in recent quarters, and the company has successfully broadened its customer base across industries. On top of that, I like that SoundHound is financially healthy, with no debt and $246 million in cash. All this makes it a great AI stock to get in on right now and hang on to as its growth story develops. Should you invest $1,000 in SoundHound AI right now? Before you buy stock in SoundHound AI, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and SoundHound AI wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to180%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adria Cimino has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Amid tariffs and falling sales, is Canada's EV mandate doomed?
Social Sharing With U.S. tariffs on steel, aluminum and light-duty vehicles continuing to batter the Canadian automobile industry, the CEOs of Canada's big three automakers are asking for a break. They met with Prime Minister Mark Carney this week to lobby for the elimination of the Liberal government's zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate. Maintaining it, they say, will cripple their companies and put thousands of jobs at risk. Carney cancelled Canada's digital services tax last weekend to keep trade negotiations going with the U.S. Could the ZEV mandate also be removed to help an auto industry bleeding from the trade war? And what would that mean for Carney politically if he did so? The mandate requires the number of new ZEVs sold in Canada to hit 20 per cent by next year, 60 per cent by 2030 and 100 per cent by 2035 in order to help the country hit its emission-reduction targets. Brian Kingston, president and CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, who was at the meeting with Carney, said the electric vehicle mandate just can't be met as it stands. Kingston and other industry players say U.S. tariffs have led to a significant drop in the number of vehicles Canada exports, putting immense pressure on the industry. According to Statistics Canada, the number of light-duty vehicles exported to the U.S. in April was down 23 per cent over the previous year. Flavio Volpe, the president of Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association, told CBC News that while Canada imports about $80 billion worth of automobiles and parts from the U.S. each year, it exports about 85 per cent of the light-duty vehicles that roll off the line. Many of those are plug-in hybrids or electric, but the market for those vehicles in the U.S. is declining just as it is in Canada. Killing the U.S. ZEV mandate In January, U.S. President Donald Trump eliminated his country's ZEV mandate that would have required half of all new vehicles to be electric by 2030. A White House statement said the mandate was scrapped in order to "promote consumer choice." The passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill" further hit the U.S. ZEV market by killing the $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit by the end of September. That credit was supposed to remain on the books until 2032. Canada had its own ZEV rebate. That program offered up to $5,000 toward the purchase of a new electric car and up to $2,500 on the purchase of a new plug-in hybrid. While it was supposed to stay in place until March, it was paused in January when it ran out of funding. In April, the sale of zero-emission vehicles in Canada sat at only 7.5 per cent — a 28.5 per cent decline over April 2024. With exports and sales down and no rebate in place, manufacturers say there is just not enough demand to hit the 20 per cent target next year. Competing concerns Christopher Cochrane, the chair of the University of Toronto's political science department, says Carney is wedged between his environmental ambition and the need for an industrial policy that will keep people employed and protect the auto industry. But if Carney decided he needed to end the EV mandate, Cochrane said, he might have a window of opportunity. "He has a coalition of people built not on any particular agreement with him, but built on a common disagreement with what they see as the main alternative — and that did give him the policy leeway to do things like get rid of the carbon tax," he said. But he said it isn't easy to navigate the environmental and economic concerns from within his own party. "The risk, longer term, is that he starts to erode and blow up that coalition," Cochrane said. "But right now I think he's still in pretty good shape." Fudging it Adam Chamberlin, an assistant professor in the Telfer School of Management at the University of Ottawa, said Carney likely doesn't want to frame any decision as the end of EV mandates. "So 2035 maybe becomes 2036 or 2037, and the other interim goals for 2030 become 2031 or 2032," Chamberlin said. "I think it's that kind of a fudge that we're going to see." Volpe says that just because the U.S. wants to abandon its EV ambitions, that doesn't mean Canada should follow suit. He says an electrified car market plays to Canada's strengths as a country with rich reserves of critical minerals, a sophisticated science and technology sector, a well-established supply chain and an ample supply of electricity. WATCH | Why experts think the future is still electric: Road to EV adoption: Why experts think the future is still electric 10 months ago Duration 5:47 Recent headlines have suggested that consumers are losing interest in electric vehicles, but a closer look at the trends tells a different story. CBC's Nisha Patel breaks down where we're at in the EV transition and why experts say the future is still electric. "The rest of the world continues down the march [of electrification] undaunted," Volpe said. "We need to make sure that as that [U.S.] market wakes up, we're first ones to access it." Volpe says any penalties for not meeting the ZEV mandate should be halted and it should be adjusted to better line up with "market realities." He wants the federal government to reintroduce the EV rebate and expand it to include conventional hybrids, which he said would build support for EVs. The government said it plans to introduce a new rebate program, but that hasn't happened yet. Volpe also wants the federal government to help identify the electric cars that Canadians want, and help factories retool to meet that demand.
Winnipeg Free Press
6 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Brazil hosts BRICS summit, eager to avoid provoking Trump's ire
RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — Brazil will play host to a summit of the BRICS bloc of developing economies Sunday and Monday during which pressing topics like Israel's attack on Iran, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and trade tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump are expected to be handled with caution. Analysts and diplomats said the lack of cohesion in an enlarged BRICS, which doubled in size last year, may affect its ability to become another pole in world affairs. They also see the summit's moderate agenda as an attempt by member countries to stay off Trump's radar. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva will have some of his priorities, such as debates on artificial intelligence and climate change, front and center for the talks with key leaders not in attendance. China's President Xi Jinping won't attend a BRICS summit for the first time since he became his country's leader in 2012. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who will make an appearance via videoconference, continues to mostly avoid traveling abroad due to an international arrest warrant issued after Russia invaded Ukraine. Debate over language on hot-button topics The restraint expected in Rio de Janeiro marks a departure from last year's summit hosted by Russia in Kazan, when the Kremlin sought to develop alternatives to U.S.-dominated payment systems which would allow it to dodge Western sanctions imposed after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. A source involved in the negotiations told journalists Friday that some members of the group want more aggressive language on the situation in Gaza and Israel's attack on Iran. The source spoke under the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the matter publicly. 'Brazil wants to keep the summit as technical as possible,' said Oliver Stuenkel, a professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation think tank and university. Consequently, observers expect a vague final declaration regarding Russia's war in Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East. As well as suiting Brazil, a watered-down and non-controversial statement may be made easier by the absences of Putin and Xi, Stuenkel said. Those two countries have pushed for a stronger anti-Western stance, as opposed to Brazil and India that prefer non-alignment. A Brazilian government official told The Associated Press Thursday that the group is expected to produce three joint statements and a final declaration, 'all of which less bounded by current geopolitical tensions.' The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the summit's preparations. João Alfredo Nyegray, an international business and geopolitics professor at the Pontifical Catholic University in Parana, said the summit could have played a role in showing an alternative to an unstable world, but won't do so. 'The withdrawal of Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and the uncertainty about the level of representation for countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are confirming the difficulty for the BRICS to establish themselves as a cohesive pole of global leadership,' Nyegray said. 'This moment demands high level articulation, but we are actually seeing dispersion.' Brazil skittish in light of Trump tariffs Brazil, the country that chairs the bloc, has picked six strategic priorities for the summit: global cooperation in healthcare; trade, investment and finance; climate change; governance for artificial intelligence; peace-making and security; and institutional development. It has decided to focus on less controversial issues, such as promoting trade relations between members and global health, after Trump returned to the White House, said Ana Garcia, a professor at the Rio de Janeiro Federal Rural University. 'Brazil wants the least amount of damage possible and to avoid drawing the attention of the Trump administration to prevent any type of risk to the Brazilian economy,' Garcia said. While Brazil will continue to advocate for the reform of Western-led global institutions, a cornerstone policy of the group, the country wants to avoid becoming the target of tariffs — a predicament it has so far largely escaped. Trump has threatened to impose 100% tariffs against the bloc if they take any moves to undermine the dollar. Other leaders shun the summit Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Egypt's Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi will also be absent. Those two countries joined the BRICS in 2024, alongside Ethiopia, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates. Saudi Arabia has been invited and is participating in member discussions, but it has yet to send its confirmation letter. As well as new members, the bloc has 10 strategic partner countries, a category created at last year's summit that includes Belarus, Cuba and Vietnam. That rapid expansion led Brazil to put housekeeping issues — officially termed institutional development — on the agenda to better integrate new members and boost internal cohesion. Despite notable absences, the summit is important for attendees, especially in the context of instability provoked by Trump's tariff wars, said Bruce Scheidl, a researcher at the University of Sao Paulo's BRICS study group. 'The summit offers the best opportunity for emerging countries to respond, in the sense of seeking alternatives and diversifying their economic partnerships,' Scheidl said. For Lula, the summit will be a welcome pause from a difficult domestic scenario, marked by a drop in popularity and conflict with Congress. The meeting also represents an opportunity to advance climate negotiations and commitments on protecting the environment before November's COP 30 climate talks in the Amazonian city of Belem.
