South Florida swim school urges teaching children water safety after 2 near drownings in Fort Lauderdale
Parents and swimming instructors told CBS News Miami that getting children at ease in the water at an early age can be a big benefit.
Daniela Egues wanted her daughter Emilia to learn the ways of the water as early as possible.
"We started the moment that she was able to get into classes like this, so she's been in swimming classes since six months," Egues said.
She wants her daughter to get comfortable in the water before she learns how to swim on her own.
"Get her accustomed to the water and respect the water, understand her limits, [and] respect the boundaries," Egues said.
Egues was at a Sunday swim lesson at OcaQuatics, where they are urging swimming safety after two children under three years old both had to be saved from pools on Saturday in Fort Lauderdale.
The first incident involved a two-year-old saved from the pool at the Sheraton Hotel, and another incident involved a one-year-old found at a pool at the corner of Northeast 35th Court and Bay View Drive.
Both children needed CPR and were taken to Broward Health. Officials haven't said if foul play or negligence played a role in the near drownings.
Florida is often one of the nation's leaders in child drowning deaths. And the CDC found that drowning is the leading cause of death for children in the age range of one to four.
OcaQuatics founder Miren Oca told CBS News Miami that children under three can still learn self-saving skills.
"They know how to hold their breath if they were to fall in the water, they know how to return to the side of the pool," Oca said. "If they turn around and grab the wall instead of swimming out to the middle. And we also work on back floating as a skill. Children under three can totally do that."
Oca said that it's still vital to have someone nearby to supervise toddlers or infants in the water.
"Arms' length away is what we like to say because you never know what they're going to do," Oca said. "You never know when they're gonna choose to jump into the pool."
Oca also teaches older children how to help save someone in the water from the side.
As for the near drownings, officials haven't given any updates on the conditions of the two children saved from the pools.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Peer-Reviewed Study Confirms Within Health's Remote PHP/IOP Model Delivers Consistent Results Across Ages
Study confirms strong outcomes across all ages, validating Within Health's intentionally-designed, fully remote model as a proven alternative to in‑person care. 'There is a lack of research on age-based outcomes in remote PHPs/IOPs, and findings from in-person settings are inconsistent. This study helps fill that gap.'— Caitlin B. Shepherd, Ph.D. COCONUT GROVE, FL, UNITED STATES, August 5, 2025 / / -- Within Health, a leading provider of fully remote eating disorder treatment, today announced the publication of a peer-reviewed study in Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention. The study, titled 'From Stopgap to Opportunity: Outcomes Across Age Groups in an Intentionally Designed, Remote Eating Disorder Treatment Program,' provides new evidence that virtual treatment, when intentionally designed for remote delivery, yields meaningful improvements across key clinical domains for all life stages. The study evaluated treatment response and clinical outcomes for 116 patients who entered Within Health's remote Enhanced Partial Hospitalization Program (PHP) and then transitioned to and were discharged from its Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP). Changes in eating disorder symptoms, depressive symptoms, trait anxiety, quality of life, as well as weight restoration for those diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, were compared across adolescents, young adults, and mature adults. 'Most research has focused on pandemic-driven shifts to virtual care, leaving gaps in what we know about remote treatment in other contexts,' said Caitlin B. Shepherd, Ph.D., lead author. 'There is also a lack of research on age-based outcomes in remote PHPs/IOPs, and findings from in-person settings are inconsistent. This study helps fill that gap and shows that, when thoughtfully designed, remote care supports meaningful progress across age groups.' Key findings include: Statistically significant improvements in eating disorder symptoms, depression, anxiety, and quality of life, along with weight restoration, specifically for anorexia nervosa patients No significant differences in treatment response across age groups, indicating consistent effectiveness from adolescence through mature adulthood Large treatment effects across all domains, matching or exceeding those reported in previous remote adaptations, suggesting potentially stronger results in this purpose-built model Positive discharge outcomes across age groups, with, on average, eating disorder symptoms below the clinical cut-off, mild depressive symptoms, minor to moderate quality of life impairment, and weight restoration benchmarks achieved where applicable The study was authored by Caitlin B. Shepherd, Ph.D., and Hannah Wolfe, MSW, from Within Health's internal clinical research team, alongside external consultant Rebecca G. Boswell, Ph.D., and clinical leaders Jessica Genet, Ph, and Wendy Oliver-Pyatt, M.D., highlighting the collaborative integration of clinical and research expertise. Why It Matters: Reach: Within Health's remote model has the potential to expand access to high-quality, intensive eating disorder treatment, addressing geographic scarcity of programs offering both PHP and IOP levels of care and overcoming logistical barriers faced by patients balancing the pursuit of recovery with other important life responsibilities and activities. Engagement: High treatment completion rates and positive outcomes across age groups demonstrate strong patient engagement, likely supported by seamless PHP-to-IOP transitions to ensure continuity of care and age-tailored programming, hallmarks of Within Health's care model. Differentiation: Unlike programs adapted to telehealth during the pandemic, Within Health was intentionally designed for remote delivery, leveraging innovations and enhanced features like medical monitoring devices, flexible scheduling, and specialized programming that connects patients based on shared experiences. Conversion (Impact): Outcomes from Within Health's intentionally remote program were comparable to those reported by in-person programs, and in some domains appeared stronger than other remote programs, positioning Within as a leader in intensive eating disorder treatment. 'This study represents a pivotal moment. The data confirm what we've long believed: remote care doesn't have to mean compromised care. When it's built with clinical excellence, compassion, and innovation at its core, it becomes a true lifeline,' said Wendy Oliver-Pyatt, MD, Co-Founder, CEO, and Chief Medical Officer of Within Health. Read the full study here: About Within Health Within Health ( is a physician-founded, clinically led, and intentionally designed, fully remote eating disorder treatment provider. The program delivers comprehensive, personalized care at enhanced Partial Hospitalization (PHP) and Intensive Outpatient (IOP) levels through integrated therapy, remote patient medical monitoring, advanced nutrition support, and individualized meal interventions. Named a Forbes Top Startup Employer in 2025, Within maintains an average clinical staff tenure of over two years and a turnover rate of just 3.24%, significantly lower than industry standards. With proprietary technology, evidence-based protocols, and consistently strong clinical outcomes, Within sets the benchmark for accessible, effective, and lasting eating disorder treatment. Cynthia Johnson Within Health email us here Visit us on social media: LinkedIn Instagram Facebook YouTube Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Even in states that fought the ACA, Trump's new law poses health consequences
Miami — GOP lawmakers in the 10 states that refused the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion for over a decade have argued their conservative approach to growing government programs would pay off in the long run. Instead, the Republican-passed budget law that includes many of President Trump's priorities will pose at least as big a burden on patients and hospitals in the expansion holdout states as in the 40 states that have extended Medicaid coverage to more low-income adults, hospital executives and other officials warn. For instance, Georgia, with a population of just over 11 million, will see as many people lose insurance coverage sold through ACA marketplaces as will California, with more than triple the population, according to estimates by KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. The new law imposes additional paperwork requirements on Obamacare enrollees, slashes the time they have each year to sign up, and cuts funding for navigators who help them shop for plans. Those changes, all of which will erode enrollment, are expected to have far more impact in states like Florida and Texas than in California because a higher proportion of residents in non-expansion states are enrolled in ACA plans. The budget law, which Republicans called the "One Big Beautiful Bill," will cause sweeping changes to health care across the country as it trims federal spending on Medicaid by more than $1 trillion over the next decade. The program covers more than 71 million people with low incomes and disabilities. Ten million people will lose coverage over the next decade due to the law, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Many of its provisions are focused on the 40 states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA, which added millions more low-income adults to the rolls. But the consequences are not confined to those states. A proposal from conservatives to cut more generous federal payments for people added to Medicaid by the ACA expansion didn't make it into the law. "Politicians in non-expansion states should be furious about that," said Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. The number of people losing coverage could accelerate in non-expansion states if enhanced federal subsidies for Obamacare plans expire at the end of the year, driving up premiums as early as January and adding to the rolls of uninsured. KFF estimates as many as 2.2 million people could become uninsured just in Florida, a state where lawmakers refused to expand Medicaid and, partly as a result, now leads the nation in ACA enrollment. For people like Francoise Cham of Miami, who has Obamacare coverage, the Republican policy changes could be life-altering. Before she had insurance, the 62-year-old single mom said she would donate blood just to get her cholesterol checked. Once a year, she'd splurge for a wellness exam at Planned Parenthood. She expects to make about $28,000 this year and currently pays about $100 a month for an ACA plan to cover herself and her daughter, and even that strains her budget. Cham choked up describing the "safety net" that health insurance has afforded her — and at the prospect of being unable to afford coverage if premiums spike at the end of the year. "Obamacare has been my lifesaver," she said. If the enhanced ACA subsidies aren't extended, "everyone will be hit hard," said Cindy Mann, a health policy expert with Manatt Health, a consulting and legal firm, and a former deputy administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. "But a state that hasn't expanded Medicaid will have marketplace people enrolling at lower income levels," she said. "So, a greater share of residents are reliant on the marketplace." Though GOP lawmakers may try to cut Medicaid even more this year, for now the states that expanded Medicaid largely appear to have made a smart decision, while states that haven't are facing similar financial pressures without any upside, said health policy experts and hospital industry observers. KFF Health News reached out to the governors of the 10 states that have not fully expanded Medicaid to see if the budget legislation made them regret that decision or made them more open to expansion. Spokespeople for Republican Gov. Henry McMaster of South Carolina and Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia did not indicate whether their states are considering Medicaid expansion. Brandon Charochak, a spokesperson for McMaster's office, said South Carolina's Medicaid program focuses on "low-income children and families and disabled individuals," adding, "The state's Medicaid program does not anticipate a large impact on the agency's Medicaid population." Enrollment in ACA marketplace plans nationwide has more than doubled since 2020 to 24.3 million. If enhanced subsidies expire, premiums for Obamacare coverage would rise by more than 75% on average, according to an analysis by KFF. Some insurers are already signaling they plan to charge more. The CBO estimates that allowing enhanced subsidies to expire will increase the number of people without health insurance by 4.2 million by 2034, compared with a permanent extension. That would come on top of the coverage losses caused by Mr. Trump's budget law. "That is problematic and scary for us," said Eric Boley, president of the Wyoming Hospital Association. He said his state, which did not expand Medicaid, has a relatively small population and hasn't been the most attractive for insurance providers — few companies currently offer plans on the ACA exchange — and he worried any increase in the uninsured rate would "collapse the insurance market." As the uninsured rate rises in non-expansion states and the budget law's Medicaid cuts loom, lawmakers say state funds will not backfill the loss of federal dollars, including in states that have refused to expand Medicaid. Those states got slightly favorable treatment under the law, but it's not enough, said Grace Hoge, press secretary for Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat who favors Medicaid expansion but who has been rebuffed by GOP state legislators. "Kansans' ability to access affordable healthcare will be harmed," Hoge said in an email. "Kansas, nor our rural hospitals, will not be able to make up for these cuts." For hospital leaders in other states that have refused full Medicaid expansion, the budget law poses another test by limiting financing arrangements states leveraged to make higher Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals. Beginning in 2028, the law will reduce those payments by 10 percentage points each year until they are closer to what Medicare pays. Richard Roberson, president of the Mississippi Hospital Association, said the state's use of what's called directed payments in 2023 helped raise its Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals and other health institutions from $500 million a year to $1.5 billion a year. He said higher rates helped Mississippi's rural hospitals stay open. "That payment program has just been a lifeline," Roberson said. The budget law includes a $50 billion fund intended to insulate rural hospitals and clinics from its changes to Medicaid and the ACA. But a KFF analysis found it would offset only about one-third of the cuts to Medicaid in rural areas. Mr. Trump encouraged Florida, Tennessee, and Texas to continue refusing Medicaid expansion in his first term, when his administration gave them an unusual 10-year extension for financing programs known as uncompensated care pools, which generate billions of dollars to pay hospitals for treating the uninsured, said Allison Orris, director of Medicaid policy for the left-leaning think tank Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "Those were very clearly a decision from the first Trump administration to say, 'You get a lot of money for an uncompensated care pool instead of expanding Medicaid,'" she said. Those funds are not affected by Mr. Trump's new tax-and-spending law. But they do not help patients the way insurance coverage would, Orris said. "This is paying hospitals, but it's not giving people health care," she said. "It's not giving people prevention." States such as Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi have not only turned down the additional federal funding that Medicaid expansion brings, but most of the remaining non-expansion states spend less than the national average per Medicaid enrollee, provide fewer or less generous benefits, and cover fewer categories of low-income Americans. Mary Mayhew, president of the Florida Hospital Association, said the state's Medicaid program does not adequately cover children, older people, and people with disabilities because reimbursement rates are too low. "Children don't have timely access to dentists," she said. "Expectant moms don't have access nearby to an OB-GYN. We've had labor and delivery units close in Florida." She said the law will cost states more in the long run. "The health care outcomes for the individuals we serve will deteriorate. That's going to lead to higher cost, more spending, more dependency on the emergency department." KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Flesh-Eating' Bacteria Cases Rising on Gulf Coast: What to Know
This scanning electron micrograph sem depicts a grouping of Vibrio vulnificus bacteria. Credit - BSIP/Universal Images Group—Getty Images At least eight people along the Gulf Coast have died and 22 others have been infected in what local health officials are warning is a rise in cases involving 'flesh-eating' bacteria. The Louisiana Department of Health issued an alert last week saying that there had been 17 cases of Vibrio vulnificus in the state so far this year. All of those patients were hospitalized, and four died. 'This represents a higher number of Vibrio vulnificus cases and deaths than are typically reported,' the department said. 'During the same time period over the previous 10 years, an average of seven Vibrio vulnificus cases and one death were reported each year.' Meanwhile, health officials in Florida have reported 13 cases this year, as of July 24. Four of those cases have resulted in death. Public health experts have generally attributed the rise in cases to climate change. Here's what to know about the bacteria. What is Vibrio vulnificus? Vibrio vulnificus is a type of Vibrio bacteria, many species of which can cause an infection known as vibriosis. Vibrio vulnificus bacteria 'cause the most serious forms of vibriosis,' according to the Cleveland Clinic. Infections can lead to painful blisters, fever, internal bleeding, organ damage, sepsis, and even death, the clinic said. Vibrio vulnificus can also cause necrotizing fasciitis, which is 'a severe infection in which the flesh around an open wound dies,' according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). While Vibrio vulnificus is often referred to as 'flesh-eating bacteria,' the CDC said that many public health experts don't consider it to be the most common cause of necrotizing fasciitis in the country. Read More: Be Careful Where You Swim This Summer How common are infections? Vibrio vulnificus infections are rare. According to the Cleveland Clinic, there are only about 100 to 200 confirmed cases in the country each year. Infections caused by other types of Vibrio bacteria are more common than Vibrio vulnificus. There are about 80,000 vibriosis cases across the country every year, according to the CDC, about 52,000 of which are caused by eating food contaminated with Vibrio bacteria. How is the bacteria transmitted, and how can you protect yourself? Vibrio bacteria typically live in salt water and brackish water, which is a combination of salt water and fresh water, according to the CDC. People can become infected with Vibrio vulnificus from eating raw shellfish, typically oysters, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The bacteria can also infect people who are exposed to seawater or brackish water, via a wound or break in their skin. Most cases occur during the summer, between May and October, when the water is typically warmer. The Cleveland Clinic advises people to reduce their risk of getting infected by avoiding eating raw or undercooked shellfish, washing their hands after preparing or touching raw shellfish, and avoiding contact with seawater and brackish water if they have a wound or new piercing or tattoo, among other measures. Both the Louisiana and Florida Departments of Health warned people with health conditions that put them at increased risk—such as chronic liver disease, kidney disease, or other conditions that compromise their immune systems—to take extra care around the coast. Those individuals 'should wear proper foot protection to prevent cuts and injury caused by rocks and shells on the beach,' the Florida health department advised. Contact us at letters@
