logo
Pentagon sends warplanes to Middle East as Iran-Israel conflict continues

Pentagon sends warplanes to Middle East as Iran-Israel conflict continues

USA Today18-06-2025
Pentagon sends warplanes to Middle East as Iran-Israel conflict continues | The Excerpt
On Wednesday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: The Pentagon has shifted warplanes and an aircraft carrier to the Middle East. Plus, President Donald Trump threatens Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on social media. And Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Tucker Carlson urge Trump to stay out of Iran, exposing a MAGA rift. USA TODAY National Correspondent Will Carless discusses how as 'lone actor' attacks rise, Trump is dismantling the program aimed at spotting them. A poll finds the majority of Americans oppose Trump's tax bill. USA TODAY Washington Bureau Chief Susan Page breaks down what some recent primaries can tell us ahead of midterms next year. The Florida Panthers are Stanley Cup champions again.
Let us know what you think of this episode by sending an email to podcasts@usatoday.com.
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Taylor Wilson:
Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson, and today is Wednesday, June 18th, 2025. This is The Excerpt. Today, the latest on US actions as it pertains to Israel and Iran. Plus, as lone actor attacks rise, Trump cuts a program aimed at spotting them. And what lessons can we take away from some recent primaries?

The Pentagon has shifted warplanes and an aircraft carrier to the Middle East as the conflict between Israel and Iran continues. Still, US officials insist the moves are defensive in nature. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump threatened Iran's Supreme Leader as he pushed Tehran to end its retaliatory airstrikes on Israel and warned against any threats to US service members in the region. Trump wrote on Truth social, "We know exactly where the so-called Supreme Leader is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there." He went on to say that the US is not going to take him out, at least for now. He also added a two-word post writing in all caps the words, unconditional surrender. While many Republicans might back any Trump military action in regards to the conflict, conservative pundit Tucker Carlson and representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who sat near Trump in the VIP section at his military parade over the weekend, are among the MAGA stars pressing for the US military to stay out of the fight, which they say is out of step with the movement's principles. Thousands of people were fleeing Tehran and other major cities according to Iranian media as Iran and Israel launched new missile strikes at each other in the early morning hours.

As politically motivated attacks by lone actors surge across the country, the Trump administration is dismantling the office that oversees efforts to identify and stop such violent extremists. I spoke with USA TODAY National Correspondent Will Carless for more.
Will, thanks for joining me.
Will Carless:
Thanks for having me.
Taylor Wilson:
So I want to just start here as we talk about lone actors. Are these types of attacks on the rise, Will?
Will Carless:
Yes. I mean, look, lone actors are nothing new. We've had lone actor attacks for decades in the United States, but there has been a recent surge in them. We're in a very heated political climate, and we've seen a good half dozen of these attacks since the beginning of the year. So for example, there was an attack in Washington, DC in which the young Jewish couple were shot and killed by a man with a political grievance. There was an incident in Boulder, Colorado just a couple of weeks ago, people might remember where a man attacked a parade with some firebombs. And then of course there was a surrender shooting over the weekend of the lawmakers in Minnesota. So there's been a gradual uptick in these since the beginning of the year.
Taylor Wilson:
All right, and how is the Trump administration cutting a program aimed at, in theory, spotting this sort of violence before it happens, Will?
Will Carless:
So if you talk to experts in terrorism and extremism, they'll tell you that these are extraordinarily difficult attacks to predict and to intervene, do anything about. If you think about it, we're not talking about members of extremist groups, like members of say a neo-Nazi group going out and committing violence. Those groups tend to be on the radar screen of law enforcement. They're watching, they're paying attention to them. But what we've seen increasingly over the last few months is just individuals who, for whatever reason, go out and act on that political grievance and either kill people or injure people. And those people didn't really have any signs of what they were going to do. The only way to really predict this is that people, even though they might not post about it on social media, they might not make their intentions clear. People do sometimes tell loved ones, or they tell friends, or they tell co-workers. And so there are a network of programs around the country where people can report that. They can call a hotline and they can say, "Hey, look, I'm a bit concerned about my co-worker," or my son or my daughter or my dad. And what the Trump administration has done is to roll back the government agency that funds those, that gives grants to those programs, essentially shutting them down.
Taylor Wilson:
How does the Department of Homeland Security defend this kind of dismantling of this program?
Will Carless:
Well, they say that this program, which is known as CP3, is really just aimed at targeting conservatives. They say that it's all about stymieing free speech, and they say that it's been used to overwhelmingly target conservative groups and not to look at left-wing groups. They also say that it's ineffectual and it doesn't really do anything, and so they don't want to spend the money on it and they want to shut it down. That's what DHS told us. Now, if you talk to the people who ran the program as I have, they'll defend against that and say, "That's not true. We intervene in hundreds of cases where people could go out and do something." These programs are able to intervene and get people mental health counseling or get them some sort of treatment or help to make sure that they don't go out and commit one of these atrocities. So it depends who you talk to. But yes, certainly under the Trump administration, they see this program as largely ineffectual and useless and a waste of money.
Taylor Wilson:
And as you write, programs supported by CP3, they also help to get people away from extremist groups, a lot of these groups that you follow and cover on a daily basis. Will, what can you tell us about this angle?
Will Carless:
So what people who watch extremist groups are concerned about at the moment is particularly post the January insurrection pardons in which anybody involved in the January 6th insurrection, including people who were accused and convicted of plotting against this country and of committing insurrection and of committing seditious conspiracy, they were all pardoned by President Trump. And that includes the leaders of the largest extremist groups or the most popular extremist groups in the United States. So what the experts are concerned about is that those groups are now regrouping. They've been given a green light by the federal government to say, go out there and do whatever you need to do. Do your training and mass weapons, write up your constitutions and your mandates, and train and form your compounds. And that's what they're worried about. They see groups like the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys gradually regaining strength and it should be said these are groups that really, January 6th and the prosecutions that followed, really hobbled those groups and took a lot of the power out of them, and they're now re-strengthening.
Taylor Wilson:
Folks can find Will's full story with a link in today's show notes. Will covers extremism and emerging issues for USA TODAY. Thanks as always, Will.
Will Carless:
Thank you.

Taylor Wilson:
A majority of Americans, 64%, have an unfavorable view of President Trump's tax policy bill, according to a new poll from the nonpartisan health research group KFF. The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, implement new tax cuts for tips and overtime, pour billions into the administration's deportation plans, and make cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. It's expected to be the biggest legislative accomplishment of Trump's second term so far if the Republican-led Congress can find the votes to pass it through both chambers. It passed the house last month and is currently being tweaked in the Senate.
He poll found responses skewed heavily on party lines, though. The vast majority of Democrats, 85%, and Independents, 71%, have an unfavorable opinion of the bill while 61% of Republicans have a favorable opinion of it. Among Republicans, support for the bill is also divided between those who do and don't identify as supporters of Trump's Make America Great Again movement. Two-thirds of non-MAGA Republicans had an unfavorable view, while 72% of MAGA Republicans had a favorable view.

What lessons can we take from a handful of primaries across the country? I spoke with USA TODAY Washington Bureau Chief Susan Page to find out. Susan, always a pleasure. Thanks for joining me today.
Susan Page:
Hey Taylor, it's great to be with you.
Taylor Wilson:
So Susan, let's get to some of these primary lessons starting with Virginia where you write that Democrats are revved up. What did we learn from this race and how else are we seeing some of this democratic energy play out around the country?
Susan Page:
Here's the amazing thing about Virginia. The Democratic gubernatorial nomination is not contested. Abigail Spanberger has in effect already won it, and yet Democrats are still turning out to vote. In fact, turnout in the early vote is almost 60% higher than it was four years ago when there was a contested race. So that tells you that Democrats are revved up and ready to go in a selection.
Taylor Wilson:
Well, as for the GOP, this is still very much President Donald Trump's party. What did you learn from his hold on the GOP in New Jersey and elsewhere?
Susan Page:
Here's some amazing thing about New Jersey. Jack Ciattarelli is now running for governor for the third time, seeking the Republican nomination. The first time around he said Trump was a charlatan. The second time around, he's just kept his distance from Donald Trump. This time, he courted Donald Trump. He went to his Bedminster golf club, he posted pictures of him with Trump, and he won Trump's nomination. That was very important to him in having a real landslide victory in the Republican primary there last week.
Taylor Wilson:
Well, you know Susan, everyone's been trying to forecast who, if anyone, might grab a similar hold of the Democrats. Have primaries taught us anything here?
Susan Page:
Primaries have taught us that Democrats are everywhere and nowhere. You just look at New Jersey, the Democratic vote there where Mikie Sherrill, the congresswoman, won the Democratic nomination. She won it with 34% of the vote. That was enough to win, not really impressive. The two liberal candidates got more votes than she did, if you combine them, about 36% of the vote. And the two most moderate or conservative Democrats got 19% of the vote, also a significant share. So there are no conclusions you can draw from that outcome to where Democrats will go ideologically.
Taylor Wilson:
Well, I guess New York's mayoral race also shows us another angle of some of these democratic divisions. What did you really take away from what's been happening out in New York City?
Susan Page:
Well, New York is sort of sui generis. It has its own politics, it's decidedly liberal. There are 11 candidates in this mayoral primary. They also used rank choice voting where voters can list up to five people in the order they would like to see them elected. So it's a little different than most places. In New York, we do see a kind of ideological battle. The front-runner is former governor Andrew Cuomo, who is pretty much a centrist, but there's a newcomer, Zohran Mamdani, who is just 33 years old, and he has come on strong. He's the strongest challenger to Cuomo and he is a Democratic socialist who has been endorsed by AOC and Bernie Sanders.
Taylor Wilson:
All right, Susan, a long way to go until midterms next year, but what else are you keeping an eye on between now and then?
Susan Page:
The one thing that tells you the most about what's going to happen in the midterms, the President's approval rating. If a president is doing pretty well at the midterm point, he tends to do pretty well in the midterms. But if the President is underwater, if he's in trouble, that is where voters let him know it.
Taylor Wilson:
All right, brilliant analysis, as always. Susan Page is USA TODAY's Washington Bureau Chief. Thank you, Susan.
Susan Page:
Thank you.

Taylor Wilson:
The Florida Panthers are Stanley Cup champions, winning the hockey championship for the second straight year over the Edmonton Oilers. Edmonton continues to search for its first cup since 1990.

And coming up later today, there are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the US, each with their own unique story.
Alix Dick:
I feel that most people believe that our stories begin when we become undocumented, and that's not the case. My story began in Mexico. I have the best parents, the best siblings, and then life happened, and tragedy hit.
Taylor Wilson:
That was Alix Dick, co-author of The Cost of Being Undocumented, describing her reconciliation with being just one in a vast sea of people in the US without documentation, currently under attack. She and her co-author on Antero Garcia joined me for a frank conversation of how undocumented immigrants are experiencing this inflection point in politics amid a global immigration surge. You can hear that episode right here on this feed today, beginning at 4:00 PM Eastern Time.

And thanks for listening to The Excerpt. You can get the podcast wherever you get your audio, and as always, you can find us on email at podcasts@usatoday.com. I'm Taylor Wilson. I'll be back tomorrow with more of The Excerpt from USA TODAY.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Returning after a six-week break, the 'Real Time' host had a bit of catching up to do.
Returning after a six-week break, the 'Real Time' host had a bit of catching up to do.

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Returning after a six-week break, the 'Real Time' host had a bit of catching up to do.

Following a six-week break, Bill Maher returned to Real Time with guns blazing as he tore into President Donald Trump's first six months in office. Dismissing frivolities like renaming the Gulf of Mexico and changing Coca-Cola's recipe, Maher said there are 'only so many f---s to give' when it comes to current events. Instead, he focused his ire on stories that matter in his current scorecard for Trump's administration during his 'New Rules' segment. 'Turning the Environmental Protection Agency into the Pollution Protection Agency, yes, that's going to matter,' Maher said. 'All the people who will lose healthcare and all the death that will be run up from the Big, Beautiful Bill, yes, that matters.'

Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers
Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers

CNN

time13 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers

Donald Trump Job market EconomyFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump has fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whom he accused, without evidence, of manipulating the monthly jobs reports for 'political purposes.' The BLS' monthly labor report Friday showed that the US economy added only 73,000 jobs in July, far below expectations. It also sharply revised down the employment growth that had been previously reported in May and June – by a combined 258,000 jobs. After the revisions, the jobs report showed the weakest pace of hiring for any three-month period since the pandemic recession in 2020. 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. Although the May and June jobs numbers were worse than initially believed, revisions are normal in this process. The BLS' initial monthly jobs estimates are often based on incomplete data, so they are revised twice after the initial report — followed by an annual revision every February. Additionally, BLS economists use a formula to smooth out jobs numbers for seasonal variations and that can exacerbate revisions when they fall outside economists' expectations. Trump on Friday incorrectly called the revisions a 'mistake.' 'McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative. The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP.'' Trump said McEntarfer 'faked' the jobs numbers before the election to try to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris' chances in the 2024 presidential election. 'We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election, and there were other times. So, you know what I did? I fired her, and you know what? I did the right thing,' Trump told reporters Friday on the South Lawn. McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate 86-8 in January 2024 for a term of four years. CNN has reached out to McEntarfer for comment. Until Trump replaces McEntarfer, Deputy Commissioner William Wiatrowski will serve as Acting Commissioner, the administration said. Trump has previously criticized the BLS for its jobs data and revisions, and he told reporters Friday evening he's 'always had a problem with these numbers.' In 2016, during his first presidential campaign, Trump claimed that the unemployment rate was significantly higher than the BLS let on. In 2024, he accused former President Joe Biden's administration of orchestrating a cover-up, after the BLS reported that it had overcounted jobs by 818,000 over the previous 12 months. 'I was thinking about it this morning, before the numbers that came out. I said, 'Who is the person that does these numbers?' And then they gave me stats about before the election,' Trump said Friday. 'We need people that we can trust,' he added. But Trump and his administration have also praised the BLS data when it has been favorable to them. During Trump's first term, former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said in March 2017 that the jobs data was no longer 'phony' after the BLS issued a strong jobs report. And a month ago, current White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on social media that the economy had beat expectations for jobs in four straight BLS labor reports. The BLS is nonpartisan, and businesses and government officials rely on the accuracy of its data to make determinations about investment, hiring, spending and all sorts of key decisions. 'It's outrageous for anyone in government to question the integrity of the BLS,' said Jason Furman, a Harvard professor and former Obama economic adviser. 'Accurate statistics are essential to the economy.' Furman doubted that replacing McEntarfer would compromise the BLS, but he said even the possibility or appearance of that notion 'would be bad.' 'Countries that have tried to fake those statistics have often ended up with economic crises as a result,' Furman said. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said the BLS' data is at the 'highest standard,' and 'as accurate as it can be.' 'Anything that undermines that or even the perception of that high standard is deeply worrisome,' Zandi said. 'I've never seen anything even close to this.' At Moody's, Zandi said he has hired a number of former BLS economists whom he called 'fantastic.' 'They do great work,' Zandi said. 'They are critical to a well-functioning economy.' Democratic Virginia Senator Mark Warner accused Trump of working the referees. 'Firing the ump doesn't change the score,' Warner said in a statement. 'Americans deserve to know the truth about the state of the Trump economy.' But Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in a post on social media that she supports replacing McEntarfer. 'A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner,' Chavez-DeRemer said on X. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS.' The BLS jobs survey is widely considered by economists to be robust. It samples more than 100,000 businesses and government agencies each month, representing roughly 629,000 individual worksites. But, as part of larger cost-cutting taking place around practically every part of Trump's government, the BLS is laying off staff — and, as a result, reducing the scope of its work. For example, the BLS posted a notice in June stating it stopped collecting data for its Consumer Price Index in three cities (Lincoln, Nebraska; Buffalo, New York; and Provo, Utah) and increased 'imputations' for certain items (a statistical technique that, when boiled down to very rough terms, essentially means more educated guesses). That worried Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. In testimony before Congress in June, Powell said he believed the BLS data to be accurate, but he was upset about what could become a trend. 'I wouldn't say that I'm concerned about the data today, although there has been a very mild degradation of the scope of the surveys,' Powell said at the time, in response to a question about survey data quality. 'But I would say the direction of travel is something I'm concerned about.' This story has been updated with additional developments and context.

Are US tariffs starting to bite? Trump, in denial over rising prices, targets Fed chief Powell
Are US tariffs starting to bite? Trump, in denial over rising prices, targets Fed chief Powell

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are US tariffs starting to bite? Trump, in denial over rising prices, targets Fed chief Powell

Memo from the White House: inflation is 'right on track', it declared this week, citing the latest official data. Price growth is now 'very low', according to Donald Trump. The actual statistics paint a markedly different picture. Just six months after he regained power, in part by promising to rapidly reduce prices, Trump has presided over the chaotic rollout of tariffs on an array of overseas products that many have argued risk having the exact opposite effect. After a lull, the consumer price index (CPI) is back on the rise. In June, everything from fruit and washing machines to dresses and toys became more expensive. Businesses in the US and around the world have struggled to keep up with the Trump administration's erratic rollout of its aggressive trade strategy: the daily White House soap opera of warnings, threats, confusion, deadlines, delays and drama. Related: Can Trump fire Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell? Putting to one side the steady stream of twists, cliffhangers and all-caps declarations, each episode has pushed US tariffs higher. The overall average effective tariff rate is now set to hit 20.6%, according to the non-partisan The Budget Lab at Yale, its highest level since 1910. Eventually, someone has to foot the bill. Interactive By Trump's telling, the countries he targets will be forced to pay up. But in reality, tariffs are paid by the importer – US-based companies, in this case – and often passed on. Tariffs are a burden. One way or another, the impact typically is felt along each link of the supply chain, from the initial manufacturer to the customer who buys the finished product. 'All through that chain, people will be trying not to be the ones who pick up the cost,' noted Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, at a recent press conference. 'But ultimately, the cost of the tariff has to be paid and some of it will fall on the end consumer,' added Powell. 'We know that. That's what businesses say. That's what the data says from past evidence. So we know that's coming.' The effect is not immediate, though. It might take Trump a matter of minutes to announce a tariff on Truth Social, but the full effects can take months to work their way through the economy. Interactive And so Powell, and the Fed, has waited. For seven months now, at four consecutive meetings, the US central bank's policymakers have sat on their hands and kept interest rates on hold. After dramatically raising rates to combat inflation, they want to see how prices respond to Trump's tariffs before cutting them back. It's early days. Prices are still rising, and by more than the Fed's target of 2% each year. Officials want to know if Trump's plan will make them rise faster. The evidence has so far been mixed. While consumer price growth accelerated slightly between May and June, the annual rate of wholesale price growth slipped. The Fed's latest 'beige book', a semi-quarterly report of anecdotal economic insights from across the US, also released this week, described a relatively calm business landscape, despite persisting uncertainty. Assuming Trump's announced tariffs are enforced, they will dent US economic growth by 0.1 percentage point this year and 0.3 percentage points next, according to modeling by Oxford Economics. 'The drag on the economy is predominantly tied to core inflation, which will temporarily be 0.2bps [basis points] higher than in the current baseline,' said its chief US economist, Ryan Sweet. 'Though the boost to consumer prices is modest, it still reduces growth in real disposable income and, by extension, consumer spending.' Inside the Fed's headquarters in Washington DC, Powell and his officials are patiently monitoring the data while deciding their next steps. But less than a mile away, one man is not prepared to wait. In a series of increasingly bitter attacks, Trump has publicly lambasted Powell for being 'too late' to cut rates, and claimed the Fed's inaction is costing the US economy. He has called on Powell (whom he first tapped to be Fed chair in 2017) to quit, and unnerved Wall Street by raising the prospect of firing him. Bharat Ramamurti, former deputy director of the national economic council under Joe Biden, said: 'If you replace Jay Powell with someone who is clearly doing whatever Donald Trump wants them to do, expectations about what inflation is going to do in the long run are going to spike and that's going to create a real problem for the Fed in the long term.' The supreme court signaled it views the Fed chair as legally shielded from presidential removal, describing the central bank as a 'uniquely structured, quasi-private entity' in a May ruling about two of Trump's other firings. Trump is 'highly unlikely' to fire Powell, he has asserted, before floating one reason he might have to go: a $2.5bn renovation of the Fed's buildings. 'I mean, it's possible there's fraud involved,' the president claimed. Powell has reportedly asked the central bank's inspector general to review the project. Powell is due to finish his term in May, and has stressed he will remain in post until then. Advocates of the Fed's independence insist the more important question is not whether the president can remove him before then, but if he should. 'Once you no longer have the check of the central bank, which can raise interest rates as needed to curb inflation, you really start to raise the specter of runaway costs, runaway inflation, and it makes the US economy less attractive for investors domestically and abroad,' said Ramamurti. Inflation is 'right on track', according to his administration. Economists are already concerned it is tilting off course – and Trump won't rule out taking action that critics warn would shunt it off the rails altogether.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store