logo
America is going back on all the things that made it great. India's must seize the opportunity

America is going back on all the things that made it great. India's must seize the opportunity

Indian Express8 hours ago
An autoimmune disease occurs when your body's immune system treats its own healthy tissues as invaders and attacks them. America's policies currently targeting its three powerful muscles — universities, companies and immigration — create short-term pain for India in remittances, student enrolment, manufacturing jobs, foreign investment and exports. While these attacks feel like a passing shower, it's too early to conclude they aren't the climate change of Pax Americana ending. Regardless of how politics unfolds in America, India must seize the long-term economic opportunities by making itself stronger through a 180-day plan for deregulation for employers, decentralisation of power and deepening of human capital.
Some people date Pax Americana — US dominance in the world order — to World War II. I prefer January 1992, when President George H W Bush, referring to the Soviet Union's collapse, said, 'The last year has seen changes of biblical proportions. By the grace of God … a world once divided … now recognises one sole and preeminent power, the United States of America.' Despite this biblical hubris — and 9/11, two wars, a financial crisis and Covid since — the US has dominated in digital innovation, new drugs and stock market growth because it stole the best people in the world, made public investments in basic science and its companies globalised their supply chains. But America is now pouncing on all three.
America's universities are home to 50 per cent of Nobel Prize winners. Funding from the National Institutes of Health contributed to 99 per cent of all drugs approved between 2010 and 2019. In biotech, US government funding accounted for 38 per of total investment in 2024, almost as much as all global venture capital combined. Global consumers of medicine and information technology innovations (chips, internet, and GPS) have benefited from generous US government funding that supported cutting-edge basic science research and grants to academic scientists. Some of the backlash against universities is earned as some intolerant humanities professors with physics envy gift-wrapped their disciplines as social sciences, ignoring Richard Feynman's warning that physics would be impossible if electrons had feelings. This conversion of economics to mathematics, political science to statistics, and sociology/anthropology to racism paralleled a crisis in peer-reviewed, journal-published academic papers around replicability, scalability, and generalisability. It's also unclear whether a private university like Harvard, with an endowment of $50 billion, should take $90,000 per student per year in government funding.
President Donald Trump's economically illiterate advice to Walmart, a hyper-efficient American retailer with 3 per cent profit margins, to 'eat' his import tariffs is a long way from the global supply chains described in the new book Apple in China by Patrick McGee. Ignoring the author's patronising and unfair portrayal of Apple's motivations, the book insightfully demonstrates how the globalisation of manufacturing supply chains became the most significant factor in reducing global poverty by attracting investment, training managers and accelerating productivity. India came late to manufacturing supply chains; only one in 10 of our workers works in a factory. However, China's recent dismissal of Deng Xiaoping's economic genius presents India with a manufacturing opportunity to attract factory refugees despite America's tariff drama.
If demography is destiny, immigration has ensured America doesn't face the problems of Japan (adult diapers outsell baby diapers) or China (Nigeria may have more people by 2060). Approximately 14 per cent of Americans are foreign-born, and immigrants, including their US-born children, account for 27 per cent of the country's population. These numbers conceal the disproportionate contributions of Indian immigrants to new company formation, university teaching, scientific research, technology innovation, and taxes. India's improbable success in two Indian industries — economists never envisioned poor countries exporting software and medicines — benefited from America's skilled worker visa regime and brain circulation. A new book by Srinath Raghavan of Ashoka University on the Indira Gandhi years suggests they represent conjoined crises of hegemony, representation, and governance. This may also explain America's political backlash. Universities became idealists with illusions. The geographic (rural) and sectoral (manufacturing) concentration of wage declines were ignored. Liberals denied that illegal migration would hurt legal migration, a path to citizenship is not necessary for a path to work. And migrants are easier to vilify than technology.
The political popularity of America's economic irrationality — Make America Great Again, feels like Make America White Again —suggests healing will take time. But Indians showing schadenfreude at America's challenges should pause. Despite our short-term pain from the US's actions, its democracy remains the best partner for India's students, emigrants, investment needs and exports. Suppose the government-funded American research engine in basic science suffers. It's hard to imagine the Indian state or pharma, software, and manufacturing companies responding with resources of the same intensity and impact. Let's compare America to the alternative; imagine the tyranny and soullessness of a global order hinged on China.
Every problem is an opportunity. India must capitalise on this one in three ways. First, cut employer compliance, filing and criminal provisions. Second, shift some of Delhi's power (funds, functions and functionaries) to state and city governments. Third, while the troubles of America's Ivy League universities are probably temporary, granting poorna swaraj to IISC, IITs, IIMs, and Ashoka to innovate, disrupt and teach would accelerate their disruption of global university rankings.
All three reforms are hard. But as a song from the movie Pink reminded us, Jo tujh se lipti bediyaan samajh na inko vastra tu/ ye bediyaan pighal ke banale in ko shastra tu (Don't mistake the chains that bind you for clothes/ Melt these chains into weapons). In policy, there is no such thing as being too late, but there is a 'fierce urgency of now'. Success is far from guaranteed but the moment feels auspicious.
The writer is co-founder of Teamlease Services
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After adding $250 Integrity Fee, US says visa screening doesn't end at approval; embassy warns of deportation
After adding $250 Integrity Fee, US says visa screening doesn't end at approval; embassy warns of deportation

New Indian Express

time14 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

After adding $250 Integrity Fee, US says visa screening doesn't end at approval; embassy warns of deportation

In a sharp escalation of immigration enforcement, the US Embassy in India has warned that visa holders who violate American laws or immigration rules could face visa revocation and deportation, signalling a tougher stance under President Donald Trump's second term. In a public advisory issued Saturday, the embassy said, 'US visa screening does not stop after a visa is issued. We continuously check visa holders to ensure they follow all US laws and immigration rules, and we will revoke their visas and deport them if they don't.' The statement, posted on social media platform X, comes amid a sweeping overhaul of immigration policy that places increased emphasis on continuous monitoring, especially of student and exchange visitors.

Trump signals support for new Israel attack if Iran moves toward bomb
Trump signals support for new Israel attack if Iran moves toward bomb

Mint

time20 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump signals support for new Israel attack if Iran moves toward bomb

WASHINGTON—Sitting across from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday at the White House, President Trump said he hoped there would be no more U.S. bombing of Iran. 'I can't imagine wanting to do that," Trump said. Netanyahu later told him in private, however, that if Iran resumed moving toward a nuclear weapon, Israel would carry out further military strikes. Trump responded that he favored a diplomatic settlement with Tehran, but didn't otherwise object to the Israeli plan. Their talks, described to The Wall Street Journal by senior U.S. and Israeli officials, underscored the conflicting calculations all three countries are facing since last month's Israeli and U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities. Trump is counting on the threat of further attacks to pressure Tehran into an agreement that would foreclose it from building a nuclear weapon. Israel is skeptical a diplomatic settlement would prevent Iran from secretly rushing toward a nuclear weapon. And Tehran is demanding guarantees it won't face more bombing in return for resuming talks with Washington. Israel wouldn't necessarily seek explicit American approval to resume strikes on Iran, a senior Israel official said. But depending on how significant the Iranian attempt to rekindle its nuclear program was, Netanyahu could face pushback from Trump to preserve the diplomatic track with Tehran. For Iran's leaders, the stakes are even more momentous: If they rebuff Trump's demand to give up nuclear enrichment and resume their nuclear activities, renewed attacks by Israel and even the U.S. could threaten the regime's survival. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, like other top Iranian leaders, in recent days has said Tehran is open to resuming nuclear talks with the U.S. with assurances there will be no renewed attacks during the negotiations. Iran will insist on what it says is its right to enrich uranium, he added. The White House declined to comment on Trump's talks with Netanyahu. The Iranian mission to the United Nations didn't respond to requests for comment. President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a dinner at the White House earlier in July. Before last month's strikes, Israel assessed that Iran could produce a crude nuclear device within a matter of months and construct a usable weapon within a year. Top Israeli officials said they thought the U.S. and Israeli military strikes had set back Tehran's ability to build a nuclear weapon by up to two additional years, matching a recent Pentagon assessment. Israel has concluded that some of Tehran's stockpile of near-bomb-grade enriched uranium at Isfahan survived last month's attacks and that with considerable effort Iran could recover some of the fissile material from that site, the senior Israeli official said. Tehran wouldn't be able to retrieve the uranium from its two other nuclear sites at Natanz and Fordow because of the damage inflicted on those facilities by U.S. bunker-buster bombs, the official said. Any effort by Iran to retrieve the uranium from Isfahan or revive the decimated nuclear program would be quickly detected by Israel, the senior Israeli official said. 'The Iranians are going to be extremely cautious," said Dennis Ross, who served as a senior official on Middle East issues during Democratic and Republican administrations. 'They are going to take the threats the Israelis make very seriously." Israel can prevent Iran from sprinting toward a bomb in the short term, the senior Israeli official said, including by continuing covert operations targeting top Iranian nuclear scientists and other national leaders that already have inflicted major blows on Iran, the official said. The danger for Trump is that Israel could effectively dictate the next moves against Iran, analysts said. 'My sense is that Trump mostly wants the Iran problem to just go away," said Gabriel Noronha, who worked on Iran policy at the State Department in the first Trump administration. 'He's clear that there should be no enrichment or nuclear weapons. But he's willing to be flexible on other things." Many experts think that if Iran does reconstitute its nuclear program, it won't do so overtly through declared facilities but rather by using secret, underground enrichment sites to produce fissile material and to work on the technically complex aspects of building a weapon. Israel has intelligence on where Tehran may secretly attempt to revive its nuclear work, the first senior Israeli official said. But Israel isn't known to possess its own bunker-busting bombs that can penetrate deep underground where Iran often houses centrifuges and other nuclear facilities. No official date for formal talks between the U.S. and Iran has been set. Western diplomats say Iran is still debating how to proceed. The strikes almost certainly locked in the core Trump demand that Iran end its uranium- enrichment program as part of any deal. Washington might feel it has the military leverage to expand its goals, including by pressing Tehran to agree to tight limits on its missile program or cut ties with regional militias. The Isfahan facility in Iran. 'It was tough enough to achieve an agreement before the strikes. Now it will be tougher still," said Dan Shapiro, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel who was part of the U.S. team that negotiated with Iran under the Biden administration. 'Trump can't back down on zero enrichment, and Iran will feel it can't concede that as a result of being attacked." Iran's move to suspend cooperation with the U.N. atomic agency needs to be addressed if Washington hopes to have long-term, on-the-ground monitoring of Iran's enrichment and weaponization work. The two sides also need to agree how to identify and deal with Iran's intact stockpile of enriched uranium. Iran's missile attacks on Israel proved Tehran still poses significant offensive threats in the region. Ali Vaez, Iran project director at conflict-resolution organization Crisis Group, says the group of Iranian officials arguing for serious diplomatic negotiations are in a minority following the attacks. He says there is even greater mistrust of Trump and concern that he will change the goal posts for what Washington wants. Seeking a deal at any price—including one which would end Iran's enrichment program—is unlikely, he said. European governments have reiterated their threat to reimpose sanctions lifted under the 2015 nuclear deal unless Iran cooperates with the International Atomic Energy Agency. An October deadline looms for Britain, France and Germany to decide whether to snap the old sanctions back in place. Iran has said such a move could prompt them to withdraw from the nonproliferation treaty, which bars Tehran from working on a nuclear weapon. Write to Alexander Ward at and Laurence Norman at

Deutsche Telekom Faces Backlash Over T-Mobile's Diversity Program Cuts Amid Trump Pressure, ETHRWorld
Deutsche Telekom Faces Backlash Over T-Mobile's Diversity Program Cuts Amid Trump Pressure, ETHRWorld

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Deutsche Telekom Faces Backlash Over T-Mobile's Diversity Program Cuts Amid Trump Pressure, ETHRWorld

Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETHRWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETHRWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles. Frankfurt, Jul 10, 2025 -German telecommunications giant Deutsche Telekom came under pressure Thursday after US subsidiary T-Mobile agreed to scrap its diversity programmes in an apparent concession to US President Donald 230,000 people signed a petition launched by activist group Campact calling on T-Mobile to keep the programmes and demand that Telekom's board take a public stand against the Trump administration 's "attempts at intimidation"."If Telekom wants to convincingly fight for diversity and against discrimination, then it has to defend its values -- especially when they come under pressure," the petition said.A spokeswoman for Deutsche Telekom told AFP that the group was "inclusive" but had to follow the rules and regulations of the countries they operated in."T-Mobile US, an American and legally independent company, operates under the legal framework applicable in the United States," she said, adding that the company wanted a "more nuanced discussion" of the row broke out after the head of the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Brendan Carr, published a letter from T-Mobile in which the firm promised to end its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives."T-Mobile will no longer have any individual roles or teams focused on DEI", the letter said, adding that it would also remove "any references to DEI on its websites" and in future -- whose agency is currently deciding whether to approve two major T-Mobile deals in the United States -- said in a post on the X platform that the move was a victory for "common sense" and for advocates say programmes aimed at helping or connecting specific groups, such as black or gay Americans, can boost fairness at the say they undermine equality of opportunity and stop merit being the only consideration in hiring Trump administration has moved against the programmes in the federal government as well as its contractors, and major US corporates including Meta, Target and McDonald's have either abolished or scaled them back since Trump took

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store