Rand Paul Seeks Information on U.K. Requests for Americans' Private Data
"Recent reports suggest that authorities in the United Kingdom (UK) have issued an order to a U.S. company requiring access to all end-to-end encrypted materials of UK users," wrote Paul, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi. "This action raises significant questions about the integrity of U.S. user data in the context of the Cloud Act and UK statutes."
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act, passed in 2018 as part of a 2,000-plus page omnibus spending bill, requires tech companies to provide information about customers to the government when asked, even if that information is stored outside the United States. The Department of Justice later entered into a data sharing agreement with the U.K. under the CLOUD Act.
When the bill came up for a vote, Paul tweeted an article in which American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) legislative counsel Neema Singh Guliani wrote that "Congress should reject the CLOUD Act because it fails to protect human rights or Americans' privacy…gives up their constitutional role, and gives far too much power to the attorney general, the secretary of state, the president and foreign governments."
In his letter to Bondi, Paul relayed that the U.K.'s demand was "the latest concerning attempt by law enforcement entities to obtaining 'backdoor' access to private user context under the pretext of national security."
To that end, he asked for unredacted copies of any requests from the U.K. government for information about U.S.-based companies—known as a "technical capability notice"—received since August 2024. Paul also asked for "records related to any confidentiality agreements or nondisclosure requirements applicable to a U.S. company as it relates to actions authorized pursuant to the US–UK Cloud Act Agreement."
Under the U.K.'s Investigatory Powers Act—nicknamed the Snooper's Charter—Britain can request information about a company's users and forbid the company from disclosing the order's existence.
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal hears complaints about U.K. government surveillance; in a letter last week, five U.S. lawmakers, led by Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.), asked the tribunal to "remove the cloak of secrecy related to notices given to American technology companies by the United Kingdom."
In fact, the U.K.'s actions are already chilling American speech. "Apple has informed Congress that had it received a technical capabilities notice, it would be barred by U.K. law from telling Congress whether or not it received such a notice from the U.K., as the press has reported," the letter noted. "Google also recently told Senator Wyden's office that, if it had received a technical capabilities notice, it would be prohibited from disclosing that fact."
The post Rand Paul Seeks Information on U.K. Requests for Americans' Private Data appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
42 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Here's How a National Trust Charter Could Boost Circle's Stablecoin Ambitions
Circle Internet (CRCL) has applied to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish a national trust bank, aiming to further strengthen its stablecoin infrastructure. The move marks Circle's strategic step to 'align with emerging U.S. regulation for the issuance and operation of dollar-denominated payment stablecoins,' according to Co-Founder, Chairman and CEO Jeremy Allaire. CRCL stock is up 2.6% in pre-market trading at the time of writing, following the news. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. If Circle's application is approved, the company would be eligible to act as a custodian for its own reserves as well as hold crypto assets for institutional clients. Circle had one of the most successful IPOs (Initial Public Offering) this year, with its share price rising over 480% from its initial listing price of $31 per share on June 5. Bank Charter Enhances USDC Framework Circle is the issuer of the world's second-largest stablecoin, USDC. The company is seeking to create a national trust charter, called First National Digital Currency Bank, N.A., which would enable it to operate as a federally regulated trust institution. The charter would be subject to oversight by the OCC. If approved, the trust bank would oversee the management of the USDC reserve on behalf of Circle's U.S. issuer. If the OCC approves Circle's application, it would further solidify the issuance and circulation of USDC, the world's largest regulated payment stablecoin. This approval would also enable Circle to offer digital asset custody services to institutional customers. Allaire stated that creating a national digital currency trust bank aligns with the company's goal 'to build an internet financial system that is transparent, efficient, and accessible.' Moreover, the broader issuance and adoption of U.S. dollar-denominated payment stablecoins will enhance the scale and resilience of the U.S. dollar. Notably, Circle is already poised to benefit from the passing of the GENIUS Act. By becoming a federally regulated trust institution, Circle would be able to meet all the requirements under the proposed Act, which aims to integrate digital assets into the traditional financial system. Is Circle Stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell? Analysts remain cautious about Circle's long-term stock trajectory, given that its stock price has already gained significantly since its IPO. On TipRanks, CRCL stock has a Hold consensus rating based on five Buys, five Holds, and two Sell ratings. Also, the average Circle price target of $185.73 implies 2.5% upside potential from current levels.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Special primary election set to take place for Arizona congressional seat: Here's what to know
PHOENIX - In July, voters in parts of Arizona will take place in the first of two special elections that will select a replacement for former Congressman Raúl Grijalva in Congress. Here's what to know about the election. The House seat for the state's 7th Congressional District is up for election. The backstory The elections were triggered by the death of Raúl Grijalva in March. Grijalva, who announced his cancer diagnosis in April 2024, died as a result of treatment complications. Grijalva, the son of a Mexican immigrant, was first elected to the House in 2002. Prior to his time in Congress, Grijalva served in various public offices for decades, including the Tucson Unified School District Governing Board and the Pima County Board of Supervisors. Arizona's 7th Congressional District, according to a map prepared by the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, covers parts of the West Valley, parts of Tucson and parts of Yuma, along with the cities of Gila Bend and Nogales. What we know Per a proclamation made by Governor Katie Hobbs on March 15, 2025, the special primary election for Grijalva's seat will take place on July 15, with a special general election to take place on September 23. Under Arizona law, a special primary and special general election must be called because the vacancy happened within six months of the next general election. Arizona's next general election is set to take place in November 2026. Big picture view According to the Arizona Secretary of State's Office website, there are 12 candidates in the primary election. Of the candidates, six identify as Democrats, while another three identify as Republicans. The other four are write-in candidates. Deja Foxx Adelita Grijalva Patrick Harris, Sr. Daniel Hernandez Jose Malvido, Jr. Daniel Francis Butierez, Sr. Jorge Rivas Jimmy Rodriguez Andy Fernandez (Write-In) Eduardo Quintana (Write-In) Gary Swing (Write-In) Richard Grayson (Write-In) Per the Arizona Secretary of State's website, the deadline for voter registration in the special primary was June 16, so it is too late to register to vote for the special primary. However, it is not too late to register to vote in the special general election, as that deadline is 11:59 p.m. on August 25. Dig deeper According to only voters who reside within the boundaries of the state's 7th Congressional District will be eligible to vote in the special primary and general election. For the special primary election, the website states that eligible voters who have registered a political party preference will receive the ballot for their respective party, while registered independents can contact their county recorder to select a Democratic or Republican primary ballot. Independent voters, according to the website, cannot select a ballot for either the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, or the No Labels Party, as all three parties are conducting closed primaries. While people can vote by early ballot for this primary, the deadline to request an early ballot has passed. Voters can check their county recorder's office for more information on where and how they can vote in the special primary. County Election Officials Contact Information - Arizona Secretary of State's Office Arizona's Citizens Clean Elections Commission has held two separate debates for the Republican and Democratic candidates in the primary, and they can be watched below. What's next The special general election, as mentioned above, will take place on September 23, and early voting for that election will begin on August 27.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Colorado says Republican budget bill will cut billions in federal funding for Medicaid in the state
State says Republican budget bill will cut billions in federal funding for Medicaid in Colorado State says Republican budget bill will cut billions in federal funding for Medicaid in Colorado State says Republican budget bill will cut billions in federal funding for Medicaid in Colorado Colorado is expected to lose up to $2.5 billion dollars annually in federal Medicaid funding under the Republican Party's massive tax and spending cuts bill. The measure passed the U.S. Senate Tuesday after Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. It would extend Republican 2017 tax cuts permanently, increase funding for defense and immigration enforcement and cut funding for Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates it would increase the deficit by about $3 trillion over ten years. The bill now goes back to the U.S. House of Representatives for approval. Among the differences between the Senate and House versions are changes to Medicaid, which provides health coverage for one in four Coloradans. The Congressional Budget Office says the Senate bill will reduce spending on Medicaid by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade, and maybe nowhere will those cuts be felt more than in rural Colorado, where half of all hospitals are already operating in the red. Lincoln Health in Hugo is among them. It is the only hospital on the I-70 corridor for 160 miles. The survival of those who live in the area depends on the survival of the hospital, which also operates family practice clinics, a nursing home and assisted living center. Lincoln Health CEO Kevin Stansbury CBS CEO Kevin Stansbury says those services are at risk under the bill. "We will have to close down some services," Stansbury told CBS Colorado. "And the challenge will be what services are not essential." Stansbury says 80% of the patients at Lincoln Health are on Medicaid or Medicare. The Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF) -- which administers Medicaid -- says the bill would mean a loss of between $900 million and $2.5 billion a year in federal funding for Medicaid. It says the state would lose another $550 million a year due to a provision that caps a fee many states assess on hospitals at 3.5%. The bill also creates new verification requirements that HCPF says could cost the state $57 million to administer. It says the red tape will also result in thousands of Coloradans losing coverage. The bill requires recipients to provide proof they're going to school, volunteering, or working every month, and provide proof of their income and citizenship every six months. Stansbury says some recipients in Lincoln County don't have internet and will need to travel 80 miles to Fort Morgan to re-certify in person. He says many will drop off the rolls and end up uninsured. "Our patients have to travel to Fort Morgan for in-person revalidation of their Medicaid," Stansbury explained. "You're cutting access to care, which ironically could drive up the cost of care and put more financial stress on hospitals." Stansbury says Lincoln Health expects to lose about 25% of its Medicaid reimbursement under the bill. While it creates a new $50 billion rural hospital fund, he says it's unclear who would qualify for the money and how it would be distributed. "Where you live shouldn't determine if you live," Stansbury said. He notes many of the people who live in Lincoln County are conservatives. "I'm not sure that's what people out here voted for," Stansbury said. "I don't think they voted to have their hospital decimated." Lincoln Health may have to scale back services, but Stansbury says the hospital will survive. "This is a mission for us, and we're going to stick here. We're going to provide care to our patients," Stansbury said. "All we're asking is that we get paid equitably for it." The Senate dropped a provision in the House bill that would have cut federal Medicaid funding by 10% in states like Colorado that use their own tax dollars to cover Medicaid for non-citizens. The bill could also impact Medicare reimbursement. Because it adds to the deficit, it triggers the "Pay As You Go Act," which makes automatic cuts to federal spending. Medicare reimbursement could drop by an estimated 4%. Stansbury says rural hospitals are not only underpaid by Medicaid and Medicare, but by commercial insurers. He says Lincoln Health receives 100% less reimbursement from commercial carriers than hospitals in the Denver metro area. Both the Senate and House bills allow a subsidy program enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic to expire at the end of the year. It caps premiums for those who buy insurance on the Health Exchange at 8.5% of a household's income. People who live in rural or mountain communities could see their premiums double.
