3 democrats released after serving jail terms in Hong Kong's largest nat. security trial
Frankie Fung, a pro-democracy activist, returned to his Kowloon City home in a police vehicle on Monday morning, according to an HKFP reporter at the scene. Fung was seen carrying a bag of belongings and did not respond to questions from reporters.
Two other activists, Carol Ng and Lau Chak-fung, arrived home in police vehicles on Monday morning, local media reported. Lau was seen entering his residential building carrying two bags of belongings, also without responding to questions from reporters.
The trio, who had been detained since 2021, were sentenced in November to four years and five months in jail after pleading guilty to subversion under the Beijing-imposed national security law.
They were among a group of 47 opposition figures charged with the offence. A total of 45 were convicted in May last year, while two were acquitted.
The case revolves around an unofficial primary election in July 2020 that aimed to help the pro-democracy camp win a controlling majority in Hong Kong's legislature.
The 47 opposition figures were accused of conspiring to subvert state power after they planned that, once a legislative majority was obtained, they would threaten to indiscriminately veto the government budget to force it to accede to political demands, such as universal suffrage.
In the verdict, three trial judges ruled the scheme would create a 'constitutional crisis.'
After Fung, Ng and Lau were released on Monday, a total of 11 democrats in the case have completed their prison terms, including ex-lawmaker Claudia Mo in late April and LGBTQ activist Jimmy Sham in late May.
Meanwhile, 34 others are still serving their sentences, including ex-law professor Benny Tai, who was sentenced to 10 years behind bars – the heaviest penalty in the case.
The Court of Appeal earlier this month heard the appeal submissions from 12 democrats in the case, including ex-lawmaker 'Long Hair' Leung Kwok-hung and journalist-turned-activist Gwyneth Ho, as well as from the government, which sought to overturn the acquittal of Lawrence Lau.
The judges presiding over the appeals hearing said they would rule within nine months.
Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
36 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong public universities agree to return more funding if asked
Hong Kong's eight public universities have promised to return more recurrent funding allocated to them if asked by the government within the next three academic years and to follow Beijing's guidance. In new documents signed with their funding body, the universities also agreed that the government had the right to reduce the amount of their regular allocation if they failed to meet their commitments or had any major deficiency in institutional governance. The University Grants Committee (UGC), a government advisory body that allocates funding for higher education institutions, uploaded the university accountability agreements it signed with each institution in June. In an unprecedented move in February, the government revealed in its budget that the eight public universities would be asked to return HK$4 billion (US$509.6 million) from their reserves that they had saved from previous government funding. Earlier, university chiefs had indicated a willingness to do so. The budget also stated that authorities would only offer the eight public universities HK$68.1 billion in the coming three school years, falling short of the HK$70.9 billion proposed by the UGC, resulting in a 4 per cent average reduction rate. The new clauses specified that the government would not only be allowed to claw back the money, but also exert fuller control of the funding granted to the universities.
HKFP
2 hours ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong slams countries over ‘smears' against bounties targeting overseas activists
The Hong Kong government has said it 'strongly opposed and disapproved of smears with distorted facts' after countries such as the US, Canada, and Australia criticised the city's fresh bounties targeting overseas activists. In a statement on Sunday, the Hong Kong government said that 'such foreign government officials and politicians, as well as anti-China organisations, turned a blind eye to illegal acts of criminals' and 'also deliberately smeared and spread irresponsible remarks, in an attempt to mislead the public.' On Friday, Hong Kong national security police announced bounties for information leading to the arrest of 19 overseas activists for their link to political group the 'Hong Kong Parliament,' accusing them of committing subversion under the Beijing-imposed national security law. A bounty of HK$200,000 each was offered for 15 members of the group, while the remaining four were already wanted for HK$1 million each. 'The 'Hong Kong Parliament' is an organisation which aims to subvert state power; its objectives include promoting 'self-determination', promulgating the so-called 'Hong Kong Constitution', and overthrowing or undermining' the governments in China and Hong Kong, the statement also said. 'No country or organisation should harbour criminals nor try to exonerate these people with different excuses.' Criticism against bounties The Sunday statement was issued after senior US, Canadian, and Australian officials levelled criticism against the bounties. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday condemned the move by the Hong Kong authorities, calling the bounties 'transnational repression.' 'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational repression,' Rubio said in a statement. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil,' he added. In Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand and Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree issued a joint statement on Saturday condemning the bounties. 'This attempt by Hong Kong authorities to conduct transnational repression abroad, including by issuing threats, intimidation or coercion against Canadians or those in Canada, will not be tolerated,' the statement read. 'The actions taken by Hong Kong threaten the sovereignty of Canada and security of the people in this country,' the statement continued. The Canadian officials also said the bounties were 'being amplified in an inauthentic and coordinated way, through an online network of accounts that are targeting Chinese-speaking communities.' Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on Saturday on X: 'Australia strongly objects to Hong Kong authorities issuing arrest warrants for pro-democracy advocates in Australia. Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy.' The Hong Kong government on Saturday also issued a statement opposing remarks by UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who described the bounties as 'another example of transnational repression.' A total of 34 people residing overseas are currently placed on a wanted list by Hong Kong national security police. Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs.
HKFP
2 hours ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong urged to strengthen climate action after ‘historic' ruling by UN court
The Hong Kong government has been urged to strengthen its policies to tackle the climate crisis following a key advisory ruling by the United Nations' top court last week. During some seven months of deliberation, 15 judges at the International Court of Justice were tasked with considering the 'obligations of states in respect to climate change.' According to the landmark ruling, countries are legally bound to reduce their emissions, as well as compensate those affected by the climate crisis. It asserted that there was an 'urgent and existential threat' to humanity, with greenhouse gas emissions 'unequivocally' caused by human activity. 'The consequences of climate change are severe and far-reaching. They affect both natural ecosystems and human populations. These consequences underscore the urgent and existential threat posed by climate change,' Judge Yuji Iwasawa, the ICJ president, said on Wednesday. Litigants can now cite the advisory opinion in future climate-related litigation. Aim for 1.5°C target Greenpeace Hong Kong told HKFP on Thursday that 'Hong Kong as a responsible city, must also strengthen its policies to support the globe to achieve the more ambitious 1.5°C target in the coming update of the Climate Action Plan.' Launched in 2021, Climate Action Plan 2050 (CAP2050) lays out multiple decarbonisation strategies – such as net-zero electricity generation and green transport – with an aim to achieve carbon neutrality before 2050. Net zero refers to achieving a balance between the production and removal of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere in order to slow the progression of global warming. The overarching goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement, adopted by 195 parties at the UN Climate Change Conference, is to limit the global temperature rise to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. In the long term, further efforts are required in the pursuit of a 1.5°C target. A spokesperson for Ark Eden, an eco-education centre on Lantau Island, called the climate change ruling a 'historic milestone,' particularly for biodiversity advocacy and for the potential impact on future environmental litigation in local courts. 'By affirming the legal right to a healthy environment, it places a binding obligation on all states to protect the natural world – a powerful reinforcement of every citizen's right to demand climate justice,' said the Ark Eden spokesperson. 'For species on the brink, this ruling could be a game-changer.' Public readiness Civic Exchange, a local public-policy think tank, said that Hong Kong has shown steady climate progress, such as through the city's CAP2025. Civic Exchange Executive Director Lawrence Iu told HKFP that, on a regional scale, the city made some of the most significant greenhouse gas emission reductions in Asia. 'Between 2014 and 2022, Hong Kong reduced its [greenhouse gas] emissions by 24%, with electricity-related emissions dropping by nearly 33%,' he wrote. Iu also said that, if the government were to become more ambitious in their climate policies and actions, Hongkongers should be 'prepared to shoulder some of the associated costs.' 'Ultimately, Hong Kong's ability to move faster will hinge not only on technical feasibility or government leadership, but also on public readiness to participate in and support the transition,' he added. Others, such as Paul G. Harris, professor of global environmental studies at the Education University of Hong Kong, welcomed the ICJ's ruling, but were more sceptical about how the crisis would be addressed locally. 'First, Hong Kong is not a state, so this ruling, at least for now, is going to be interpreted by [local] officials as not applying to Hong Kong,' he said. Despite having plans to slowly cut the city's greenhouse gas emissions, climate change is not an urgent priority for the government, Harris added. 'I don't think the ICJ ruling will do much, if anything, to cause the [Hong Kong] government to prioritise the climate crisis.'
