ICE agent impersonations spike in wake of immigration crackdown
(NewsNation) — Impersonators pretending to be immigration agents are spreading fear among migrants already uncertain about their future in the country.
Cases of illegitimate Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been reported across the country. Some have been charged with federal criminal crimes of impersonating a federal law enforcement agent.
In Florida, a 23-year-old man was recently arrested and charged when police said that he claimed to be an ICE agent and threatened to deport two men after he pulled their vehicle over and demanded their identification.
Justice Roberts temporarily halts deadline to return mistakenly deported man
A 33-year-old South Carolina man was arrested in January after he was accused of stopping a vehicle with Latino men inside and claimed to be with ICE. Video of the encounter involving Sean Michael Johnson allegedly claiming that Latinos were 'going back to Mexico' went viral.
Johnson was charged with three counts of kidnapping, impersonating a law enforcement officer, petty larceny and assault and battery.
In North Carolina, a 37-year-old man purported to be an ICE agent and allegedly sexually assaulted a woman at a local hotel, saying he would have her deported if she did not have sex with him, local affiliate WBTV reported.
In North Dakota, a man posing as an ICE agent walked an inmate out of a local jail after telling officials he was there to pick him up. Jail officials only learned of the mistake when the real immigration officer showed up.
But such cases are only hurting legitimate efforts by ICE, which reported in March it had arrested more than 32,800 people in the first 50 days of President Donald Trump's second term in the White House.
'ICE works very hard on its image – an image that is constantly being torn apart by the open border and (the) Abolish ICE movement,' John Fabbricatore, a retired chief of the Denver ICE field office, told NewsNation. 'Impersonators tarnish that image and create an even more resistive relationship with ICE.'
California Attorney General Rob Bonta recently warned residents to protect themselves after new reports of ICE impersonators and other immigration-related scams were reported.
Bonta said that 'bad actors' and scammers have sought to capitalize on 'the fear and uncertainty created by the Trump administration's racist rhetoric and destructive immigration policies.'
Last month, Bonta warned Californians about an uptick in criminal activity and scams related to immigration enforcement.
Cartels targeting US firms in Mexico for theft, extortion
'Let me be clear: If you seek to scam or otherwise take advantage of California's immigrant communities, you will be held accountable,' Bonta said. 'My office will continue to ensure our laws are fully enforced and the rights of California's immigrants are respected and protected.'
In February, Temple University officials in Philadelphia warned students after three people — including two who were wearing black T-shirts with the words 'Police' and 'ICE' printed on them — attempted to enter a university residence hall but were denied access. Police are looking for a third person seen on camera recording interactions between the three people and Temple students.
Two students were suspended in the incident, and one of the students was charged with impersonating a public servant. School officials said harassment of members of the university community will not be tolerated.
After Johnson was arrested near Charleston, South Carolina, earlier this year, The Charleston Hispanic Association told local affiliate WCIV that concerns have increased over migrant safety. Johnson's family, meanwhile, has told police officials that he struggles with mental health issues.
'The big fear when it all started is that ICE is after anybody and almost sounds like racial profiling,' Enrique Grace, the organization's chief financial officer, told the station. 'If you look Latin, we're going to stop you. If you look like an immigrant, we're going to stop you. And that's not the case. And it's kind of gone overboard.'
Fabbricatore, the retired ICE field office chief, said that impersonators can be very damaging to legitimate ICE activity. An ICE spokesman said that the agency 'strongly condemns' the impersonation of its agents and that those doing so can face local, state and federal charges.
The increase in ICE attention and agent impersonations has put the onus on immigrant communities to protect migrants who may become targets for bad actors, Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh, an associate policy analyst with the Migration Policy Institute, said.
'Chapo' associate 'Leo' arrested in Mexico City after years on the run
In addition to migrants already being aware of increased immigration enforcement by federal agencies, ICE impersonators have added to the growing list of concerns, she told NewsNation.
Putzel-Kavanaugh, like Bonta, said migrants need to know their rights and to understand how they can protect themselves by asking an agent for their badge number and name before cooperating.
Still, anxiety remains high even among those who have been instructed about how to handle themselves during encounters with ICE.
'The increase in enforcement operations that we've seen and surely, the increase in (migrant) arrests has already caused an immense chilling effect on immigrant communities,' Putzel-Kavanaugh said. 'So, this adds certainly another layer to that chilling effect that already exists. This isn't necessarily new, but it adds to a culture of concern and fear that people are living in.'
The Associated Press contributed to this story.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Immigrant detentions in New Jersey and Pennsylvania hit highs not seen since 2011
The number of individuals arrested and held in New Jersey and Pennsylvania detention centers pending deportation hearings has risen to levels not seen since the early years of the Obama presidency, according to recently released government data. The detained population in New Jersey surged 451% since the end of April, when only 65 newly-arrested individuals were detained while awaiting deportation hearings. Pennsylvania's detained population crossed the 300 mark in March for the first time since 2011. As of May 31, ICE held 358 and 353 people, respectively, in New Jersey and Pennsylvania detention facilities who were detained that month as their deportation cases wound their way through immigration court. New Jersey's figure represents the highest number of such detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 14 years while Pennsylvania's is the highest in 16. The figures reflect the number of individuals detained in a given month pending removal proceedings who remain in detention at the end of the month in which they were detained. They are an undercount of detained individuals as they do not include people in so-called "expedited removal," a process by which immigration officers can deport noncitizens from the United States without a hearing before an immigration judge. President Donald Trump expanded the use of expedited removal upon returning to office. The figures were published by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, or TRAC, a data gathering and research organization which regularly acquires and analyzes such data from the Executive Office for Immigration Review, or EOIR, and ICE through Freedom of Information Act requests and litigation. The data do not indicate which centers held the individuals but the 1,000-bed Delaney Hall immigration detention center in Newark began housing migrants on May 1. Jenny Garcia, a communications associate at Detention Watch Network, a national coalition that supports local communities trying to shut down local centers, has no doubt the increase is at least partly tied to the facility's opening. "When a detention center opens up within a state - within a community - ICE is going to fill those beds with local people - people in the tri-State Area," Garcia said. The Delaney facility, located in an industrial stretch along the Passaic River, has been dogged by controversy since before it even opened. The administration of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka in March filed a lawsuit and issued a stop-work order against GEO Group, the private prison company which operates the center under a 15-year contract with ICE worth $1 billion, claiming the company blocked city building inspectors from conducting required inspections. Baraka, a candidate in this month's Democratic primary for the state's governorship, was later arrested at a protest outside the center shortly after it began operating. Baraka is currently suing New Jersey U.S. Attorney Alina Habba for "false arrest and malicious prosecution." The U.S. Attorney's Office last week charged four Delaney Hall detainees with attempting to escape earlier in the month amid reports of late-arriving meals and other poor conditions at the facility. Garcia, whose group has held daily vigils outside of Delaney Hall since the center began holding migrants, said detainees have suffered from a lack of medical care and food, alternately freezing and boiling temperatures, and access to family and legal counsel. "We've seen clergy get denied. We've seen families get denied," Garcia said. "And, very concerningly, we've seen many, many lawyers get denied visits with their clients." A spokesperson for ICE's Newark field office did not respond to an email seeking comment on conditions at the facility and whether the agency has been making an effort to detain more individuals now that it's open. While Pennsylvania did not experience the same month-over-month surge in detentions that New Jersey did, the 353 individuals held in detention pending removal proceedings is the highest number since September 2009. The state's detained population has increased every month since last December and crossed the 300 mark in March for the first time since 2011. Peter Pedemonti, the co-director of the New Sanctuary Movement of Philadelphia, decried the increased detentions. "I hope everybody can look at those numbers and agree that those are 353 people who have been abducted out of our communities," Pedemonti said. "These are our are members of our community." The number of detained people in Pennsylvania has long been higher than that of New Jersey. Before May, the last time New Jersey's total exceeded that of Pennsylvania was March 2020. Part of that is the presence of the Moshannon Valley Processing Center. The former federal prison, located 30 miles northwest of State College, was repurposed as an ICE detention facility in 2021. The facility is run by Geo Group, the same private prison company that operates Delaney Hall, and has faced accusations of serious mistreatment of detainees. Activists have identified Moshannon as the ICE facility where detained Philadelphia residents are most often sent. Pedemonti said he expects Pennsylvania's numbers could rise even further based on anecdotal reports of increased arrests in recent weeks. "(ICE) is under tremendous pressure to produce numbers," Pedemonti said. "We've seen an uptick in the last three weeks (in arrests) in Philadelphia and before that was Norristown, and I'm sure we'll see that in the June (detention) numbers." A spokesperson for ICE's Philadelphia field office did not respond to an email seeking comment on whether the agency has recently been making an effort to detain more individuals. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
This rich California city is losing its mind over a housing project — and it shows why new rules are needed
Most Californians are intimately familiar with stories of cities going to comically absurd lengths to block new housing. Sausalito tried to argue it could build affordable units on underwater eelgrass. La Cañada Flintridge in Los Angeles County flirted with bankruptcy to fight its first multifamily development in more than a decade. And Woodside attempted to declare itself a mountain lion sanctuary to avoid duplexes. But the affluent city of Menlo Park is bucking the trend. At least it's trying to. This month, the city issued a request for proposals to transform three downtown city-owned parking lots into at least 345 units of affordable housing near public transit and local businesses. Since the city already owns the lots, it won't have to worry about land acquisition costs — making it easier for the projects to pencil out, Mayor Drew Combs told me. But this is California, where no good housing deed goes unpunished. A coalition of residents and small businesses called Save Downtown Menlo is suing to stop the development, alleging that the city lacks legal authority to repurpose the parking lots and that reducing parking would cause 'serious and irreparable harm.' It's also collecting signatures for a ballot measure to require voter approval to repurpose the downtown lots. The group announced this week that it already had 66% of the necessary signatures. 'Hoping to squeeze large apartment buildings into narrow, heavily used downtown parking lots … is not a path to success,' Save Downtown Menlo organizer Alex Beltramo told me in an email. When I pointed out that the Menlo Park City Council has pledged to replace most, if not all, of the 556 parking spaces that would be impacted, Beltramo argued it wouldn't be sufficient for residents and shoppers and replacing surface lots with parking garages would be 'more difficult to navigate and far less convenient.' Making space for workers who otherwise couldn't afford to live nearby is a no-brainer. So, who would actually be inconvenienced? Most likely wealthy shoppers from Portola Valley, Woodside and Atherton who drive to downtown Menlo Park and 'absolutely believe they're entitled to their parking spot in front of their store,' Karen Grove, co-founder of Menlo Together, a group that advocates for affordable housing, sustainability and economic justice, told me. Marlene Santoyo, a part-time Menlo Together organizer, told me she doubts that there would be as many businesses opposed to the project if it weren't affordable housing. 'They don't think low-income people can afford their coffee, can afford their pastries, can afford them as clients, when that is clearly not true,' she said. All this is a clear example of why state lawmakers need to pass more robust housing laws, such as state Sen. Scott Wiener's SB79 to legalize dense housing near major transit stops and other bills to exempt most infill housing and infrastructure from frivolous reviews and lawsuits under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Gov. Gavin Newsom is seeking to accomplish the latter objective via a state budget trailer bill and is haggling with lawmakers over the details ahead of a Monday deadline.) Even though the Menlo Park project would benefit the environment — it's close to transit and would save many residents from soul-draining, climate-polluting commutes — Save Downtown Menlo's lawsuit alleges that it violates CEQA and the city's general plan, which are 'standard fare challenges you'd see in almost any case objecting to new housing,' said Chris Elmendorf, a UC Davis School of Law professor and state housing law expert. Furthermore, most Menlo Park residents have made it obvious time and again that they support increased development. In 2014, a measure to limit downtown development was defeated with about 62% of the vote. In 2022, the same percentage of voters defeated a measure that would have prevented the City Council from rezoning land designated for single-family homes. Even Mayor Combs, the City Council member perhaps most willing to strike a compromise with Save Downtown Menlo, described the situation as 'frustrating.' He's being nice. The effort is unhinged. One of the main allegations in the group's lawsuit, for example, is that Menlo Park doesn't technically own the parking lots because they were paid for by assessments on nearby property owners. Only a majority vote of those property owners, the lawsuit contends, could allow the lots to be repurposed. When I ran this by Darien Shanske, a UC Davis School of Law professor and expert on taxation and local government law, he described the allegations as 'crazy,' noting that California law gives significant leeway to local policymakers to repurpose property paid for by an assessment district. 'I am not sure if this complaint was just drafted to be a nuisance, or by ChatGPT, or both,' Shanske told me in an email. 'For my part, the city should not be intimidated and should proceed.' The irony is that Save Downtown Menlo's efforts — if successful — could lead to the city being forced to approve even bigger, denser projects. If Menlo Park were to backtrack on its plan to redevelop the parking lots, the state could revoke approval for its housing plan — opening it up to the builder's remedy, which permits developers to bypass local zoning rules for projects with affordable units, a spokesperson for the state Department of Housing and Community Development told me. David Lanferman, the attorney who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Save Downtown Menlo, filed a similar lawsuit against Palo Alto, which is also seeking to transform a downtown parking lot into affordable housing. He did not respond to my request for comment. Ultimately, logic may not be the point here. The goal seems to be making it harder to do things that should be simple — like building housing. The state can't act fast enough. It's still far too easy for a vocal minority of people to hold up projects that would benefit the vast majority of a community. Emily Hoeven is a columnist and editorial writer for the Opinion section.
Vox
2 hours ago
- Vox
The Democratic Party is ripe for a takeover
is a senior politics reporter at Vox, where he covers the Democratic Party. He joined Vox in 2022 after reporting on national and international politics for the Atlantic's politics, global, and ideas teams, including the role of Latino voters in the 2020 election. The signs have been bubbling up for months: The Democratic base is fed up with the status quo of their party. Democratic voters believe their party leaders are out of touch, and they don't think they're rising to meet this moment. They want more confrontation with President Donald Trump, and they're hungry for an inspiring, forward-looking economic vision. That sentiment comes through in just about all the polling of the party, in focus groups with voters, and in anti-Trump protests and populist rallies since Trump's inauguration. The latest sign of this frustration might just be the stunning result of New York City's mayoral primary this week. The victory of a self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani over the embodiment of the Democratic establishment, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, all with high turnout and a comfortable margin of victory, suggests Democratic voters are open to radical change. Of course, there are plenty of peculiarities that make a New York City primary contest a bit of a unique case: a toxic early front-runner, ranked-choice voting, and an open field of candidates during an off-year election. These specifics all make it risky to try to draw national implications from a local race. But there's at least one big warning for national Democrats from this upset: the kind of anti-establishment energy that boosted Mamdani exists in Democratic enclaves around the country. It feels familiar — reminiscent of 2009 and the rise of the Tea Party among the Republican Party's conservative base that ended up remaking the GOP. The energy also feels similar, but more widespread, than what boosted progressive victories during primaries in Trump's first term. And that energy suggests that the forces that remade the GOP could be aligning for Democrats to face a Tea Party moment of their own. It remains to be seen whether this revolt will turn into a leftward shift of the party's ideological positions. But it appears at least likely to result in targeting older and established incumbents, replacing the party's leadership, or, at a minimum, forcing those leaders to be more aggressive against Trump, accommodating of younger leaders, and less complacent when faced with populist anger. So as the national Democratic Party continues its post-2024 soul-searching, its incumbents and leaders are getting a clear warning. The ingredients are here for a populist revolt within the Democratic Party. Will leaders adjust and listen? Democratic voters are on board with generational change This year's Democratic rage is very different from the last time Trump was elected president: The base wants not just confrontation with Republicans but to replace the party's leadership entirely. Consider a June Ipsos poll of Democrats, the latest of many surveys showing the Democratic base is unhappy with the state of their party. About half of Democrats are 'unsatisfied with current leadership,' and 62 percent said 'party leaders should be replaced.' This dissatisfaction is historic. Going back to 2009, Democrats haven't been this upset with their party before. As noted, the last time a party's base was worked up was during the Republicans' Tea Party movement, which culminated in Trump's GOP takeover. Unlike previous moments of Democratic infighting, this divide isn't primarily about ideology. That same June poll found that Democrats want their party to focus more on affordability, on getting the wealthy to pay more on taxes, and health care expansion. Older and younger Democrats are broadly in agreement about prioritizing economic concerns over social issues — and there aren't that many differences between what younger and older Democrats want to prioritize. Instead, it's a fight over priorities. There's a huge gulf between what each cohort of Democratic voters think their party does focus on and what it should focus on, particularly because younger Democrats are more progressive and think their leaders don't care enough about universal health care, affordability, or taxing the rich. On this front, age is becoming the big dividing line within the party. Previous polls have shown that overwhelming shares of Democratic voters want their party to run 'younger candidates that represent a new generation of leadership' and 'encourage elderly leaders to retire and pass the torch to the younger generation.' Dissatisfaction with 'the establishment' is overwhelming. The result of these combined feelings may lead to more Mamdani moments, according to some activists and strategists. Already a handful of younger candidates have announced primaries of longtime incumbents in California, Illinois, and Indiana. More are expected in blue states like Massachusetts and New York, including in the New York City region. Even party activists have announced that primarying older incumbents should be a party priority. And there are signs this energy exists at every level of politics. At the grassroots, liberal, anti-Trump energy is still bubbling up through smaller but more frequent protests. Though it may seem like the 2017–18 #Resistance protests were more visible than those of 2025, various tracking efforts show that protests this year are happening more often and in a more localized manner. One metric from Harvard, for example, finds that there have been more than 15,000 protests since Trump's second inauguration. In that same time in 2017, the number was smaller: over 5,000 protests. How far can we expect this new movement to go? As far as turning this energy into political action, there are also clear signs. Since Tuesday's primary, the progressive political organization Run for Something, which recruits and supports young people who want to run for office, is reporting a surge in candidate recruitment, with more than 2,700 people signing up to explore campaigns as of Friday afternoon. The organization's president, Amanda Litman, says it's one of the biggest spikes in interest since Trump's election, mirroring the grassroots intensity generated after the Elon Musk-backed Department of Government Efficiency began to make cuts across the federal government and when Democrats helped avoid a government shutdown this spring. And it brings the number of young potential candidates who have expressed interest in running for office since Trump's election to more than 50,000 people. 'We are seeing more young people than ever before raise their hands to run, not in spite of the chaos, but because of it. They are bringing urgency, boldness, energy, and their lived experience to the table. They are ready to change what leadership looks like in this country,' Litman said. How successful these efforts at generational change will be remains to be seen. The GOP's internal revolt back in 2009 and 2010 contributed to the party's takeover of the House by boosting conservative and Republican enthusiasm, but Tea Party candidates had more success in winning primaries than winning general elections. (That dynamic shifted some after Trump's total takeover of the party.) Similarly, calls for the Democrats to move left, and embrace a more progressive agenda, seem to resonate with a party whose membership has become much more liberal over the last 20 years. But that might be a misreading of a national electorate's mood, particularly after a presidential election that showed large segments of the electorate were hostile to Democrats' 'liberal' identity. Insurgent populist candidates have many steps ahead to win primaries and then prove they can win general elections. But it's not inconceivable to think they can do it. There was a time when the GOP's populist wing was considered fringe — extreme, even. We all know how that turned out.
