More than two dozen critics of Pakistan government face YouTube ban
ISLAMABAD (Reuters) -Alphabet-owned YouTube has told more than two dozen critics of the Pakistani government that it is considering blocking their channels after a local court sought to ban them for being "anti-state".
The channels that could be blocked in Pakistan include that of the main opposition party and also its leader, jailed former prime minister Imran Khan, as well as journalists critical of the government, according to the June 24 court order seen by Reuters.
The judicial magistrate court in Islamabad said it was seeking the ban after the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) criticised the channels in a June 2 report for "sharing highly intimidating, provocative and derogatory contents against state institutions and officials of the state of Pakistan".
Digital rights campaigners say that any ban would further undermine free speech in Pakistan, where the authorities are accused of stifling newspapers and television and social media is seen as one of the few outlets for dissent.
YouTube told the 27 content creators that their channels could be taken down if they did not comply with the court orders.
"If you fail to do so, as per our local law obligations, we may comply with the request without further notice," the popular video sharing platform said in emails this week to the channel owners, according to a notice seen by Reuters.
YouTube's regional communications manager did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for a comment. Pakistan's Information Minister Attaullah Tarar also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
One of the content creators, Asad Toor, who has more than 333,000 YouTube subscribers, said the move was aimed at undermining fundamental and constitutional rights of the people, political parties and other dissident groups.
"It is not about me. It is about these people who are on the left side of the state," he told Reuters. "I have dedicated my platform for these underdogs who have no place to go to and raise their voices against the state oppression."
MIGRATION TO YOUTUBE
After the government clamped down on traditional media, many independent-minded reporters migrated to YouTube, as did journalists and commentators sympathetic to Khan, who was removed from office in 2022.
"It's not only about anchors getting fired or YouTube channels getting banned. It's what they are not allowing to be told and the human rights abuse they are trying to hide from the world," said Zulfikar Bukhari, a spokesman for Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party.
Khan has said his party has faced a military-backed crackdown since his removal, a charge the army denies.
"In this day and age you can't suppress digital media," said Bukhari.
The order is the latest in a series of laws and regulations from Islamabad that have enabled the authorities to crack down on critics and dissidents. It has blocked social media platforms like X, Facebook and TikTok on several occasions.
In January, Pakistan's parliament introduced a new amendment in the Electronic Crimes Act to further regulate cyber content, which included a new social media regulatory authority with its own investigation agency and tribunals.
Such tribunals will be able to try and punish alleged offenders with prison sentences of as long as three years and fines of two million rupees ($7,200) for dissemination of information deemed "false or fake".
Similar laws to order the removal of disputed content have also been introduced in neighbouring India, which has had disagreements with X and Google over such directives.
In recent years, India has banned dozens of YouTube channels citing national security.
Digital rights activist Usama Khilji said the Pakistani court did not fulfil due process.
"What is jarring is the complete lack of legal process," he said.
Toor said neither the court nor the cyber crime agency gave him a chance to respond to the allegations, and that he would be taking legal action against the court order.
"It is a dictatorial move. It can't silence me," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Conflict With Pakistan Undermines India's Geoeconomic Fortunes
Pakistan India Military Crisis Conflict as a geopolitical conflict between the Pakistanis and Indian ... More nations as a South Asia security crisis due to political territorial dispute diplomatic standoff. The world's fastest growing economy faces serious headwinds because of its worsening conflict with its western neighbor. While it did not last more than 87 hours, the May 2025 war between India and Pakistan underscored the fragility of the security environment in South Asia. Already faced with serious constraints this conflict places further limits on Indian ability to take some of the bite out of China's manufacturing dominance. U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly stated that he leveraged trade as a tool to prevent a wider war between the two sides, however, his administration will need to engage in sustained diplomacy to create the conditions in which India can focus on significantly enhancing its industrial capacity. During a meeting on July 14 with North Atlantic Treaty Organization Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump reiterated that Washington averted a war between New Delhi and Islamabad that could have gone nuclear had the fighting continued for another week, reminding the world that both Asian nations have nuclear weapons. Trump said he used trade to stop the escalating conflict from spiraling out of control by telling both sides that 'we're not going to talk to you about trade unless you get this thing settled.' Then, on July 16 Trump told reporters that his administration was "very close" to finalizing a trade deal with India as talks between American and Indian officials are underway. The negotiators hope to reach an interim deal by the extended Aug 1 deadline when the Trump White House has said reciprocal tariffs on India would be increased from the current 10% baseline to 27%. It will likely be sometime in the fall that the Americans and the Indians clinch a deal. Such an agreement with its strategic South Asian ally is of course part of the Trump administration's efforts to reset American global trade relations. However, the United States sees India as integral to its highest foreign policy priority, i.e., the imperative to counter China. The Indian role in America's China strategy has two different dimensions: military and economic. China Containing U.S-India Military Alignment The military angle has received a great deal of attention for the better part of the past decade. Washington's November 2017 decision to revive the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) was designed to bring India into the security architecture of the Western Pacific together with allies Japan and Australia. Likewise, the May 2018 move by the Department of Defense to include the Indian Ocean basin under the remit of its old Pacific Command (renamed as the Indo-Pacific Command) was aimed at further integrating India into its strategic plans vis-a-vis China. The Chinese response has been to ensure that India is tied down on its northern Himalayan flank as illustrated by the June 2020 border clash between Chinese and Indian forces in which both sides lost soldiers. In this way, New Delhi has fewer resources for its military modernization efforts needed to become an effective American partner in the Asian maritime space. China is sustaining pressure on India with a huge military buildup on the border. Meanwhile, Beijing is a key ally of Pakistan, which relies on Chinese military hardware for 81 percent of its defense needs, a 30 percent spike in just the past decade The Americans understand that it will take several years before the Indian military will be able to assume the desired role, which isn't a major problem. Despite making significant advances in the past five years, China is still far from being a serious military competitor to the United States. That said, Beijing does pose an immediate threat in the economic and technological spheres. America, therefore, must reduce its dependency on China's manufacturing output, which is where the U.S. has been hoping the Indians would be able to play a key role. Compounding of Legacy Factors Inhibiting India's Industrial Potential Given its large market, young work force, and increasing investments in infrastructure development India has great potential. However, New Delhi must address a number of chronic systemic issues that prevent the world's fourth largest economy ($4.19 trillion by nominal gross domestic product) from becoming a competitive manufacturing destination. These include but are not limited to: infrastructure deficiencies (both in terms of transportation and reliable and cost-effective power supply), complex regulatory environment and bureaucratic roadblocks, and legal barriers and political hurdles to land acquisition. In addition, a very small percentage of the labor pool of the world's most populous nation consists of skilled industrial workers. India also suffers from underdeveloped supply chains needed for components. Furthermore, among Asian manufacturing nations, India is the least integrated into the global value chains. In order to truly unlock its manufacturing potential the Indian government will need to prioritize infrastructure modernization, regulatory reform, labor skilling, and global integration. Despite all this, the World Bank considered India the world's fastest growing economy in 2024. These economic growing pains have multifaceted impacts. What renders the above circumstances an even bigger challenge is the conflict with Pakistan. The Indian government has said that all future terrorist attacks from Pakistan-based groups will be treated as an act of war, which means the fighting we saw in early May could become the norm. Further aggravating the situation is India's move to suspend the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, which is a river-sharing agreement between the two neighbors. What this evolving situation does is scares away foreign investors who are highly sensitive to disruptions to supply chains and exports amid geopolitical uncertainty. There is also the matter of vulnerability to infrastructure and production areas close to the Pakistani border in northern and western India. Airspace closures and restrictions on access to ports is another key related risk. An atmosphere of regional conflict means Indian spending will be geared towards national defense needs. In essence, a redirection of scarce resources that ought to be invested to rectify longstanding structural problems holding India back from the path towards emerging as a serious alternative to China's manufacturing prowess. Moreover, Indian diplomatic bandwidth is also consumed by the need for conflict management as opposed to engagements that could enhance the country's factory firepower. From the American perspective an India focused on conflict with Pakistan undermines the U.S. need to reduce exposure to China. In fact, India embroiled in conflict with Pakistan works to the Chinese advantage. It helps Beijing keep Washington within its economic orbit. In the meantime the Chinese continue to develop their military capabilities to eventually challenge American global dominance. The Trump White House must thus move beyond tactical level diplomatic moves that can at best produce ceasefires as the one that took place between New Delhi and Islamabad on May 10. Certainly, the United States does not have the ability to resolve the nearly 80-year old South Asian rivalry. But what it can do is to engage in strategic mediation between the two sides that can produce long-term calm in the region, which can allow India to focus on geoeconomic competition with China. Such a move also has the potential to help Pakistan address its own chronic economic and financial problems and thus reduce its alignment with China.
CBS News
9 hours ago
- CBS News
After message protests Trump, Carnegie Mellon University temporarily closes The Fence
The Fence at Carnegie Mellon University has become a staple for students to display messages on campus. Whether it be advertising their organization or giving a take on current events, it has served as a way to express their speech. But in a letter to students, CMU President Farnam Jahanian said the fence is closing after a recent message protesting President Trump. The fence sits as just a white fence now in the center of the campus. No messages, no pictures, just a plain fence. This comes after "no rapists on our campus" was painted during the AI and Energy summit at Carnegie Mellon on Tuesday. CMU's administration decided to paint over it and close it until sometime next week. "It strikes me as very uncharacteristic and concerning to see that they've made the decision to censor speech on campus," said Anthony Cacciato, a CMU senior and member of the College Republicans. Cacciato said CMU has championed free speech, and this goes against it. While he didn't agree with the message, he says students had a right to say it. River Sepinuck, a junior at CMU and communications chair of the College Democrats, said it's disappointing the university is censoring students. His group met with university leadership about the fence. "Unfortunately, [Jahanian] spent most of the meeting talking down to us, which we were disappointed by. We were hoping to get some form of concrete action about the change in policies surrounding the fence," Sepinuck said. Earlier in the week, "protest the summit" was written and protected by the school with space for the students to address their concerns about Tuesday's event. In a message from the university's president, he says CMU supports peaceful protest, public dissent, and the exchange of ideas. It goes on to say that after messages equating Nazism, Zionism and Hindutva earlier this year and this latest message, the school is looking at how to move forward. "It would be a great disservice to the culture on campus and the students on campus to go back and renege on this commitment to free speech that has been a cornerstone of how Carnegie Mellon has conducted itself in the past," Cacciato said. Jahanian's letter says recent years have seen more messages disconnected from "meaningful dialogue." Cacciato said once messages are allowed back, no one should feel a chilling effect to say their thoughts. Sepinuck says there is most certainly a chilling effect moving forward. "Knowing that just by unilateral decision, that President Jahanian can say, 'I don't like and I'm going to paint over it,' it makes us more hesitant to paint on the fence," Sepinuck said. According to CMU, it looks to reaffirm the purpose of the tradition. No word on when next week messages may continue.
Bloomberg
a day ago
- Bloomberg
Bangladesh Imposes Curfew After Violence in Hasina's Stronghold
Bangladesh's interim government has imposed a curfew and deployed the army to contain violence in the political stronghold of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's party after attacks on a student-led rally. The curfew in the district of Gopalganj, the ancestral home of Hasina, began on Wednesday evening and will continue until 6 pm on Thursday, according to a government statement. Four people were killed in clashes with security forces, according to the Prothom Alo newspaper.
