
‘Draconian' school policies unfairly impact ethnic minority children, MPs told
Labour MP Kim Johnson said racism in schools is a continuing problem as she called for a public inquiry into a 'significant miscarriage of justice' that saw hundreds of ethnic minority children in the 1960s and 70s wrongly sent to schools that were designed for pupils with severe physical and mental disabilities.
These children were incorrectly designated as 'educationally subnormal' (ESN).
Ms Johnson's adjournment debate coincided with the 40th anniversary of the Swann Report that was commissioned to examine disparities in educational attainment and made recommendations to tackle institutional racism in the education system.
The Liverpool Riverside MP said: 'I hope the minister will join me today in recognising the wrong that was done to the survivors of ESN.
'A public inquiry into the scandal of these ESN schools is necessary, not only to secure justice for the victims of these historic discriminatory policies, but also for us to understand how systemic racism and discrimination takes form in our current education system and how we can eradicate it.
'The survivors and the campaigners are calling on the Government to give due consideration to a public inquiry, and four decades on from the first public inquiry report into racism in education, to learn the lessons of the past and secure justice for all whose lives were impacted and continue to suffer.'
Ms Johnson told MPs that 'many racist barriers still exist in education' that have 'evolved directly from the policies and attitudes that drove the ESN scandal'.
She said: 'The closure of ESN schools in the 1980s directly led to a rapid expansion in the use of school exclusions, and we began to see higher numbers incarcerated in prisons, the expansion of the use of set and tiering in education whereby certain groups of children, increasing numbers, are being denied the opportunity to sit exams at certain levels and then denied the opportunity to progress in educational settings, including going to university.
'The establishment of pupil referral units (PRUs) is recognised as another method of systematic exclusion from education.
'The use of PRUs and exclusions are a symptom of failure of the education system; disruptive behaviour of a child is a cry for help, not a crime.
'An education system that does not respond with care and support is an education system that is broken.
'The number of exclusions have soared in recent years, with children as young as five being kicked out of school.
'Draconian behavioural policies impacting disproportionately poor children, those living in care and those from black Caribbean, mixed and Gypsy-Roma and traveller backgrounds.
'Swann's recommendations for an inclusive education system are more important today, and we must take this opportunity to update those lessons learned and apply them to our current system.'
Education minister Catherine McKinnell said the Government 'doesn't currently plan to establish a public inquiry' but is committed to ensuring ' Britain is a country that will respect your contribution and will give you a fair chance to get on in life'.
She said: 'While overall the outcomes of some ethnic groups now compare positively with national average outcomes for some groups, outcomes are significantly below average or worse than other groups throughout the education system, and that includes black Caribbean children.
'But one of the most significant factors affecting pupil attainment, which cuts across all ethnicities, is economic disadvantage.'
She added: 'It's why this Government's opportunity mission will break down barriers and that unfair link between background and success, we're determined to help all children achieve and thrive.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
ITV Good Morning Britain host abruptly walks off ITV set while live on air
One Good Morning Britain presenter made a quick exit as Yvette Cooper was welcomed to the ITV show on Tuesday There was a bit of a stir on Good Morning Britain when Ed Balls mysteriously vanished just as guest Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for the Home Department, came on air to discuss Labour 's latest stance on migrant policies. Kate Garraway was left to handle the interview solo on the ITV programme after her co-presenter went AWOL. The 58-year-old didn't miss a beat, diving straight into the tough questions as the show resumed post-ad break. She kicked off with: "Now, the first illegal migrants that will be returned to France under the 'one in, one out' deal are set to be detained within days, but critics say it will barely scratch the surface when 25,000 people have crossed the Channel so far this year." She continued: "The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, joins us now. Can you just clear up when this is coming in? I think the Home Office told us yesterday it was today, but I believe on another broadcaster, you said it was actually tomorrow. Can we just clarify that quickly, first of all?" Yvette confirmed Kate's information, stating that the treaty is indeed being laid out today, along with the immigration rules that support it. "That means, in practice, they come into force tomorrow and that means that we can start detaining people within a matter of days," she clarified, reports the Express. Kate highlighted the concerning statistics, noting that 50 individuals per week are being sent back, commenting: "It is a proverbial drop in the ocean and no deterrent at all." Yvette explained that the intention is for the figures to initially be modest and then increase, as this is "the nature of it being a new deal". Ed's absence during the interview with Yvette, his wife, follows previous backlash he received for conducting interviews with her on air, which viewers criticised as "biased". After the segment, Good Morning Britain transitioned to a commercial break, returning with Ed resuming his presenting role. Kate addressed his earlier departure, stating: "Ed, of course, removed himself during our interview with the Home Secretary because he is married to her." Viewers at home didn't miss the opportunity to make light of the situation. One viewer humorously posted on X: "Ed's popped off for a cuppa to make it look like he's not Yvette's husband # gmb." Another viewer quipped: "Ed you can come from under the desk now #gmb," and a third chimed in with praise: " #GMB lovely cosy interview with Ed's wife the Home Secretary this morning. Well done Kate, they're probably having dinner together tonight."


Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
If you come to Britain and can't support yourself, you must leave
For the 25 years up to 1997, according to the Centre for Policy Studies, net migration was 68,000. In the 25 years that followed, however, that figure shot up to nearly 6 million. Our immigration system is out of control. It isn't just about the number of people who've come here, unsustainable though that is. Our migration system has also been highly un-selective. The vast majority of those who've arrived in the last few years haven't come to work, and didn't need to be earning a particular salary – or often anything at all – to get their visa. Even those who did come here to work are often employed in low-paid jobs, and won't be paying enough in tax to account for the pressure that they put on public services, or the costs that they'll incur later in life. According to the researcher Karl Williams, 72 per cent of those who came as 'skilled workers' in 2022-23 earned below the UK average salary, with 54 percent likely earning less than half of that average. But after just five years here, most of these people will qualify for Indefinite Leave to Remain, or ILR. With ILR, migrants can access welfare, social housing, and free healthcare, as well as stay permanently in the UK and apply for citizenship. On average, the Government spends £34,000 looking after somebody in the last year of their life. Only a small minority of recent migrants will pay enough in tax to cover those costs over the entire time that they're here – let alone to cover the cost of the benefits and services that they and their family will use over their lifetimes. It's going to cost us hundreds of billions of pounds. We simply can't afford it. But it can be fixed. Earlier this year, the Conservatives proposed a plan to reform our immigration system, including by introducing a hard cap on visas and stopping ILR from entitling people to state support. We also proposed extending the qualifying period from five years to ten. This wouldn't just mean that it takes longer for migrants to be eligible for ILR status. It would also give us an opportunity to review the visas of those who are already here. Those who come to Britain from abroad must be able to support themselves, and must be earning enough to contribute more in tax than they will cost over their lifetime. If they can't, their visa must not be renewed, and they must leave. The Government voted against that plan, but they've committed to a consultation on ILR in the autumn. We must use that opportunity to push them not just to extend the qualifying period for ILR, including for those who are already here, but also to refuse to reissue visas to those who won't end up contributing enough. The era of mass migration has been a disaster. People can see it in their rising rents, in the pressure on their public services, and in their increasingly divided communities. Most disgracefully of all, the British people have voted to avert that disaster, time and time again. Government after government has failed to heed their warning. It's a complete scandal, and it's probably the single biggest reason why trust in our political system is in such short supply. Rebuilding that trust means building a migration system that's limited and selective – but it also means undoing the harm that has already been done. We can still avert the coming disaster around ILR, and we must.


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper refuses to say how many Channel migrants will be returned to France under new 'one in one out' deal because it 'could help smuggling gangs'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper today refused to say how many migrants will be returned to France as part of Labour's new 'one in, one out' deal with President Macron. Migrants who arrive by small boat from tomorrow could face being selected for the scheme and placed in detention instead of being sent to taxpayer-funded hotels. The Home Office will then work with French counterparts to return the migrants in return for Britain accepting others still in France with stronger asylum claims. However, the much-trumpeted deal has come under fresh scrutiny after it emerged the agreement will expire in just 11 months. And this morning, Ms Cooper declined to say how many migrants she expects to be able to send back. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, she said: 'We are not putting an overall figure on this programme. 'Of course, it will start to lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it. 'We want to be able to increase the number of people returned through this programme.' She added: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' The arrangement with Emmanuel Macron's government will lapse at the end of June next year – just 47 weeks away – unless it is renewed. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the 'meagre' and 'short-term' deal would splutter to a halt even before the start of next year's peak small boats season. Meanwhile, pro-migrant groups have already indicated they are poised to bring legal challenges – just as they did against the previous Conservative government's Rwanda asylum deal. There was no mention of an expiry date for the new treaty when it was first announced by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Macron last month. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Over this period both countries have committed to continually review and improve the process and effectiveness of this innovative approach, pending decisions on the long-term future of the arrangements after June 2026.' Last month it was suggested the scheme would see 50 migrants a week sent back to France. At that rate, just 2,350 would be returned before the agreement expires. By comparison, a record 25,436 migrants have reached Britain by small boat since the start of this year. The spokesman refused to reveal how many migrants will be targeted for removal, but said the Government had 'an ambition to scale up' the numbers. Last night the PM said: 'Today we send a clear message – if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France. This is the product of months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve and strike at the heart of these vile gangs' business model.' Mr Philp said: 'This is a short-term arrangement that will only last a few months and will expire before next year's peak crossing season. This meagre arrangement will be no more effective than the Government's previous gimmick, which was claiming to 'smash the gangs'. 'The Rwanda removals deterrent, under which 100 per cent of illegal arrivals would be removed, was ready to go last summer but Labour cancelled it just days before it was due to start with no proper replacement plan. As a result, this year so far has been the worst ever for illegal immigrants crossing the Channel.' Today, Ms Cooper accepted that the deal would not end Channel crossings on its own, but pointed to a similar accord between Greece and Turkey in 2016 which she said brought down numbers of migrants to Greece. Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Ms Cooper said: 'We never claimed that there is a single silver bullet on this. So this goes alongside the 28% increase in returns of failed asylum seekers that we have brought in. 'It goes alongside the change to those French maritime rules that I referred to which means France taking action in French waters to prevent boat crossings in the first place, and the much stronger law enforcement that we announced earlier this week with the additional National Crime Agency investigators and police to be able to go after the criminal gangs. We have to do all of these things.' From tomorrow, any new Channel arrivals will be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate, Kent, and assessed by Border Force officials. Any selected for the returns scheme will be transferred to short-term immigration holding facilities operated by the Home Office, such as those at Heathrow and Gatwick airports. After further assessment, they could be sent to an immigration removal centre to await return to France. It is hoped the first migrants will be returned by the end of August and detention space has already been set aside for the launch of the scheme. However, it is likely to face legal challenges – possibly as early as this week. A spokesman for the charity which helped blocked the Tories' Rwanda scheme, Care4Calais, said last night: 'We will consider all options open to us to oppose any plans that will put more lives at risk and involve governments trading humans.' The Home Office spokesman said: 'The UK government is prepared to robustly defend any legal challenges to removal within the initial trial phase, as we look to ramp up both the pace and scale of returns over the course of the pilot scheme.'