Auto recap, May 10: Volkswagen Golf GTI booking closed, Honda CB650R and CBR650R launched, Citroen and Jeep service camp
Here is your quick check on the biggest developments in the world of automobiles. Check Offers
Given the rapid progress in the automotive sector, keeping abreast of new developments can be challenging. However, HT Auto is committed to providing timely updates on significant changes in the industry. Below is a summary of the main highlights from Saturday, May 10.
Volkswagen Golf GTI first batch sold out, bookings closed
Volkswagen India has announced that they are no longer accepting bookings for the Golf GTI. So, the first batch of hot hatch is sold out. Volkswagen is bringing the Golf GTI to India through the CBU or Completely Built Unit route. The prices are not yet announced, but the booking amount was set to ₹ 2,65,370. Volkswagen clarified that only a limited number of individuals from this list will ultimately be selected to own the GTI.
Also Read : Volkswagen Golf GTI first batch sold out, bookings closed Suzuki Access, Avenis, Burgman, Gixxer SF and V-Strom SX get summer benefits
Suzuki Motorcycle India is offering summer benefits on its 2025 product lineup, including the Access, Avenis, Burgman Street, Gixxer SF and the V-Strom SX. The benefits include cashbacks, exchange offers and much more. Suzuki made the announcement for these discounts over its social media channels. The two-wheeler manufacturer is offering exchange offers of up to ₹ 5,000. Moreover, there is a 10-year warranty worth up to ₹ 2,299 being provided under the umbrella of summer benefits at absolutely no cost. This 10-year warranty plan includes a 2-year standard warranty along with an added 8 years of extended warranty.
Also Read : Suzuki Access, Avenis, Burgman, Gixxer SF and V-Strom SX get summer benefits. Check details 2025 Honda CB650R & CBR650R with E-Clutch launched
Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India (HMSI) has launched the 2025 CB650R and CBR650R middleweight performance motorcycles in the country. The 2025 Honda CB650R and CBR650R come with the brand's E-Clutch technology, which lets riders shift gears without having to use the clutch lever. The 2025 Honda CB650R is priced at ₹ 9.60 lakh, while the 2025 Honda CBR650R is priced at ₹ 10.40 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi). Bookings are now open at Honda Big Wing dealerships for both motorcycles.
Also Read : 2025 Honda CB650R & CBR650R with E-Clutch launched, prices start at ₹ 9.60 lakh Citroen and Jeep roll out service camp for May
Citroen and Jeep have rolled out a service campaign for May 2025. There are offers on service, parts, accessories, and merchandise. The campaign is in effect from 2nd to 31st May 2025. There is also a complimentary vehicle health check-up and exciting rewards with extended warranty purchases. The complimentary summer health check-up ensures vehicles are ready for summer with a complimentary checkup, identifying and addressing any potential issues that could affect performance and safety. Customers can avail of special pricing on labour charges, select genuine parts, accessories, and value-added services designed to suit summer driving needs. Customers can get benefits and expanded coverage options with every extended warranty purchase. Moreover, the brand is offering limited-edition Citroen and Jeep merchandise. Finally, there is a team of factory-trained technicians for these camps.
Also Read : Citroen and Jeep roll out service camp for May. Check it out
Get insights into Upcoming Cars In India, Electric Vehicles, Upcoming Bikes in India and cutting-edge technology transforming the automotive landscape.
First Published Date: 11 May 2025, 08:08 AM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
16 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SUV mania goes fatal: Poor front-end visibility causes pedestrian and cyclist fatalities, finds study
The SUV mania that has taken over the global passenger vehicle market and is witnessing rapid growth, is not only generating revenues for the OEMs' coffers, but posing a grave threat to fellow road users. A higher-positioned and longer bonnet is reducing the visibility of the SUV drivers. This is causing fatalities for pedestrians and cyclists. Besides that, SUVs are bigger and wider vehicles compared to hatchbacks or many sedans, occupying more space on the road, which eventually adds to the traffic congestion, especially in urban areas. Research conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has revealed that the visibility for drivers in some modern SUVs has dropped by more than 50 per cent since the '90s. The study analysed 17 vehicles across six nameplates to see how blind spots have changed over the years. IIHS gathered each generation of the Ford F-150, Chevrolet Suburban, Honda Accord, Honda CR-V, Toyota Camry and Jeep Grand Cherokee from 1997 and 2023. It set up a 360-degree camera system where the driver's eyes would be and found a significant reduction in visibility. The study found that as cars have grown larger and more stylised, visibility for their drivers has become harder. It also stated that tall hoods, big mirrors, and blunt noses may be worsening pedestrian and cyclist safety. This comes complementing the data that pedestrian and cyclist fatalities continue to increase, by 37 per cent and 42 per cent over the past 25 years, respectively. The researchers have concluded that while there are many factors, one increasingly obvious one is visibility. Numbers ring an alarm The study found that within a 10-meter radius, visibility for drivers declined as much as 58 per cent for the SUVs over the 25-year period. The Ford F-150 saw visibility fall by 17 per cent. The Honda CR-V saw visibility diminish more than any of the other models, by 68 per cent of the area 10 meters ahead. In the case of the Chevrolet Suburban, the drivers registered a similar drop, from 56 per cent of the area being visible earlier to just 28 per cent in 2023. The study also revealed that sedans saw minimal change in visibility. The smallest decreases in visibility came from the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry, where the change was so small that it fell within the margin of error. Get insights into Upcoming Cars In India, Electric Vehicles, Upcoming Bikes in India and cutting-edge technology transforming the automotive landscape. First Published Date:
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
The EU needn't have yielded to the US on a trade deal
When US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen shook hands at Trump's Scottish golf resort last week, they weren't just announcing a new trade deal—they were formalizing Europe's economic and ideological surrender. By agreeing to 15% tariffs on most exports to the US, the EU has capitulated to Trump's zero-sum world-view. In doing so, it has abandoned the principles of multilateralism that have long guided global trade. The economic consequences will likely be immediate and severe. European exporters now face tariffs nearly ten times higher than the previous trade-weighted average of 1.6%. Volkswagen alone has reported a $1.5 billion hit due to higher US tariffs. Also Read: Global shake-up: America's retreat spells a big opportunity for Europe But this is just part of the problem. The real damage is what the EU agreed to pay for the 'privilege' of maintaining access to the US market: buying $750 billion worth of US energy over three years and investing another $600 billion in the US economy. These staggering sums will inevitably divert resources from European development and innovation while legitimizing bilateral coercion over the multilateral rules-based World Trade Organization system. As critics have rightly pointed out, this massive outflow comes directly at the expense of domestic investment. What makes the EU's surrender especially troubling is how unnecessary it was. As America's largest economic partner, the EU has considerable leverage. The bloc's $270 billion services deficit with the US offered clear avenues for retaliation, from digital taxes to restrictions on American tech giants. Also Read: The IMF's 'World Economic Outlook' is too coy for a Trump-shaken world Weeks earlier, anticipating a stalemate, European policymakers had prepared counter-tariffs targeting $107 billion worth of American goods. But the EU had far more potent weapons at its disposal. Its Anti-Coercion Instrument, for example, could have barred US companies from government contracts, revoked intellectual-property rights and imposed broader trade restrictions. Yet, national leaders, fearing Trump's retaliation and under pressure from domestic industries eager to maintain access to the US market, refused to authorize Von der Leyen to use any of these tools, forcing her to negotiate from a position of weakness. The contrast with other US trading partners could not be starker. When the UK secured a 10% tariff rate from Trump in May, European leaders expressed concern about accepting similar terms. Now, they hail 15% tariffs on EU exports as a diplomatic breakthrough. Britain, acting alone, negotiated better terms than the EU as a whole. Also Read: How Trump got the upper hand over the EU on tariffs This failure exposes the fundamental weakness of European governance. Lacking a true EU-wide governance system, the bloc remains incapable of translating competing national agendas into a unified position. With Von der Leyen hamstrung by member states prioritizing narrow domestic interests over European cohesion, the result was a deal that pleases no one but Trump and locks Europe into a state of structured dependency. The EU's failure to push back against Trump is especially troubling given its stated goal of achieving strategic autonomy. Some may argue that the deal—technically not a formal trade agreement, but rather a set of statements outlining an ongoing negotiation process—buys time. By appeasing Trump, the argument goes, the Commission has maintained transatlantic ties while creating space for future carve-outs. But if this were truly a time-buying strategy, we would expect the EU to take concrete steps to advance strategic autonomy: boosting defence spending, accelerating supply-chain diversification and investing in retaliatory capabilities. Instead, after years of pledging to reduce reliance on foreign powers, EU leaders chose to replace Russian energy imports with American supplies and commit to massive purchases of US military equipment. Also Read: Mint Explainer: Why does the EU keep sanctioning Russia? Europe's subordination both reflects and reinforces the continent's dependence on US power. It has created a structural imbalance that extends across defence, trade and energy, leaving Europe in a state of permanent vassalization. Trump's ability to extract sweeping economic concessions and defence-spending commitments shows how effectively the US can weaponize Europe's security anxieties to pursue broader geopolitical objectives. The $600 billion investment pledge, much of it earmarked for military-equipment purchases, forces Europe to subsidize American defence contractors while undermining its own industrial base. By giving in to Trump's demands, the EU validated Trump's transactional approach, emboldening not only future American administrations but also other global powers eager to turn trade into an instrument of geopolitical coercion. While the immediate crisis may have passed, the long-term damage to EU credibility and autonomy will be long-lasting. The widespread perception that Europe surrenders without resistance will undoubtedly invite further challenges to European interests. Until European leaders are able to break the cycle of dependency by empowering EU institutions to act decisively against external coercion, these humiliating capitulations will only multiply, reducing the continent to a prosperous yet powerless appendage of the US empire. ©2025/Project Syndicate The author is professor of European Union Law at HEC Paris and visiting professor at the College of Europe in Bruges and Natolin.
The Print
2 days ago
- The Print
UK FTA means cheaper Rolls-Royce, Bentley. Though it matters little to India's auto market
So what do we know about these tariff reductions and what they mean for Indian industry? I will admit straightaway that I am not a tariff expert. But I do understand the automotive industry and how tariffs work in that space. Trump's outburst came just days after India signed a landmark Free Trade Agreement with the United Kingdom. The agreement will mean cheaper Scotch and cheaper Rolls-Royces as well. In fact, following the deal signed by Narendra Modi and Keir Starmer, it was this second point that dominated my social media timelines. The past couple of days have been a bit of a news whirlwind, and the 72-point-size headline screams: 'Tariffs'. After Donald Trump's latest tantrum against India — imposing a 25 percent tariff on Indian exports to the United States, with exceptions for items like smartphones, pharmaceuticals, and guar gum — and calling the Indian economy 'dead', I read a joke on X: that there should be a 75 percent tariff on everyone who claims to be a tariff expert. FTA brings down duties When I called up some car companies to find out, they all told me the same thing: 'Our tax lawyers and chartered accountants are still trying to make sense of it all.' At the same time, the import duty cuts come with quotas, and there are a couple of serious little snags. Chief among them: automotive manufacturing in the United Kingdom has almost died out. For example, cars with petrol engines larger than 3,000cc and diesel engines over 2,500cc will see duties drop significantly, from 110 percent to just 30 percent. But such high-capacity vehicles are made by very few companies these days, and their sales are extremely limited. Take Volkswagen-owned Bentley Motors, which sold just 64 cars in India in 2024, according to one report. And while Bentley is expanding in India and the number of Ultra High Net Worth Individuals (UHNWIs) is rising, even the most 'affordable' Bentley—the Bentayga SUV—costs Rs 5 crore. A 30 percent duty could bring that down by a crore or slightly more. So yes, you still have to be 'silly rich' to afford one. But what about Tata Motors–owned Jaguar Land Rover (JLR)? Well, here's the funny thing. Just last year, Tata started assembling the Range Rover in Pune using kits from Solihull, UK. And the Defender — the most popular show-off SUV for the rich and famous — is currently made at JLR's plant in Nitra, Slovakia. Even those vehicles might soon be assembled in Pune. As for Jaguar, they're not making any cars right now. When they restart, it will be as a luxury all-electric brand. So I don't foresee the massive 19,000-unit low-duty quota (in year five) for such large vehicles being filled anytime soon. There's another important factor being overlooked: India's push toward lower-capacity engines due to Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE) norms. Larger engines are powerful and fun to drive, but they naturally consume more fuel. Personally, I believe India will shift towards 1.5-litre turbocharged petrol engines in strong and plug-in hybrids. There's also a duty cut for electric vehicles, but only for those priced above £40,000. Interestingly, there is also a duty cut on smaller-capacity engines. These vehicles previously attracted a 66 percent duty, which will now drop to 50 percent, and eventually to 10 percent by year five — again, with strict quotas. But given that very few manufacturers of small cars remain in the UK, this duty cut might only benefit Mini (owned by BMW) and Nissan. There's another catch: at least 35 percent of the vehicle's value must be produced in the UK. Chance for India to gain This rule also applies to high-end, large-engine vehicles — and this is where arcane bureaucracy kicks in. Take Rolls-Royce, for example. Much of its mechanical engineering is shared with top-end BMWs, since BMW owns the brand. Rolls-Royce, of course, handles the 'coachwork,' but how do you classify hand-stitched bespoke seats or hand-painted pinstripes? Thankfully, McLaren Automotive — a division of the Formula 1 team — is still a mostly British manufacturer. But they've sold only 50 supercars in India as of January 2025, since opening shop in 2022. Given how Indian excise authorities love taking carmakers to tax court, this will be debated intensely. Incidentally, the same issue applies to Mini, which shares mechanical components with the BMW 2 Series, made in Leipzig, Germany. Nissan might benefit the most, but they're not exactly setting the Indian market on fire right now. And because the duty cuts are gradual — with the full impact kicking in only by year five — a sensible buyer might just wait a couple of years before taking advantage. Here's what I clearly believe: because the UK is no longer an automotive manufacturing powerhouse, the impact of the FTA on India's automotive sector will be limited. In fact, it could benefit Indian automotive exports to the UK more — since they too will see duty reductions (starting year six of the deal) — than the UK's exports to India. While Tata Motors hasn't made any announcements, it's unlikely they'll abandon their Pune assembly plant. However, reduced duties might make special editions — like the souped-up SVR line — cheaper to import. Now, when the India–EU FTA is signed… that could be a different kettle of fish. Because the European Union is still an automotive manufacturing powerhouse. Kushan Mitra is an automotive journalist based in New Delhi. He tweets @kushanmitra. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
